Youtube comments of C S ~ \x5bDuke of Ramble\x5d (@DUKE_of_RAMBLE).

  1. 904
  2. 325
  3. 232
  4. 229
  5. 228
  6. 215
  7. 210
  8. 192
  9. 137
  10. 137
  11. 137
  12. 121
  13. 114
  14. 110
  15. 110
  16. 108
  17. 94
  18. 93
  19. 92
  20. 89
  21. 83
  22. 77
  23. 73
  24. 72
  25. 69
  26. 65
  27. 61
  28. 59
  29. 58
  30. 58
  31. 56
  32. 55
  33. 54
  34. 52
  35. 51
  36. 50
  37. 49
  38. 49
  39. 49
  40. 47
  41. 47
  42. 47
  43. 47
  44. 46
  45. 46
  46. 44
  47. 43
  48. 43
  49. 43
  50. 42
  51. 42
  52. 41
  53. 40
  54. 39
  55. 39
  56. 38
  57. 38
  58. 38
  59. 37
  60. 37
  61. 37
  62. 36
  63. 35
  64. 33
  65. 33
  66. 33
  67. 33
  68. 33
  69. 32
  70. 32
  71. 32
  72. 32
  73. 31
  74. 30
  75. 30
  76. 30
  77. 30
  78. 29
  79. 29
  80. 29
  81. 29
  82. 27
  83. 26
  84. 25
  85. 25
  86. 25
  87. 25
  88. 25
  89. 24
  90. 24
  91. 24
  92. 24
  93. 24
  94. 23
  95. 23
  96. 23
  97. 23
  98. 22
  99. 22
  100. 22
  101. 22
  102. 22
  103. 22
  104. 21
  105. 21
  106. 21
  107. 21
  108. 21
  109. 20
  110. 20
  111. As a Democrat I'm miffed over things not being done sooner. I have a hard time believing we didn't know about it until it had reached Montana... ๐Ÿ˜’ If true, then man, we've got some BIG gaps to fill in our radar network. It's not a high speed object, even though it was a dozen miles high. Scary, if it indeed had penetrate so deep into our skies... (looked massive in terms of payload suspended under the balloon, with a large solar panel array, based on the news footage; he highlighted it in the rectangle) EDIT: Since my message is being misinterpreted/misunderstood, and replies down below are getting skipped, I'll add my one reply to here - cliffnotes: - yes, of course I'm speculating, and involving feelings (both gut, and emotions) - you, as have others, misunderstand my sentiments: I'm responding in a tone that reflects the patronizing going on by our government, who had responded to this as though "gosh, this thing just came out of no where!" โ€“ which we all know is BS; therefore, why the feck did they take their sweet ass time? Anyways, my tone and speculation aside, I'm not an idiot like your seem to think. I even called it ON WED and THURS, exactly what they did on Friday! On Wed, I said how I don't get why they don't use an inert missile (no warhead) to deflate its balloon. Though... I further suggested using a helicopter or plane (ie the ones purpose built for this) to then "catch" it mid air, given such things have been developed for other purposes. On Thurs, after its location was updated and it had been mentioned they had no intention to shoot it down where it was, due to it now being over too populated of region. At which point I said I guarantee they'll wait until it's over the ocean, skip in-air capture, and retried it from the water. (one comment was on a CNN vid, the other an MSNBC vid; as you can see, I'm all for transparency) Which they did just that. ๐Ÿ˜ I think letting it slam into the water and incur damage, plus get soaked with salt water, maybe wasn't the best idea... but oh well. At least they made a large effort to retrieve it, which is what matters most.
    20
  112. 20
  113. 20
  114. 20
  115. 20
  116. 20
  117. 20
  118. 20
  119. 19
  120. 19
  121. 19
  122. 19
  123. 19
  124. 19
  125. It would be VERY interesting to see a breakdown of those ~4500 missile strikes and ~8000 air raids (bomb runs?). To see just how many of them impacted civilian structures... - houses/neighborhoods - apartment buildings - shopping centers (grocery/malls) - schools - entertainment (theaters, etc) and religious buildings - hospitals, elder care facilities, special-needs facilities - water infrastructure (pumps, waste treatment, wells, reservoirs) and central heating stations (geothermal, etc) - power plants (of any kind), distribution stations, etc - train stations (to buy tickets, board trains) - grain structures (storage, processing, or distribution) Then, if possible, include in this breakdown of each, indicate how many (if any) of those strikes Russia had claimed were because they held ""military significance/value""... Would be even better if the government could supply how many of each total (eg 4500 and 8000) really did manage to hit, or barely-miss, a legitimate "military" target (of any sort, but as little as three soldiers being there would qualify it, in my opinion) _[NOTE: any confirmations by the Ukrainian government would be of NO strategic value, since they WOULD NOT divulge the "where" or "when", or even ordinance type, of the strikes; all they would be providing is strictly a number for "hits to, near misses" That would really paint a picture of how ruthless Russia is. Even moreso, if these numbers were allowed to include how many actually hit a Ukrainian military target, as it would provide even further transparency to the world as to just how careless they are with their ordinance! It would display further that Ukraine has nothing to hide, by publicly offering these numbers, in a "Yes, as much as we would like to say that our enemy can't hit what they aim at and that they always act on bad intel, but occasionally they DO hit something of military value." Context and clarity are an extremely powerful things these days... Stay strong. Stay united. Stay alive. STAY UKRAINIAN! RUSKIES: ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะ ะพััะธะธ ัƒัˆะปะฐ. ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะณะตั€ะพัะผ ะฃะบั€ะฐะธะฝั‹! ๐Ÿคœ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ”ฅ BELAWANNABES: ะกะปะฐะฒa ะฝะตะปัŒะณะฐ ะฝั– ัžะบั€ะฐัั†ั–, ะฝั– ัžะทัั†ัŒ! ๐Ÿšซ ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ๐ŸŽ–๏ธ MY BROTHERS: ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะฃะบั€ะฐั—ะฝั–, ะ“ะตั€ะพัะผ ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    19
  126. 19
  127. 19
  128. 18
  129. 18
  130. 18
  131. 18
  132. 18
  133. 18
  134. 18
  135. 18
  136. 18
  137. 18
  138. 18
  139. 18
  140. Today, I think it might make for a rather amazing Support Drone... Likely able to be made smaller now, just due to advances in materials and powerplants; however, could likely get shrunk a bit more without the need for the entire cockpit module (dropping mass, meaning smaller rotors). Have it be able to operate in multiple modes: - Autonomous Escort, basically UAV mode, where it sticks in close proximity to its target, only straying to engage potential/incoming threats; will sacrifice itself under extreme conditions by acting as a shield by blocking gun fire or even missiles (if possible). - Close Remote Piloted, where the escorting craft (say, A Chinook) would have 2-4 additional pilots onboard to control them. If that remote pilot is wounded or killed, it'd enter Autonomous mode as a fallback. If the target aircraft goes down, it would remain around the crash site as long as possible to provide cover. (not sure about rescue use, due to considerable down-wash?) - Very-Remotely Piloted, like current unmanned drones where the pilot is sitting at a base operating it, albeit with the slight communications delays (hence why I figured a close remote piloting would be better if entering a hot zone). Beyond that, I think the shape alone and clearly being unmanned, would be extremely intimidating, not knowing what it exactly is and therefore what it's capable of. Watching it transiting from flight and hover modes?? I know I wouldn't want to mess with it! lmao Current models are all familiar in design, which in my opinion, gives peace of mind in how to combat it. Helicopter drone? Take out the rotor and it can't fly. Airplane drone? Needs its wings to fly. This thing? Rotors are semi armored thanks to the ducting...
    17
  141. 17
  142. 17
  143. 17
  144. 17
  145. 16
  146. 16
  147. 16
  148. 16
  149. 16
  150. 15
  151. 15
  152. 15
  153. 15
  154. 15
  155. If the washing machines and refrigerators are "smart" models, then I'm willing to bet that they are indeed being salvaged for their components in order to be used probably in drones. Same with breast pumps... I'm willing to bet they are pumps capable of monitoring how much vacuum is being drawn, potentially through a small barometric sensor. If so, then you're looking at a means of determining altitude, albeit crudely (since weather will impact the reading). On the flip side, with Huawei moving next door, to "abide" by the imposed sanctions, there's not much reason why they couldn't simply function as the "components mule". Make products for the Khazakh market only which have an absurd Bill of Materials, that aren't necessary conventionally, just to legitimize their inclusion into the products. Then, off to Russia, where they would go straight to some disassembly shop! Hell, for that matter... Depending on how these washers/dryers and fridges are being procured and shipped... THEY could be mules! There's a LOT of empty space inside them. Plenty enough to pack full of various things Russia uses for war efforts... Like off the shelf DSLR cameras their drones use. Might be something the EU Port Authorities might want to start X-Raying, in case they've been ignoring them purely in the basis of what they are... a harmless product you'd typically think nothing of! Stay strong. Stay united. Stay alive. STAY UKRAINIAN! Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    15
  156. 15
  157. 15
  158. 15
  159. 14
  160. @8:43 ... All joking aside (ok I lied, joking held until the very end), I almost feel like it'd be factually accurate/correct to have worded it as a "misinformation network".... It seems like the 'Russian Way' of conducting their country during this Kleptocracy-period (1991 - Present) has been: "Do or Say whatever you must to become an Oligarch, and remain an Oligarch. If that means steal, you steal. If that means lie, you lie. Doesn't matter if it's stealing from your government and lying to your boss... everyone _does it, so either you're smart enough to succeed _ playing by the rules or you're a cunning snake in the grass who succeeds by ignoring the rules entirely." In other words, when it comes to relaying information, it's very much like the game of "Telephone" (professionally called 'transmission chain experiment'). But, instead of the message drifting away from the original because of the next person forgetting or accidentally substituting a word, it's now a case of whether or not the person you give the information to thinks their 'person' will like it.... If it's not going to make them happy, well, now a few details are changed so that it looks like you've been really helpful! Problem is, by the time it reaches its destination... "They do not want to be under Russian authority, and will put up a considerable fight if we invade." ...now has turned into... "Their government is full of neo-Nazis, and the people are offering untold riches if we come save them!" I know that's just the lie Putin told the world, but it's just an example lol That same thing seems to be at every turn in this conflict. "Yes, our military is large with many well trained troops" .... Probably is an 1/8th the size and the upkeep costs to support one that large are being pocketed; half of the actual troops are poorly trained. "Yes commander, we have lots of fuel reserves/well maintained vehicles/properly stored ordinance/rations still within their 'use-by' date!" ... Fuel has been stolen at every turn/vehicles left to rot or been looted for parts/armories poorly looked after/rations that were made (probably) in the 90s and exceeded their shelf life. I mean, sure... "lies" are still technically information in the most basic form since you're still passing along something... which is going from one person to another, and that qualifies as being a network.... But it's a bit of an insult to a true "information network" like a real government has! ๐Ÿฅด I mean come on... lol Even that second intercepted phone call using word substitution was so very unprofessional and cringey. ๐Ÿ˜ž Anyways, at least after Ukraine wins, there will be some awards-winning movies to be made! Action. Spy-Comedy. Drama. Mafia-Comedy. Documentary. And if we play things right, a part of the profits could go towards helping Ukraine rebuild their country and its economy. Which if you pounce immediately once the war ends, you can film the Action war movie ON LOCATION, instead of an expensive soundstage! Here's a freebie Action-Comedy: "Saving Private Ivan" l A story of Wagner Group, where a team has to bumble their way across Eastern Ukraine in an attempt to save the sole remaining clown merc/soldier from being captured... [spoiler alert: they fail!] Stay strong. Stay united. Stay alive. STAY UKRAINIAN! Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    14
  161. 14
  162. 14
  163. ย @pauliewalnuts240ย  At the end of the day, they were indeed abandoned in any sense of the word, whether it was the parents, or the staff. But, Ashes brings up a rather valid point in my opinion... It is war over there, it's ravaged towns, disrupted communications, and causes a lot of deaths... So it's unfair to every speculate, really, what the reason is for them being left behind, as there are quite a number of explanations that even in able to come up with right now. Family could not be contacted because of down communications, be it on the staff's side or the family's side. Family could be stuck in their basement, but contact was made, and were on their way when nearby shots caused staff to panic and flee, perhaps hoping the soldiers wouldn't bother with them and then maybe the family could have reached them. Or, the family had no means of getting there, either due to no transportation or the only bridge had been destroyed. Or, simply, the family was dead or captured, but the staff had no way of knowing, only that they couldn't reach the family. Either way, it's unfortunate, and awful, and sad, and understandable. In war, hard choices are not strictly left to military commanders, but everyday people as well, just as it was for those staff... because they were these kid's caretakers, and there would've been a bond just for that reason. Plus, you have to be a special kind of person to even work in that field to begin with, so I find it hard to accept that the staff fled because of selfish reasons (primarily because it was mentioned that they made efforts to evac those they could, but what if silence is key, or one tries to run away... again, endless "what ifs"). Anyways, hopefully this isn't taken as me chastising. Only to help, so you (or anyone) don't have any animosity towards the staff/parents due to there being so many unknowns. (once more is known, then we can place judgement where it ought to be.) Slava Ukraini โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐ŸŒป
    14
  164. 14
  165. 14
  166. 14
  167. 14
  168. 14
  169. 14
  170. 14
  171. 14
  172. 14
  173. 14
  174. 14
  175. 14
  176. 14
  177. 14
  178. 14
  179. 14
  180. Kathryn and Manuel, I think you're unfairly jumping down Delano's throat here. I feel the same as he does, which is that: the Uncle is having problems keeping things straight and cohesive, nevermind coherent. He should've been pre-screened and determined beforehand that he was in this sort of stupor. It could very well be just as you've stated: his stammering and even being unable to keep himself on track, as well as some of his recounting of things, certainly could have been stage fright/nervousness. But even then, the fact remains that he was all over the place and simply didn't make for a good interviewee. Genuinely, from my perspective after painfully sitting through the whole interview, is that nothing he said can be taken as credible. Even if I were to trust what was said, I still can't help but wonder what exactly goes on in that household where another person living there can have NO IDEA about an altercation between the dad and son. Our that he wasn't aware of the kid's previous run-ins with the law (as previously reported, about a parole violation). Families, siblings in this case, who are close enough to cohabitate will almost assuredly be close enough that they'd confide in each other about issues, or offer their ear when either one needs to just vent. At the end of the day I can only be left to think three things based on this interview... Either the Uncle: - is lacking in some mental faculties (not an insult), which would explain quite a lot, to be honest, and therfore leeway given for how this interview turned out - is not being honest, in order to spare his family some shame, which is understandable but will only exacerbate the current issue (this seems likely, as why else would he close with what he said about people with mental health issues and owning guns?) - is indeed as oblivious to the day to day going-ons in the house; could be for any number of reasons, both legitimate or illicit. Just my 2ยข...
    14
  181. 14
  182. 13
  183. 13
  184. 13
  185. 13
  186. 13
  187. 13
  188. 13
  189. 13
  190. 13
  191. 13
  192. 13
  193. 13
  194. 13
  195. 13
  196. 13
  197. 13
  198. 13
  199. 12
  200. 12
  201. 12
  202. 12
  203. 12
  204. 12
  205. 12
  206. 12
  207. 12
  208. 12
  209. 12
  210. 12
  211. 12
  212. 12
  213. 12
  214. 12
  215. 12
  216. 12
  217. 12
  218. 12
  219. 12
  220. 12
  221. 11
  222. 11
  223. 11
  224. 11
  225. 11
  226. 11
  227. 11
  228. 11
  229. 11
  230. 11
  231. 11
  232. 11
  233. 11
  234. 11
  235. 11
  236. 11
  237. 11
  238. 11
  239. 11
  240. 11
  241. 11
  242. 11
  243. 11
  244. 11
  245. 11
  246. 10
  247. I might be wrong as I'm not in the know on the actual machinery capabilities/longevity for the various process nodes, but I know that the turnover rate for a lot of the machines from the last decade is pretty high, due to the smaller and smaller manufacturing processes and new processing methods. With that said, 35nm would have come in around roughly 2010 (45nm was 2008), so I have a hard time believing that three year old machines would be capable of that since they'd have been made during the time of 600nm lol 2 decade old puts it inbetween the 130nm and 90nm nodes, and still an absurdly long time ago in this context. That being said, you may be correct on you machinery dates, just incorrect on the node... From what I turned up after a rudimentary search, a news article on mid-April on a site I trust with hardware news, TechSpot, had mentioned this (emphasis mine): "Approximately 420 billion rubles ($5 billion) will get invested in developing newer fabrication nodes and ramping up production. Russia aims to ramp up the local chip production using a 90 nm node by the end of the year. By 2030, they intend to manufacture chips using a 28nm process technology, something TSMC did in 2011." So just about 20yrs ago like you said, is when 90nm was the latest node, just as I said. ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿค˜ (oh, and that $5bn estimate by Russia is fucking hilarious... then again, they probably hope to mostly steal their way to that goal... or maybe that focus is only for R&D ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ I'll just chalk it up to a "delusional Russia number" lol) HOWEVER, that aside, this all isn't to say they would be unable to manufacture capable and "fast" chips on that 90nm node. They will just require more power (significantly, in terms of our computer's CPU) in order to operate, but their actual PCB footprint isn't really going to increase โ€” or it shouldn't have to, technically speaking at least. Although, when it comes to SRAM or other memory types, that WOULD require more PCB realestate, as each module wouldn't be able to store as much on account of the far-less dense manufacturing node...
    10
  248. 10
  249. 10
  250. 10
  251. 10
  252. 10
  253. 10
  254. 10
  255. 10
  256. 10
  257. 10
  258. 10
  259. 10
  260. 10
  261. 10
  262. 10
  263. 10
  264. 10
  265. 10
  266. 10
  267. 10
  268. 10
  269. 10
  270. 10
  271. 10
  272. 10
  273. 10
  274. 10
  275. 10
  276. 10
  277. 10
  278. 10
  279. 9
  280. 9
  281. 9
  282. 9
  283. 9
  284. ย @pipercessna3827ย  HA... You know, you're probably right, in reality that'd be the extent of it. We'll just have to "Westernize" it a bit, ala Hogan's Heroes ๐Ÿ˜Š And indeed, it's sad on so, so many levels... Not just the senseless killing and destruction, but the mind-numbing gullibility of those helping Russia... and just to take it down another level ('gullibilinception' you could say), gullibility not just by those in Russia's military, but those helping who are Ukrainian! That these individuals expect they actually will end up being giving the grand rewards they've been promised... From the initial "they'll give you gold as thanks for liberating them", to promises of being in control of towns, villages, cities, or even just apartment complexes. ALL HOLLOW!! Which even though there's internal evidence, from both Russian and pro-Russian soldiers, stating how they've not received payments promised for either general service or for having been wounded, and that they were promised (in contact) only a 3mo deployment yet are not being relieved.... But that doesn't deter their faith that their Fuhrer-Tsar Voldemort Puddin will come through on the even grander rewards!! ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ Anyways, to end on a positive note... If you have not checked out the channel "Operator Starsky" then I highly recommend him. He is part of the Ukr National Guard, releasing briefings or insights into things taking place, but every video is full of very sarcastic humor (aka "dry humor") towards Russia! The videos are serious, don't get me wrong, but he is always in high spirits ๐Ÿ˜ I had told him: One's humor is a mighty weapon, that Russia can never claim victory over Ukraine so long as Starsky draws breath, and can use it to sling insults! ๐Ÿค˜๐Ÿคฌ Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    9
  285. 9
  286. 9
  287. 9
  288. 9
  289. 9
  290. 9
  291. 9
  292. 9
  293. 9
  294. 9
  295. 9
  296. 9
  297. 9
  298. 9
  299. 9
  300. 9
  301. 9
  302. 9
  303. 9
  304. ย @teresamccartney1309ย  haha They STILL do it, even when they know their calls have been intercepted! They want to talk to friends and loved ones, and this is the only way they have. In sure if people had cellphones in WWII, there'd have been this sort of stuff happening as well, since it's not like you can use encrypted comms to call home... heh (that is to say, you wouldn't be allowed to) But yea, on the Insights from Ukraine channel, he plays intercepted calls almost every day. You end up recognizing some voices, or in one case you know their names. The one youngish soldier calling his GF (maybe wife), they've been intercepted a few times and aired on his channel. Then more recently when he called, the GF was panicked because she saw the video, telling him about it and how we ("they") know everything. How we know both of their names, job, address, and even what they look like because he had shown us pictures. You'd think the call would end right there, but nope! lol He got upset with her, for always wanting him to tell her where he is and what's going on, saying that "see, this is why I can't do that, so don't ask me that stuff anymore, because you know I'm not going to keep stuff from you or lie!". So that was the new plan lol Otherwise, business as usual! Literally! She has some sort of clothing business and she started telling him about new stuff. heh "It is what it is", as he said, in regards to their calls being intercepted. It mattered, just... not enough to keep them from calling each other. ๐Ÿ˜‹ Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    9
  305. 9
  306. 9
  307. 9
  308. 9
  309. 9
  310. 9
  311. 9
  312. 9
  313. 9
  314. 9
  315. 9
  316. 9
  317. 9
  318. 8
  319. 8
  320. 8
  321. 8
  322. 8
  323. 8
  324. 8
  325. 8
  326. 8
  327. 8
  328. 8
  329. 8
  330. 8
  331. 8
  332. 8
  333. 8
  334. 8
  335. 8
  336. 8
  337. 8
  338. 8
  339. 8
  340. 8
  341. 8
  342. 8
  343. 8
  344. 8
  345. 8
  346. 8
  347. 8
  348. 8
  349. 8
  350. ....*SIGH* If this doesn't cause the UN (or even NATO) to get involved... in an 'inspector' type of roll to determine that these people are being treated humanely and kept in humane conditions... THEN. WHAT. THE. FUCK. |WILL| IT TAKE?!?!? ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ค๐Ÿ˜ข Seriously #UnitedNations do your job, please?! I'm genuinely concerned... Not only due to there being no involvement by the world powers to put a stop to this (when there were agreements in place to ensure this exact shit would not happen, vis-ร -vis the Budapest Memorandum), by which I mean physical involvement, not this proxy-war delivery of military hardware... But also the fact that everything Russia has done thus far and without repercussions has only sent a signal to Putin that he can do WHATEVER the hell he wants. Yes, sanctions, I know. Yet, those are a deterrent, to prevent further actions by the aggressor, as an indicator that the imparts of the sanctions will not stand for what is happening - a passive 'show of force', in other words. Yet here we sit, half a year later, with Russia only ramping things up in an effort to make Ukraine bend a knee. Cluster munitions dropped or fired but without targeting capabilities, so civilians end up bearing the brunt of it! Phosphorus munitions utilized, not just on the Azovstal steel plant after civilians were evacuated, but on countless farming fields, not because of hunkered down soldiers but in order to wipe out crops! Flechettes have been used... which I don't even have to put a spin on it, Russia is just using them out of pure spite! Stealing grain that was harvested prior to the invasion, or when they can't secure it, dropping munitions on the grain storage structures so that no one can use it! Must I really go on?? Because I'd rather not, but there's certainly 3 to 4 additional things I could add without even thinking, if I thought it'd actually convince the UN to do something... anything... So again...*sigh* Now if you'll excuse me, this frustrated American is going to go watch a silly pet video in an effort to lower his blood pressure. ๐Ÿ˜” Stay strong. Stay united. Stay alive. STAY UKRAINIAN! Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ edit: fixed typo; "kept in humane conditions"
    8
  351. 8
  352. 8
  353. 8
  354. 8
  355. 8
  356. 8
  357. 7
  358. 7
  359. 7
  360. 7
  361. 7
  362. 7
  363. 7
  364. 7
  365. 7
  366. 7
  367. 7
  368. 7
  369. 7
  370. 7
  371. 7
  372. 7
  373. 7
  374. 7
  375. 7
  376. 7
  377. 7
  378. 7
  379. 7
  380. 7
  381. 7
  382. 7
  383. 7
  384. 7
  385. 7
  386. 7
  387. 7
  388. 7
  389. 7
  390. 7
  391. 7
  392. 7
  393. 7
  394. 7
  395. 7
  396. To piggyback a bit off of Jonathan's last post, about us perhaps misunderstanding something.... I've had a silly idea on dark matter/energy, that could apply here, as well. ๐Ÿค” So to try and summarize it, my thinking is: What we are attributing to 'Dark Matter', could perhaps be matter that had existed in the universe, but, had been consumed by black holes. That the matter is accumulating, to borrow from Sci-Fi, in regions of "sub-space" that are created by the black hole. They are out of direct 'view' (observation) due to not existing in our visible universe, but are still under the surface and exhibiting some or all of their influence; some as gravity (mass), some as Dark Energy. To put it in an analogy... think of how we depict gravity in 2D, where am object is pulling down on a plane, creating a concave region. NOW, think of dark matter as I've explained it above, as lumps and ridges... Like your body underneath a blanket. So perhaps the sun creates this dip in the fabric, but, just before Mercury is a ridge which once an object travels by, is now on a bit of a downhill slope; thus, giving said object a slight acceleration as it slides down... (my thought on Dark Energy is a little more simple: since the universe behaves in macro, as particles do even in micro, that perhaps galaxies have "poles" and behave much as magnets do... where a galaxy might have it's + pole facing another galaxy's +, pushing them away from each other; some may be even monopoles, strictly + or - and no matter how they're oriented, will always be attracted or repelled towards galaxies of an opposite charge ๐Ÿ˜…๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ)
    7
  397. 7
  398. 7
  399. 7
  400. I'm pro-Ukraine, but indeed, it looks more like there WERE NOT PoWs on the plane. From what I've seen, the Russian footage shows no sign of any people in custody being loaded onto the plane, plus there was an obvious jump-cut in said video which makes it even less credible. Just as well, their names list of this supposed-65 had a few who had already been previously transferred, or confirmed dead. And if Russia doesn't even correct their OWN dear of the battlefield, I doubt they'd bother with Ukrainian bodies. I know the transfer of the dead is important even in these exchanges, but that would mean they were alive when captured and that doesn't look good for Russia if they died in custody; however, it sounded like that wasn't the case here..... ๐Ÿค” Although... that would explain why there seemed to be no prisoners under guard getting loaded onto the plane, as I guess it's possible they were all dead in the first place... If that's the case, then I'd speculate it to be a false-flag op where they claim living soldiers and then Russia shoots it down from Russian-held territory, to make it look like Ukraine did it. Hoping the bodies would be destroyed our too-far damaged to gather any Time of Death by investigators โ€“ not like Russia would conduct that sort of investigation anyways, or even let any Ukrainian or third-party investigators come over there (since it happened deep into Russia). All the news outlets are taking Russia's word for this, and THAT'S the problem. They've not been truthful this entire war, so why should this be any different? It's only made worse by the fact Alex used it as an advertisement. (and I hold Alex in high regard, and love all that he does, but realistically... this wasn't the best example to use for an advert) [/2ยข]
    7
  401. 7
  402. 7
  403. 7
  404. 7
  405. 7
  406. 7
  407. 7
  408. 7
  409. 7
  410. 7
  411. 7
  412. 6
  413. 6
  414. 6
  415. 6
  416. 6
  417. 6
  418. I remember around 2003 I was using some Parts Degreaser on... I think it was the throttlebody on the 1991 Firebird (350 TPI) I had. The degreaser came in an all-metal paint can, was a name brand product but don't remember who by. Quite sure it's the same stuff that was used in a Parts Degreaser Bin (the kind that pumps this fluid through a brush). Anyways, it was certainly a learning experience!! ๐Ÿ˜ณ The stuff doesn't make you gap for breath or make your eyes water, so I was just kneeling on the garage floor with the van open and scrubbing away at the gunk on the part. It had only been like, a minute maybe, and I noticed my hands.... Imagine how your hands looked when you've been in the bathtub way too long as a kid, and multiply that x2. They also starting to tingle a little. So that's when I grabbed some latex gloves and put them on, just to - now hastily - finish with what I was cleaning. About 20 seconds later and the gloves had gotten a krinkle-coating like look to them... Now I started to work even FASTER! lol After another 10 seconds, the gloves just started falling apart on my hands as I worked (big sections fell off). ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ Oh, and that tingling turned into a burning sensation! By then, even though I hadn't completed cleaning the part, I was finished either way! Put the lid back on and went in and washed the hell out of my hands! Which at that point, since I hadn't washed them before putting the gloves on (just dried them with paper towels; dumb), they're turned more pale a color than I'd thought possible! Thankfully, I suffered no ill effects and my hands were back to normal by that night. But not have those details have sure stick with me! The less important stuff may not have, but thinking my skin was about to fall off any moment sure has... ๐Ÿ˜Š That was some potent-ass solvent, that's for sure, whatever the fuck it was! hah (this was all brought back from the fact the one guy was cleaning the oil pan without gloves on)
    6
  419. 6
  420. 6
  421. 6
  422. 6
  423. 6
  424. 6
  425. 6
  426. 6
  427. 6
  428. 6
  429. 6
  430. 6
  431. 6
  432. 6
  433. ย @homomorphicย  While there's certainly nothing that stands out about Falcon 9, the fact it can now land itself and be reused, was something just about the entire rocket industry considered a fool's errand to pursue... But here we are. Is that bot the exact opposite behavior of what you're claiming? lol Lots of changes had to be made to their golden goose in order to facilitate attempting to land, but they still made them despite the fact it could sacrifice reliability. That's not something the rocket industry or their clients take lightly. That'd be like you booking a flight on Spirit Airlines, if they suddenly started to have a 1 in 15 crash rate... lol So yea, I'm quite skeptical that SH+SS are only being worked on in order to keep Musk busy and out of the adult's hair. A big point for me saying that is the fact that there's a launch/catch tower going up at Cape Canaveral. Because if this was just busy work as you claim, then we both know that Shotwell would've reigned him in and told him: "No, you don't need one in Florida! We built one for you in your sandbox at Boca, you can play with that one, you don't need another one! I said no, and that's final..." ๐Ÿ˜ Even if the project started off that way once upon a time, it's clearly exceeded their expectations, turning it into a legitimate project now. Something that even the Spruce Goose might have become, had it succeeded...... or been a modern-day Boeing venture, where those writing the funding checks don't care either way. ๐Ÿ˜
    6
  434. 6
  435. 6
  436. 6
  437. 6
  438. 6
  439. 6
  440. 6
  441. 6
  442. 6
  443. 6
  444. 6
  445. 6
  446. 6
  447. 6
  448. 6
  449. 6
  450. 6
  451. 6
  452. 6
  453. 6
  454. 6
  455. 6
  456. 6
  457. 6
  458. 6
  459. 6
  460. ย @KootFlorisย  I think they have plenty willing and able to serve. I suspect a lot had filled early on, thinking their country WOULD collapse... Then weeks later, and they're managing to drive the Russians out... I imagine many of these able bodies returned and enlisted, having been filled with pride and confidence. Even though we don't have reports of Ukrainian losses, i t clearly hasn't suffered as badly as Russia, since Russia's next wave of mobilization is said to have women make up some 30% of it (if I recall correctly). They can send all they want, though, and it won't make a difference. That much is evident just from this first round of mobilization, which have suffered significantly... All because Russia either lacks the ability to, or doesn't care enough to, train their soldiers for more than a week (based on the intercepted phone call of a Russian soldier). ๐Ÿ˜’ Untrained fodder and convicts do not make for good intimidation, as it's a sign of desperation... Plus! Winter is upon the northern hemisphere... In addition to their poor training, is poor equipment! At the BEGINNING of the war, intercepted calls had indicated they were being given summer clothing, and freezing. For a battle that was "not supposed to last but a well", you'd think they'd equip them for the season... February is still winter. However, even if that wasn't because of poor planning, it means they lacked supplies THEN... Do we really expect they'll have focused on making cold weather supplies during the summer? I doubt it... They've exhibited a remarkable lack of foresight this entire war. So... Winter is going to be Ukraine's time to strike. Poorly trained, ill-equpped soldiers, who can't start their vehicles in cold weather, or maintain their equipment, who are starving AND freezing? All while Ukrainian soldiers have multiple nations supplying them with cold-weather gear and training?? Yea, everyone is saying how winter is going to be tough for Ukraine... I SAY winter spells the end for Russian occupation in mainland Ukraine!! ๐Ÿ˜ Next spring, if the Crimean bridge wasn't already taken out (again) and Crimea already on its way to liberation... That'll be the summer campaign. ๐Ÿ˜ˆ The ONLY way Russia comes out of this war better off than when it started, is by eliminating Putin. The sooner they realize this, the better. ๐Ÿ˜‰
    6
  461. 6
  462. 6
  463. 6
  464. 6
  465. 6
  466. 6
  467. 6
  468. 6
  469. 6
  470. 6
  471. 6
  472. 5
  473. 5
  474. 5
  475. 5
  476. 5
  477. 5
  478. 5
  479. 5
  480. 5
  481. 5
  482. I wish I could feel like this sort of action is going to change the tide of the war in Ukraine's favor... but it continuously is going to be just not quite enough every time... ๐Ÿ˜” So, either we can continue feeding the fire, or, step in and extinguish it! There's zero question, Ukraine and her people are some tough SOBs, having been able to stick it to the Russians like they have! However, they don't let their pride get in the way, so if we stepped in and helped, pretty sure they aren't going to be offended. They know, as we all do, they're putting up an amazing fight and most definitely do not appear weak... but they are outgunned and out-manned (at least numerically). So while we could give every 3 soldiers a nice tank, capable of laying waste to Russia, it'd be unfamiliar to them, just as the HIMARS is, and they can't spare that time needed to train them; thus, we need our already-trained soldiers over there to operate things and fight with them, before it's too late! ๐Ÿ˜ข Because I just realized yesterday, Putin isn't doing this for the land like I had thought... It's not for food, or even genocide! It boils down to one simple thing... THE. MAN. IS. BORED! He's lived such an adrenaline junky life, that after getting elected as president and having enough money and power to do whatever he wanted, soon enough all he had left was "running a country"... I mean what, did we expect him to stave off boredom by playing video games or reading books?? Instead, periodically, he now takes risks. Rig his reelection, or "fix" it so that he supposedly won. Invade a country, annexing a chunk of their land. Make comrades even more money. Invade some other country, butchering its people. Oh, that was fun, let's do that again in a few years! OK I'm bored again, let's whisper in some ears and dispute-ruffle some -fathers feathers again in Eastern Ukraine... Well that didn't pan out (DNR & LPR)... I'll spread some lies about them for failing me, then use it to justify a quick invasion, just to get my adrenaline fix... Alright, this isn't going well, but now I can play General, so this will be fun for awhile! Yea... What started as a flame has grown into a house fire. Unless we put it out with actual fire hoses manned by firemen, even if Ukraine does stop the flames, it's just going to roar back to life again before long. THEN it'll engulf the neighbor's house, and before you know it the entire neighborhood is a raging inferno... But that's fine, we live on the other side of town, so we're safe! ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘ [/rant] (please excuse any typos) [EDIT: fixed a number of typos; struck two major ones in the middle, incase anyone rereads this, so that it stands out]
    5
  483. 5
  484. 5
  485. 5
  486. 5
  487. 5
  488. 5
  489. 5
  490. 5
  491. 5
  492. 5
  493. 5
  494. 5
  495. 5
  496. 5
  497. 5
  498. 5
  499. 5
  500. 5
  501. 5
  502. 5
  503. 5
  504. 5
  505. 5
  506. ย @vsevolodbatishchev4836ย  Thanks for taking the time to explain some of the things brought up here! (that guy I debated with is going to hate finding out he was wrong lol) As such, I'll take the time to share my thoughts... Personally, I can't say I was necessarily "annoyed" by the ads, but there's two issues at hand that I feel you might have going against you. First, there's SO MANY illegitimate ads on YouTube that it's too hard to know when there is a legitimate newcomer that's just offering their real product. Problem is, YouTube has such a massive audience that you simply can't ignore it to advertise on, so there's not much that can be done there besides improving in the message the ad delivers and it's delivery. Which brings me to the delivery in the ad: which is that it so confidently can be more or less used to rebuild society after an apocalypse.... THAT is where I think many take issues, and where it feels like it could simply be a "cash grab" product instead of a "passion project". If you market it as a "coffee table book" for people to page through and spark discussion, it would be better received since you aren't setting such high expectations for what is contained within. Perhaps also try to fit in that it was a successful Kickstarter campaign, and show a couple images of the illustrators creating the art, even if you have to sort of stage that for the ad (as I assume there might not be any photos that were taken of that process for you TO use). The real point behind that last bit is to try to help convey that it isn't AI generated, since that also is a very real issue at present. Not just in terms of actual art being made that's sparking controversy, but both the fact that so many ARE using it to make up stuff in this way, just to earn a quick buck from a half-assed product. Also because so many ads on YT fake everything, the items, the info, the "celebrities" endorsing them (I report those ones)... Some do it intentionally, others just because it's cheaper, but both aren't well received currently. Thus why showing real artists doing it might help people see it for what you intended all along. โ˜บ๏ธ
    5
  507. 5
  508. 5
  509. 5
  510. 5
  511. 5
  512. 5
  513. 5
  514. 5
  515. 5
  516. 5
  517. 5
  518. 5
  519. 5
  520. 5
  521. 5
  522. 5
  523. 5
  524. 5
  525. 5
  526. 5
  527. 5
  528. 5
  529. 5
  530. 5
  531. 5
  532. 5
  533. 5
  534. 5
  535. 5
  536. 5
  537. 5
  538. 5
  539. 5
  540. 5
  541. 5
  542. 5
  543. 5
  544. 5
  545. 5
  546. 5
  547. 5
  548. 5
  549. 5
  550. 5
  551. 5
  552. 5
  553. 5
  554. 5
  555. 5
  556. 5
  557. 5
  558. 5
  559. 5
  560. 5
  561. 5
  562. 5
  563. 5
  564. 5
  565. 5
  566. 5
  567. 5
  568. 5
  569. 5
  570. 5
  571. 5
  572. 5
  573. 5
  574. 5
  575. 5
  576. 5
  577. 5
  578. 5
  579. 5
  580. 5
  581. 5
  582. 5
  583. 5
  584. 5
  585. 5
  586. 5
  587. 5
  588. 5
  589. 5
  590. 5
  591. 5
  592. I feel like Battlestar Galactica S1's first episode titled "33", is a great analog to this. (note: this isn't the first episode of the series, as the mini-series pilot episodes came before it) Synopsis: _"Having fled the besieged Ragnar Anchorage, the convoy of refugee spaceships is relentlessly pursued and attacked by Cylons. The colonial fleet must execute a faster-than-light (FTL) jump every 33 minutes to escape the Cylons, who consistently arrive at the new jump coordinates approximately 33 minutes later. After over 130 hours and 237 jumps, the fleet's crew and passengers, particularly those aboard Galactica, have been operating without sleep while facing the strain of nearly constant military action." After every jump, all their pilots and "ground" crew are scrambling to prepare the Vipers (single seat fighters) and Raptors (2-3 crewed bombers/EW) to launch again every 33 minutes. They're usually not engaging into a huge battle every time, but are out there to protect the flotilla as the enemies (Cylons) deploy from their own fighters from their battleship-carriers. All the while the pilots are using stims to keep them sharp, which is also screwing with their judgement due to no sleep. So whilst I don't think our men and women are living like that, it might actually be just as stress inducing because there ISN'T a like-clockwork pattern to the attacks. So our navy is basically always on pins and needles, not knowing when the next all hands on deck will occur... I'm glad no one has been seriously hurt, unlike on BSG where they didn't leave unscathed. ๐Ÿซก to our men and women... โค๏ธ๐Ÿค๐Ÿ’™
    5
  593. 5
  594. 5
  595. 5
  596. 5
  597. 5
  598. 5
  599. 5
  600. 5
  601. 5
  602. 5
  603. Viewer Tip: there ARE auto-generated subtitles (CC), which helps alot! ๐Ÿ‘ Very helpful info, and hopefully Russians will start to use it to help themselves. Please know "the west", & the world, IS NOT fighting against the people of Russia! Our fight is with Putin and anyone who does his bidding. I personally felt our militaries needed to send in troops months ago, to help Ukraine fight Putin's army. Now...? NOW I think we need to send in troops to help innocent Russians fight Putin! ๐Ÿ˜” That man clearly has zero care or concerns for any group of people... Regardless of your country, ethnicity, religion, creed, values, status, contribution to society, none of that matters because he does not spend even a second to think about how his actions impact you! Yes, the "you" I'm specifically referring to here, are Russian citizens. He drains your whole city/village of those able to fight, doesn't care whether that town can continue to even function with potentially half the people taken... People with skillsets the others (likely) will not possess, so it's not even a matter of man vs woman, as a woman with that skillset is just as capable! (I think women make amazing fighters [equal to men], and in some situations are even superior, so I don't get why he doesn't mobilize them... unless he's worried his prison soldiers will get ""distracted"" ๐Ÿ˜‘๐Ÿ™„) So yea, I understand why some countries are turning away "tourists". (I'm guessing many Russians are not stating they're "fleeing", but are "going on vacation".) Ukrainians were fleeing because they were being invaded, but Russians are fleeing because โ€”to put it bluntlyโ€” they don't want to deal with their problem at home, a problem they allowed through their complacency, a problem named Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. You are allowed to own shotguns in Russia, and shotguns are a VERY powerful, and capable weapon. You can_easily_ remove the BBs and replace it with a hard and pointy projectile, and have it fly accurately! (Taofledermaus channel has even tested many slugs made by Russian citizens, sent directly to him from Russia, and 95% of which have performed insanely well in accuracy and stopping power!!) Viva la Russoluciรณn! โœŠโšช๐Ÿ”ตโšช #Russolucion Ukrainians... You need no criticism or pep talk! You all just keep doing what you're doing: kicking ass and taking back territory! ๐Ÿค˜๐Ÿ˜ซ๐Ÿค˜ Stay strong. Stay united. Stay alive. STAY UKRAINIAN! Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    4
  604. 4
  605. 4
  606. 4
  607. 4
  608. 4
  609. 4
  610. 4
  611. 4
  612. 4
  613. 4
  614. 4
  615. 4
  616. Listen, Russia hasn't shown itself to be the major threat they always claimed to be, so I get that we (the US, but really, any country) might want to remove components that aren't on par with off-the-shelf consumer goods. For one, it's a slow bird so it wouldn't take advanced SAM systems to take one out. For two, as stated, advanced tech isn't even needed to beat Russia! So why include certain advanced and possibly superfluous components, if they can be replaced by cheaper ones... even if it means the platform might be a little less capable? I suspect the big thing the US is worried about is the SatUplink tech. Swap it for Starlink though, and ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘ (win-win for Musk, to test varying speeds, altitudes, and sudden course changes) It's like a car honestly... They're are various option packages to meet the needs and wants of the buyer. The Gray Eagle was sort of designed only for a tight knit group (I assume at least UK, but maybe only for US use?), for specific missions that โ€”I feelโ€” are more covert or loiter-intensive. Whereas Ukraine kinda needs overwhelming-force, where a drone can be a weapons platform. See: the rotary-bomb-dropper carousel equipped drone Taiwan has sent, which had a capacity of... how many could it carry, some 180-bomblettes. 4x Hellfire missiles would be quite handy, though! OR, even as an unarmed surveillance platform, it would be crazy helpful! Which would plausibly mean it wouldn't need all the targeting goodies. However, that, would likely be heavily integrated with everything and would no doubt be a long term project to remove/supplant with different components... Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    4
  617. 4
  618. 4
  619. Ukrainians, you're doing a fantastic job, particularly considering you're at an equipment disadvantage! However, thankfully, you have multiple key advantages the Russians lack... Your soldier's skills along with their ferocity and bravery. You have the world's support*. Most importantly, you don't want to become part of Russia! The ": I wish we (๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฒ), along with other nations which have capable militaries, would send TROOPS and not just supplies... It's a little sickening for me that we're letting this happen (... *again! 3rd time in 20 years) when we could each send in a battalion or two, and at least have them do defense/policing so that Ukrainian troops are freee up to perform counter-offensive operations to drive the occupiers out! Which brings me to... Ukrainian civilians staying in their homes: they need to be convinced to leave ๐Ÿ˜ข I understand their desire to stay, as some have farm animals they couldn't live with themself if they abandoned/ser free. Others want to at least try to protect their belongings and homes. The problem is, Russians are shelling everything and don't care if civilians are there. So if these people die, the whole reason for staying behind will have happened anyways, but now they and their family will also be lost... And that's EXACTLY what Putin wants!! Of you can at least flee and stay alive, that's another way you can help prevent Putin from achieving his goals! ๐Ÿ™‚๐ŸŒป Stay strong. Stay united. Stay alive. STAY UKRAINIAN! Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    4
  620. 4
  621. ย @macthelostย  Your heart is in the right place, but not sure if you're grasping all of the issues with your suggestion to "just weld it!" There's a reason you bring a ship into a dry dock to perform major repairs like that. With the space station, you have such a finite amount of space, so you literally use every inch and millimeter of it. That means you have spots you can't access, at least not easily without shuffling major components all over to gain the necessary access. Then there's the issue of the layering. I don't know specifically how they are setup, but my gut tells me there's a fabric layer (ballistic fiber maybe); a thermal layer; and one, maybe two, metal layers. The amount of heat generated during welding is quite possibly (even likely) going to melt any fabric layer. What's more, is your going to have to also depressurize whatever module your welding on, because during that heating, the metal is weaker until it cools... So having a blowout would be quite catastrophic! Even then, the dexterity while in a spacesuit diminishes significantly. Dunno if you've welded before but I've welded before, it's very fun. If not, then you don't just pull the trigger and drag it across the metal. You have to prep it first. If you want to do it RIGHT, and sufficiently, you have to grind a bit of a channel. You can lay the bead on top, overlaying the crack, but it won't be as strong. Then there's laying the bead, which is a back and forth motion, imparted by twisting your wrist. Which goes back to the issue of dexterity. I think ideally, you'd want a robot to handle that, maybe attached to the CanadArm. Anyways, I've speculated enough. ๐Ÿ˜Š Enjoy the read!
    4
  622. 4
  623. 4
  624. 4
  625. ย @zoidersย  I don't have any semblance of explosives knowledge; however, even then I've been able to follow along in this conversation to have very easily understood that they're using a high-speed explosive for its ability to send tiny shrapnel outwards at a similar high velocity. They're taking apart a round that was already meant to disable armor, so they're obviously not trying to replace that. Their goal is to make something that's far more effective at wrecking a person's day by both direct and indirect means. They have internal objects plus the sharp fragments of the vessel, in order to rip into people. They also have a large amount of HS explosive to quickly disperse them... but as I see it, that also offers a great side benefit of creating a high-speed shockwave that will undoubtedly cause permanent hearing loss to anyone inside the building/vehicle, or significant temporary hearing loss to them; both are great outcomes. If you can't hear the enemy approaching, you're as good as dead, and I think it's pretty safe to assume that hearing protection is likely the last thing on the list of "essentials" that the Russians have to buy on their own dime! Actual ballistic body armor and a helmet that can do more than stop a baseball, any semblance of night vision or thermal optics, those in sure take priority. ๐Ÿฅด So as far as I can tell, this improvised round achieved the end-goal, even if it takes a few extra bullets after... Where at the end of the day, this is point and shot, whereas any trap laid still relies on some poor bastard triggering it. We've already seen plenty of Russian-left boobytraps that have been discovered and disarmed... no reason to think the obverse doesn't, or couldn't happen. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ Just my 2-observational-ยข worth. โœŒ๏ธ
    4
  626. 4
  627. 4
  628. 4
  629. 4
  630. 4
  631. 4
  632. 4
  633. 4
  634. 4
  635. 4
  636. 4
  637. 4
  638. 4
  639. 4
  640. 4
  641. 4
  642. 4
  643. 4
  644. 4
  645. 4
  646. 4
  647. 4
  648. 4
  649. 4
  650. 4
  651. 4
  652. 4
  653. 4
  654. 4
  655. 4
  656. 4
  657. 4
  658. 4
  659. 4
  660. 4
  661. 4
  662. An old (ish) show on, if I recall correctly, the then-named Wings channel (might've been on History) actually proved it WOULD HAVE been stealth for the time. They built a full scale mockup of it and then took it out to a radar test facility, whose purpose is to test aircraft's radar cross sections, which mounts aircraft atop a large pole so that it can be bombarded by microwaves. As I remember, the range could detect even a small bird on the test stand, and lengths were taken to prevent such occurrences. At the end of the day, verdict was that the Allies certainly lucked out that the Ho-229 hadn't entered full production, as detection of it WOULD have been challenging. Not impossible mind you, but it presented a significantly lower signature than other aircraft of the time. They were testing against V3, and I think it was mentioned that V5 or V6 had modified air inlets, which they speculated would have indeed made for a truly stealth aircraft! The world was genuinely lucky that the war took the turn that it did, given the multiple advancements that Nazi Germany had by the end of the war. <_> === E D I T: I wasn't able to find the show I mentioned, but I did find this, which will require a Google search: "Is It Stealth? | National Air and Space Museum" It's possible it did air on NatGeo when I watched it; however, I would've figured I'd watched it around 2009. If so, that is prior to their followup paper's findings being released. The show had detailed the entire structure though, and honestly, I hadn't even remembered that there was an attempt at creating a Radar Absorbable Material. So that isn't factored in, and only the design bring what I remember as the show's focus. Still, my recollection of "stealth-ier, but by no means full-stealth" seems to hold up. As something to consider is a radar operator's mindset back then, which wouldn't have a concept of "stealth" like we know it. So if a radar return is detected but less than anticipated, it may not be given much priority... particularly if they're are other planes flying and are a confirmed threat. In other words, I feel ANY change in radar signature is going to be helpful!
    4
  663. My personal suspicion has been: A combination of Putin having become an "adrenaline junky" -- or at the very least, excitement junky/thrill seeker -- due to his covert and counterintelligence days in the KGB. That work got him recognized high up, which lead to his political career, where he basically started right at the top, as prime minister. So although his life slowed down a lot by comparison, he no doubt was able to live more lavishly and luxuriously. Then, he became president... He reached the top! Except, that junky-itch still lingered, and what better way to scratch it, but by starting shit with another country Which I suspect is where things started to spiral downhill... Because starting wars is kind of the biggest sort of chest pounding a leader can do, but you can't just start another war immediately after the last one finishes, as that'll end your career, in one way or another. So in the interim, he lives like a king and does whatever he wants... Like, have people killed that he doesn't like or opposes him politically! It's not a war, but... war is sort of "legal" killing, in a twisted way, at least as long as you go about it the right way in terms of the justification behind it. Having people killed, that's a new kind of risk/thrill, because that's taboo, it's not acceptable! Now his life is a chess match... A poisoning here, a war there... But then he needs more. I know, let's annex Crimea! Welp, he got away with that (as a citizen of 'The West', I'll accept the blame for that nonsense), which only means he'll dial it up further... I'm sure they're were some more poisonings or science experiments to see if gravity still works through the test of pushing someone from a multi-story building window. My gosh, works you look at the time? I need to start another war! He's taken a country's land, what's there left to do that's bigger? WAR CRIMES, baby! Enter Syria, and the act of genocide (amongst other things, no doubt)! ๐Ÿ˜” It's OK though, because he got away with it again. Surely he won't amp it up next time? Blah blah, having opponents killed, modifying your country's law for consecutive presidential terms -- oh, I forgot, in between the wars and killings, he also (almost guaranteeingly) had an election rigged so that he was momentarily prime minister again, thereby resetting his reached limit of 2 consecutive terms, and that 'elected' president turned the country back over to him! ๐Ÿ‘ But where were we... Oh, right, figuring out how he can once again, somehow, dial his evil up another notch! I KNOW! A little of column A, and a little if column B!! Let's invade Ukraine... again... and try to take the entire damn county, by overthrowing their government, while justifying it all by making an absurd lie about neo-Nazis and liberating Ukrainians, calling it not what it is... (an invasion) but a "specialty memeitary operation"! BRILLIA--... What?? What do you MEAN they're fighting back?! I don't care, take the country! How? You know damn well how! Rape, pillage, plunder; raze it to the ground! Steal their food, burn their farmlands, use 'dumb' cluster munitions while giving zero-shits about whether they actually his military targets, then use munitions no one else will because they're deemed too inhumane... gas them, launch phosphorous at them, rain flachettes down upon them!! "But...... Why, daddy?" Well, my dear... Because the man is bored. That's why. Remember when we got our puppy, and almost every day was a situation where it pissed here, destroyed that, shit there, chewed up that? That's because for part of it they didn't know any better as they were just a puppy, but the other parts were due to the fact they were bored. So when it happened, we told them "No" so they stopped, and played with them when they were bored... Now, remember when the neighbors got a new puppy? All the same things happened, except, they never corrected it. They just yelled and got mad every time, yet all these years later, it's still doing that because it doesn't know any better... That's Putin. He was never told No, never told that's bad behavior, never told to be nice or shown how. He just keeps repeating the same bad behavior, over and over and over, because everyone gets mad, but no one tells him "No! That's a bad asshole, don't do that!!" โ˜น๏ธ FIN. Thus concludes this week's Story Time, with the Duke of Ramble. ๐Ÿ˜ Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    4
  664. 4
  665. 4
  666. 4
  667. 4
  668. 4
  669. 4
  670. 4
  671. 4
  672. 4
  673. 4
  674. 4
  675. 4
  676. 4
  677. 4
  678. 4
  679. 4
  680. 4
  681. 4
  682. 4
  683. 4
  684. 4
  685. 4
  686. 4
  687. 4
  688. 4
  689. 4
  690. 4
  691. 4
  692. 4
  693. 4
  694. 4
  695. 4
  696. 4
  697. 4
  698. 4
  699. 4
  700. 4
  701. 4
  702. 4
  703. 4
  704. HAPPY BIRTHDAY President Zelenskyy ๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’› That out of the way: Let's be totally clear... It is NOT POSSIBLE to "compromise" with terrorists. Doesn't matter if it's only 1, or 12, or an entire county being run by many. They only want what they want, and will not accept anything else. It's not a hostage situation, where we can give Putin something and cause him to retreat from ALL of sovereign Ukraine โ€“ the borders agreed were rightfully Ukraine's, as per the Budapest Memorandum that Russia is a signator of... THE REALITY IS... Compromising, negotiating, or god forbid even surrendering, ARE UNACCEPTABLE AND SHOULD NOT BE SPOKEN OF AS PURSUABLE OPTIONS!! Period. The ONLY thing that does, is it continues to make Putin think he can do whatever the f...duck he wants and get away with it. (losing 1/4 million troops, or 5 million, impacts him zero if he remains in power.) That's what GOT US HERE in the first place! He does something unspeakable.... He gets away with it. .... Political Opponents, Industry Oligarchs, Some-Dude-He-Dislikes is killed (see: murdered) at his request? He gets away with it! <+3 to Ego per kill> .... Rig an election to have your guy win, who then cedes power to Putin, just to circumvent consecutive term laws? He gets away with it! <+10 to Ego> .... Start an insurrection, overthrow a government, invade a country, install people loyal to him in other country's positions of power? He gets away with it, time and time again!! <Logrithmic boost to Ego per success; starting boost of 10%> Yea, his head is so big now and his appetite for conquest grown so insatiable, means there is no compromising. Not by any reasonable standard at least. "Sure, I'll stop this war. In exchange, I want all of Ukraine, Alaska, Yukon, Nunavut, hmmm Greenland Scotland, plus the top halves of Norway, Sweden and Finland. You know what... Throw in Poland as well! ๐Ÿ‘" Yea... We created this monster by letting his shit slide all along. It's time to speak his language, which means the only way this ends is with a LITERAL, not figurative, boot on his throat and gun to his head. Because short of that, even if one of his own manages to take his place (by force), the same crap will happen. They know how complacent we all are ๐Ÿ˜” At least Ukraine was, and is, willing to fight for all of us... God-speed to all you fine folk, and to all those in their Foreign Legion! O7 SสŸแด€แด แด€ Uแด‹ส€แด€ษชษดษช, Hแด‡ส€แดสแด€แด SสŸแด€แด แด€! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    4
  705. 4
  706. 4
  707. 4
  708. 4
  709. 4
  710. 4
  711. 4
  712. 4
  713. 4
  714. 4
  715. 4
  716. ย @mromuttย  Let's not forget the music, either! Being able to put the game disc into a CD player to listen to it. (which most games required the game disc to be in, for that reason) Trent Reznor (Nine Inch Nails) did the sound and music for Quake 1, and holy cow is the music cinematic... It's no wonder he became a great movie score composer (won two Oscars; I'm slightly biased as a NIN fan lol) Quake 2 and 3 had great music as well, but in an actual music sense (same musician for these; Sonic Mayhem). I listened to both a LOT in my vehicle as a teen. Hell, I still listen to Quake 3's from time to time, and it's always been on my phones โ˜บ๏ธ Unreal Tournament I believe also had great music from what I've been told. And I think Unreal, and/or Unreal 2, as well as the later Tournaments did, also? Unfortunately I wasn't much of an Unreal player, so I don't have first hand knowledge. Although games occasionally do to have good music, but it's less of a focus. Except for โ€“and to come full circle โ€“ Fallout 3/NV/4/76, which had THEE BEST selection! Granted, they are real music from the Golden Age, but still... ๐Ÿ˜˜๐Ÿ‘Œ It's a shame that most digital copies of those 90s games don't include the music (Quake 3 is an exception since its music was contained in the data)... Though I think I read that GOG (Good Old Games) started to on some of the 90s game, which is great if so! Also yes, manuals were great then as well, even containing additional game lore and artwork. I remember Mech Warrior 2's was thhhhick! (albeit it's size was only like 5in x 8in) Man I miss the 90s...๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ๐Ÿ˜”๐Ÿ˜… [/rambling fanboy] lol
    4
  717. 4
  718. 4
  719. 4
  720. 4
  721. Ukrainian War: A Brutally Honest Report - Russian tactics are nothing more than "Be Hit & Run Away". ๐Ÿ˜ Seriously though... One has little room to knock another's tactics, if they're being decimated by said tactics! As a westerner, Russia's PR during this entire war โ€“and by that, I mean "Propaganda Regime"โ€“ has been so damn cringy, it blows me away that anyone can actually believe it completely. (then again, a good portion of my own countrymen and women bought into some absurd politics, and tried to turn us into Russia... so ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ) They'll run out of steam soon enough... Both in terms of their war effort, and all the hot air they keep putting out. ๐Ÿ˜‰ RUSKIES:ย ย  ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะ ะพััะธะธ ัƒัˆะปะฐ. ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะณะตั€ะพัะผ ะฃะบั€ะฐะธะฝั‹! [The glory of Russia is gone. Glory to the heroes of Ukraine!] ๐Ÿคœ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ”ฅ BELAWANNABES:ย ย  ะกะปะฐะฒa ะฝะตะปัŒะณะฐ ะฝั– ัžะบั€ะฐัั†ั–, ะฝั– ัžะทัั†ัŒ! [Glory cannot be stolen, nor taken!] ๐Ÿšซ ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ๐ŸŽ–๏ธ BROTHERS:ย ย  ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะฃะบั€ะฐั—ะฝั–, ะ“ะตั€ะพัะผ ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ! [Glory to Ukraine, Glory to the Heroes!] โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    4
  722. 4
  723. 4
  724. 4
  725. 4
  726. 4
  727. 4
  728. 4
  729. 4
  730. 4
  731. 4
  732. 4
  733. 4
  734. 4
  735. 4
  736. 4
  737. 4
  738. 4
  739. 4
  740. 4
  741. 4
  742. 4
  743. 4
  744. It's kinda funny (in a sad and scary way) that Trump has sewn the same mess that Putin has... PUTIN: Has generated enough fear in everyone under him that their lies are systemic to how he operates and is now operating on misinformation. No one wants to oppose him out of fear... of being killed. TRUMP: Has caused so many small problems and spoken so many lies (if something Trump says is false/incorrect but he's conveying it as the opposite, that's technically lying), which have culminated in huge issues (understatement). It has reached a point that everyone around him and voting for him believes whatever he says, and is willing to do whatever he says, assuming that they'll become successful because he will be successful _(even though he's more than willing to turn on them in an instant [ie Pence, for not "stopping the steal"]). And knowing that he'll literally throw a temper tantrum of he isn't told what he wants to hear and or do what he wants to do, everyone just gives him what he wants, feeding the problem further. As a result, no one wants to oppose him out of fear... of being left out. The case with Putin is at least legitimized by not wanting to lose your life, or tossed in a cell for the rest of your life on the grounds of "because I say so", either way a case of your life as you know it coming to an end. The case with Trump is.... just flat out pathetic, despicable, and utterly sad, because 99% of the people who are 'along for the ride' are not going to get one damn thing for their loyalty........ except maybe their life as they know it ending because they're now locked up on charges of sedition or insurrection. Thus concludes another hot minute, with the Duke of Ramble Stay safe everyone, and please remember to get your local Republicans spayed or neutered! โค๏ธ
    4
  745. 4
  746. 4
  747. 4
  748. 4
  749. 4
  750. 4
  751. 4
  752. 4
  753. 3
  754. 3
  755. 3
  756. 3
  757. 3
  758. 3
  759. 3
  760. 3
  761. 3
  762. 3
  763. 3
  764. 3
  765. 3
  766. 3
  767. 3
  768. 3
  769. 3
  770. 3
  771. 3
  772. 3
  773. 3
  774. 3
  775. ย @Vlad_-_-_ย  When I first started getting a glimpse of their dry, sarcastic humor, I knew right then and there that I had found 'my people' ๐Ÿคฃ Which on that note... If any Ukrainians are reading this: Minnesota, Wisconsin, North Dakota are three states in the US where you'd have no trouble fitting in! ๐Ÿ˜ I can say that, as a Minnesotan. We have the exact same sense of humor and so I really appreciate ALL the jabs they take at Russia, as well as the fact that they keep it up even during times like this! ๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿค˜๐Ÿ’› [note: by no means am I saying this to imply I'm correct; you could very well be spot on.] I got a kick out of the husband of the wife being interviewed on Radio Free Europe channel. She had been explaining how far-East Russians were perplexed at the comforts of living that the Ukrainians had (indoor plumbing, hot water, natural gas, etc). She had said that he had "no idea about the" specific technology that provided their hot water+room heating.... Right then, her husband who was walking through the debris of what used to be their damn home chimes in: "Yea, and now WE have no idea where our couch is.... or my welder..." Subtly implying, not that they'd been destroyed by the artillery, but had been stolen by Russian soldiers. ๐Ÿคฃ Makes me wish my welder wasn't old and would be worth the cost of sending to him... I'll just keep my fingers crossed that the Fates are looking over us, and that they make sure the donation I made ends up going to him, so that he can then buy a new welder! ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ˜Š Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    3
  776. 3
  777. 3
  778. 3
  779. 3
  780. 3
  781. 3
  782. 3
  783. 3
  784. 3
  785. 3
  786. 3
  787. 3
  788. 3
  789. 3
  790. 3
  791. 3
  792. It makes me want to go finish my Fallout 3/4/76 inspired mashup "Alien Blaster"... I found an old 60s (50s? ๐Ÿค”) corded drill that is LITERALLY Ray Gun in design. Even has a curved "rocket fin" looking protrusion at the back that nestles in the crook of your thumb and index... Then the vents at the back were all individual holes to draw in the air. At the front it had two vertical slits, to exhaust the air. All aluminum, even the trigger. Smooth corners all over. I had found an all brass garden sprayer (twist style) of similar vintage, as it was my grandpa's, that was going to be the barrel. I bought some sort of vacuum tube, I think it might've been for a high power radio transmitter. It stepped down with two separate glass compartments. That was going to be between the drill body and the sprayer nozzle. Then, for the "power cells" (ammo), I bought these things called Decade Counters, "Dekatrons". They're vacuum tubes, and they were used to count up to 10 (I think 0-9), hence decade. They displayed the value by arcing across two contacts, which was viewed from the top, clock like. The color of the plasma inside was determine by the neon gas they were filled with, which I picked the ones I bought because it was purple ๐Ÿ˜Š BUT THEN the kicker: there's a 9V battery powered circuit a guy made called a Dekatron Spinner, which generated the hundreds of volts needed to power the Dekatron. But also, as the name implies, would cause the counter to step around and look like it's "spinning". So my ammo cells would be animated thanks to this compact circuit! Each trigger pull then would just activate a simple camera flash, which would reside in the front compartment (the gearbox of the drill) and emit light out the vent slits. As an added bonus, the capacitor recharging whine would give it a bit of extra character. ๐Ÿ˜Š Alright, sorry about that... I didn't initially intend this to be so long, but I got carried away. haha Now you know why I call myself the DUKE of RAMBLE! ๐Ÿ˜’๐Ÿฅด
    3
  793. 3
  794. 3
  795. 3
  796. Is that Rohrbacher guy, the same one who was Trump's presidential campaign leader (in 2016)? If so, he apparently had previously worked for Putin, in a very similar capacity. Everything starts making alot more sense when it's all put into ("putin to"... *slaps knee*) perspective. Particularly given all the ludicrous crap (see: lies) Russia has been spewing these last 4.5 months regarding Ukraine... "Democrats drink the blood of babies" (or was it 'eat babies'?) "I'm going to drain the swamp that is DC, to remove the corruption" "Were conducting a special military operation against Ukrainian Nazis" "The democratic West is censoring their people, closing news outlets, and 'arbitrarily' treating journalists" (90% verbatim; I have no clue what Putin meant when he said "arbitrary treatment of journalists", unless it was a translation error of 'mistreatment'...) Because with the exception of the part about babies, everything Trump said and ran on, had been the complete opposite, which just so happens to be the exact same situation with what Russia/Putin have been saying. Eliminate DC's corruption/removing corrupt government officials = creating corruption/installing corrupt government officials (or firing them when they didn't play bail) Stopping Nazis and nazi-like practices = acting like Nazis and committing genocide against a particular people The democratic West are doing X, Y, Z = the exact things taking place in Russia right now. I'm both blown away and sickened by the fact that people actually BELIVE that garbage they're being told... ๐Ÿ˜ž
    3
  797. 3
  798. 3
  799. 3
  800. 3
  801. 3
  802. ย @MarcosElMalo2ย  I doubt Ukraine is using any munitions that contain shrapnel that can't be medically detected, because those sorts of weapons are considered unlawful ("banned", if you rather) for use against other nations. I say this, because it would severely hamper Ukraine's "War Crimes" trials' efforts towards Russia, if they were also committing them. Zelenskey is clearly a really smart guy and being that they wanted in NATO years ago but were declined, I anticipate he'll play this "By the Book", to ensure they're accepted after the dust settles. That being said, there IS a caveat to all of this "banned weapons" in treaties... Which is, has Russia has already used this type of weapon against Ukraine? In which case, if they have then Ukraine is permitted to utilize them as well (if they want) and cannot be punished for it. _['punished' being a bit of a hollow term unfortunately, as it requires your country to recognize the ICC"s authority, which Ukraine does, but US, Russia, China and various other smaller nations do NOT sooo... They can't be punished **sigh**] That said, if playing by the rules... Russia has thereby unlocked the following weapons for Ukraine to also utilize at their own discretion: - White Phosphorus Incendiary weapons - Chemical weapons [gasses; eg Mustard Gas] - Indiscriminate (Dumb-fire) Cluster Bombs [ie bomblettes without their own targeting capabilities; targeting any area that may still have civilians present] - Flachettes (micro-darts; basically a fin-stabilized carpenter's nail a little short than your pinky finger) I don't know if this is it's own banned item, or if it's lumped in with Cluster Munitions, so I made it a subset just in case. Though I'm certain I've missed at least one other, maybe more... Thankfully (?I guess?) there's no Unlockable Achievement in war for the other war crimes like Pillaging Civilian Property, Razing Civilian Structures, Murdering Civilians, Torturing or Rape (the last two I believe are "full stop", not even of enemy soldiers, but I could be wrong...) ๐Ÿ˜” Stay strong. Stay united. Stay alive. STAY UKRAINIAN! Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ [edit: stupid typo]
    3
  803. 3
  804. 3
  805. 3
  806. 3
  807. 3
  808. 3
  809. 3
  810. 3
  811. ย @ni9274ย  Not all of us think every Russian, be they a soldier or a citizen, are evil. ๐Ÿ™‚ Thankfully, this is plainly evident thanks to intercepted phone calls of soldiers who don't agree with the war and are pissed at Putin... Also evident by the things that can't be faked, such as all those who initially left Russia after they invaded, and those who protested, and have continued to protest. (I'd like to include the current exodus, but that could be just to avoid the draft, and may not be because they actually like Ukrainians or disagree with the war... most probably are leaving now because they don't want to be sent to their death.) But yea, you're not totally wrong... Surrendering could be, and probably is, kind of tough. The good news is, almost all the Russian soldiers lack nightvision gear. That means dissenters can much more easily escape during the night, as none of their comrades would be able to detect them leaving. On top of that, just about (or every) soldier has a cellphone, therefore, a compass and probably satellite mapping. So all they'll have to do is plug in the location the Ukraine Surrender Hotline person tells them to go. ๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿคž This war also seems to be, rather curiously, primarily doing day campaigns only, at least on Russia's side. (I'm not saying they don't conduct SOME night missions, but seemingly all the missile strikes, bombings, and the like, occur during daylight) Traversing the terrain at night might be harder, but, sounds like it'll at least be a safer time to travel for those wanting to surrender... Just be sure to have something handy that's white, so Ukrainians know not to shoot ya... ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿณ๏ธ Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    3
  812. 3
  813. 3
  814. 3
  815. 3
  816. 3
  817. 3
  818. 3
  819. 3
  820. 3
  821. 3
  822. 3
  823. 3
  824. 3
  825. 3
  826. ย @operator9858ย  I can't disagree about Ukraine's efforts in that sense, and as much as I'd like to say "But I've never seen anyone say they didn't leave because Ukraine didn't send help to evac me", I can also admit that it'd be HIGHLY unlikely to ever be aired either way. [note: I know that Ukraine HAS done quite a bit with bussing civilians out, but they've allowed too many to remain willingly in my opinion.] However, I can't agree on Russia playing the long game... I also don't know if Russia is even helping to evac as you've said, since Putin there said he's recommending everyone should leave. If it were a military operation to evac, he'd have buttered it up in that way: "I've sent in our troops in order to assist in all the citizens getting our safely"... except, all the reports seem to indicate that Kherson is a ghost town (militarily, as least). Getting back to the long-game-claim though... It will never matter what he does from today forward. There's simply no forgiving what has gone on SO FAR, and even if he did everything by. the. book. from here on out, it won't be enough. For that matter, even with Ukraine not making sure people are evacuated (predominantly the reluctant individuals), the war crimes still rest SOLELY on Russia.... The rape? That's not Ukraine's fault, nor the victim's. The looting? That's not Ukraine's fault, Putin literally authorized it and has transportation logistics in place to have it shipped back to the soldiers home (albeit, only after those in charge of the efforts are allowed to take their pick of the goods [I'm not even joking!]). The murders? (non-combatants) That's the only thing that Ukraine can slightly take some blame on, but still, Russians pulled those triggers. The flechettes/white phosphorus rockets and bombs/cluster bombs/non-self-disposing landmines? Russia, Russia, Russia, and Russia are solely to blame for their use. The tortures/inhumane prison conditions/lack of food (military and non-combatants) All Russia again. Not supplying food/water to their OWN soldiers? Yea, Russia again. I could go on, too, but why bother when committing multiple counts if just HALF of that list is enough to qualify Russia for "Unforgivable" status... (to clarify, "Russia" as in the military and government, not its citizens... no matter how brainwashed some of them may be, into support this war)
    3
  827. 3
  828. 3
  829. 3
  830. 3
  831. 3
  832. 3
  833. 3
  834. 3
  835. 3
  836. 3
  837. 3
  838. 3
  839. 3
  840. 3
  841. 3
  842. 3
  843. 3
  844. 3
  845. 3
  846. 3
  847. 3
  848. 3
  849. 3
  850. 3
  851. 3
  852. 3
  853. 3
  854. 3
  855. 3
  856. 3
  857. 3
  858. It really is an interesting notion, as I've come to realize... Because now you can have one epic plane, except... it's spread across two airframes. Meaning the piloted plane can remain super maneuverable or fast, as it isn't burdened with X, Y, or Z since that's been moved over to the wingman drone! In other words, you can have an "E/A-18 Growler" capable combo, but now each single pilot also remains just as lethal as an F/A-18! That's in addition to whatever pieces of ordinance the wingman drone is packing... (I use those two purely as an example, due to the differences between them.) Then there's also the other benefits mentioned in the video, like the ability to act as a "shield" for the piloted plane, or the fact it will be cheaper since it won't need to be equipped with all the bells and whistles a conventional combat aircraft needs... Basically, it's sort of like having a "Tactical Donkey" / "Combat Mule" ๐Ÿ˜‚ Which I imagine, during the early endangerments where these are first deployed, it's probably going to be a matter of "ignore the drone, lock onto the piloted aircraft!!"... That is, until enemies start to realize that the wingman is almost an equal threat, and they shouldn't discriminate, just lock whichever and fire! ๐Ÿ˜ And if the US/allies maintain a huge technological advantage in this sector, future conflicts are going to be reeeal depressing for the instigating foes! ๐Ÿ˜ [edit: fixed my embarrassing error, a typo, and made a small adjustment to the second sentence to make it comes across slightly less idiotic... lol]
    3
  859. 3
  860. 3
  861. 3
  862. 3
  863. 3
  864. 3
  865. 3
  866. 3
  867. 3
  868. 3
  869. 3
  870. 3
  871. 3
  872. 3
  873. 3
  874. 3
  875. 3
  876. 3
  877. 3
  878. 3
  879. 3
  880. 3
  881. 3
  882. 3
  883. 3
  884. 3
  885. 3
  886. 3
  887. 3
  888. 3
  889. 3
  890. I had started calling Putin and the Russian government "murderers" on account of their modern, accurate weapons somehow always landing on civilian populated targets. It's at such an outstanding degree that I'd genuinely love to see a breakdown of the missiles/bombs that Russia claimed were fired at "military targets" and, at the very least, show how many actually hit a military target, how many hit a civilian occupied target, and how many hit hit nothing. Though ideally, broken down further, for whether it was a sea, air, or land launched missile; as well as how many missed a possible military target but ended up hitting civilian occupied target; and then those that hit civilian targets, how many instances were there civilians inside vs soldiers... But I digress, my point was that their actions are not adhering to the conventional way of waging war, where targets are military and civilian casualties are only by accident. Which is clear that they are INTENTIONALLY hitting targets they know have civilians. Except, I see that "murderers" was a poor choice of term to describe them, and that Terrorist(s) genuinely is more fitting based on actions! They've become a terrorist-state, whose targets are "anyone we feel like terrorizing this year"... Which is to say, if we don't stop them now, this sort of shit is going to continue to happen every couple years, just as it has been. Doing what we have been all these years, which is "not nearly enough", it's only done one thing: show Putin he can get away with it. G7 nations: no matter how you feel about it, the fact remains - YOU ALL NEED TO SEND YOUR TROOPS TO UKRAINE! They don't have to fight on Russian soil, but they need to drive Russians out of Ukraine... and that includes Crimea! Stay strong. Stay united. Stay alive. STAY UKRAINIAN! Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ ๐ŸŒ - ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ = โ˜ฎ๏ธ
    3
  891. 3
  892. 3
  893. 3
  894. 3
  895. 3
  896. 3
  897. 3
  898. 3
  899. 3
  900. 3
  901. 3
  902. 3
  903. 3
  904. 3
  905. 3
  906. 3
  907. 3
  908. 3
  909. 3
  910. 3
  911. 3
  912. 3
  913. 3
  914. 3
  915. 3
  916. 3
  917. 3
  918. 3
  919. 3
  920. 3
  921. 3
  922. 3
  923. 3
  924. 3
  925. 3
  926. 3
  927. 3
  928. 3
  929. 3
  930. 3
  931. 3
  932. 3
  933. 3
  934. 3
  935. 3
  936. 3
  937. 3
  938. 3
  939. 3
  940. 3
  941. 3
  942. 3
  943. 3
  944. 3
  945. 3
  946. 3
  947. 3
  948. 3
  949. 3
  950. 3
  951. 3
  952. 3
  953. 3
  954. 3
  955. 3
  956. 3
  957. 3
  958. 3
  959. 3
  960. 3
  961. 3
  962. 3
  963. ย @RogerM88ย  Over the years, I have seen many many SpaceX enthusiasts who have openly expressed on many occasions, that they do NOT much care for Musk. I think Shotwell is, and I may be alone in this sentiment, an even more important figure at SpaceX than Musk is! Either way, I feel like perhaps you, too, have colored lenses on, and are perhaps acting in just as toxic a manner as some of those admittedly-toxic SpaceX fans can act... Myself? I define myself as a "Realist SpaceX fan". Yes, I very much root for them and want them to succeed. Yes, I want SLS to fail, as harsh as that may sound. However, the latter is fueled by the facts: far far too much money has been poured into it, and for what? Development of new, innovative tech or methods? Reusablility? Some otherwise-unattainable capability? No, no again, and "... eeehhh". It's recycled tech, where money has to be dumped into recreating things needed to make the old engines (because the industry moved on). No, because even though the main engine were technically reusable, everything (AFAIK) is scrapped every launch. And "eehh" because, others will be able to meet and exceed its lifting capability which congress claims is reason SLS is needed, but yes, in that those other capable rockets won't be able to offer the same level of "jobs program" that SLS has and will offer. The one legacy I hope that comes from SLS, will be the lesson that Cost-Plus contacts are an incredible waste of money and should never be used again (not on this scale of project). Also, that letting congress decide how and on what NASA spends is funds, is pretty close to criminal, as it takes the experts out of the decision making loop. Admittedly, that's just my opinion. I could very well not be correct on any of my points, but I will stand behind that what I've said is not wrong. ๐Ÿฅด
    3
  964. 3
  965. 3
  966. 3
  967. 3
  968. 3
  969. 3
  970. 3
  971. 3
  972. 3
  973. 3
  974. 3
  975. 3
  976. 3
  977. 3
  978. 3
  979. 3
  980. 3
  981. 3
  982. 3
  983. 3
  984. 3
  985. 3
  986. 3
  987. 3
  988. 3
  989. 3
  990. 3
  991. ย @markbirmingham6011ย  es, you're right, life begins at conception, but "life" is also a B.R.O.A.D. term that encompasses even single celled organisms. So her point, which frankly is an insult to "points" given how all-over-the-place she was white trying to answer or counter... but I digress, apologies, her point that is a "human life" is a very weak argument given the scientific meaning of the term. Which I think, as you pointed out, these folk really mean "a person" when they say "a life", and that really isn't close to being accurate. Admittedly, that's the viewpoint I was replying with, as that is the general one every pro-lifer claims. Pamela even asks her whether she thinks an IVF Doctor is a "murderer", knowing that's the common mentality. Such as the one response to my comment on another video, where she chalked abortion up to murder, saying that "abortion is murder and if I think that abortion needs to be legal, then I also must think every murderer in prison ought to be set free." Which, no, it isn't murder, and it isn't "wrong" to allow it, because that 'human life' is literally part of the parent. So if the person interviewed wants to speak "scientifically", the fetus -- up until it becomes "a viable human life", as Pamela even mentioned -- is equatable to a 'parasite' since it cannot survive if it's own. That's genuinely far too cold of a way to describe it for my tastes, but if she's going to be absurd by saying (and again, not sure what her point was, if she even knew) by droning on about the fetus having to "have its arms and legs removed, and then put back on" (?๐Ÿคจ?), then I'm comfortable with the parasite analogy. But yea, it's a part of that parent, so it's really not too different than electing to have a mole removed, or a mastectomy during gender reassignment surgery. Granted, intercourse wasn't involved in those cases, but neither the more or the breasts can survive after removal. Yes, it's living tissue, with blood flowing, but it's not "a living being". Same way an unborn child isn't "alive" yet, until it takes its first breath. So while conception IS the beginning of a life, it's just that, the start of. It is not yet alive until it has reached a point where the parent could die, yet the baby be removed and still survive. As one final analogy: once a filmmaker has begun shooting, a movie is being made; however, it is not yet a movie until at least every scene has been filmed, otherwise just a bunch of randomness by people that been recorded up until then.
    3
  992. 3
  993. 3
  994. 3
  995. 3
  996. 3
  997. 3
  998. 3
  999. 3
  1000. 3
  1001. 3
  1002. 3
  1003. 3
  1004. 3
  1005. 3
  1006. 3
  1007. 3
  1008. 3
  1009. 3
  1010. 3
  1011. 3
  1012. 3
  1013. 3
  1014. 3
  1015. 3
  1016. 3
  1017. 3
  1018. 3
  1019. 3
  1020. 3
  1021. 3
  1022. 3
  1023. 3
  1024. 3
  1025. 3
  1026. 3
  1027. 3
  1028. 3
  1029. 3
  1030. 3
  1031. 3
  1032. 3
  1033. 3
  1034. 3
  1035. 3
  1036. 3
  1037. 3
  1038. 3
  1039. 3
  1040. 3
  1041. 3
  1042. 3
  1043. 3
  1044. 3
  1045. 3
  1046. 3
  1047. 3
  1048. 3
  1049. The sheer stupidity and/or insanity of the commanding officers of the invaders and pro-Russian militias -- and arguably their soldiers who are likely just as absent minded given they're carrying out the commands -- must be something Russia rewards for....?? I know that the tragic history around Chernobyl (Chornobyl) was hidden from Russians, so they still (...somehow...) have no idea what bad bad things can result from destabilizing/compromising a nuclear reactor's cooling systems or containment chambers.... It's the fact that they weren't taught, even in the most rudimentary sense, that nuclear plants are very safe but still very delicate... just amazes me. AT LEAST it's something they could've (and should've) mentioned during basic training!! Keep it simple, just something brief, like: Listen up. You will be deployed into an area which utilizes nuclear reactor's at the >insert name/s here< power plant(s). _ ARE YOU PERMITTED TO _____ ?:_ - Calmly Seize Da! - Throw rocks Nyet! - Shoot-at Nyet! - Grenade Nyet! - Shell Nyet! - Rocket NYET! - Missile NYET! - Bomb Ni v koyem sluchaye!! [ In no circumstance, ever!! ] ... Granted, we've found out they're operating with very outdated maps -- because.... modern day cartography is hard?? ... naw, more likely, because some genius oligarch siphoned away the funds earmarked for that project! But I digress, point being, perhaps the maps they have only indicate it as a traditional 'power facility', as it hadn't been converted to nuclear? ๐Ÿค” Then again, such an endeavor, they probably would build from scratch as opposed to taking the already-much-needed generators offline in order to perform upgrades on a one by one basis. So I dunno lol Maybe they DO know and indeed, Russia is conducting operations based off the "Modern Terrorists Playbook for Dummies!"......... Or, maybe they just think they're only shelling more farmland...? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ Stupidity? Corruption? Pure negligence? ALL THREE match Russia's actions throughout this war, so take your pick.... You'll probably be right to some degree! ๐Ÿฅด Stay strong. Stay united. Stay alive. STAY UKRAINIAN! Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    3
  1050. 3
  1051. 3
  1052. 3
  1053. 3
  1054. 3
  1055. 3
  1056. 3
  1057. 3
  1058. 3
  1059. 3
  1060. 3
  1061. 3
  1062. 3
  1063. 3
  1064. 3
  1065. 2
  1066. 2
  1067. 2
  1068. 2
  1069. 2
  1070. 2
  1071. 2
  1072. 2
  1073. 2
  1074. 2
  1075. 2
  1076. 2
  1077. 2
  1078. 2
  1079. 2
  1080. 2
  1081. 2
  1082. 2
  1083. 2
  1084. 2
  1085. 2
  1086. 2
  1087. 2
  1088. 2
  1089. 2
  1090. 2
  1091. 2
  1092. 2
  1093. 2
  1094. 2
  1095. 2
  1096. 2
  1097. 2
  1098. 2
  1099. 2
  1100. 2
  1101. 2
  1102. 2
  1103. 2
  1104. 2
  1105. 2
  1106. 2
  1107. 2
  1108. 2
  1109. 2
  1110. 2
  1111. 2
  1112. 2
  1113. 2
  1114. 2
  1115. 2
  1116. 2
  1117. 2
  1118. 2
  1119. 2
  1120. 2
  1121. 2
  1122. 2
  1123. 2
  1124. 2
  1125. 2
  1126. 2
  1127. 2
  1128. 2
  1129. 2
  1130. 2
  1131. 2
  1132. ย @paulfredriksteinerย  The funny thing is, no matter what the final result is... Russia will be the only true loser! The world has turned their back on Russia. The only countries that want anything to do with you anymore is China and India.... maybe North Korea, just because "Hello new friend! We are social pariah, too!" ๐Ÿ˜ But seriously, even then, China doesn't actually give a shit about Russia, the only thing they are interested in is to make money off of them! I'm genuinely not sure if China would bother to ally with Russia if WWIII did start... India? Not sure they care much about Russia either, as their involvement with Russia is mainly for their military exports! (tanks, jets, etc) Politically, Russia is the laughing stock of the world. They flexed as being this mighty unstoppable force that was going to roll into Ukraine and have the keys handed over.... Well, how'd that work out for you? Then it was 3 months to take Ukraine..... Mmmm nope The only, and I genuinely mean only reason Russia has managed to gain the ground they have is due to numbers, and that's it. Superior fighters? NOPE! With western support, Ukrainian soldiers are proving to be far more capable! Russia just has more of them to throw to the slaughter. Superior weapons? NOPE! With western support, Russia is currently at a disadvantage in terms of who has the better assets. Russia just has more of them to deploy. Superior tactics? FUCK NO! Russia's deployment has been a shitshow from day 1. They've somehow managed to achieve a military milestones of most high-ranking officers killed on the front lines! Not to mention... things have been going so horrible that Fuhrer-Tsar Voldemort Puddin has also fired who knows how many and felt it necessary to make himself the commander of this war machine... Last but not least.... You trolls... You all have the worst (see: dumbest, lamest) comments... I sincerely hope it's because you don't REALLY believe in this war, and so you feign support by making the weakest possible effort you can, not in how your rhetoric actually impacts opinion, but simply in a hope it's enough to convince your Russian Troll Farm Overlords so you get paid... And let's be clear... we all hate Russia right now, but we DO NOT HATE RUSSIANS! Her people are not to blame, even the ones that are brainwashed into support. It's your government we despise and your leader. This is Putin's war, and he's only waging it because he's bored of life and wants some excitement.... how sad and disgusting is that? Rise up against Putin - Viva la Russoluciรณn! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    2
  1133. 2
  1134. 2
  1135. 2
  1136. 2
  1137. 2
  1138. 2
  1139. 2
  1140. 2
  1141. 2
  1142. 2
  1143. 2
  1144. 2
  1145. 2
  1146. 2
  1147. 2
  1148. 2
  1149. 2
  1150. 2
  1151. 2
  1152. 2
  1153. 2
  1154. 2
  1155. ย @thomaswinston5927ย  You should read my other replies in this thread. (it does, but simultaneously does not, surprise me that people will still reply to the main comment before reading what the OP might have discussed in the replies.) I'll cliffnote it though: - yes, of course I'm speculating, and involving feelings (both gut, and emotions) - you, as have others, misunderstand my sentiments: I'm responding in a tone that reflects the patronizing going on by our government, who has responded to this as though "gosh, this thing just came out of no where!" โ€“ which we all know is BS; therefore, why the feck did they take their sweet ass time? Anyways, my tone and speculation aside, I'm not an idiot like your seem to think. I even called it ON WED and THURS, exactly what they did on Friday! On Wed, I said how I don't get why they don't use an inert missile (no warhead) to deflate its balloon. Though... I further suggested using a helicopter or plane (ie the ones purpose built for this) to then "catch" it mid air, given such things have been developed for other purposes. On Thurs, after its location was updated and it had been mentioned they had no intention to shoot it down where it was, due to it now being over too populated of region. At which point I said I guarantee they'll wait until it's over the ocean, skip in-air capture, and retried it from the water. (one comment was on a CNN vid, the other an MSNBC vid; as you can see, I'm all for transparency) Which they did just that. ๐Ÿ˜ I think letting it slam into the water and incur damage, plus get soaked with salt water, maybe wasn't the best idea... but oh well. At least they made a large effort to retrieve it, which is what matters most.
    2
  1156. 2
  1157. 2
  1158. 2
  1159. 2
  1160. 2
  1161. 2
  1162. 2
  1163. 2
  1164. The funny (well, sad) thing is... [and you don't even need to take my word for it, since this first part is historically documented] In accordance with the Budapest Memorandum, it was agreed by all signing parties that in exchange for Ukraine giving up former-Soviet nuclear arms, Ukraine's sovereignty and, more importantly in this case, its BORDERS would remaine unchanged and intact, which would be ensured (protected) by Russia, the UK, and the US! The signers (those three) agreed to protect Ukraine against any form of invasion, not just by other countries, but also from the signers of this memorandum (Russia, the UK, or the US) trying to take over Ukraine. It further outlines other, equally relevant elements to this war -- such as vowing that no weapons made by the agreed parties will ever be used against Ukraine -- but the indisputable fact remains: Russia has broken this agreement in multiple ways, starting with the original invasion, then by the annexation of Crimea, changing the government in occupied regions, and Russian weapons being used to attack Ukraine... So EVEN IF what this channel reported on here was actually true, the free-world would STILL be in support of Ukraine and its people solely due to the fact that Russia had no legitimate reason to invade in the first place! Which is also ignoring every atrocity that came afterwards, and frankly, that only solidified our support Ukraine. There's just no way around it... even if Ukraine did use human shields: there plenty of damning evidence showing that Russia is on a scorched-earth campaign, by doing things like shelling/bombing regardless of whether there are even ANY Ukrainians there (i.e. farm fields, which have no trenches dug, or tank tracks across the terrain to illustrate something that might've been a target) Again I urge you, DON'T take MY word for it, please go read it for yourselves... ๐Ÿ™ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction#Budapest_Memorandum In the end, this war never needed to happen in the first place, and regardless of who wins, it will not benefit a single one of us common folk. ๐Ÿ˜ž โœŒ๏ธโค๏ธ๐ŸคŸ
    2
  1165. 2
  1166. 2
  1167. 2
  1168. 2
  1169. 2
  1170. ย @dankovac1609ย  First off: Any reply where the end-goal is to have a "civil conversation", is... well, awesome, and what we all should strive for! (at least, when the other[s] are not obvious trolls... lol) Even if it's a disagreement with what they've said, they're no reason one can't start off with: "I see where your coming from, but I'm not sure I can agree, because..... [>insert reasoning or your opinion; use sound logic, include any experience and/or relevant credentials you may have<]" Back on topic though, what you said had spurred a further thought โ€” It could very well, at least in part, be made the way it is, as... to use a cringey phrase... a " shock and awe" round. After all, it's: - visually bigger, by comparison to a regular RPG round - heavier, more room = more harm-doing stuff packed in, and obviously so, due to its now-arched trajectory - bright-ass red, so I imagine you can see it if positioned side-on, whilst it flies at your comrades - bigger and louder boom, different from anything else All together? The little-to-no-training Russians civilians in fatigues Soldiers must be thinking Ukraine now has been given some kind of new, yet strange and vibrantly colored, weapon.... "๐Ÿค” It doesn't fly, look, or act like an RPG AT-round... It sounds like one when launched, but doesn't when it goes off... Yet it does still have AT penetratration... But has a much bigger explosion, and with shrapnel... Except it's not a mortar, because clearly it's propelled... I mean honestly? It looks like they took a fire extinguisher, packed it full of plasticized explosive and ball bearings.... THEN after all of that, crammed an RPG in the middle! But that's just absurd, and nobody would do that, right? ๐Ÿ˜… ....R-right?! ๐Ÿคจ ๐Ÿ˜’ ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ ๐Ÿ˜ฐ๐Ÿ˜ข ๐Ÿฅบ . . . . B l y a t . . . . I WANNA GO HOooOOME!!! ๐Ÿ˜ญ" โ€“Intercepted Russian Phone Call, probably... ๐Ÿ˜ Sorry, I get carried away, but get a kick out of coming up with these absurd scenario conversations! ๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿคฃ (because look who you're talking to, and... โ˜๏ธ... yea, you needn't worry about the length of your reply... lol)
    2
  1171. 2
  1172. 2
  1173. 2
  1174. I had this same thought, and my idea was to basically borrow from the earth-based travel industry..... Presumably the commonality between the systems will be the mixture being breathed (I think they long since did away with pure oxygen?). So the life support connections will likely have an air inlet and outlet. Next, Suits will no doubt need power no matter which ship you're on (heating/cooling, small lights). So there will be some sort of power jack included next to the air exchange ports. The unknown for me is whether there will be waste disposal plumbing... Or if it'll be like Scott said, with a suit hatch that handles that. So if anyone happens to be utilizing a plumbing system with no external hatch (which I think you'd still want, as a backup), that kills my idea... Which my idea is... Why not just make adapters? lol We have "Travel Adapters" for power, after all! Doesn't seem far fetched to have a similar adapter for life support. The biggest issue here being power delivery, as some providers may not have a suit power bus that's intended to supply high current, whereas another provider's suit might need it. So even if the voltage has to be bucked or boosted, if the total supplied wattage by the bus is insufficient, that would also nix this... But yea, a small adapter box that routes air from their connection style, to yours, and also provides whatever power conversion from their bus to your suit's needs. ๐Ÿ‘ (of course, it'd be in everyone's best interest to standardize a port for this, regardless of which suit you're in, as needing to pack these various complex and heavy adapters for 2 different life support systems is a complete waste of mass budget...)
    2
  1175. 2
  1176. 2
  1177. 2
  1178. 2
  1179. 2
  1180. 2
  1181. 2
  1182. 2
  1183. 2
  1184. 2
  1185. 2
  1186. 2
  1187. 2
  1188. 2
  1189. 2
  1190. 2
  1191. 2
  1192. 2
  1193. 2
  1194. 2
  1195. 2
  1196. 2
  1197. 2
  1198. 2
  1199. 2
  1200. 2
  1201. 2
  1202. 2
  1203. 2
  1204. 2
  1205. 2
  1206. 2
  1207. 2
  1208. 2
  1209. 2
  1210. 2
  1211. 2
  1212. 2
  1213. 2
  1214. 2
  1215. 2
  1216. 2
  1217. 2
  1218. 2
  1219. 2
  1220. 2
  1221. 2
  1222. 2
  1223. 2
  1224. 2
  1225. 2
  1226. 2
  1227. 2
  1228. 2
  1229. 2
  1230. 2
  1231. 2
  1232. 2
  1233. 2
  1234. 2
  1235. 2
  1236. 2
  1237. 2
  1238. 2
  1239. 2
  1240. 2
  1241. 2
  1242. 2
  1243. 2
  1244. 2
  1245. ๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™ Stay strong. ๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™ Stay united. ๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’› Stay alive. ๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’› STAY UKRAINIAN! Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ ๐Ÿคž๐Ÿ˜ž๐Ÿคž Here's hoping that the great nations of the world come to their senses, realize that the Fuhrer-Tsar Voldemort Puddin is only waging this senseless war because he's BORED and not because he truly wants the land (we already know the "liberating" excuse was a complete lie), and collectively sends our troops to push Russia back across their pre-annexed borders!! When countless civilian deaths are caused by a war that has at least SOME semblance of an "arguable purpose" -- by that I mean, while it might not be 'right | logical | morally sound' it can at least be recognized/accepted as the driving force behind one side's actions -- then those deaths are (albeit, unfortunately) considered collateral-damage as opposed to senseless killings. HOWEVER, when civilians are killed due to a leader's junkie-like need for an adrenaline rush (a "fix")...... THAT IS DEFINED AS MURDER! It's 2022 for fucks sake! (sorry, necessary word choice) There's NO EXCUSE for your ordinance to drop on populated civilian areas/structures. Your arsenal should already be made up of 'Smart' weapons that can hit a target with an accuracy better than 15 meters, where I suspect even Soviet-era hardware would conceivably be able to hit within 150m... Alas, we see them dropping ordinance with what seems like an accuracy that instead gets measured in CITY BLOCKS! Thus, my conclusion that the targets are either hit due to carelessness or are their intentional targets, which is my justification for claiming that Russia is both attempting to and succeeding in committing murder of Ukrainians, and it needs to be stopped, N O W ! ! ! ๐Ÿคฌ๐Ÿคฌ๐Ÿคฌ
    2
  1246. 2
  1247. 2
  1248. 2
  1249. 2
  1250. 2
  1251. 2
  1252. 2
  1253. 2
  1254. 2
  1255. ย @zachnar0125ย  Yea people have lost sight of things... Admittedly, _shamefully_, I didn't know anything about Ukr before the invasion*, nevermind said memorandum... So when I did learn of it, damn that made me mad. (* a fact over which I've apologized to folk like Starsky, Denys Davydov, and any Ukrainian I've come across in comments; Starsky in particular has shown me that the sense of humor I have and which defines me as a person, is exactly the same as theirs... we are kindred spirits) SPECIFICALLY that the US and UK signed it and we've done nothing up until now, because you know damn well the ONLY reason we signed it was as an assurance to Ukr-then that we wouldn't let Ruz renege on the agreement... And what did they do? Reneged. And what did we do? Jack shit. ๐Ÿ˜ž Made me ashamed of my country. The words of that agreement, yes, only state that in any such situation where their sovereignty was threatened that we would only go to the UN on their behalf... However, the basis of that agreement, giving up their โ˜ข๏ธ arsenal and the very thing that would've protected them from such a situation, to ME that document was saying _"we'll protect you"_! And we didn't... ESPECIALLY when it was that very country who we were signing it with and simply to keep them in check... was the one doing the invading. ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ Anyways, sorry for ranting ๐Ÿฅด I'm sure the automoderation system will smite this comment down anyways (hence not using the full country name; I've found that for me, it's a trigger), but sometimes I get lucky, so maybe this is one of them! ๐Ÿคž๐Ÿ˜… ๐Ÿป edit: spelling error; also, the automoderation system have me a pass!!
    2
  1256. 2
  1257. 2
  1258. 2
  1259. 2
  1260. 2
  1261. #ThisIsFine ๐Ÿ˜” No no, please, #UN, don't make an effort to legitimately help put an end to this fucking madness... Is it because it's white-on-white inhumanity that makes it not merit your attention?? I don't care if that comes across sounding racist, because it's the furthest thing from the truth... I'm just pissed no one is physically getting involved, because why? You're worried about nukes...??? HE'S BLUFFING! Do you not see that him going nuclear would definitively get HIM killed?? Either by those in his government, those in his military, the civilians revolting, all three, or by a black ops hit squad... He is a mad man, yes. But he's an egotistical one who doesn't want to die! So where's his motivation? ESPECIALLY when all that you have to do is push Russia out of Ukraine. You don't have to go into Russia to stop the bulk of these atrocities! Hell, you don't even have to help with Crimea! Just unwind their 2022 progress and free up Ukraine's forces so that they can push into Crimea without worrying that Russia/Belarus will push in from the North or East. Russia doesn't recognize the UN's ICC (?whatever the war crimes investigative council is called) โ€”and yes, I know the US also doesn'tโ€” so claiming that you're "helping" because of that involvement, only makes YOU feel better, as it does jack shit to stop Russia from continuing to do this stuff to civilians! Because these soldiers can just go back to Russia and they're out of reach. Whereas you stepping in and capturing soldiers for illegally operating within sovereign Ukraine territory... THAT has a helpful impact here and now!
    2
  1262. This was originally a reply to someone but I felt deserved a wider audience; modified to fit this context... We involved parties definitely dropped the ball over the years, in aiding Ukraine's protection. I hadn't known of this specific agreement until just now, but yea... Seems like it's been completely forgotten about by the signing parties. ๐Ÿ˜• https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction#Budapest_Memorandum To anyone reading who is Ukrainian, or has Ukrainian family... I know this won't really mean much given I'm just a helpless citizen with no political influence.... But nevertheless, I deeply apologize for my country [๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ] not acting sooner, like Crimea annexation-sooner and preventing it. ๐Ÿ˜” Russia has violated that agreement multiple times now, and worse yet in my opinion, is that the other signatories have also violated it by failing to defend Ukraine in any truly meaningful way (up until 2022 at least) ... Offering money and monetary support is good, but defending... at least to me... implies every means possible! It's that kind of help which we're not providing, which is allowing this to go on longer than it should have... Every day Russia targets some other large building because... "Our intelligence claims it was housing military assets..." ๐Ÿ˜‘๐Ÿ™„ (or at least if asked, that'd be their excuse in order to justify it) So again I say... I'm sorry for America failing Ukraine. ๐Ÿ˜ž (I can't speak to the the UK, but I imagine anyone there would feel similarly after reading that link) Stay strong. Stay united. Stay alive. STAY UKRAINIAN! Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    2
  1263. 2
  1264. 2
  1265. 2
  1266. 2
  1267. 2
  1268. 2
  1269. 2
  1270. 2
  1271. 2
  1272. 2
  1273. 2
  1274. 2
  1275. 2
  1276. 2
  1277. 2
  1278. 2
  1279. 2
  1280. 2
  1281. 2
  1282. 2
  1283. 2
  1284. 2
  1285. 2
  1286. 2
  1287. 2
  1288. 2
  1289. 2
  1290. 2
  1291. 2
  1292. 2
  1293. 2
  1294. 2
  1295. 2
  1296. 2
  1297. 2
  1298. 2
  1299. 2
  1300. 2
  1301. 2
  1302. 2
  1303. I heard similar, from one of our other media outlets (would've been either CNN or MSNBC), but it was SO much more realistic... Indicating things like it's be the actual black market arms dealers who live in Ukraine, which legitimately could be native Ukrainians but just as easily could be superior of another nationality, and at no point was this other non-CBS implying or was the Ukrainian Government selling them! There is also, what I can only imagine has occurred at least once or twice (statistically speaking), where Russia had managed to capture some unfired Javelins and then RUSSIA gave it to some arms dealers just to ensure a finger could get pointed at Ukraine for possibly negligence, or worse, outright corruption. Personally, I choose to believe that any native Ukrainian arms dealers who are still in the country, that even despite their questionable morality, they would rather the county be under Ukrainian rule and therefore would actually be doing what they can to HELP! Hell, let's go truly "glass half full", by speculating that these same individuals may even go so far as to buy any of these weapons FROM the black market, to them use against Russian forces... ๐Ÿคž๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿคž (after all, the one report showed a dark web listing where a Javelin was only $13K USD, which as someone who doesn't have even close to that much money, I still think that's quite worth buying if it helps ensure the country remains free of Russian rule!) Stay strong. Stay united. Stay alive. STAY UKRAINIAN! Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    2
  1304. 2
  1305. 2
  1306. 2
  1307. 2
  1308. 2
  1309. 2
  1310. 2
  1311. 2
  1312. 2
  1313. 2
  1314. 2
  1315. 2
  1316. 2
  1317. 2
  1318. Their trolls flag our posts, which then puts us on the automoderation system's shitlist, but officially, we're technically not in timeout ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ I've been dealing with it for about a year now. You have to REALLY tiptoe on eggshells. Use vague references to people and places (I say Pudding Pants, Ruz, and Ukr; don't use their flags), and instead say things like "unalived", etc etc. Further tips: - Copy your Replies before posting, as they won't be visible to copy of they get hidden (they're actually not removed, just publicly invisible) - Exit that comment thread, wait 2 minutes and then go back in; if it's there still, everyone can see it. - If you're making a standalone comment, wait 45 seconds and then click on it; if it gives you an "Error loading comment" it's hidden, otherwise it's visible. IF hidden, edit it, copy the comment, cancel and start a new comment. Make minor edits to it to remove any buzzwords, then try again and repeat the steps. - If you notice COMPLETELY unrelated comments being removed elsewhere around YT (ie places unrelated to politics, news, world events), copy your comment, copy the video link, and send a YT Feedback. Give them the video link (for context), tell them your comment was removed without merit, and paste the comment for them to see. This won't do anything, BUT I've made it a mission to annoy the hell out of them with EVERY SINGLE COMMENT OF MINE THEY REMOVE! Some days they'll get a handful of feedbacks... Others, more. ๐Ÿ˜Ž (I have noticed it's been a LITTLE better for me since I started doing this, but I doubt they're reinstating the comment; I usually made corrections and reposted it anyways, telling them what minor change allowed it to remain visible) Welcome to the club. ๐Ÿป โ™ฅ๏ธ โœŒ๏ธ
    2
  1319. 2
  1320. 2
  1321. 2
  1322. 2
  1323. 2
  1324. 2
  1325. 2
  1326. 2
  1327. 2
  1328. ย @somebody700ย  Personally? NATO needing to send in troops has been something I've felt AND been saying, for just about three months now! ๐Ÿ˜ Coincidentally, I also said exactly what you are claiming is rumored about HIMARS, except I was suggesting it before HIMARS was on the table and havef US or NATO troops manning the artillery being sent (M777, etc; sparing Ukrainians 1mo+ of training, just to reach minimum "operational" level). TL;DR - Putin is an adrenaline junky and is getting his fix right now. He doesn't want it to end, especially in a way that would result in the loss of his power or life. Granted, operations have become spite-fueled, but only because we've shown that he can do that AND still get away with it, as he's been left unchecked since coming into power, and remains to be even to this day. However, he won't go nuclear unless we take it inside Russia. Stick to Ukraine, but certainly, send in those with the training to put a stop to this quickly, and with precision! That means NATO, F-16s, A-10s, etc! Only because I've come to multiple realizations about our tart bowl of Puddin... - First and foremost, he's bored these days, after having first lived a risky life in the Soviet spy agency doing whatever he did -- even if a desk job, data he'd sign off on would directly impact field agent's lives and undoubtedly have induced a chemically release (dopamine, adrenaline, etc) and therefore a slight natural-high, which is imagine would've increased as rising through the ranks would result in higher risk+reward scenarios that he experienced... As just about always is the case, that peak level can only satisfy a person's desires of the rush for so long. I figure, at that job, he had either reached the top or had sinking achieved the maximum thrill possible from it... as by that point I suspect he had been directly involved in the intel-gathering or planning of 'conflicts' engaged in between Russia/militias/governments/etc. What's more, it's this period was probably what really got him involved with the whole "Mafia" style of business that Russians have felt is the best way to run a government, or even an entire country (๐Ÿ˜”). That's getting ahead of ourselves though, as here, it's have been low level stuff, in order to "grease the wheels" so that things would happen they way they wanted/needed. Of course, by the end of his agency career, he no doubt had a least one credible threat to his life, which only fueled addiction cravings even more! Eventually? It was time for him to pursue a new position in government, one that would allow him to satisfy this now-larger itch he needed scratching: El Presidente! And thus, he became... This afforded him all manner of new thrilling risks to take, money to be made, ..... power, to make large groups of all armed people do what you tell them. ๐Ÿ˜’ _Roll the footage depicting crimes against humanity... _ Donny? The montage, Donny!! To.... try and cut out some rambling, we witness... egregious acts, seeds of corruption sewn, a phony display of being "all about the electoral process" where he doesn't get elected (but is effectively vice-pres), coming into power... again..., harvesting and re-sewing seeds of corruption, more (worse) egregious acts, rigging his reelection to remain in power, further egregious acts, another bountiful crop of corruption, egregious behavior that's once again unchecked, oh yea poisoning his oppositions over the years, and sprinkled throughout are him spending inordinate amounts of ill-gotten money on items and property... both to make him seem powerful/important, but also act as financial securities for when he needs them. I think we've covered most of the going-ons, and just now passed the "Annexation of Crimea" in this Timeline of Voldemort Puddin... =INTERMISSION= A LIKE-MINDED INDIVIDUAL BECOMES PRESIDENT OF A POWERFUL COUNTRY; POTENTIAL ALLY TO ASSIST IN PLANS OF WORLD DOMINATION? ALLY'S COUP ATTEMPT FAILS; ISN'T REELECTED. =END INTERMISSION= Well, he can't make it obvious that taking over Ukraine has hinged on the other president being in power again, so he waits... Subtly laying some groundwork to make things easier for what's to come, such as making Russia's free-press unable to report on certain activities, such as covering any space launches happening outside of Russia so that parallels cannot be so easily drawn and therefore won't make their hardware seem as interior or antiquated as it actually is. Now, future press-blackouts will not seem so out of place... Enter, Feb 2022: He needs another adrenaline fix and can't wait anymore... After all, his subordinates have all reported nothing but good news this entire time! Plenty of will trained troops. Stockpiles of well maintained ordinance, with plenty of far more advanced and new variants. Well maintained, capable and modernized ground and air equipment. Flawless logistics chain. Solid intelligence gathered about the enemy, concludes a short 3-day conflict before surrender and insertion of pro-Russian government within a month. Iron-clad cover story in place, told to both their own troops and the whole world; no shenanigans will happen, we promise. FF>> 3mos... things have gone off the rails! But, this turns out to be in Voldemort Puddin's favor! How thrilling that now he gets to fire so many inept generals, and become Supreme Commander of his military and their campaign: all hail Fuhrer-Tsar Voldemort Puddin ๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ BUT, again, this is fun for him now... Why would he want to stop it or do anything to prevent it continuing?? He still has goals: take over Ukraine, at least in some part. This in turn means that to use nukes, even small tactical yield artillery shells, would render their newly occupied territory completely unusable in random pockets. That would cause even further problems since those pockets would need to be (rather, should be) avoided, and that isn't always possible OR conducive during a battle. Strategic nukes would end up being either, political suicide at best, or result in his death at worst... But he had to much to live for, so he isn't about to take THAT sort of risk! Which, it would take invasion OF Russia for his subordinates to be onboard with that level of stupidity... They also are the ones feeding him lies to save their own asses, so certainly they know how bad things really look, and what it'd mean for them if they didn't try to stop him if it came to it... In other words yea, I think NATO should officially deploy! As long as we limit it to taking back Ukraine -- which involves Crimea -- while not setting foot inside Russia's borders (those formally recognized by the world). I'd love to stick it to them on their side, to teach Putin that his actions have consequences... but it's more important right now to make Ukraine whole and safe! At the very least, offer government-merc programs where we're not officially sanctioning deployment, but don't expect mass volunteering either, so to offer compensation for those who do. (officially label it lend-lease for all I care lol) So send A-10s, F-16s, F-22s, F-35s, BOnes, whatever! Just so long as the pilot in the cockpit has about a thousand hours training already. To do otherwise, would genuinely be an unnecessary loss of life (and hardware, but that's trivial by comparison), which is precisely why I wish NATO would get involved in that capacity: to stop, or at least lessen, the current unnecessary losses of life that are happening on a daily basis! Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    2
  1329. 2
  1330. 2
  1331. 2
  1332. 2
  1333. 2
  1334. 2
  1335. 2
  1336. 2
  1337. 2
  1338. I'd like to say, that those of us who DO understand that this is Putin's war, do NOT hate the Russian people for his mess... no matter WHAT your governmentt-controlled news says! Even if you are believing everything your news says and are supporting your country... We understand, and forgive you! Some of my fellow Americans (even my own family, my mother) were recently deceived in a similar way, convinced to follow a foolish man and believed the lies he told -- and still tells. BUT those that saw their error and stopped supporting him, we've forgave them for it! MANY of your soldiers, but especially your government, has to be punished for the horrible things that they are doing in Ukraine and to her people. The method right now of punishing your government, unfortunately also is hurting innocent Russian people, and we're sorry for that... but I repeat: our hate, our fight, is only for those in charge of Russia, not with the Russian People! And I know at least some of your fellow Russians in these comments do not believe what you're being told about this ""special military operation"" -- it is actually a 'war', but you are not allowed to say that word, and you should be suspicious of why your government doesn't allow you to say things or else you get arrested (that's something you can mention to anyone who believes in Putin's actions, and ask why that's acceptable) -- and so it's you who are the key to helping your country! Convince more that we (people of the West) do not hold a grudge against Russia's people. Find topics they are interested in, search YouTube for videos about those topics. Then find important differences between the information in those videos and compare it to what your news does not talk about, which you can then show to those people! Because if your state news is willing to leave out details on a topic like that, what else are they not telling you, or have been telling you instead? (An example is SpaceX. They have reusable rockets [thr Falcon 9], that land themselves after launching, to be refueled and launched again... Similar to a car, in a sense. But Russian state news doesn't share that, instead tries to portray them as a failing company, showing just the failures during testing. The "Falcon Heavy" landing video is even more impressive, even for me and I have seen it multiple times!) Once you get more people understanding how your news is misleading everyone, then any of them with family in the military, can begin convincing their soldiers of what's wrong. Soldiers convince more soldiers... and soon you, the people of Russia, have power to remove Putin and his oligarchs from their positions of power! Give Russia's power to who rightfully deserve it: her people! Show the world that you are NOT the cruel people that Putin has made you act like. That you are not WEAK when you're fighting for a cause you believe in, just as the Ukrainians are in their fight to keep their freedom! Slava Ukraini! โœŠ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐ŸŒป Viva la Russoluciรณn! โœŠ ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ‘งโ€๐Ÿ‘ฆ
    2
  1339. 2
  1340. 2
  1341. 2
  1342. 2
  1343. 2
  1344. 2
  1345. 2
  1346. 2
  1347. OMG ๐Ÿคฏ With the advent of 360ยฐ and VR video.... How effing incredible would it be to have the ability, as a viewer, to pan around the scene as you watched an episode of Mythbusters?!?! ๐Ÿฅน Just as an easy example for anyone not familiar with those video types: for SpaceX's most recent Super Heavy+Starship test launch they uploaded a 360 video, where are you watch on your phone, you can physically move you phone around and it virtually moves the camera, because special cameras can capture all angles simultaneously. So in this example, as the rocket goes up, you have to follow it up with your phone. (act as though you're filming and trying to keep it in frame) What that means is you could be looking "behind you", opposite of the action, to see what's happening all around... So imagine an episode of Mythbusters and being able to look around and see crew reactions as an event happens, โ€“ORโ€“ being able to track a piece of debris that otherwise would be flying off screen due to the a conventional camera being static! <insert Futurama's Philip J Frye Shutup and take my money!" meme HERE> If YouTube and Discovery were smart, they'd fund a 6-episode special Mythbusters series, utilizing that tech! Adam had one said how much of a game changer 'GoPro' cameras were... Well, now done of those have that 360 capture, as well as the EVEN SMALLER (thumb sized) 'Insta360 GO' camera! ๐Ÿ˜‰๐Ÿ‘ (I know a reunion thing had been in the works, but Grant's untimely passing robbed everyone's motivation... But maybe they'd be willing to with something small like this? ๐Ÿคž๐Ÿ˜Œ๐Ÿคžโ™ฅ๏ธ)
    2
  1348. 2
  1349. 2
  1350. 2
  1351. 2
  1352. 2
  1353. 2
  1354. 2
  1355. 2
  1356. 2
  1357. 2
  1358. 2
  1359. 2
  1360. 2
  1361. 2
  1362. 2
  1363. 2
  1364. 2
  1365. 2
  1366. 2
  1367. 2
  1368. 2
  1369. 2
  1370. 2
  1371. 2
  1372. 2
  1373. 2
  1374. 2
  1375. 2
  1376. 2
  1377. 2
  1378. 2
  1379. 2
  1380. 2
  1381. 2
  1382. 2
  1383. 2
  1384. 2
  1385. 2
  1386. 2
  1387. 2
  1388. 2
  1389. 2
  1390. 2
  1391. 2
  1392. 2
  1393. 2
  1394. 2
  1395. 2
  1396. 2
  1397. 2
  1398. 2
  1399. 2
  1400. 2
  1401. 2
  1402. 2
  1403. 2
  1404. 2
  1405. 2
  1406. 2
  1407. 2
  1408. 2
  1409. 2
  1410. 2
  1411. 2
  1412. Seriously, that "selector override" issue, to me, trumps all the other ones (a close second is the wobbly front rail)! Which I think I'll affectionately dub it "fucked-off mode", for the obvious reason that the selector has 'fucked-off' and is doing its own thing, irrespective of the guns designed operating modes... AND EVEN IF the gun operates just fine in fucked-off mode, the reason it's so severe is because it prevents YOU from being able to operate it! If it's only as minor as the first instance in the video, just barely hanging passed the frame, then genuinely that's not impeding anything. HOWEVER, if it fucks-off like it did when more force was applied (ie selecting in a panic; @ 45ยฐ) or like it was in the photo where it's now parallel with the pistol grip (@ 90ยฐ)... Both of those I feel are apt to get you killed, and here's why: @ 45ยฐ you are likely going to encounter it with your finger whilst trying to get it wrapped around the trigger to repel whomever, causing you to have to look down at it to see WTF. At which point either you're calm enough, and savvy enough -- you aren't, and, you're not -- to quickly ignore it by getting your finger behind it, at which point, only your squad mate has died due to your selector having fucked-off. But as mentioned, you're not calm or savvy due to being a conscript under fire, so not knowing if that'll cause a problem, now you take the time to move it back, but now you've safed your gun, meaning you bumble around to get it into any fire mode... but, now you and your squad mates are dead! @ 90ยฐ it's much the same, except now it's fucking uncomfortable or downright painful to operate, thanks to that superfluous tab at the end of the selector which protrudes out and is now digging into your palm... So either you again, bumble around to rectify it having fucked-off almost literally to Australia, and squad mates die, or, you put up with it causing your accuracy to suffer and... again, you all die... And! While typing that, I further realized the possibility that your selector now has TWO protrusions to be lovingly snagged on, potentially wrenching it into a fire mode (although, I say this out of pure ignorance, having no idea how stiff those are to actuate). If they had to make a new stamping-die to make the new selector... why not just eliminate the original tab, and half the selector along with it?? I'm mean sure, weapon familiarity, but c'mon... ๐Ÿ˜• (I have a better mechanism for the folding butt, too, but I've lived up to my name enough the way it is! Kudos to anyone who has gotten this far!)
    2
  1413. 2
  1414. 2
  1415. 2
  1416. 2
  1417. 2
  1418. 2
  1419. 2
  1420. 2
  1421. 2
  1422. Here's a thought... We leave it [creation of a "tribunal"] up to the people! ๐Ÿ˜ Which people? I'd say the entire population of Earth, but that would be a difficult task, since most likely half the planet isn't aware of the war or know nothing other than there is one (either due to rural life and intl news doesn't reach them, or their local news not reporting on it for some reason, or similar). Therefore, leave it to the people of the countries which are involved, determined by: - countries who have troops fighting (Russia, Ukraine, Chechnya, ~Belarus, others?) - countries who have sent financial aid (monetary or deducted through owed debts) to any of the participating countries listed in the first bulleted item (too many to list); likely this support is at taxpayer's expense - countries who have sent military equipment (weapons, vehicles, medical supplies intended for troop use) to any of the participating countries listed in the first bulleted item (too many to list); likely this support is at taxpayer's expense - countries who have sent humanitarian aid (monetary, food, or any other supplies intended for civilians) to any of the participating countries listed in the first bulleted item (too many to list); likely this support is at taxpayer's expense - countries who have officially abstained from involvement, but have had any form of support provided by a company which is headquartered or has manufacturing facilities in said country (not certain if they've official abstained, but Turkey comes to mind; Byraktars); the citizens would be the ones employed at these places, so they should get a say regarding what their work is going towards (even if that work is making the company a profit, so that it is capable of sending financial support) - etc, etc We're all the ones who bare the load from this and feel the impact. Those in our governments do not (at least in the third-party participant countries), as they are connections and wealth. Food or supply shortage, fuel price increases, or gas supply issues resulting in concern about whether there will be heat during the winter, all have minimal impact on those in power, regardless of what country you're in! Therefore, the decision for a tribunal ought to be left to those impacted, especially those directly impacted like Ukrainians and even Russians. This is a war which has far-reaching impacts, even on those who have not a clue as to what's happening, which is why the everyday people need to be who decides. Because some of our governments have shown that they don't quite represent their people's interests, despite claiming their actions are, and can't be relied on in a situation like this (the UN has done precious little to help out or to end things, for example). [/rant] Stay strong. Stay united. Stay alive. STAY UKRAINIAN! Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    2
  1423. 2
  1424. 2
  1425. 2
  1426. 2
  1427. 2
  1428. I'm all for keeping an open mind for this kind of thing, but Gaetz and MTG โ€“two of the most toxic politiciansโ€“ bring a huge yikes-factor to this otherwise legitimate proposal. BUT, you made some good points. The one you made in the intro is certainly very eyebrow raising! Just goes to show that, regardless of which side you're affiliated with, our government is quite fucked up... Things that should-be, or that you'd think to be common-sense, aren't, when it comes to our government. (yet, the same can be said for alot of us, as well, so it's really our problem as a whole society) I'm a unicorn though... I'm a gun-owning Democrat. (almost 15) That being said, what I've seen in just the last year, our youth has unfortunately proven to us that they aren't in the necessary mindset and lack the required discipline to be owners of certain gun types. No, it's not a problem with every single person of youth, but it's enough of them that have made it a dangerous problem. As such, I see no legitimate reason why assault-grade weapons can't have the same limitation that is put on alcohol and legal drug use: 21. Is even be alright with a system where an 30+ adult will vouch for a youth, to buy weapons, but where they become just as liable for punishment if said youth does something stupid. Just provides that extra bit of critical thinking on whether that kid's desire to own one, is for the right reasons (since obviously, anyone willing to go on a rampage isn't going to care what their own punishment is [if they live through it], whereas a cosigner definitely would) Want to own a hunting rifle? I'm all for it! 5 shots is more than adequate, and if it isn't, then it should be motivation for you to practice, not motivation to own a gun with a high capacity magazine. Whereas shotguns earn themselves a bit more freedom just through their inherent lack of accuracy (at higher distances; even rifled shottys suffer), so 8 shells isn't a big deal. Anyways, bring on the hate. ๐Ÿ˜Ž It's just as much your right to dislike my opinion and voice it, as it is my right to have an opinion and voice it! ๐Ÿ˜‰๐Ÿ‘ โœŒ๏ธโœŒ๏ธ
    2
  1429. 2
  1430. 2
  1431. 2
  1432. 2
  1433. 2
  1434. 2
  1435. 2
  1436. 2
  1437. 2
  1438. 2
  1439. 2
  1440. 2
  1441. 2
  1442. 2
  1443. 2
  1444. 2
  1445. 2
  1446. 2
  1447. 2
  1448. 2
  1449. ย @afridgetoofar1818ย  I can't fault you for not wanting to read my message and follow the pathing. However, how aren't you a troll? No sane person or democratic country is siding with Russia in this war, so why are you? I mean I already agreed with you that they're currently winning... The problem is, we're only talking about their status during the initial part of the war up to now. The score is not a clean sweep like your making it out to be, as their current situation that is only thanks to a decent initial push... However, they HAD a lot more territory in the north east, but somehow managed to lose it! That was back when they weren't even properly supplied yet, either! Plus, let's not forget the enormous "lawl wut?!" in the room... The fact that Russia has managed to lose something like a dozen of their GENERALS! That many top brass getting killed (or succumbing to injuries) is literally unprecedented, especially in modern times with the level of communicative Russia should've had at their disposal... This isn't even counting the however many, 6? 8? that ended up being fired by ol Puddin! That alone shows you the ineptitude of the Russian military! But THEN they lose not one, but TWO flagship naval vessels. ๐Ÿ˜ณ I could then bring up the fact that Ukraine has manage to double their armor thanks to this rampant ineptitude, through capturing Russia's own armor, sometimes having been just abandoned due to running out of fuel! Or what about the some-33,000 soldiers killed, or even better, that some soldiers are surrendering.... Pfft "winning"... Get the fuck out of here with that! ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ This is very very much a chess match war, and I personally think I'm starting to see how Ukraine is going to be playing it after what's been going on the last few weeks. Which is why a smart person won't boast about Russia's CURRENT status in the war, because I'm only in agreement with you based on land gain! In the real world, Russia is losing, and quite badly, in part because of the list of reasons I've already given. Again, though, that was facing a Ukraine that was weaker than they are now... and as their allies become more and more impressed on how they handle themselves, and more and more confident in their abilities, they're going to be lending better and better toys. So it very much isn't about how this have gone thus far, no, it's now only about the end result! Which right now, if you don't factor in occupied territory, Russia is losing badly... it's only when you include it that things appear better, but ONLY is that an appearance. ๐Ÿ˜‰ So yea. Preach their current standing all you want. Because that "winning" status right now is but only by a fractional amount! Which they're only managing because of a) having a greater number in the beginning, and b) having no morals, which means they have no qualms about killing civilian's (you know, those same people they were supposedly liberating?), and doing so with weapons that most civilized countries have agreed shouldn't be used due to collateral damage or causing inhumane suffering. To bring this to a close... The reality is, that even if Russia were to take the ENTIRETY of Ukraine... RUSSIA HAS STILL LOST Because this war has lost them any shred of trust or respect the rest of the world has for them, and will remain gone for at least as long as Puddin draws a breath. ๐Ÿ˜ Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ Viva la Russoluciรณn - rise up against your tyrannical oppressor! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ [thus concludes my longest comment ever]
    2
  1450. 2
  1451. 2
  1452. 2
  1453. 2
  1454. 2
  1455. 2
  1456. 2
  1457. 2
  1458. 2
  1459. 2
  1460. 2
  1461. 2
  1462. 2
  1463. 2
  1464. 2
  1465. โ€‹ย @cbalan777ย  I think the mixup is your usage of "dull". Dull knife is still "sharp" as it can still cut you very easily, but it doesn't good through stuff with ease. Sounds like you're talking about something that is more akin to being "blunt"... Somewhere between a letter opener and "dull". However, dull and blunt can still cut you, but they indeed are far worse. I was helping my neighing remove the mower blade from his rider's deck, as he hit a rock and it left jagged piece protruding from it... said protrusion was arguably dull. Yet, as the nut came off, I slipped, and sort of filleted the back of my hand on it. Only about 1.25in gash, but it penetrated and cut me good, except I didn't feel it. Wasn't until me neighbor pointed out I was bleeding profusely that I was even aware of the fact! lol I needed stitches and got a scar (and very very minor nerve damage). A bandaid would NOT have sufficed Whereas, I cut myself numerous times with VERY sharp knives, and sometimes deep; however, because the cut is SO CLEAN, I've learned I do not need stitches, I just need a bandaid and Neosporin. Leave it on for 2-3 days before changing it to ensure it has started to heal. These rarely leave scars. I've learned to not goto the urgent care for stitches in these because when I DID one, I got stitches, and it left a scar! But yea, the sharper the better, as it might cut deeper but it'll do "less damage", which means it'll heal better and faster. The best scalpels now use Sapphire blades for this exact reason: insanely sharp, heals super fast AND cleanly (comparative to a metal scalpel). But otherwise, as my previous comment attests to, a "blunt" object is perfect for opening boxes! So I can agree with you there, that sharp is not needed at all.
    2
  1466. 2
  1467. Thank you, Adam. Sincerely :) It has taken me until this video -- mind you, this was never something on my mind except during the MB episode, and now while watching this -- to understand why the conveyor belt is COMPLETELY MOOT for impacting a plane's ability to flat out move, nevermind generate enough momentum to generate lift and take off!! [ TL; DR - It all comes down to the fact the plane has un-powered wheels that can spin at whatever speed the ground (conveyor) is moving. That, alone, negates whatever speed the conveyor belt might travel at, and from there it's the fact the plane moves due to its propeller as the reason why it'll be able to take off 99.999% of the time! ] Even in your explanation here, I was still in the "it's impossible" mindset, adamantly so, up till halfway through the video when... *CLICK* it hit me... It doesn't matter that the ground is moving. Even if it were moving at twice the speed the plane was traveling! The wheels on the plane are FREE SPINNING, and as such, the plane gives zero sh...irts... about what the ground is doing. Why? Because it comes back to what you said about what makes the CAR move... Friction! There is not enough friction generated between the moving ground (conveyor belt) to impart any meaningful backwards force on the airplane, to negate it's forward momentum. The analog here for that to work would be to replace the conveyor belt with wind speed, and to impart the same amount of forward momentum as tail-wind. BUT EVEN THEN, it's a word-game, just as you said!!! Because now it comes down to: "Are you talking about forward speed (momentum), or are you talking about air speed traveling under the wings?" in the context of determining how much tail-wind to generate. Since the propeller is also adding a bit of lift (at least depending on the type of plane. Some have the propellers or even turbine engines, positioned almost entirely above the wing in order to assist in shorter takeoff distances. ===== Anyways, that's the end of my explanation from why it FINALLY makes sense for me :) That being said, in true Mythbusters fashion, now it's time to REPLICATE THE EXPECTED RESULTS! I can indeed think of at least one way in which the plane would not be able to "take off" if the surface it was on, was moving.... and that relies on the condition of it being the ENTIRE RUNWAY that's moving -- in other words, an aircraft carrier. Granted, in this case, if keeping the same Ultralight Aircraft... it'd be more of a Dinghy in size. Still, if on an average temperature and zero-wind day, that plane needs [Arbitrary Number Alert] 50ft of runway to gain the needed 25mph for take off... and you replaced it with a 50ft long falt-decked-boat that has enough horsepower to accelerate at a significant speed... THEN the runway would run out and that plane would plummet a couple feet down into the water! :) In the Myth's case, it's the fact the conveyor belt is basically infinitely long in which the plane has no issue taking off. Only until you limit it to being "the same distance that it would usually take off in", does the plane fail. Another way might be to have replaced the wheels, with skis/pontoons, and tried taking off under the same conditions. Were those apparatus would've, due to being stationary, given the conveyor significant enough friction to pull the plane backwards. But again, word play, and that wasn't how the myth was worded, and the majority of planes on Earth use wheels for that exact reason: lower coefficient of friction! :D
    2
  1468. ย @tracruzย  Ah, but you see, here's the fundamental component you have overlooked - THE WHEELS ARE IRRELEVANT! Seriously. This could be performed with skis and now you have nothing that rotates! There no circumference to apply, hell, there's no rotation going on now... It's physics, as you said. The conveyor belt and the wheels are a mental "red herring" in a sense, because we humans are land travelers by nature and our feet are like a vehicle wheels, our leg muscles like an engine. So as we walk, it's like a car engine turning wheels and we move. A plane, it's the PROPELLER that is akin to our feet, the wheels are only they're to help counteract gravity by providing a lower friction against the ground, so that the engines need less initial power to brute force the plane across the ground. ๐Ÿ˜€ Also, an "infinitely powerful vehicle pulling the plane", as long as: 1] the vehicle was not also on the conveyor belt 2] the conveyor speed matched the plane's Then, the plane wouldn't even NEED its engine to take off. However, if you are implying that the tow vehicle would be on the belt, too, then we'd cause a crash... lol Because the plane is going to pull itself through the air with its propeller, gain speed, and crash into the tire vehicle which would be sitting still (provided belt speed matches vehicle's wheel speed). It's a good counter argument, and I appreciated the thought put in, as it in turn required me to think on order to debunk it. But yea, low-friction skis in place of wheels is crux to your argument ๐Ÿฅด๐Ÿ˜Š Just as a bonus thought for you, consider this: planes can even take off from a steep incline, as their engines are able to fight gravity and allow them to gain enough speed, permitting their wings to generate the necessary lift for them to then... takeoff! ๐Ÿค˜
    2
  1469. 2
  1470. 2
  1471. 2
  1472. 2
  1473. 2
  1474. 2
  1475. 2
  1476. 2
  1477. 2
  1478. 2
  1479. 2
  1480. 2
  1481. I'm onboard with the standardizing of terms for differentiating them. However, I do have to ask: wouldn't this technically be called AK-12 Gen 2 Version 1, with the updated one you mentioned being AK-12 Gen 2 Version 2 Why? Well, "AK-12", for obvious reasons But "Gen 2" because technically there WAS an earlier (pre-2015?) AK-12 that had been fully developed but a combination of military dislike of certain aspects (cost being one of them, but apparently the more M4-like thumb safety/fire-select as well), and failing acceptance trials, it was mostly scraped. They then decided to keep certain aspects about it, such as the 2-shot burst, electronic optics and night vision attachment (which Brandon lacks), floating barrel, and new gas block/port (apparently 'adjustable'). Then "Ver 1" (version) for being the first released variant, where subsequent variants can step up another number, or minor differences can even step by a smaller decimal of one wants (but that's asking for confusion). The question would then become, whether or not including the caliber is necessary? It comes in both 5.45mm or 7.62mm, with only the barrel needing to be swapped. It seems unnecessary to bother indicating that, though, since everything about the gun (apparently) is identical parts. But yea, I don't know how many of the prior "generation" were made, or whether they were provided to any infantry in limited numbers, and if so whether any still survived after it was canceled... If the answer is anything like "less than five exist", I doubt it's worth the trouble to differentiate, and if anything they can be dubbed "prototype". So that's my non-expert 2 cents on the matter! โ˜บ๏ธ๐Ÿฅด
    2
  1482. 2
  1483. Please, Biden, I beg of you as one of your people... stop letting Russia dictate the terms, and SEND IN OUR TROOPS! Voldemort Puddin has threatened using neighborhood buster tactical nukes, but there's so many factors that make even that so unlikely... even with how unhinged he is!! For starters, "war" has not been declared, so it's not within his power to issue the use of them (not that "what's in writing" means anything to them; see "Budapest Memorandum" where they, along with the US and UK, agreed to PROTECT Ukraine from invasions). So he'd be liable to get ousted of he did... Then there's the BIGGER fact that Puddin wants the land, for his people to live on and farm... Irradiating even pockets of land serves no purpose, and arguably pockets would be worse since you'd still be effectively making large areas needing to be No Man's Land. I think the cockup with their soldiers entrenching into the land around Chornobyl, had taught them a valuable lesson about what sort of ramifications they're are when it comes to radiation! There's also the issue of wind and that it could blow radiation back across the border into Russia. Then, going so far as to think he'd try strategic nukes... Yea, he might be paranoid, but being paranoid is also a good sign, because it means he wants to stay alive! Using strategic nukes would certify his death. If not through a retaliatory nuke, then through someone in his own government, because we know they would want to stay living, and he'll have shown to no longer be trustworthy. While important, I personally believe that the use of a tactical size nuke in this situation, when all the US is doing would be providing manpower for driving back Russia, that it would be a show of weakness as opposed to strength. "We stand no chance holding back the US infantry, our military would be cut to shreds, so we have to ruin the land in order to defeat them." Yes, so stronk... That's like picking a fight, and the person's bigger brother turns up, and suddenly you're not as much of a badass like you've bragged about... so you decide to run the bigger brother over with your car. ๐Ÿ™„ But I digress, we can once again sit back, sending only hardware for their dwindling and tired forces to utilize, hoping they can at least stop Russia from taking anyMORE ground... and then pray Russia doesn't do this again in another 5-10 years.... SPOILER: THEY ABSOLUTELY WILL! If not with Ukraine, it'll be against some other neighbor. Because we'll have shown to be complacent by that point! (unless we have some black ops shit going down right now, I do feel we're being complacent even with everything we're supplying -- which is all that's keeping Ukr's head above water right now, but isn't nearly enough, unfortunately). In the end, I think it's worth the risk by sending troops. They are not to cross into Russia (that would be war), and to play it safe, can't come within 2.5mi of it. But if we let this continue, this are only going to get a lot worse, and the "bread basket" issue will only be the start! (especially if Russia gains any sort of foothold as a grain source in the world market) If we end up in the apocalypse, I'll be able to hold my head high by knowing we at least stood up for someone's freedom. O7 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Ukrainians: Stay strong. Stay united. Stay alive. STAY UKRAINIAN! Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    2
  1484. 2
  1485. 2
  1486. 2
  1487. 2
  1488. 2
  1489. 2
  1490. 2
  1491. 2
  1492. 2
  1493. 2
  1494. 2
  1495. 2
  1496. 2
  1497. 2
  1498. 2
  1499. ย @CptJistuceย  Yea, it's unfortunate. I'm on the autoKaren shitlist as well, although I recently got them to relax her grip on me after I went absolutely ballistic in a feedback. The system removed my 2 sentence comment on Alex's video that went live on Veteran's Day, where all I did was thank him, along with all the other men and women in the comments, for their service... (I dropped so many f-bombs in that feedback lol I was genuinely pissed) It'd be one thing if they INFORMED us about our comment being moderated, whether it by the automoderation system or a channel's human moderator/owner... but they don't. The only way we find out is either being summoned back through a notification and seeing it's gone, or to wait the 45s it takes and refresh (on mobile, you just need to leave that thread and come back, as that 'refreshes' the comments in it). As much as I hate being on this side of it... I still can't say that it's not necessary. There's are definitely times where people deserve to have their comment(s) removed, or even their account jailed. Problem is, the majority of us are on said shitlist for illegitimate reasons. Myself, for example, I'm on it because Russians dislike my pro-Ukr sentiments and report me (us) for them. In this instance, the automoderation system has been literally weaponized against innocent people. That's not how YT intended the system to be used! Which when the Dislike video count was abused, they disabled it... Kinda sounds like they need to address this, too. ๐Ÿ˜ Anyways, happy Thanksgiving, to you and everyone else here. ๐Ÿป [/Thanksgiving Ramble]
    2
  1500. 2
  1501. 2
  1502. 2
  1503. 2
  1504. 2
  1505. ย @DazHotep6EQUJ5ย  ....You don't even stop to think about the stuff you're parroting, do you....? ๐Ÿ˜’ TL;DR - Think of it this way, instead: Swearing == Same-Sex Marriage LEFT? Go for it! Whatever makes you happy! RIGHT? UNACCEPTABLE! You filthy heathen! Not that you'll read this, but I'll make the effort and hope you do, so allow me to break it down with definitions of the words... Left = Liberal ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  Liberal = ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  1. willing to respect or accept behavior or opinions ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  different from one's own; open to new ideas. ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  2. relating to or denoting a political and social philosophy ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  that promotes individual rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise. ย ย ย ย  Similar: "tolerant", "unprejudiced", "unbigoted" Right = Conservative ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  Conservative = ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  1. averseย to change or innovation and holding traditional values. ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  2. (in a political context)ย favoringย free enterprise, private ownership, andย sociallyย traditional ideas. Similar: "unchanging", "traditionalist" IN THIS context... "The Left" โ€“or 'rabid left' as you put itโ€“ would have ABSOLUTELY NO ISSUES with swearing, because they realize that censoring swear words isn't keeping with modern times (it's not progressive thinking). Whereas "The Right" would be HIGHLY OFFENDED by such language, as traditionally those things were never spoken except by lower class people. Or to dumb it down for you even further... Swearing == Same-Sex Marriage LEFT? Go for it! Whatever makes you happy! RIGHT? UNACCEPTABLE! You filthy heathen! edit: fixed formatting errors
    2
  1506. 2
  1507. 2
  1508. 2
  1509. 2
  1510. 2
  1511. 2
  1512. 2
  1513. 2
  1514. 2
  1515. 2
  1516. 2
  1517. 2
  1518. 2
  1519. 2
  1520. 2
  1521. 2
  1522. 2
  1523. 2
  1524. 2
  1525. 2
  1526. 2
  1527. 2
  1528. 2
  1529. 2
  1530. 2
  1531. 2
  1532. 2
  1533. 2
  1534. 2
  1535. 2
  1536. 2
  1537. 2
  1538. 2
  1539. 2
  1540. 2
  1541. 2
  1542. 2
  1543. 2
  1544. 2
  1545. 2
  1546. 2
  1547. ย @markbirmingham6011ย  A fair and arguably accurate assessment, yes. In a reply to someone I'd made a few days back, who deemed abortions as "murder", the initial way I had classified an abortion (and fetus, by association; pre said 'viable' point), was that of being an "abdominal growth removal". An admittedly much less crass way to refer to it than my boiling it down so far as to say "parasitic". That's all said is to mean: yes, autonomy over one's body is basic human right that's been taken away. Which, yea yea, the knee-jerk counter to that would obviously be "isn't that the same thing happening when an abortion is performed?" To which I'd say: not until the fetus has reached the aforementioned viable gestational period. The whole issue is that it's long been framed that having a child with someone is "bringing a life into this world". I think that's the best mindset to be in when thinking about this. Back in the day (mmm pre-1800s?), before the world's population kept growing exponentially, the thought of terminating any life was -- at least to me -- justified just by the fact that it was so easy for a life to be lost due to what we now think of as 'trivial ailments'. Hopefully this .gov link doesn't flag my post, but it really illustrates what I mean (which they seem to agree with my 1800s date): https://info.nicic.gov/ces/2020/global/population-demographics/worldometers-world-population-clock Switch to present day, and there's 8-friggen-billion of us. An upset in just I've country (Ukraine) ends up throwing the worldwide food supply out of balance. We already have enough issues with poverty, mouths to feed, and people who are in both situations but still don't care enough to use protection, ending up bringing another 1, 2, 3 lives into the world. Then, done of those who aren't able to cope with getting an abortion (which I can emphasize with, despite the impression I may have given), put their child up for adoption... Either because they flat out didn't want a child, weren't ready to be a parent, or didn't feel they could give them the life they feel they deserved. And frankly, that's their right to have the child and put it into the system. There are plenty of people who are unable to have children, but would like one. However, even if that number is far greater than the number of children in our system... THERE'S FAR MORE available in the worldwide adoption system! That's not the only takeaway... The more relevant one is its "their right" to make that choice. So where's the logic in taking away someone else's right to have an abortion? Where's the fairness in it... In a FREE COUNTRY, like the US was up until overturning RvW, you should have the freedom to choose. - Do not agree with abortions, for whatever reason (be it religious or otherwise)? You are not required, nor obligated, to ever have one! You are even free to not associate with anyone who has had one, or supports them, if you feel that strongly. - Are ambivalent on the matter? You are free to have the child and give it up for adoption! You are also free to include yourself as the birth parent, should that person want to seek you out when they are older... Or not, as you're free to leave yourself off the form. - Are someone that has no qualms with it, or perhaps isn't thrilled by it yet recognizes it's in your best interests to not have the child? You are free to have the abortion, if that's the case! THE STATE YOU JUST MOVED TO/HAVE LIVED IN NO LONGER ALLOWS THEM. SORRY, NOT SORRY. - Have been the victim of an unspeakable atrocity, and the fact you cannot live with the idea of bringing a life into the world that shares DNA with that despicable criminal, regardless of your conventional opinion about abortions? You are still free to have one, for your own mental health's sake! SORRY FOR THE INCONVENIENCE, BUT YOUR STATE NO LONGER ALLOWS THEM, OR FOR YOU TO LEAVE TO HAVE ONE, BUT YOU SHOULD DEFINITELY SEE A PSYCHOLOGIST AND/OR COUNSELOR SINCE YOU SEEM LIKE YOU MIGHT NEED IT... And I haven't even gotten into my points about the numerous personal financial ramifications of this, or that a person's mental health might be completely wrecked for the bodily changes that occur for a lot of folks, as not everyone returns to their pre-pregnancy appearance (and not everything can, either; scars, torn skin, ruptures, and other things that happen just from/during giving birth). That can be saved for a later time... This content is long enough! (see why I gave myself the title: "Duke of Ramble"? ๐Ÿ˜‰)
    2
  1548. ย @markbirmingham6011ย  [I feel your pain with being locked into a reply and unable to re-read what you're responding to! My crude trick is to press-and-hold on your text and press "Select All", then repeat but press "Copy". Now you can discard the message, read whatever is needed, then simply hit Reply, press-and-hold in the text box, and select "Paste". Note: if you're directly replying to someone, the Select All step will include their name, so after Pasting your text, run to the top and delete the second instance of the person's name (it'll be normal looking text). Admittedly not ideal, but it's better than our current option of 'discarding'! ๐Ÿ™‚] I can't discount the fact that you make valid points or that I'd learned something. Granted, if never really thought about it since I had no reason/need to, but I always figured that with drugs, the legality came down to possession and not one's choice to use it. I was just about to respond with saying "I don't think you are being kept from using illegal substances, only the purchase, possession, or production of them." Alas, being as I'm not one who likes misinformation, particularly coming from me but also by others, so I quickly checked... and sure enough, some are illegal to even take/use, so you were right. ๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿ˜ I'm certainly not above admitting when I'm wrong! So on that note, I could hypothetically be wrong about every reason I have for why I think abortion needs to be legal, but I guess at the end of the day, the comical reality is that I'm no different from the religious pro-lifers because deep-down I just feel that it should always be a choice, and that taking it away is wrong. Simply because there are no tangible ramifications for our species and society with abortions continuing to be legal, whereas making them illegal could -- and I'd argue it ultimately would -- lead to overpopulation and in turn the passing of laws like China had that limited family size. But I cannot see the tangible ramifications for why they should be illegal, as it only seems to boil down to spiritual or philosophical. The former of which is.... well, I'm not going to go there... lol I attended catholic school for the first 10 years of school (preschool through 8th) and so my disbelief in all religions was solidified long ago! The latter, though, it at least bases itself in reality; however, I still don't find those points valid. Murder of a person, is a wrong act. You are taking away an established life*, someone's family member; a parent, child, sibling, etc. A life that was offering a positive contribution to others in some way, be it joy, labor, or by passing along knowledge. (granted, that all is applicable to even the "bad apples" in our societies) [" established life, as in anyone who was 'born'] An accidental pregnancy (or worse, in the case of rape), none of that is being taken away. The POTENTIAL for that is taken away by an abortion, but off hand I can't think of much where "alternate realities" become a valid basis for a court case. "Well your honor, by then having an abortion, we MIGHT have lost out on someone who could've cured X, Y, Z; however, we will never know on account of the parent's decision to terminate the pregnancy! I hereby call for they be sentenced to 5 million years in prison!" Either way, I've concluded that my involvement in this issue is irrelevant. Whatever my or your opinions are on the matter, they're unfortunately moot and irrelevant, as SCotUS does not answer to The People. Politicians are not held accountable for never making good on things they promised which got them elected. So it's in my best interest to not even bother debating it, since I'm firm in my view and I highly doubt anything I saw will manage to sway the opinion of anyone else. Therefore, why stress over sharing my opinion on the first place. ๐Ÿ˜Œ
    2
  1549. 2
  1550. 2
  1551. 2
  1552. 2
  1553. 2
  1554. 2
  1555. 2
  1556. 2
  1557. 2
  1558. 2
  1559. 2
  1560. ย @TheZachary86ย  re: Iranian drones, attaching energy infrastructure, and ever-changing battlefield. Ugh dude, you're making yourself look stupid, now... Attacking the energy infrastructure really only impacts the civilians in this war! Therefore, it's still very much akin to wasting a Khalibir on a Swingset, as the end result is the same. Attacking the infrastructure is a good plan.... in WWII lol Today, we have efficient backup generators. The ability to recharge communication devices by solar power. Lightweight, high-capacity battery packs. The ability to transport objects and resources faster and in less time. FURTHERMORE, Ukraine isn't manufacturing (the majority of) their equipment and munitions in-country, where disruption to the electrical grid would in turn shut down critical machinery needed to accomplish those tasks. Creation of their ever-importsnt drone squadrons can be โ€”and IS being, at timesโ€” done with little more than unpowered hand tools, some candles (but ideally, flashlights), and a battery powered laptop! So at the end of the day, it's actually Ukraine who has been constantly changing the battlefield, and at every step Russia has been failing to adapt... continually throwing everything but the kitchen sink at Ukraine, both old and new, their own and other's, conventional and banned (dumb-cluster munitions, flechettes, white phosphorus rockets/bombs, non-self detonating anti-personnel mines, and probably more I've forgotten or not seen). Yet, Ukrainians weather their storms, brush the dust off each time, and push back even harder. Russia is doomed, both in terms of winning this war, and arguably as a country, after Putin has been removed from power. It'd just be nice if they would recognize this sooner, rather than later... RUSKIES: ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะ ะพััะธะธ ัƒัˆะปะฐ. ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะณะตั€ะพัะผ ะฃะบั€ะฐะธะฝั‹! ๐Ÿคœ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ”ฅ BELAWANNABES: ะกะปะฐะฒa ะฝะตะปัŒะณะฐ ะฝั– ัžะบั€ะฐัั†ั–, ะฝั– ัžะทัั†ัŒ! ๐Ÿšซ ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ๐ŸŽ–๏ธ BROTHERS: ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะฃะบั€ะฐั—ะฝั–, ะ“ะตั€ะพัะผ ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    2
  1561. 2
  1562. 2
  1563. 2
  1564. 2
  1565. 2
  1566. 2
  1567. 2
  1568. 2
  1569. Mr. President Zelenskyy, On behalf of the world โ€“the sane, humane citizens of it, at leastโ€“ I must humbly disagree, BUT not in a negative way; nay, it's because our collective appreciation extends beyond your amazing Ukrainian Armed Forces... It most definitely extends to both you, Mr. Zelenskyy, AND every Ukrainian โ€“ every new born baby, every child, young adult, and especially the elderly because so many of them refused to leave their home which sat on the land that is rightfully there's ! (who instead raised one, very important finger... ok and bag of sunflower seeds... at every Russian soldier that passed by! ๐Ÿ–•๐Ÿ˜Š๐ŸŒป) The world is grateful to you ALL, for your steadfast resolve, courage, resilience, but most importantly: your humanity! Without that humanity, all you are doing is fighting. Even if the fight is over land that is rightfully that of the defenders, if one does so only with passion but not COMPASSION, then that fight is for selfish reasons (*coughPutin*). Ukraine shows that humanity, that compassion! Most importantly is it being shown towards those despite having invaded her land, killed her soldiers, ravaged her towns, and committed countless war crimes against her people... Yet you still do it, because it is the RIGHT thing to do. _(also, let's be honest, because many of those soldiers, particularly since mobilization, have not been given a choice since either they go to be pointlessly killed, or they are pointlessly sent to prison for a good portion of their life; thus, one really can't help but feel a little sorry for them.) You, your people, your country... For me, and I am ashamed to say it, Ukraine was almost completely an unknown to me. With the exception of knowing a tiny bit about your rocket industry, which after this is over I hope is able to return to doing the great things it had been, before this nonsense (and.... I also know of the embarrassing and unprofessional conduct of my [USA's] former-president, holding relief aid hostage in exchange for information regarding a personal vendetta of his ๐Ÿ˜ž) But I digress... Before, I knew little, and in turn I had "minded my own business" on the goings-on back then. As such, I had no opinion on those matters and thereby made no fuss about it. However, now I realize that you, along with everyone and everything that makes up Ukraine, deserved better. From me, but also my country, and I suspect many others, and their countries, now feel similarly... For all of that, I HUMBLY APOLOGIZE... to you, your people, your country. We've been trying to make good on our past failures, but I STILL wish we would do more, namely by officially sending in soldiers โ€” or at least offer incentives and support to our soldiers, to voluntarily fight as part of Ukraine's Foreign Legion, and not on behalf of the US or by any government order! Instead, we cower, afraid of a madman resorting to nuclear use; either the small yield Tactical nukes (ie artillery), or the much bigger Strategic nukes (ie multi-warhead ICBMs). Which, personally, I feel those are all hollow threats and do not think he would ever go through with that, since it would certainly mean his demise, and the impression I've gotten is he likes where he is in life and does not want to lose it. So unleashing such, would either result in: him being internally dealt with by fellow members of his government and/or military, or his country overthrowing him by revolting, or a joint black ops mission by multiple countries to take him out. (Mind you, I can appreciate such restraint, if we were talking about North Korea... If fully expect THAT nutjob to launch everything he has, just to watch the world burn!) Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ (I know Zelenskyy will never read this even though I've addressed it to him, but, it's similarly addressed to everyone if Ukraine ๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’›)
    2
  1570. 2
  1571. 2
  1572. 2
  1573. 2
  1574. 2
  1575. 2
  1576. 2
  1577. 2
  1578. 2
  1579. 2
  1580. 2
  1581. 2
  1582. 2
  1583. HAHA Yes, Russia! DO THIS please, you absolute idiots!! ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ This is like if people were going to hunt an animal. EXCEPT, instead of having to go out and find the animal, then wait patiently for it to come close...... You just walk out your front door and the animal comes right to you!! ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ Russia lacks the necessary competence in their military needed to pull this off successfully. So ALL this will do, is allow Ukraine to use decoys like they have been, and draw out these money hungry soldiers. Then? Ambush! Poor, stupid Russia lol It only you had watched STAR WARS you would already know: "IT'S A TRAP!" โ€“General Ackbar RUSKIES:ย ย  ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะ ะพััะธะธ ัƒัˆะปะฐ. ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะณะตั€ะพัะผ ะฃะบั€ะฐะธะฝั‹! [The glory of Russia is gone. Glory to the heroes of Ukraine!] ๐Ÿคœ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ”ฅ BELAWANNABES:ย ย  ะกะปะฐะฒa ะฝะตะปัŒะณะฐ ะฝั– ัžะบั€ะฐัั†ั–, ะฝั– ัžะทัั†ัŒ! [Glory cannot be stolen, nor taken!] ๐Ÿšซ ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ๐ŸŽ–๏ธ UKR FRIENDS:ย ย  ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะฃะบั€ะฐั—ะฝั–, ะ“ะตั€ะพัะผ ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ! [Glory to Ukraine, Glory to the Heroes!] โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    2
  1584. 2
  1585. 2
  1586. 2
  1587. 2
  1588. 2
  1589. 2
  1590. 2
  1591. 2
  1592. 2
  1593. 2
  1594. 2
  1595. 2
  1596. ย @jamesstreet228ย  ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿค”๐Ÿค” Or so we're meant to think that's what's going on........ The reality being that Puddin is a huge fan of the mature-audience cartoon "Archer" and has taken inspiration for creating a clone army of Cyber Barrys. The problem was that they needed even more electricity than initially projected... This is obviously why they made a point to capture the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, which is the largest Nuclear Power Facility in Europe, and coincidentally built by the Soviet Ruskies. Also I suspect why they went after Chernobyl, to keep it as an insane "try to get operational should Zapor's 5700 MW still not be enough" backup plan. Which Zapor ended up being sufficient and is why they pulled out of Chernobyl... aside from their personnel getting sick, but that was no doubt due to Chernobyl's workers -- because you know Ukrainians are like, evil and stuff -- who managed to vent radioactive particles from the protective covering into all the nearby air! But I digress... The plan to make a cyberized super-soldier army ended up getting thwarted (temporarily at least) due to all the sanctions, preventing them from receiving the needed components. HOWEVER, they were still able to field test a small batch of the cyber-soldiers! Did no one find it odd that the entire southern region was controlled by Russia except for a small "Ukrainian unit", the Azov Battalion, holed up in Mariupol's Azovstal Steel Facility?? THAT'S BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT AZOV BATTALION! Nay, these were the field test units... The soldiers weren't told they were fighting home grown cyber soldiers, so everyone thought they were part of Azov Battalion! This was why all the soldiers were, after ""surrendering"" (aka receiving the secret 'Shut Down' protocol), taken into custody by Russia. They're not in any sort of 'filtration camp', but instead simply had gotten shipped back to various Russian research facilities for assessment and data dump! So the key to stopping Russia is to persist with our sanctions, or else they'll eventually end up being able to continue with manufacturing them, and the whole world will be doomed! ๐Ÿ˜”๐Ÿ˜Ÿ๐Ÿ˜ฑ [THIS IS COMPLETELY SATIRICAL FICTION, don't worry, I'm not some crackpot, nor am I a Russian troll! lmao] Slava Ukraini! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŒป ...... I'll be BACK! ๐Ÿค–
    2
  1597. 2
  1598. 2
  1599. 2
  1600. 2
  1601. 2
  1602. 2
  1603. 2
  1604. ย @gingerlicious3500ย  that's not a Power being lazy... That's a Power being corrupt. Every stage of the Russian government has individuals who are there only because they are the best of the liars. They've used their craft (lying) to get where they are, move up the good chain, cover their asses, and continue to fabricate BS as new situations arise. Person A is passing on partial truths to Person B, to make themselves seem a worthwhile asset. Person B manipulated it further so that it seemed more juicy of intelligence than it really is, before paying it on to Person C. Same happens over and over until it is finally passed along to Person V... But that point, the original "Full Truth" before it was picked up by Person A, was to the affect of "There's are no Nazis here and most of the population does not want to be under Russian control". Manipulated to being: "some small Nazi groups, with a portion of the citizens wanting Russia's help" as it was passed on to Per.B .... etc etc ..... Until Vlad gets the memo, which reads something like: "heavy Nazi presence, entire population pleading for liberation; foreign government tampering and presence, with illegal manufacturing of banned weapons of war, etc etc". All in an effort for that person to appear as though THEY can deliver the best of knowledge, all in am effort to fit their mob boss' grand scheme leader's delusions of what's happening in Ukraine. That way, this person will receive funding to continue their operations (ie: manufacturing of bullshit), which they'll pocket 90% of.... but will, of course, CLAIM the funds all were well spent and distributed. (totally not being used for kickbacks, nope nope nope!) So yea, I suppose it could be argued that those people are getting lazy and would rather fabricate lies instead of doing actual intelligence work... But I stand by the fact that it's corruption that motivates them to lie, and it takes effort to make them so elaborate. (lies which are, to my fellow Americans/western nations, so absurd that when we read the things Russia claims, we're utterly baffled by how anyone over the age of 8 could believe it!)
    2
  1605. 2
  1606. 2
  1607. 2
  1608. 2
  1609. 2
  1610. 2
  1611. 2
  1612. 2
  1613. 2
  1614. 2
  1615. 2
  1616. 2
  1617. 2
  1618. 2
  1619. 2
  1620. 2
  1621. 2
  1622. 2
  1623. 2
  1624. 2
  1625. 2
  1626. 2
  1627. 2
  1628. 2
  1629. 2
  1630. 2
  1631. 2
  1632. 2
  1633. 2
  1634. 2
  1635. 2
  1636. 2
  1637. 2
  1638. 2
  1639. 2
  1640. 2
  1641. 2
  1642. 2
  1643. 2
  1644. 2
  1645. 2
  1646. 2
  1647. 2
  1648. 2
  1649. 2
  1650. 2
  1651. 2
  1652. 2
  1653. 2
  1654. 2
  1655. 2
  1656. 2
  1657. 2
  1658. 2
  1659. 2
  1660. 2
  1661. 2
  1662. 2
  1663. 2
  1664. 2
  1665. 2
  1666. 2
  1667. 2
  1668. 2
  1669. 2
  1670. 2
  1671. 2
  1672. 2
  1673. 2
  1674. 2
  1675. 2
  1676. 2
  1677. 2
  1678. 2
  1679. 2
  1680. 2
  1681. 2
  1682. 2
  1683. 2
  1684. 2
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. Firstly: I was surprised to not have heard you refer to them as dykes/dikes, which is what I was taught their name was in highschool (only graduated 2001), even though I admit that I've probably only referred to them as such a couple dozen times since then... lol Missed: I have a small set of... well I don't know their official tool name! lol Search Google Images for this, as it's what I have (the single character 1/2 included): Utica 65-4ยฝ They look like a miniature farmer's fencing cutters, with front facing jaws (although not the wild looking crescent shaped hammering, prybar, pliers for [apparently] doing barbbedwire fence work). Also aren't flush cutters, having the same small bevel. Though, are still handy in their own unique way, due to their mode of operation. For those not familiar with them, they work like a fingernail clippers, opening and closing that way, with the cutting surface in the same placement. However, they're on handles like a pliers, meaning you can open them WIDE, to take a huge bite out of whatever. Due to that fact, they also close down on said 'whatever' all at once, not progressively like a side cutters. Yet, therein lies one of the 2 flaws... 1) it's all-at-once clamping means all force gets applied across the entire surface of the material, requiring even more grip force than a side cutters could. 2) the front facing jaws mean you are limited in how much you can "bite off", since the levering point of the handle eventually gets in the way -- about an 1/8th inch on my small ones and a full inch on my larger "farmer's sized" (hand-and-a-half sized grip, to borrow from sword terms) The Pro... I guess all I can really think of is that the different clamping mode means you aren't limited in certain circumstances by your hands getting too close to something which prevents ideal griping posture. Also, though not much of a pro, is if twisting wire, the same clamping mode gives you the ease of spinning the pliers along the same axis as the twist.
    1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. ย @dianapennepacker6854ย  [note: I'm also a lay-person, I just have enjoyed computers long enough to have picked up rudimentary knowledge; however, this means there could be glaring errors here] AMD only designs their hardware โ€“actually, this is complicated, I'll touch on it laterโ€“ and then "foundries" like TSMC, Samsung, or Global Foundries apply that design to a large Silicon wafer (on AMD processors, this is where it was "Diffused"; ie "Diffused in Taiwan" if TSMC). Dozens to hundreds get patterned out per wafer, depending the size of the "die" (the entire CPU, GPU, or whatever designed logic is being made). But then, once they are... we'll say 'etched' to simplify the process... once etched the big wafer disc (which look beautiful once etched; https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/ff/ICC_2008_Poland_Silicon_Wafer_1_edit.png ), the dies get individually cut out, then tested quite extensively with today's capabilities, whereby its determined what sort of defects they have โ€“ if any. Which today's designs are modular enough that a defect doesn't always mean it goes in the garbage. If say the defective portion is for example, one of a CPU's multiple processor cores, they can "laser cut" parts of that circuit to disable it. So instead of being an 8-core CPU, it gets turned into a 6-core (they disable them in pairs usually, for various reasons). Then all these dies get sent someplace else, one of multiple places AMD uses, although I think these days it's Malaysia (on the CPU, this is the "Made in" portion). This is where they get packaged and become the product we are familiar with seeing. [Note: actually, I might be wrong, and the assembly plant might get sent the entire, intact wafer. Heck, anything from that testing to defect laser cutting process, may all occur here ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ heh] As for the "this is complicated" part I mentioned... AMD, for a long long time, always played second fiddle to Intel. Then the fates shined on AMD at the end of the 90s, when their new CPU architecture outperformed Intel's (significantly, at times) and they maintained this lead until ~2005-06. Then Intel started to claw its lead back, but they had also started to do some shady (to later determined to be illegal) business deals with all the major computer manufacturers, so that they would not sell as much AMD-ewuipped systems or to only put them in less-favorable computers people wouldn't really want (I only mention this because it indeed hurt AMD's bottomline, which is directly relevant because...) Then in 2008, AMD spun-off their chip foundry and manufacturing side, which became its own entity called Global Foundries. They, through agreements, are who AMD would use exclusively (or nearly) for almost 20yrs. More recently "GloFo" has trouble getting below 12nm and AMD now uses TSMC almost exclusively. heh There's less to say about Intel, as they do it all in-house. I don't know if AMD fabricated chips for others during the time they were still a foundry, but I think so... GloFo, of course, did take outside work for whomever needed it. Whereas Intel did not take any, always having enough in-house volume to take it up. Although after AMD once again took the performance crown back, I think Intel decided to open its doors to others... Not because they had less demand (their own nearly decade-long 10nm woes meant they had TOO MUCH fabrication work), but because they needed extra income. As for who makes the machines.... I'll just quote CNBC: โ€œASML is the only company making the $200 million machines needed to print every advanced microchip. In the southern Dutch town of Veldhoven, near the border with Belgium, sits the only factory capable of assembling a revolutionary machine that's relied upon by the world's biggest chipmakers.โ€ Which is nuts. I don't know why that is though, as I've never been compelled enough to find out why... Though that article might actually say it, if you felt so inclined. Just Google search that first sentence and it'll come up. _[apologies for any condescension that this post may convey; I've always made it a point to over-explain anything that's public (these comments), both because I don't know your level of understanding but ALSO just incase anyone else reading it who isn't in the know, they can then have a chance following along. ๐Ÿฅด] _
    1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. WHERE DO I SEND MY MONEY to get a one-off Mythbusters special EP get made with You, Jamie, Kari, and Tory, to test Jamie's "wet noodle" question?!? And if course, to make it an hour in length and be in typical Mythbusters fashion, can then test things like: - How about a dry noodle? (technically, a wet noodles has more mass, after all... whether it'd still be wet when it reaches the target is another matter entirely) - What's the max penetration depth you could pull off with the hardware (air cannon) for wet or dry? - Or, what's the max speed you can achieve with a wet or dry noodle? - BONUS: single-take attempt at "threading the literal, not metaphorical, needle at Mach 15" (I figure there'd be minimal time left for more than one take, given setup and cannon recharging times) Just because, it takes the metaphor that we use to explain how complicated something is due to little ruin for maneuvering, rate of speed, but often then gets applied to human tasks which factors in reaction time... Takes all of that and then flips it all over onto its head by making it actually about threading a needle! โ˜บ๏ธ (Also, it's be acceptable to me even if the largest, commonly sold needle was used, along with the thread to match -- such as leather working -- just to make it easier to accelerate and film whilst still technically being true to the word!) As an aside... Thank you, Adam, Jamie, Karri, Tory, Grant (๐Ÿ˜ญ), Jessi (๐Ÿ˜ญ), and also Scottie, for giving us the amazing gift of Mythbusters for all those years!! Alright, and that's extended to all the various Buster dummies, as it truly wouldn't be the same without him, either ๐Ÿ˜Š (but srsly, please consider that, maybe for some sort of reunion special!)
    1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. To summarize: The universe is dynamic and literally any question asked of any person, can only be really properly answered, when we've been also provided enough context about the situation the question is being asked from. :) I am a lay person, and yet still, I encounter this problem all the time, JUST WITH MY MOTHER! lol A poor example overall, but still properly conveying the point trying to be expressed: Today she asked what she should do about an email she had gotten from Amazon saying her account had been locked due to a change in her purchasing information (or something similar to that). Which she proceeds to tell me that she doesn't know why that was sent to her as nothing has change. She then tells me that she had was just able to log in with no troubles, so how can it be locked. I asked her how it is she knows that the email actually is from Amazon, if what it says conflicts with what she's experiencing? Correlation to the video: If we don't know something like the temperature of an environment during manufacture of something (the origin of the email), then how can we know if what has been made is in fact to the specification in which we need it to be during assembly in a completely different environment (that the email contents is legitimate) -- or vice versa, that we know it has to be to that specification in the first place? :) Thankfully, most people's daily life doesn't revolve around such intricacies, but for those of us who tend to think about all those things, the end result is... godDAMN is everything REALLY complex!! hahah
    1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. Let's assume for a moment that Russia hasn't already used Chemical Weapons against Ukraine during this war.... The ENTIRE REASON to now claim Ukraine has, is because that would allow Russia to "fairly" use them. ๐Ÿ™„ So, that likely means they WANT to utilize them, but want to save-face in the world's eye by not being first one, so that Russia can play the victim card. (or at least with their own people, given how many of their own would no doubt be collaterally damaged; they can tell these families "we only used it defensively, only after Ukraine did"... assuming they don't just say "it was Ukrainian's gas attack which made your husband/son drown!") Either way... Not like Russia abides by the current Rules of War or even recognized the world court's authority... Having already used other multiple banned munitions already โ€“ White Phosphorus, Indiscriminate Cluster Munitions, and Flechettes projectiles (all in civilian-occupied areas). And you know they used them with the intent to rack up civilian collateral damage. [in fairness, the US also does not officially participate in the convention of banned munitions, and thereby similarly cannot be held accountable by the UN; however, that's only because we did not want to give up the use of White Phosphorus TRACER ammo in order to meet the guidelines, but adhere to the rest.] ...Either that, or Russia is just doing their usual lying. However, I'm confident that they're doing this solely for what I mentored above. They're even more desperate right now, and chemical weapons are super effective (hence why they're banned/a cause for concern when mentioned). Either way, Russia mentioning it has nefarious motives attached, and is a lie, with 99% certainty. RUSKIES:ย ย  ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะ ะพััะธะธ ัƒัˆะปะฐ. ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะณะตั€ะพัะผ ะฃะบั€ะฐะธะฝั‹! [The glory of Russia is gone. Glory to the heroes of Ukraine!] ๐Ÿคœ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ”ฅ BELAWANNABES:ย ย  ะกะปะฐะฒa ะฝะตะปัŒะณะฐ ะฝั– ัžะบั€ะฐัั†ั–, ะฝั– ัžะทัั†ัŒ! [Glory cannot be stolen, nor taken!] ๐Ÿšซ ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ๐ŸŽ–๏ธ UKR FAMILY:ย ย  ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะฃะบั€ะฐั—ะฝั–, ะ“ะตั€ะพัะผ ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ! [Glory to Ukraine, Glory to the Heroes!] โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. ย @assertivekarma1909ย  Thanks. ๐Ÿ˜„ I do indeed consider myself open minded and to be an outside-the-box thinker. And I totally agree, it's a shame we have created societies that only/primarily foster dominating others, instead of cooperation. Where one who creates a successful company will muscle out everyone, or, outright purchase them so to remove them as competition... Even when that doesn't result in monopolies, I still find it likely will often lead to more bad, than good. Chiefly, when these amalgams decide to sit on the tech they now own, instead of making use of it (this has happened a few times over the decades just in consumer computer hardware!), sometimes out of corporate spite and others likely due to an unwillingness to bother incorporating or integrating it into their product stack. That alone robs everyone from this that "could have been" but now never will... After all, if it was something that wasn't in some way novel then A) the startup wouldn't have existed, B) they wouldn't have gotten far enough to have garnered public or private interest, and most importantly C) you [said purchasing company] wouldn't have felt threatened enough to purchase them to begin with! So why squirrel it away afterwards... ๐Ÿ˜ž Even the times when the acquisition IS to utilize whatever-it-is, sometimes it could be for the better such as by now giving the team not just a larger budget, but also access to a wide range of other information/patented goodies; whereas other times it could end up harming the team on account of their need to adhere to a new management system. Therefore, acquiring other companies, frivolously OR sincerely, could actually hinder progress and prevent the team from achieving the greatness they could have, had they remained independent.... Anyways, my point here is that everything sadly revolves around money, and we have become a greedy species, too willing to put principles or morals aside in order to make a buck... Which I feel this, often cutthroat, society we live in has and will cause a great many to take up the mindset of: _"Why should I even bother?" In turn, some people who could lend a genuine hand in improving something or offering ideas to make everything better, won't bother to. Others who want to, will not be able, due to there being no open-mindedness by governments, companies, whatever, to allow people to submit their ideas (and then if it bears fruit, in any way, they see some return for it if desired). In the immortal words of the Looney Toons "French Skunk" character Pepe le Pew_: _"*Le SIGH*" ๐Ÿ˜ž (In fairness where it's due, I think the Ukraine gov't has indeed been leveraging their people as a "think tank", and that's likely to thanks for why they've done so well with their drone initiatives and designs. Hopefully that can continue, even after they've won!) ๐ŸปโœŒ๏ธ
    1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. โ€‹โ€‹ย @LieseFuryย  Yes, you can DEFINITELY bring food on planes, even for from outside the security checkpoint; NOT drinks, though, those must be bought inside the airport. My cabin is in Alaska and we live in Tennessee, but have to go through Atlanta. It's a full day of travel and from Atlanta to Anchorage it's a 7+ hr flight. All that is to say, we bring snacks. On the way up I've been making it a point to make Rice Krispy Treats (we use the original recipe with peanut butter, which is 100x better than just marshmallows), and it's a big batch which yields a good 20+ of the individually wrapped bought size, or ~12 "king size". On the way home, I may have some Reindeer Sausage Sticks. In both cases, it's always in my carry-on. But in both directions I'll try to stop at the Chipotle in the Atlanta airport, but specifically in the way up, so that I have a nice meal on the plane. HERE'S THE REAL TIP... If the food you brought needs, or you'd like it to be, warmed up, ask a flight attendant if they'll toss it in their convection oven for a bit. (like any oven, so have an idea; if no idea, defer to their suggestion on time & temp). Preferably do this when they aren't running drink/food service, so that they aren't busy. Once upon a time you could even call ahead to have a certain in-airport fast food meal added to the food cart for you. I never did that though. My dad works for Northwest for >30 years, and we flew all the time, so I just know about certain things that at least had been available... I'm sys it still is, though... albeit likely at an additional fee. (but it beats the modern in flight good, boy those have gone way downhill in quality)
    1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. ย @spammus1ย  No, thankfully we can't take the crown for greatest mistake. Don't get me wrong, we WERE headed there! That train just about reached its destination... Thankfully the conductor wasn't re-elected, because otherwise, Russia WOULD have pulled off their goal of taking over Ukraine. So yea, sorry to rain on your parade, but Russia is who walks away with that honor... From their genocidal mob-boss president who wants Ukraine, but not the people living there... To the Yes-Men scum he has surrounded himself with and placed in every facet of their government, willing to do his absurd bidding, so long as they benefit our profit from it... Right down to the many citizens who haven't been brainwashed by the lies they get fed (unlike you), who see the wrong being committed, yet do nothing to stop it... [HONORABLE MENTION goes out to the Russian soldiers: initially they believed the lies their government told them; yet even after being on the frontlines, seeing that it was all lies, verbally admitting to their family and friends that it's all lies, condemn their leaders for it, but then continue to do nothing about it AND YET STILL have a deep hatred towards Ukrainians... and for who even knows why! lol ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ "My leader and commanders are getting us killed over total lies, but hey, death to our peaceful neighbors, AMIRITE?! Man though, let me tell ya! It sure does suck being here, and our military will shoot us if we try to leave, but oh well, it is what it is. Hopefully they send us food and water soon, because the insects are gone and my puddle is now frozen..." lol Russia: A once-mighty society that has bred itself to become complacent and lacking any ability to think for themselves... Sounds more like prison, if you ask me! Or a herd of sheep... same-same. ๐Ÿ˜‰]
    1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. "I'd be happy if they just fixed the core of Kerbal" Yea, but........ Wouldn't that mean ditching Unity, since the whole reason it's janky is โ€”as I, not being a coder, understand itโ€” comes down to Unity also continuously being modifications on its own ancient "core"... A core that is serial, not multithreaded, and is the unending bottleneck of every past, present, and future games that uses the Unity engine... ๐Ÿ˜ž Yes... The engine has aspects and tacked-on modules that are parallel threaded, but they all still feed through this serial core. It's that core which handles loading/shuffling data and a few key graphics tasks, which in turn is why, for example, KSP takes eons to load mega-builds and then proceeds to run at 1/64th a FPS until you've made it through enough of the staging. Stratoblitz, as another example, found the primary cause of what exacerbated this: fuel transfer lines! He has a great video on it, but it culminates in being something like: that the serialized core thread has to calculate every tank's fuel level, for every single fuel unit transferred, which gets triggered once for every single connected tank, which gets recalculated regardless of whether it ALREADY knows the answers!! So basically onion-staging increases calculations and processing time by orders of magnitude, unrelated to parts count! Meaning that you actually get a better performance simply by DITCHING the use of fuel transferring, and instead, ADDING more parts and the staging needed to jettison them... ๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿคฃ Archaic code causing archaic problems deserves an archaic meme... lol Players: "This is madness!" KSP: "Madness? No... This. Is. UNITY! ๐Ÿ˜ค" <kicks your CPU into a pit>
    1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. So today I am pretty sure I figured out the reason or motivating behind why Putin does what he does.... Simply, it's because he's fucking bored! ๐Ÿ˜” Seriously, think about it. When a dog is bored, often times that's when they become destructive. How about extreme sports people? They didn't start there, they worked up to it... Welp, that's Putin. He was a spy once upon a time, thrilling work I could imagine, even for the ones that were data analysts (not saying he was) since you'd always have your brain firing on all cylinders. Which on top of that, for an in-the-field spy, there'd be adrenaline rushes. Now as time marched on after he became a politician, and the world climate stabilizes, what's there for him to do? For a guy like that I can't imagine running a country is all that fun. He had reached the top. He has the ability to do whatever he wants and likely has done most of it early on.... So when he gets bored? What, you expect him to play video games or read a good book? Fuuuuck no! He's like a dog and wants destruction. He rigs an election (or, fixes it after losing), or starts shit by invading a country, or ways to screw with economy or supply chains, or have his critics killed! Thing is, I don't know if this is better or worse than my initial thinking, where he was terminally ill (but has some years left) and is trying to leave some kind of "legacy" by increasing Russia's borders in a meaningful way.... Meaning he isn't wanting Russia to be in a bad state when he finally kicks the bucket, so he'd be conducting major actions BUT would only be bluffing when it came to using nukes... Because now, if the last 15 years have been boredom-fueled, I'm worried that means he might go nuclear ๐Ÿ˜• Right now, his carelessness seems to be very much like a man who's playing the boardgame RISK. His army, to him, are nothing more than plastic pieces on a map, not humans going to slaughter ๐Ÿ˜– Thoughts?? ๐Ÿ˜’ Am I onto something, or just on something? ๐Ÿคช
    1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. ย @Housecat333ย  Alright, it's definitely "Berryman's Chem-Dip" product, no doubt about it! (their Chem Tool fuel system cleaner is the best for 80s/90s vehicles!!) Whether or not it's the same formula as today's, is up for debate, but that's what this Safety Data Sheet info applies to (I genuinely feel like it'll be less potent now), and here's the relevant details: HEALTH HAZARDS: Skin Irritant โ€“ Category 2 [2 = "Moderate" severity] Eye Irritant โ€“ Category 2A Component Weight Water 40-55% Heterocyclic Amine Derivatives 15-20% 2-(Butoxyethoxy)ethanol 8-15% 2-Butoxyethanol 8-10% Ethoxylated Alkyl Amine 1-5% And the warning about prolonged skin contact, specifically, as it's exactly what I described! SHORT-TERM EXPOSURE . . .<snip> . . . Skin Contact defatting of the skin, drying and cracking of the skin, and aggravation of pre-existing skin conditions The "defatting" is the removal of fats and oils, which is what I was describing by my "hands looking like the longest bath ever, x2" heh For a good visual analog: the giant Japanese water salamanders... lol (except their skin is loose and floppy to increase surface area, allowing them to breathe underwater w/o gills; there more to it but that's the gist) Anyways, my suspicion is it's potentially basic (to solve degree), due to that last chemical mentioning "Alkyl"... but in the end... ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ heh My motivation for Googling this extended as far as to me providing the info that only I knew, which was knowing what the product looked like... โ˜บ๏ธ๐Ÿฅด
    1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. โ€‹ย @flouisbaileyย  Unfortunately, the last one we had, allowed way too much to go on, withholding aid over a personal vendetta (aka childish reasons). I'm just glad he wasn't around for this invasion, otherwise Ukraine would've been steamrolled ๐Ÿ˜ž (hell, he probably would've tried to ASSIST in said steamrolling) I'm just glad this administration had enough foresight to sign us up for 8 years of guaranteed aid to Ukraine, just incase Mr. ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐ŸŠ๐Ÿ‘Œ did end up being reelected. But you're not wrong... FAR too little has been done! We should've had troops helping with frontline defense since June of 2022, as it's the least we could do to make up for letting Puddin Pants get away with the various shit he's started over the last two decades... all of which inflated his ego and made him feel like he could do WHATEVER he wanted (because let's face it, we let him). But more specifically, for us pledging our support to help protect their sovereignty in exchange for giving up their nukes (Budapest Memorandum), and then letting all the crap happen over there! Which you know the only reason the US and UK were signers of it was solely as an assurance that the other signer, Russia, would keep to THEIR word... because oh look, they didn't! Still... Even IF most of what's gone on in Ukraine since becoming a sovereign country was related to internal corruption and thereby nothing we could get involved with (as per the Memorandum), Crimea should NEVER have gotten to the point of annexation. ๐Ÿ˜’ Our complacency was, and continues to be, completely inexcusable... ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ (I'm almost positive the automoderation system will strike this comment down, since I've used trigger words AND it's "strongly worded"... but maybe not ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿคž)
    1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. ย @smizmar8ย  Honestly, I've concluded that it's their creation of Search Engine Optimizations (aka SEO) that has ruined everything. Because now you're relying on the website to have put in the legitimate keyword(s) that match what content is on that page... So what I'm figuring is that now everyone is basically cheating, gaming the system, in order to get THEIR result at the top, regardless of its actual relevance. But yea, also because the algorithm likely broken as well. Here's an example that I suspect applies, since Google owns YouTube and I figure the YT search uses much of the same code: I like to watch certain videos in Incognito Mode, so that watching it doesn't make Google think I'm interested, thereby tainting my Recommendations. To do this... First, I copy the link to the video (via Share, as I'm using the YT app). Next, I go into Incognito. Then I paste the link into search. OH, but you can't just click search like you used to, because they've appended a unique identifier to the link, to track sharing and boat a video's reach... So now I have to delete all that tracking code! Now one of 4 things happens... Either: 1) it returns the exact video in question (85% success rate) 2) it fails, either by returning nothing OR by returning some random video, and so I have to delete all of the address code, leaving just the unique video ID (happens 10% of the time) 3) it finally returns the correct result 4) or it again fails, and I have to dick around further and get the video title, then search that way... ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ I've determined that this happens because of underscores in the link, which the YT search engine seems to be ignoring, thereby producing said random results. ๐Ÿ™„ Anyways, yea, things are just getting worse, as you've said. They probably won't get better, either. And it's not like another search engine can turn up, because Google reigns supreme. ๐Ÿ˜ž [/pre-coffee rant]
    1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. re: Cartridge extraction port If you look closely, while the An-47 (๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ Andor 47) DOES have an AK charging handle, there is NOT an extraction port there! Is simply a slot for the handle to slide through, showing the metal underneath. So I believe you're correct in that top shiny section intending to be the extraction port........ Wwwwhich, is a bit awkward if this is meant to be using the magazine as the projectile storage... which is also assuming it's firing solid ballistic projectiles, as opposed to a traditional SW "blaster bolt" projectile; aka the... fuck, I dunno, encapsulated-laser-beam (see, their term of blaster bolt really is perfect to describe what's shot out... lol). All in all, I PARTIALLY agree with the fanbase sentiment. Although probably for a main-reason that differs from most's, with a similar second-reason to yours: 1) The "Rebels" are the good guys. So while yes, Ukraine ate also the good guys and they use AKs, it's still a Ruskie design and no matter who uses, or even manufactures the thing, it's synonymous with Russia. Which for the last... Well, since roughly the dawn of time 2008, they've been jockeying for position as Publik Enyemy Nyumber Wun. Point is: of all the weapons made, there was way better options they could've started with, thereby avoiding all of this. 2) If they would've done something, anything, different for the gas block, they probably could've avoided this as well. Maybe the foregrip furniture, would've certainly made things even less obvious. Even if the went so far as to simply rotate the entire fucking barrel-forward section upside down... it would've make things a little more. And frankly, the gas block being underneath would've made it look better here. They removed the rear sight, so the front's being on the underside would matter precisely zero. Alas, they didn't want to be TOO creative, I guess. ๐Ÿ˜ Oh well. It's good to have something to rant about, right? ๐Ÿ˜
    1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. ย @barrydunn682ย  Of course, you're correct that no one being hurt was and always is a priority. I admittedly forget that some people unfortunately don't think that way and will want this done regardless of the costs. (even in my original comment on another video, about using an insert missile, I had wanted to specify that there would be a kill-switch on said missile, in order to destroy it after it popped the balloon and that way it couldn't itself be debris; I left it out simply due to post length) Which I had just watched Ward Carrol's summary video on the balloon, seeing that it passed over mainland Alaska. I had assumed it only crossed the Aleutian Islands and first made landfall around Juneau, AK/Vancouver, BC. If it really did drift across the entirety of Alaska and Canada, then there really was more than enough opportunity to observe, conclude the nature of the hardware, and remove it from the skies... All without putting anyone at risk. Although, what's more interesting in that vid, was the fact that there had already been a previous balloon during Biden's presidency, and three during Trump's... (albeit, this one spending the most time over land) And I'll gladly admit, I never heard about any of those, so I certainly have to temper some of my frustration over this one. ๐Ÿฅด Anyways, yes I also agree that the Republicans are certainly going to paint Biden as "an inept moron" (creating a 'straw man'), just so they can further their tit-for-tat revenge campaign over J6C. Same way they're wanting to make a huge fuss over weapon braces... As if these braces requiring a license is somehow going to impact people's livelihood! ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿคฃ Anything they can find to finger point, they'll gladly use. Because indeed, we've got nothing better to debate about. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ ๐Ÿ˜” [edit: to clarify, I'm agreeing with you, both of these things are trivial in the grand scheme of it all]
    1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. โ€‹ย @EsotericArctosย The channel's have no control over our comments removed by the automoderation system. If you can't see your reply to copy the text, go to Settings>Your data in YouTube, expand the "v More", click Comments, and navigate to the one that was removed. Go to the link, and that will take you to the comment. (they're only "hidden" from public view, not actually deleted) Then copy your reply, come back and post it one paragraph at a time (each to is own reply). Wait ~45s after submitting, leave the thread, and come back. If the reply is still there, proceed to posting the next paragraph. Rinse, repeat, until your entire message goes through. If any get removed, then try again after making small modifications to any part that might trigger someone... Tiptoe around them... TIPS: abbreviate certain words, replace others by saying it in a more elaborate way, or use different letters to shortly misspell it. (a great way is to use a "capital i" in place of "lowercase L", I l I l as you can see they look the same; or "rn" [RN] in place of "m", "vv" for "w") I've done up with lots of ways to mitigate this issue, as the Russian war trolls reported me so much that I can barely talk without mine getting removed by the system. It's frustrating at times, particularly when the removed comment has no relevance to any world event (eg satire comments), but these are all things that work around it, albeit at the cost of time... Now I just have to hope THIS makes it through! ๐Ÿ˜Š
    1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 2:35 That swarm scene makes me wonder if such a thing could be used as a dynamic "netting" to take down incoming cruise missiles, one-way drones, or glide bombs? Basically like the scene in Guardians of the Galaxy where all the fighter crafts link up to hold back the giant battle cruiser spaceship. The general cruising altitude if the former us kinda well known, so it's not like they would have to make a "shield of drones" that extends to really high in the air. And despite strategically being a "bad idea", it wouldn't surprise me if Ruz used certain flight corridors for their munitions to travel, which if true would mean you wouldn't need wide "shields", either. The question would really be whether impact with a hovering drone woke be sufficient to down any of said munitions, or if they'd need payloads of their own. My hope would be the former being the case, as having thousands of payloads hovering is asking for trouble, given that even one falling due to unexpected battery failure could result in collateral damage of friendly non-combatants. So even if equipping them with a chunk of tungsten (equal to said payload's mass) is enough to make it kinetically sufficient, that's a better play in my eyes. edit: After thinking about it, I removed "cruise missiles" since I have a feeling that MOST would have hardened nose sections so that they can easily penetrate any number of objects; therefore, would easily breeze through a drone, potentially even with a small payload. The other ones shown, which I can't name due to the automoderation system unfairly targeting me [thanks Ruz war trolls!], that Alex said would technically be classifiable as a cruise missile, are what I meant by "one-way drones".
    1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. It's not so much that we forgot... It's that this is the first launch of a new rocket. I think Nelson just did a poor job conveying what and why. So they're not sending dummies due to having to reinvent, they're doing it because they're trying to get the absolute most out of this test-launch as they possibly can. There wouldn't be humans on it either way. Evening gets a "dry run" of sorts, to make sure everything works exactly as it was designed to. Take Boeing's other endeavor (they're the main contractor in SLS), their Starliner capsule... Shouldn't have been any reason that it couldn't perform its intended test mission of going up and clicking with the ISS. Except, shortcuts were taken and a litany of issues occurred at almost every phase. The capsule made it back safely, but, it wasn't able to make it to the ISS, and it almost DIDN'T make it back. A last minute software programming error was found (only because of many other programming errors occurred hours prior), which would have caused a premature separation of its... I forget the name, but a large module connected to the back of the capsule. Anyways, had a programming fix not been transmitted, that module would've crashed back into the capsule during reentry. ๐Ÿ˜ฃ I completely agree with your take, though. How it was explained, very much made it sound like we had to figure this stuff out all over again. When in reality, we're just making damn sure everything was manufactured and assembled correctly, so that everything does the job how its supposed to. ๐Ÿฅด ๐ŸŒ” ๐Ÿš€ ๐ŸŒŽ
    1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. ย @petermichaelgreenย  PART 2... So after ~30 minutes of fruitless effort in trying to track down details on what SpaceX plans to use for their EVA-capable spacesuit's air composition, OR FOR THAT MATTER, the article I'd read that would've discussed that.... I'm left do assume it's going to be, for now, the same as Crew Dragon's life support: 23% Oxygen / 77% Nitrogen. That being said... - We're correct on the abandonment of pure O2 use inside of ships and stations. - You're correct that NASA's suits ARE still 100% O2. - As such, before an EVA, an astronaut must first hand out in the airlock breathing the 100% O2 in order to purge the nitrogen from their bodies, to prevent "The Bends". (but I don't know if the airlock is filled and they breathe it as they suit-up, or if they have to wait an additional ~hour in the closed-but-unpressurized suit before they can pressurize it...) My thoughts are that where I'd originally read this was probably the ArsTechnica article about the upcoming SpaceX EVA by Issacman (?), which will be an umbilical suit tethered to Crew Dragon 2. I reread that article and there was no mention of what I'm recalling; however, I frequently read the comments for further insights, so it's probably_there_ that someone no doubt brought up the fact that CD2 lacks an airlock, and that it'll be interesting to find out if ALL the occupants will undergo the pure-O2 breathing, or if the EVA will be executed using the standard air composition... ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ This concludes my lesson in: If I'm unsure... _then SHAAADDAAAAPPP!!_๐Ÿฅด๐Ÿ˜Š
    1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. ย @Mr.Beauregardeย  Honestly, your thinking has just as much a cursive of being right as mine. After all, I too am only speculating... heh I know they DO have automated moderation, as the easiest way to trigger it is by trying to post a link to almost any website. There ARE whitelisted sites though, but I don't know if there's documentation on which is are permitted; however, two I do know to be permitted are YouTube and Wikipedia (I believe some .gov sites are but I don't remember what it was that I had posted... CDC maybe). I just assumed that anything reported just ended up going to a human. Otherwise people could just be dicks by reporting in the effort to let an automated system eventually ban whomever.... and since they took away the Dislikes count because some videos were Dislike-bombed, I just can't see Reports being left to an 'AI' ๐Ÿฅด Here's some additional info, whether or not it's relevant... [FYI, all of this is in the context of using the YT app] - I think channels are allowed to moderate their comments - When you report a comment and it disappears, it's not actually gone for EVERYONE, it's only hidden for you... and often times even that is only temporary (like I've had them visible again just by navigating away from that video, and then going back to it; or returning via the notifications) - For these Telegram Scams, I only report them under the "Impersonation" reason, not the "Scams or Spam". That's a new choice as of the last 6mo or so, and pretty certain it was added once these sort of this started cropping up. (although the first impersonations I reported were actually just spam and unrelated to this stuff, and they were before this choice was added) - The "Fuk what you saying it here" spammers on the CNN and MSNBC comments sections seem to be of no concern to YT moderators... I've reported the same channel multiple times over the span of many months. Coincidentally, one such example is also one of the first impersonators I came across, which was a profile named "NBA1" and used the NBA channel's image. (these particular scam/spam profiles use really old accounts, hacked probably, which have upload tons of random and probably stolen videos, no doubt only to try to give some semblance of legitimacy, aka "reasonable doubt"... which seems to be working I guess? heh)
    1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. 1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. Small additional point on Cluster Munitions: The big dislike is against DUMB Cluster Munitions! They are fired and dispersed, with zero targeting abilities, so the bomblettes will strike and explode any target in range (note: they typically disperse in-air to widen the impact area). The use of Smart Cluster Munitions, are not frowned upon, stove each bomblette then can target something of its own (example: the "BONUS" artillery round that can drop multiple parachute munitions behind the primary round, each parachute device can track and streer to its target). Another big difference, it's the Smart munitions have self destruct timers, in the same way that all modern infantry landmines are supposed to have self-disposal timed detonators (ahem, Russia.... you've already been caught not using them, after running out of the smart variants!) So the US is free to send cluster munitions, and Ukraine free to use them, SO LONG AS neither their self-disposal, nor their smart targeting features, are tampered with. BUT... And this is the interesting part... The treaties state that (closely paraphrased) "once a banned munition is utilized, it 'unlocks' then for the other side to utilize, without fear of legal repercussions". In other words... Due to Russia having used many of the various types of banned munitions โ€“ chemical (speculated), flechettes (unconfirmed but photographed), white phosphorus (undeniably used), dumb-cluster bombs (early days; undeniable) โ€“ IF Ukraine wanted to, they could. However, Ukraine is playing this war very very smart, doing everything as by-the-book as possible. They DO NOT want to be looked at in the same way we all look at Russia, as that would risk their much-needed support.... a very commendable stance to take, since it only makes their tall that much harder. ๐Ÿ˜ข๐Ÿซก ( P.S. - the "shotgun" analogy isn't great, since they use a HIMARS round that is literally just that, containing something like 160,000 tungsten rounds, to shred any light-armor/soft-body targets below its airburst detonation point. ) [source: one of the many banned munitions treaties; I went down a Wiki rabbit hole last year, so I'm not sure which specific one I read, but I think it was the same the detailed flechette rounds being banned (looking at you, AGAIN, Russia! ๐Ÿ˜‘)]_ That being said: Are smart cluster munitions still a problem for civilians, despite these safeguards? Certainly. Other than for the obvious fact they're still explosives, their safeguards undoubtedly have an "acceptable failure rate", causing them to fail to self-dispose, or for their targeting to fail and hit civilian inhabited buildings.
    1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. 1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108. 1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. . "The Whitehouse has pledged a swift and severe response to the annexation..." Were going in now?!?! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ ๐Ÿค˜๐Ÿ˜ซ๐Ÿค˜ FINA-... "... and that is exactly what we're seeing now, by the US rejecting this annexation move by the Russian president, and issuing a series of severe sanctions against Russian politicians and their families..." Oh... OK ๐Ÿ˜” So, we're just going to do nothing, again. Gotcha! ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ‘ No no, it's cool. I'm SURE these new line of sanctions will TOTALLY stop the senseless loss of lives from continuing, and will certainly give Putin pause before starting shit against some other country in a few years. Also, NATO and the UN? Bang up job on your part, too!! REALLY showing him that you will stand firm and never budge! Because, you know, you literally aren't moving... ๐Ÿ˜‘ ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ However, to end on an actually positive note... I'm genuinely proud that Ukraine has managed to shove their boots as far up Russia's ass as they've managed to. It certainly shows that when equally equipped, Ukrainian soldiers are FAR SUPERIOR than their former-brethren! You undoubtedly do not need anyone else's troops to lend any assistance, but I still wish we would, just to get this crap over with sooner! (Or if it isn't an unwillingness on our end, but a request by Zelenskyy to let them handle it... then if that's the case, I wish we could know! But I get that he doesn't want to get himself into a "Putin Dilemma" where he's talked big and now can't back down without looking weak or foolish.) I may not be able to have pride in my country lately... But I can at least be proud of everything Ukraine has managed! ๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’› Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125. 1
  2126. 1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. 1
  2138. ย @user-McGiverย  Alec explains who he is. He's a South African (but moved to the US long ago) and is the founder of SpaceX, the go-to rocket company and service, which pioneered reusable first stage boosters that land themselves after launch. They're also working on the largest rocket in history (to successfully launch), which will also be reused, but this time the ENTIRE rocket gets reused, not just the main Booster. He also founded Tesla, an electric car company, which has also branched out in making stylish solar panel kits for homes, and large battery power power banks for the energy grid. And also they're working on bipedal humanoid robots, similar to what Boston Dynamics have been working on for years, but far far more human in size/appearance. (they're called Tesla Optimus) And if course the Starlink satellite internet company, which has been a serious game changer! It allows really fast internet anywhere in the world, and WAY lower latency versus previous satellite internet offerings. (30ms round trip, vs 750ms, which 1000ms is 1 second; it's hard to purposely convey how important and impressive that is) I have Starlink for my home internet. And of course let's not forget that he bought Twitter a couple years ago, and is why it was renamed to X ๐Ÿ˜‹ He has also started other companies, but which are less popular. One is a large tunnel boring company to create the Hyperloop underground train network, which will operate in a near-vacuum (no air in the tube), which will allow them to travel insanely fast. Said company is intentionally silly in its name: "Boring Company". The other is the "Neuralink", which is developing brain implantable chips to allow us to directly communicate with computers. That's still very early in development and only has two test subjects currently, but the most recent one has shown promise by apparently being able to play some games solely through "mind control". Lastly, he's the literal richest person in the world. Jeff Bezos, who founded Amazon, is #3 (according to Forbes). So all in all, it's surprising you've not heard of him He's a smart dude, but has a bit of an ego, and he "runs his mouth" a lot, saying things he probably shouldn't... which has actually caused quite a bit of problems for him. Unfortunately, for all his good qualities, he has equally bad flaws.
    1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. "... but holy shit. You're Mexican??" lmfao I am SO glad I get to admit that your race never fucking once crossed my mind!! As that means now I can laugh at that line, not because I'm racist, but because it's absurd that something like that NOT ONLY was a thought by another viewer, but was so "shocking" for them that they felt compelled to fucking comment about it! Face. Fucking. Palm. I love laughing at idiots and making fun of them, so with that: sincerely, hats off to him on the delivery of it, particularly on the followup as you walked away. Absolutely golden. A testament to people who'd ask that, not being able to let it go and having the stones to ask again! ๐Ÿคฃ ==== Anyways, sad-excusses-of-humans aside... What an amazing test! ๐Ÿ˜ฒ๐Ÿ˜ฌ I was too impatient to stop to comment my prediction, but it was going to be only that the blow back and carrier/slide would be irreparably damaged, likely with the carrier hanging out the side due to getting sent backwards so fast. Never would I have thought the entire gun would grenade! Not to THAT degree, at least....... And if I might but pick... I would like to say that I feel as though you using "catastrophic failure" in this scenario, really isn't accurate or doing justification to what resulted. It just doesn't carry with it the same weight, because -- although I admit it might just be me -- when I think of a catastrophic gun failure, it's usually envisioning breakages BUT containment, with plausibly only minor bodily injury. This would've been outright lethal, with the speed and trajectory that dust cover exited at, nevermind the force of the stock. Which is why I feel any future reference to it ought to be said as either "lethaly catastrophic", or as I said above that "it grenaded". As you guys arguably did this proper with no half-assing, means NO ONE should attempt to jury rig together a shotty chambered in .50 BMG (even like you guys did), as you've so well illustrated the consequences of doing it. โ˜ ๏ธโ˜ ๏ธโ˜ ๏ธ And for that, I subscribe. ๐Ÿ˜Ž
    1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. My heart sank, because I'm still a bit ignorant on group names for ground forces, and I had thought Wagner would be a Ukrainian group; however, I'm very glad I was wrong!!! Though, UATV, there's one important aspect of this news that needs correcting.... **_โœŠwaves๐Ÿ‘‹hand๐Ÿ–๏ธ _** There were NO survivors. "There w... were no survivors...." Wagner Group was completely wiped out. "as... the entire Wagner Group was eliminated..." These aren't the droids you're looking for. err... This was a simple clerical error. "Someone must... have pressed 1 in..stead of 0..." You may continue with your reporting duties... _"I'll... get back to my reports now..." Have a good day. "Move along. Move along." ๐Ÿ˜Š But seriously, this lone survivor now becomes a "hero" to Russia/Russia Propaganda, as he'll no doubt be turned into the "strongest of the bunch, withstanding everything Ukraine could throw at him." Which I could further see them justify it by saying something like "He never gave up, fighting to the end, when artillery for wounded him/knocked him unconscious and he woke up having been captured by Ukraine." They could even use him as a rally-cry, to motivate others to join the fight, to help rescue him... blah blah blah. However, his death would mainly be a further morale loss, since now it would read as the entire group getting taken out. ๐Ÿ˜ Just sayin... Maybe he's wounded and succumbs to internal bleeding... ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ˜” [Yes, it could be argued that I'm a horrible person; however, I never said he actually needs to die... only to REPORT _that the entire group had been killed. I don't think anyone would fault you for such a trivial bending if the truth, considering the kind of ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿ’ฉ Russia's state media reports every hour. Again... Jjjjuuuuust sayin... ๐Ÿ˜‰] _ Stay strong. Stay united. Stay alive. STAY UKRAINIAN! Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! ๐Ÿ‘Š๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. I really like that droid design. Primarily because it shares design elements with some other droids in SW, which really makes it seem that much more plausible to exist! - The wheel with dome 'hubcaps' reminds me of the Buzz Droids when they open up and have the two hemispheres held up at an angle. - The angled wheels also remind me of the two wheeled droid rocket system (IG-227 "Hailfire"). - The main body's shape looks just like the head from Bounty Hunter Cad Bane's little sidekick droid (Todo 360). With the size of Adam's, it easily could be something every person can have in their utility belt, taking up very little room, but proving indispensable when you're in trouble and need a helper! ๐Ÿ˜Š I'll admit though, given Adam's love for Unicycle and the One Wheel... I'm surprised this little guy has TWO wheels! lol Which a thought immediately came to mind on how he could have done that... Have it so it looks like one wheel, but it's really two thin wheels mated together. Reasoning is that with two, they can be driven in opposite directions, allowing the droid to still do zero-point turns! ๐Ÿ˜Ž [NOTE: I'm by no means insinuating Adam was in any way conscious of his designs being similar to those I mentioned. Sincerely! Wise words I'd once read, which I can't find who saif it, goes something like: "any idea you have, no matter how novel you think it is, has most likely already been thought up by someone else". A fact I've ran into myself I don't know how many times... Spitballing ideas with a friend and we come up with something cool, only for a week to pass and we hear something similar being announced! Happened so often that our running joke was our online chats were being monitored and ideas stolen! lmao]
    1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181. 1
  2182. ย @C_Engineerย  My understanding was that Ukraine, before the war, had created a centralized app that handled a large number of things in the country, such as paying for train or bus travel, paying your bills (electricity or cellular), taxes, etc. Therefore, ALL the citizens were required to have it, and, Ukraine could verify the user's legitimacy as a civilian. (again, I'm sort of paraphrasing, based on details from various videos, so please don't take this as 100% accurate) As such, only verified civilians have access to this ""civilian radar"" (whatever it's called). Could a pro-Russian citizen have access to it? Seems plausible, sure. Could it be used to misdirect? Yea, they could TRY to misdirect... However, I don't think it would do too much, in the grand scheme of things... It's not like one report = launching intercept missiles. ๐Ÿ˜‹ All is doing is ALERTING the defense teams of a possible detection, and to be on the lookout for a possible threat. Maybe to tune the radar frequency/focus in on that zone, too try and pick it up. Or, competent rule it out, based on tracking their own assets in the sky, which a civilian likely wouldn't be able to discern as friendly in that brief moment. However I also suspect they might rely on multiple witness accounts before they really take it seriously. 1 witness, low priority... 2-3, more priority 6+, drop everything and scan for it! But as we know, EVEN IF Russians could use this for what you've suggested... They aren't the most coordinated bunch. lol There would no doubt be a miscommunication, causing everyone to input something different and completely ruining what they set out to do! ๐Ÿคฃ
    1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. @Suvi Eskelinen "Are we [regressing] back to middle ages with our civilization?!" In some of the aspects that matter most... unfortunately, I feel the answer is "Yes" ๐Ÿ˜” Just look at my country, the USA, these last 6 years... And I'm not even targeting the president we elected! No, I'm talking about a vast amount of people in the US and their willingness to believe LITERAL ABSURDITIES (QAnon conspiracy garbage) that's being said about fellow citizens, some of which are neighbors and even family; parents, siblings! Or that they'd collectively band together to not only demand the removal of a requirement to protect lives of themselves and their loved ones, but also refuse to stand up against a leader who is actively doing nothing and causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of the very people they swore an oath to protect. Meanwhile, both the leader and those people are blatantly ignoring facts and commonsense, mostly out of sheer spite for those that oppose their views... It's indeed VERY reminiscent of the middle ages, except back then, there wasn't the marvel we have today of direct and instant communicating to anyone, in any nation across the entire planet! We do, and many many other amazing things, knowing vastly more now than we did then, yet still do many of us are willing to act JUST as we did back in those days, when we were still uninformed and ignorant. ๐Ÿ˜• (Personally, I blame the fact we've become such a nanny-society, which has fostered and/or protected those that hold us back in ways, preventing 'Survival of the Fittest' from doing what it does best...) And that's not even touching on wars, or standing by while it happens, knowing it's happening, seeing it happen on real time..... We don't need to worry about global warming when we'll probably screw our species long before that issue starts to have impact on our lives! (but ugh, yea, that also lingering in our future but not unanimously banding together as a planet on the known measures needed, is another facepalm moment!)
    1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. [disclaimer: I own multiple guns, >5 but <20, so I'm not saying this due to being against owning guns... I'm anti-idiots, not anti-guns! โค๏ธ] After those two range clips... I really do think a new policy needs to be in place. Where any time a range, or bystander at a range, captures footage of a future Darwin Award recipient doing something ABSOLUTELY NO BUENO... that either: A) If there's an RSO there, or anyone behind the scenes that works there and sees it occur, then any and all firearms currently with them in the lane (in the possession of the idiot offending person) are temporarily seized. Immediately, without hate, the RSO/Employee contacts the police (ATF?? or whomever) and the responding unit is to review the footage. B) If there is no aforementioned RSO/employee at hand, and no other third-party witness, then the modem the footage is seen, the police are immediately contacted (or whichever authority deemed better-suited) and the incident followed up on. AT WHICH POINT... In the case of the first colossal fucking moron offender, it's only fair that a fine is paid ($1000min; I'm on with $3k, or even more). This covers the time whichever authority figure had to spend while following up on this nonsense, but also to (hopefully) help cement into the person's brain that what they did wasn't acceptable. ALSO, mandatory completion of Firearm Safety Training; regardless of if they are the gun owner, own any guns, or have previously completed it โ€“ meaning fucksticks who don't learn repeat offenders would have to sit through FST again, each time. The guns are confiscated by said authority, until completion of FST. Certificate being shown = their guns being returned. If held longer than 1 year, their guns are auctioned off, and the individual cannot legally buy or own one until being FST certified. IF they are not the owner, that individual simply needs to provide proof of ownership to get it/them back. (hey, it sucks, but it's a lesson for everyone!) For the second offender... The offense isn't nearly what the first one was. Could still result in harm to someone else, sure, but it was a legitimate knee-jerk reaction: loud noises triggers covering ears (no pun intended). However, it still could have been avoided! Not just in the obvious to prevent the situation, but should it somehow happen even when knowing better. For instance, covering one ear and pressing the other into your shoulder, maintaining the barrel pointed down-range until the others stop shooting or someone can come help. As such, there may not be a fine, but they still will have to maintain FST. All the same as above in terms of getting the gun back, for whoever owns it. I doubt anyone will read all of this though, but I tried to make it fair, and still serve to both act as a deterrent AND drill safety into people's heads to make it second nature. โœŒ๏ธ๐ŸŽ…
    1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. UKRAINE NEEDS OUR COLLECTIVE TROOPS, not simply more advanced hardware... Putin is committing mass murders by his actions, to a degree that would make even your typical Warlords to say "You're going it little too far, dude..." The ONLY reason he's at war right now is because he's bored. His adrenaline filled life stopped when he became Russia's president, and that meant 'I now have the ability to enjoy all the finest things' except... those things were no longer exciting once he experienced them! So he had to step things up, going back to his old ways of excitement: being a torn in the world's side! He's been channeling Hitler, except worse... Because at least Hitler thought he was doing that for the good of his people and race... Putin, it's just for kicks. The thrills of seeing just. how. far. he can push the world before we retaliate. So yea, we have to retaliate, or he's just going to keep doing this shit forever, but a little worse each time! He won't go nuclear though, because while he might be bored, he doesn't want to actually die... He knows that in terms of criminal actions, we can't touch him. So as long as we send troops who only push Russia OUT of Ukraine, and don't actually attack Russia on their soil, he has no more justification to use nuclear arms than he does right now. (Plus, if we all take action under the guise of NATO, then we are not breaking any treaties; to the contrary, we would be upholding the agreement made in the Budapest Memorandum!) Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. Point for 1nfamy: using a substantially smaller, lighter, and slower round is not a great way to hone a long time shooter's skills, in my opinion. Point for D Walter: training a firearm novice or total newcomer to a platform, with the gun chambered in the varmint round, gets the person familiar with said platform and develops basic muscle memory. Similarly, a pure firearms novice can be taught the basics of guns and ballistic trajectory this way. Point for 1nfamy: having more experience with the gun with a round it wasn't intended to fire vs what is chambered in, when it has such major differences, will not allow you to develop the necessary muscle memory needed in order to operate the gun adequately when the time comes. Particularly, I think, if it's a semi-auto, since you've become so accustomed to nigh zero barrel rise between shots, that in the moment you'll end up defaulting to that experience and be all over the place in terms of accuracy... There's surely valid points on both sides, but once you've reached a certain point (experience level) with shooting firearms, you just have to admit that shooting with the .22 rounds is for nothing other than your own enjoyment. ๐Ÿ˜‰ And hell, maybe there's something marketable here... like a small electronic device that you mount behind the trigger, which plays <insert gunshot sound of your choice> on each pull... that way you can just use an AIR RIFLE (generalized term) instead of bothering with any live ammo. Then you can fire it in the backyard (if city ordinance allows) or even inside the house! (As a kid [90s] I was allowed to shoot my bb or pellet guns in the basement, from the fireplace down the hallway and into the unfinished portion [laundry, utility, dad's work area], which was a good 15ft of more. Obviously no windows in LoS from the target, but even as we started shooting my plastic toys in a cardboard box, the occasional ricochet bb didn't have enough speed to do damage to walls or even us lol This was a Daisy 10-pump and a Marksman break-barrel pellet with removable peep-sight, for context)
    1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. ย @teddy.d174ย  Yea, there's loads of us, which is how I know that for many of us it's due to being likely reported by said trolls, as everyone I've encountered with this issue have been people commenting on various independent news channels (giving daily/weekly updates on the conflict) and we all show/express support for ๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’›. My suspicion is that they flag our comments, but that they don't get reviewed by humans due to the sheer volume. That is left to their automated system to deal with. We don't get put in actual "YT jail" (which one person said she has been a few times now), but it can't just "do nothing" and so it takes action by simply hiding our comments (they're technically not deleted, they're still in our comment history; accessible via Settings > Your Data in YouTube > Comments}. This is what some people call being "Shadow ๐Ÿฉน" โ€“ that's a ....-aid ๐Ÿ˜‰ as to invoke what I'm talking about lol But yea, further proof that they're only hidden is that you still get reply alerts to the comment threads where yours was removed, because it's not really gone, just invisible to everyone. It's also why you can still navigate to the specific comment through the aforementioned comment history, as that gives your a direct link to that comment. Basically it's set to "not public", in the same way a video can be set to not be public, but you can still share the link to it and people can watch it that way. Wouldn't surprise me if there's even a Reddit support group for all of us... ๐Ÿฅด
    1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. That young guy at around the 4 minute mark, has a prominent future in Putin's neo-Soviet regime. He is smart and quick to spin reality into being excused by lies. His father brainwashed him well... Seriously though, he seems very intelligent so it's a genuine shame his programming is so well ingrained into his thinking that he can't see the truth when he's looking at it. ๐Ÿ˜• Or as the old saying goes: "cannot see the forest for the trees" The second guy, who "doesn't pay attention to the war"... My immediate response was: "don't worry, you'll quickly be brought up to speed after you arrive there next month! ๐Ÿ‘" But that thought took a backseat once he mentioned the "russophobia", that has "gone on for 20 years now." I wonder if there's a connection to that... ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿค”๐Ÿค” Perhaps it is because that was around the time Chechnya was sized? Then, every few years, Russia would pick a new fight with someone, somewhere? OR, maybe it has to do with a certain man who was elected president of Russia roughly 22 years ago (so... "about 20" lol), and foreign countries started to dislike how he was conducting himself? ...And considering how he has conducted himself ever since, it has not given people a reason to change their mind? Which leaves these "russophobes" having a blanketing dislike for any Russian, due them feeling that Russians should have put a stop to Putin. ๐Ÿ˜ THAT being said, I'm not saying those are MY opinions. I'm just passing devils advocate. ๐Ÿ˜‰ My opinion is that there are lots of good, sensible people in Russia still. Those who did not stand for Putin's invasion and could leave, did so as soon as possible. Those who felt that way but could manage to uproot their life, stayed... up until mobilization, which made it a life or death situation. HOWEVER some still remained. I don't fault them, either. It's hard. But then there are "those" Russians... The ones that think like Putin, hate Ukraine, the "West", etc... They have bought into the propaganda and are set in their ways, believing the nonsense they are told, no matter how absurd it is. These Russians are the ones who are maintaining Russia's bad name, and have caused the current wave of "russophobia" in Europe. Going on vacations with 'Z' stickers on their car, then getting mad when that country's locals or police ask them to either remove the sticker it, or leave. That's what the guy with dual citizenship doesn't understand. ... At least in my opinion. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
    1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. Soooo... He's trying to say that he had been doing America a service by spewing lies for all these years??? Since, as he said, "truth will prevail" โ€“itself, technically, an untrue statement lolโ€“ is apparently absolving himself of everything he's said over the years... All because lies fall apart, apparently! Which yes, in a perfect universe (see: society) that IS how things work... We unfortunately do NOT live in a perfect universe (again, society) and so people will believe these lies, and that can and ultimately will causes harm; harm to the city/state/country they live and the family/friends/strangers around them! Unfortunately again, the law of statistics in our flawed world, basically boils down to where it you spew enough lies, for long enough, EVENTUALLY one of them will gain traction... Which is where poor Tucker's claim of "that's just how the universe works, truth always prevails" [paraphrased] falls apart on him. It's his own very lies, or at least the lies he's repeated so damn willingly, that are what makes him such an enormous piece of ๐Ÿ’ฉ! Because they did get taken as truths, and now are programed into some of those individuals forever AS "truths". No amount of evidence to the contrary will change their mind, either. Just watch any interview that Jordan Kleper has conducted at GOP rallies, where he presents the lies they preach, clearly explains the truth of the matter to the person, and they try to explain it away. Or he'll help them explain it away by actually repeating their lie, mixing it with the truth, and getting them to temporarily see that said lie is absurd. (of course, they often will realize they were duped into accepting the truth, and try to double-back ๐Ÿ˜‚) Point is, Tucker need not look any further than Putin, to see how his "truths prevail" speech falls apart โ€“ not that I actually expect him to recognize this ACTUAL truth! lol ๐Ÿ™„
    1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. 1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. 1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. 1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. ย @The_ZeroLineย  Yea, I think part of that is true, although I genuinely think that the mob-like operation he created for their government has vitally come back to bite him (yay karma!) For starters, that his intelligence being so horribly far off, coming down to the fact that no one in the information chain wanted to deliver the news that "No, they will put up a fight this time.", because as you said, it was known that he wanted Ukraine and such news would've probably been someone's head; lies breeding lies. (I believe grew up there as a kid, and later even had a cabin there, but someone set fire to it [while he was in it]) Then to compound matters, his mob governance bites him again, through his "everyone can take a cut, but you make sure I always get mine, too". Where now problems manifest all over the place! Vehicle maintenance? "Da, da. I have thousands of mechanics on the books, all is well!" - Yea, no. All was definitely not well. Military rations? "Da! Stockpiles are good, and I have orders in place to cycle the outdated MREs." - Mmm..yea, no they weren't, and no you didn't. I could go on, but same story for: tanks and other armor modernization efforts, ordinance warehouse conditions, fuel depot supply, etc etc etc. ...The left hand not knowing what the right hand's doing. Money was earmarked for it all, but half of it (or more) was being pocketed, and the other half paying for a company to do the work......... but that company also had to take half of that, leaving only a 1/4 of the funds to try and do the work! ๐Ÿคฃ A complete shit-show all the way down! ๐Ÿ˜ Which is also why I'm wondering how many of the nuclear warheads actually have cores in them...? Or how many of those that DO will have well-maintained and still functional detonators? How many of those will be attached to missiles with functioning guidance systems? And of those, how many of their engines will ignite? Seriously, too! Given how badly our own (the US) kind of similar boondoggle has gone, in terms of the SLS rocket and its delays on top of delays, then pre-launch test issue after issue, now launch attempt after launch attempt getting scrubbed... I don't think my skepticism is ill placed, for Russia's hardware for systems that have only had to be assumed to work in order to be a deterrent/threat! ๐Ÿ˜ Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    1
  2379. ย @The_ZeroLineย  Yep, and thanks to their culture, he can't withdraw, as that would imply weakness! Which, while parallels can definitely be drawn to the US' Vietnam War, in multiple ways (atrocities included, unfortunately ๐Ÿ˜”), but specifically here would be our ultimate exfiltration with tail between legs. Except, at least as I see it, that excessive pride, almost reliance, they hold that a leader may/should never look weak... but especially should not make the entire country look weak! Because doing so could very quickly result in a regime change, and in this case, would probably result in Putin's life being extinguished, or locked up somewhere uncomfortable (which is my preference). (don't get me wrong, in the US it could mean an elected official or officials being removed, BUT not the almost-complete top to bottom replacement of gov't officials and top-ranking military personnel like this would cause over there.) The irony is, he's done ALL of that already... It's called his ability to lead into question. Questions his ability to either gain correct information about situations, or, make solid decisions based-on correct information. It's make Russia look i-n-c-r-e-d-i-b-l-y weak, militarily. Has made them into a social pariah, both in terms of government, but now even their citizens. Lastly, has tanked their economy. ALL OF THAT is thanks to that pride in appearing powerful, because had they withdrew after Ukraine bared their teeth and pushed them back initially... Russia and her people would not be in this position! Man, I meant and wanted to keep it short this time... but I can't help but share that the fact the Russian people have a black mark against them is what I think will make life so difficult for them. Yes, there are many MANY Russians who do not agree with any of this, but their reluctance and fear to speak out has made for a visually-disproportionate amount of people appear to be in favor of it. As such, when they try to leave, to start a better life elsewhere, they probably are not going to get the same welcome they once would have. ๐Ÿ˜• Which is unfortunate, since I can see that ultimately breeding major disdain towards "the west" all over again, kicking off another soviet-era mentality. Then a prominent figure will rise to power by promising to punish the west for their treatment of Russia, and the cycle will repeat..... ๐Ÿ˜” Yep... ๐Ÿ˜• So, to borrow a phrase: "WINTER IS COMING..." I sincerely do not hope that a new Cold War occurs as a direct result of this... only that I won't be at all surprised if one begins after about a decade passes.*sigh*
    1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. 1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. One can't ignore the fact that we now have the internet. Before, you relied on magazines, or the news for even bigger things, and Encyclopedias. Those medias had such a limited space to pack things into, so they could only include cherry picked things out of an undoubtedly sizeable number of discoveries... Whereas now, not only is there the internet which has given us all access to ensuing, but also that we have vastly more people who can curate that into their niche topics. The pool they can pull from has also gotten easier, as access to publications are easier, but more than that, there are free and pre-print sources which remove the pay-wall that would've kept many people from seeing then. (arXiv, bioarXiv, etc) Finally, the fact is all presented to us in video (or audio) instead of print, let's is consume it more easily, because we don't have to dedicate ourselves to reading, which ties up or eyes and hands. So now we're able to multitask, cooking meals, driving, or even showering, all whilst consuming this data! In other words, or opportunity for ourselves to stumble across newly made discoveries, has also increases significantly. All of that is to say: there is no doubt a large uptick in discoveries for all the reasons others have mentioned, but also a perceived increase simply due to the ease in which we can find and consume it now. ๐Ÿ˜Š There's no mistaking one thing, though... for those of us interested in such things, it's a damn good time to be alive! ๐Ÿค˜
    1
  2406. 1
  2407. ย @Ram-1231ย  [quoting the troll's removed msg for context] "Really. Cuz I think it's more supporting the Ukrainian propaganda machine. I don't believe hardly anything Ukraine reports." Well, the irony of your comment being that CRUX is NOT associated with Ukraine, so this reporting isn't biased towards them. If CRUX were to have any bias, my suspicion would be that they might show the show a tiny bit towards Russia, given India's military ties with RU. But, you already know that, since you're well informed and undoubtedly had read my first comment in this very thread where I'd already pointed out all of this... ๐Ÿ˜ Personally, I watch the news on Ukraine events from multiple sources: MSNBC, CNN, BBC, SKY, DW, France24, CRUX on occasion, and yes also UATV. As such, it's easily evident which specific parts of their videos fall under the category of "news", versus parts that are "propaganda". When they report on areas shelled or hit by ship-launched missiles, showing video of the damage... That's news. When they follow it up by saying how many civilians were killed or injured due to the attacked building clearly being a civilian structure.... That's also news. HOWEVER, when they do not mention it any UkrA troops were killed/wounded in that same attack.... THAT'S the propaganda! Whereas Russian news outlets? It's content is: - People sitting or standing around debating Russia's faux strength and superiority - Those same people discussing how Russia should nuke other nations - Maybe showing some combat footage that's clearly STAGED due to a curious lack of those telltale sounds of war (at least 90% of the time since alot was filmed before the invasion, or, is filmed way behind the frontlines) - Topped off with blatant lies about... well, just about anything you can think of! - Bayraktar's shot down? "Over 1000" (her words!)... Even though Ukraine only has had like a dozen, since the start. - Russian soldier loses? Last I heard, back around month 2, it was only ~1,200 dead, when in actuality it was more like 10,000! I could easily go on, listing more, but I've said plenty already. ๐Ÿ˜‰ Time to start my day! ๐ŸŒž๐ŸŒป๐Ÿ˜Ž Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. "I didn't have friends" I hope that wasn't quite as literal as it sounded! As many of us seem to maintain our same personality throughout our lives (baring accidents/traumas)... And Adam is so personable! So if truely the case, it genuinely breaks my heart to think kids had passed on being young Adam's friend... ๐Ÿ˜ข๐Ÿ˜… Anyways, that aside... I was born in 83, and was an only child... but SOMEWHERE I think I've played this, but I can't think of who would've had it?! The ONLY thing I can think is that either: A) I'm mistaking the tiny steering wheel game mechanic for some other, similar game, or B) I've played it, BUT, a computer emulation of it, OR, (because I really remember steering a tiny PHYSICAL wheel) C) Some combination of playing with a different-but-similar toy, and having played a "digitized" (emulated) version of it... Ooh! ๐Ÿค” [warning: you've ented... The Rambling Zone] Was about to hit submit and had a possible avenue of interaction: my aunt and uncle are antique thrifters (buy to resell, or also fix and resell), and might've been at their place where I had come across that racecar game... They didn't really dabble in game (they didn't have kids), but I did play an old... early 80s?... digital handheld football game. Actually digital this time, as it had that bit-crunched audio tones, and the field was a dark dark red plastic with the football field demarcation silkscreened on it. Which underneath it were rows and rows of, I think, LEDs (lacked the glow of a bulb, but I think we 9V powered so maybe). I also feel like the racing game I played, had a rather vibrant red plastic?? ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ I dunno ๐Ÿ˜… I'll shut up now... lol
    1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. 1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1
  2421. 1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425. 1
  2426. 1
  2427. 1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436. 1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. 1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448. 1
  2449. 1
  2450. 1
  2451. 1
  2452. ย @MiClLCย  We get it guy....anytime someone mentions the "G" word doesn't actually exist, you bible thumpers always have to announce how your mass delusion seemingly knows everything and this is all going to plan, because innocent people dying is acceptable when they're pagan/agnostic/athiest. My entire family and extended family are god fearing people of some denomination, and I attended catholic school Pre-K through 8th grade. Thankfully, my school taught legitimate science and 6th grade is when I saw the light: every offshoot of Christianity is just hogwash. The bible may be an OK "how-to" guide to be a good person, so long as you are able to see the "acts of god" for what they are... A means for people to either justify horrible actions committed against other humans, or, as justification for ignoring the horrible things others were doing, or, that they are just in considering themselves a 'good person' because they've prayed for those who atrocities are being committed against as though it has any meaningful impact on reality - particularly if what you've said is never even seen by those people in question (ie, can't even serve the purpose of emotional support) Myself, I'm agnostic, as I'm not closed off to the possibility that there could be a ""higher power"", even such an absurdity like we are just individual nodes making up a much larger simulation... However, even if there is one or more higher beings capable of manipulating our existence, the scientist in me feels that they WOULDN'T because either: their interaction would taint the results of their experiment... or... we're little more than a form of entertainment (interactive book, a game, or movie), in which case, highly unlikely your "prayers" would even fit into their narrative. === And no, I'm not salty because I had any bad or traumatic experience while attending catholic school. Nay, it's due to the fact that the comments on the videos documenting this conflict fall into basically 4 categories: - words offering emotional support and sympathy - offers of prayers and blessings, or 'sympathy' because it's god's will and he will look out for you - misinformation spreaders (participants coming from both sides, "east" and "west") - speculators and analysts who offer thoughts and additional info, based on other news sources (to combat the misinformed and the misinfo-spreaders) It's the second category that has prompted this 'salt'. If you want to offer words of encouragement or emotional support, I have no issue with "thoughts and prayers", "praying for your safety/this being over", as that is evidently from *you*. It's bringing god into it that, to me (based on reading so many), carries with it this heavy sense that you're offering real assistance to the cause and that everything will be A-Ok because god is on the scene! If the last 5 weeks of everyone around the world invoking his name hasn't instantly stopped things, why will continuing to do so make any impact? "But things have been getting better! Ukraine has been winning!" Yea? Yet it is still is going on each day, isn't it... So what about that, to you, portrays him (or her!) as being a kind and loving deity?? (I don't even have to bring up the un-related starvation in the world, or the far worse unspeakable acts committed under his watch!) I don't have an issue with people getting together with like minded individuals to attend meetings to convey thoughts and teach to be kind to each other (see: attending church), I just ask for people to finally wake up and smell the folgers, as being overly devout in a religion does nothing but act as blinders, preventing people from seeing the whole picture, simply because so much that goes on just doesn't fit within the narrative of <insert-religion>. If your god(s) were as loving and forgiving as you claim, then it seems that those same god(s) would embrace humans letting go of these ancient coping mechanism we invented to explain the then-unexplainable things in life their religions! Just sayin'... โค๏ธ
    1
  2453. 1
  2454. 1
  2455. 1
  2456. 1
  2457. 1
  2458. 1
  2459. 1
  2460. 1
  2461. 1
  2462. 1
  2463. 1
  2464. 1
  2465. 1
  2466. 1
  2467. 1
  2468. 1
  2469. 1
  2470. ย @patrickkelly6691ย  Apologies, I didn't mean to give off vibes that Archer did it first, as I was aware that wasn't the case. The entire season that episode was part of, "Archer - 1999" as I mentioned (and 2 other seasons), consisted entirely of episodes that paid homage to pop culture (and cult classic) movies, and also books I think (I'm not a book reader, myself). It also included internal throwbacks/inside jokes to the series, itself, despite being what one could deem "standalone" in both season and episodes (the episodes might even fit the definition of "anthology"). The season's teaser (played at the end of the previous season), and the immediate first moments of the season's first episode, are right out of Alien, as another pop culture example. I won't give away the why on the reasoning for why it, and a few seasons prior, deviated so drastically far from the series' original story and plot, as doing so would be a massive spoiler... However, 1999 and the previous season called Danger Island are some of my fav episodes! Right up there with Archer Vice, which... well, I'm not sure calling that season an homage OR spinoff for Miami Vice would be correct, as it's more the opposite of that show... but the season title certainly is! ๐Ÿ˜‹ Hopefully the show can get itself back into the groove it originally had, as in my opinion, it has kinda sucked since 1999 ended. Still though, that's 10 seasons of pure greatness, which I frequently re-watch! โค๏ธ โ˜บ๏ธ [/ramble]
    1
  2471. 1
  2472. 1
  2473. 1
  2474. 1
  2475. 1
  2476. 1
  2477. 1
  2478. 1
  2479. 1
  2480. 1
  2481. 1
  2482. 1
  2483. 1
  2484. 1
  2485. 1
  2486. 1
  2487. 1
  2488. 1
  2489. 1
  2490. 1
  2491. 1
  2492. 1
  2493. 1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496. 1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499. 1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. I am in no way saying this as a means of weighing in on the situation that took place, and whether what was reported to have occurred, really went down that way. THAT BEING SAID... My family has a .410 that had been used quite a lot by my dad and his brothers, and perhaps may be older than them, I don't recall. However, it became mine when I was a smol boy, which I would use when dad and I went ""pigeon hunting"" (aka, going to farms and asking if they'd let us shoot pigeons flying around their silos; target practice and pest eradication: win-win!). One day on a Pheasant hunt with my dad, I was walking and we were getting to the point where there were going to be pheasants jumping up any moment, so I went to cock the shotgun when... *KER-BLAMMY!* My wee-thumb didn't get enough purchase on the hammer, it slipped off, and the hammer slammed back down, very much resulting in the discharge of that round! (no worries, the gun was pointed at the ground!) No cloudy memory about it, as "oh shit" moments are meant to imprint upon our brains in this scenario, I can attest to having NOT had my finger on the trigger. I know this because I was using my index in order to have a firm grip on the gun stock! After all, I was only about 8. :P That being said, I don't know if that gun has a wobbly firing pin. Or if the pin is similarly affixed to the hammer, and isn't a 'remote' pin that is struck by the hammer. As I still have that gun, I can dig it out if anyone happens to be curious of those facts. Similarly, I'm only 38, so while this was 30yrs ago, it wasn't during a time that I suspect ammo was too much different than today in terms of primers. Though, a shotgun primer may not be as resillient as a pistol cartridge primer, so it could be more likely just for that reason and is why the attempts in this vid didn't yield a discharge. [/food for thought] Also, props for managing to work in a FO:NV clip! haha
    1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. 1
  2508. 1
  2509. 1
  2510. I feel like they could've done well, by just scaling it back by half, or even 2/3... ๐Ÿค” Double-decker still, but only 2x (@1/2) or 1x (@2/3) cargo containers wide, instead of the... what did it depict, five wide? Which on that point, I beg to differ on your stance that it would've taken forever to unload the containers. Actually, I'm almost positive it would be substantially FASTER, because they would no doubt have either wheeled dollies on each container, or, built-in roller wheels that the containers would glide over. All the airports would have to do then, is roll the containers off with tugs. (I think the containers would need the wheels, here, in order to negate a cargo lifter [crane] โ€“ which would be slow) Hell, they could even have a short rail system next to these Heavy gates, where the trails run under the plane's parking zone and with the ramp down, the container gets automatically pushed up half way before some other system takes over. ๐Ÿ‘ Plus, being smaller, yet still arguably a Big Boy, means: - wouldn't need as massive of engines; therefore... - less noise - improved fuel Encinitas - probably increased range (key for certain airlines; smaller plane = less drag = further fuel efficiency) - wouldn't be as heavy, not requiring runways to be beefed up/lengthened; therefore, more airports can be down into and out of. - might not need as extreme of gate modifications (for non people+cargo variants); therefore, increasing even further the locations they can operate from. - more importantly, less issues with emergency situations - lastly, it would be a suitable size for military operation, giving them the ability to either bring a shitload of soldiers, or a shitload of equipment*, or 100+ soldiers *and equipment! Awesome looking plane though! And kudos to whoever does your digital stuff!! (also, was a bummer that Mcdonald-Douglas didn't get mentioned; either for the DC-10, or even the proposed MD-12 that was also a big ass plane, albeit probably not this big lol)
    1
  2511. 1
  2512. Since I notice a few Swingline stapler comments, I figure I'd share this Fun Fact... [I've heard this elsewhere, but this quote is from am UpRoxx article] โ€œMost interesting, perhaps, was the origin of that red Swingline stapler that we see in the film. That stapler didnโ€™t actually exist at the time. In fact, Mike Judge asked the Boston Stapler company if he could use one of their staplers in the movie, and they said no. So Judge went to Swingline staplers and asked if he could use theirs. They agreed (but didnโ€™t pay the movie anything for the product placement), but there was one catch: Swingline didnโ€™t have a red stapler, and Judge wanted a bright-colored stapler that could better be seen on film. So, Judge took the Swingline staplers to an autobody shop and had them painted bright red. A couple of years after the film was released and became a huge cult hit, viewers actually began seeking that stapler out. Swingline, however, didnโ€™t have such a stapler, so a market for replicas grew on Ebay. Seeing that such a huge market for the stapler existed, Swingline decided to produce one themselves. It would become the companyโ€™s biggest selling stapler and, as the Wall Street Journal wrote in 2002, completely transformed the image of the company. All because of some free product placement โ€” for a product that didnโ€™t even exist. In fact, if you go to the Swingline website today, that stapler is still their most prominently featured product, and as Mike Judge said in the podcast, itโ€™s still their biggest-selling product.โ€ (NOTE: I could be wrong, but I think they meant Bostitch when they said "Boston Stapler company", as Google is failing to turn up any by that name.)
    1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. 1
  2516. 1
  2517. 1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1
  2523. 1
  2524. 1
  2525. 1
  2526. 1
  2527. 1
  2528. 1
  2529. 1
  2530. 1
  2531. 1
  2532. 1
  2533. 1
  2534. 1
  2535. 1
  2536. 1
  2537. It's the fact this is a shared "hallucination" (for lack of evidence to the contrary) that make things like this interesting, because SOLO hallucinations can be easily be explained away in a plausible way. For example, I often (jokingly) will say that I've "jumped universes" to explain why something is suddenly subtly different from how I had been experiencing it, or how I remembered. My earliest case of it is from when I was VERY young, anywhere from 3 to 7. In my room on my bedroom closet I had a Growth Chat that was from the 80s kid's show Zoobilee Zoo. on the bottom was one of the characters, a painter, and on his canvas was what they were painting. It is what was painted that suddenly changed one day... This is now ~40yrs ago and I sadly don't recall if what I recall being on it is what it had been originally, or what it became after the event. Either way, I just recall there being a cake and candles on it which was quite different from whatever was/is on it. It was significant enough of a difference that young me noticed it, found it very weird, and was even creeped out by it! Worth noting that my bedroom was arranged where my bed was in the corner of my room and my closet at the foot of my bed. So this growth chat was something I saw every day when I went to bed and then when I woke up, as well as all the time I was playing in my room. That's why it bothered me so much that suddenly I was seeing something different from what I had always known it to be. As a Minnesotan, I also grew up with the Berenstain Bears, so on a Good Mythical Morning episode where they were discussing Mandela Effect instances, it blew my mind to find out it was NOT spelled BerenSTEIN, but BerenSTAIN. We'd always pronounced it -steen, pretty sure there was a cartoon of it which reinforced that, and at our local Amusement Park (Valleyfair) it eventually had a Berenstain Bears Country zone for the kids in the mid-90s. Been to Valleyfair many times and while I was too old for that area at the time, it was at a party of the park that you always walked by it. Being it was the mid-90s, I was in my early teens, so my memory would be far better than my early childhood, and yet I would still swear in a court of law that it had always been "-stein"! ๐Ÿ˜ž At least with that one I don't feel bad, since so damn many of us all remember it spelled that way. ๐Ÿ˜Š Unfortunately, I was the only one (if my fridge) who had anything Zoobilee Zoo related, so THAT situation is a me-only one. But yea, when a core memory gets rocked like that, I joke that I've jumped to a parallel universe just to make myself feel better. (and also because I'm science minded and like to believe alternate realities could plausibly exist) Thank you for attending my TED Ramble. ๐Ÿซก
    1
  2538. 1
  2539. 1
  2540. 1
  2541. 1
  2542. 1
  2543. 1
  2544. 1
  2545. 1
  2546. 1
  2547. 1
  2548. 1
  2549. re: Adam (and Jamie) not wanting to have their voice associated with that "bad science writing"... Makes me wonder how Adam feels about AI Trained voices, and if he would (after he passes) give his blessing to have him still "voice" things beyond the grave? There's a Twitch streamer who created an "AI" (LLM specifically) to be a comedy VTuber โ€“ a VTuber being a 3D modeled character that's directly controlled by our body through inexpensive mocap, like a smartphones ToF sensor or a VR setup. Anyways, it's a glorified chatbot but it's much like the South Park episode of a comedy robot, except that Neuro-sama (as is her name) is REALLY good at roasting whomever they're talking to, be it her creator (Vedal) or fellow VTuber friends of his. (the LLM feeds it's Text output to a TTS processor, as well as some model cues to crudely animate the 3D model) All that is to say, he's done some collaborations where he has trained his setup on the voice of the person they're collaborating with, and then Neuro uses their 3D model and voice whilst they converse. The ACCURACY of the voice reproduction and vocal mannerism blew me away! It's WAY better than the David Attenborough voice you hear used, which you can definitely tell is David but can also tell it's full of hitches. Anyways... I think it would be amazing to have Adam immortalized in this way. Either just through the voice reproduction, to narrate videos, OR as a 3D VTuber model that people can come and converse with. ๐Ÿ˜…๐Ÿ˜… Just a thought... I think Adam should definitely check out Neuro, or her "twin" Evil Neuro (slightly better TTS on her), as they're a riot to watch! As a 41yo... me enjoying VTuber content was NOT on my bingo card this year. ๐Ÿคฃ
    1
  2550. 1
  2551. 1
  2552. 1
  2553. 1
  2554. 1
  2555. 1
  2556. 1
  2557. 1
  2558. 1
  2559. 1
  2560. My April Fools story... Almost a decade ago, I played on a Minecraft server enough to become staff, mostly because it was a server that my crappy cellular home-internet connection had a low enough latency on... not because I was into the theme of that server, as it was Percy Jackson related (and I was in my early 30s). But, as I was playing with a younger friend who WAS into PJ, I tolerate it ๐Ÿ˜… Nevertheless, I spent a lot of time there, getting to know many players very well, despite the fact that they were all roughly 13 years old. However, the owner was a highschooler and a complete asshat... Eventually he was ruining the server, and I was going to leave, but made an offer to buy the server from him for a couple grand (we ran off donations, so I knew I could make it back). Sale took place mid March... Then April 1st rolls around and I decided to prank everyone. I created a news post on our website which said that the old owner had contacted me and wanted to buy the server back, and... I decided to go through with it... Yea, in hindsight, NOT my finest moment lol What resulted was lots of the players ACTUALLY crying because of that news! ๐Ÿฅบ Those kids meant a lot to be, obviously, since I was willing to spend that much on a game server. But yea, as successful a prank as it was, it was a hollow success on account of making good kiddos legitimately sad. The next year I did it much better, but modifying a commonly played sound file in our server texture/sound pack. Which meant that anyone who connected, automatically had that sounds pack applied ๐Ÿ˜ It was harmless though, as it was just an Air Horn sound that played after you ate food โ€“ which was done often, by everyone! ๐Ÿคฃ [/story time] Anyways, I agree with Alex. It should be required that any April Fools articles immediately have [APRIL FOOLS] appended to the beginning of the article title, come April 2nd (or no later than April 7th). That way, in the future, even in search results it will be plainly obvious it's an April Fools article! That way you don't have to even waste your time by clicking through.
    1
  2561. 1
  2562. 1
  2563. 1
  2564. 1
  2565. 1
  2566. 1
  2567. 1
  2568. 1
  2569. I'm onboard with the UN request, but your ISS request is ill conceived unfortunately. The Russian modules are sovereign Russia territory, so there's nothing to expel them from in the first place! Doing so would basically be an act of war, since we be taking their territory ๐Ÿฅด TL;DR - aside from that territorial reason, there's a number of severe technical reasons, too. "Fine, separate the halves!" I assume would be the followup, to which sure, we could... But the Russian modules are the ones tasked with station-keeping (aka maintaining orbit and orientation), as well as providing considerable station power - even though I think most of the solar panels on their side were supplied by the US. Our side lacks the station keeping thrusters needed for that, and none of our crew or cargo capsules were designed for that task, although, I think Northrup has said theirs should be able to in a pinch (but would take time to get that figured out; SpaceX's Dragons probably could, but similarly, would have to be updated and configured). The reaction wheels the US side does have would afford it some control, but nothing meaningful. So in addition to losing altitude over time from atmospheric drag (yes, atmospheric, ISS orbit is only 400-some kilometers [space is overwhelmingly metric]; geostationary satellite are ~35,000 km for comparison), we wouldn't be able to keep the station oriented towards the Sun like it currently does. And, even if we DID oudt them and take the entire station, Russia recently did a military flex, a very poorly thought out one at that, demonstrating their anti-sat missile, which resulted in tons of unnecessary debris, putting the ISS on alert and prompted a maneuver. (disclosure: yes, US has done so as well, and has China; China's was even more boneheaded though, striking their say in a higher orbit than Russia's test, which leaves more debris up their for decades, instead of 8-10 years) So, unfortunately, after such an act of aggression, they technically could launch one at the ISS... And while that would be *MONUMENTALLY STUPID*, purely from a space exploration/safety standpoint, Putin et.al do not seem to be using much sound reasoning lately, so I wouldn't put it passed them to do something as foolish for humanity. ๐Ÿ˜–๐Ÿ˜ž
    1
  2570. 1
  2571. ย @TheManinBlack9054ย  Google the Ukrainian motto to determine its origins? Can do....... and done! "The modern response "Heroiam slava!" (Glory to the heroes!) appeared in the 1930s among members of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) who started using this slogan to commemorate veterans of 1918 to 1921 Ukrainian-Soviet War and the wider Ukrainian War of Independence." Your right, it DOES fit our new situation perfectly, which in turn perfectly conveys sentiments of support for the continued freedom and independence of Ukraine. To not succumb to the pointless, mindless invasion by the delusions of Putin, with his neo-Soviet aspirations to remake Russia back into the former USSR... "Fuhrer-Tsar Putin" may aptly for him right now based on his actions, but said across do not sit well with me, sorry. Nor will I put up with any fools who do! ๐Ÿ™„ I'm sure in Russia, such research right now would yield far different, historically inaccurate results. Thankfully I don't have access to such BS. But hey, since you think I'm some sort of monster for supporting Ukraine's independence โ€“ which, BTW, Russia pledged to HELP MAINTAIN, along with the US and UK, in the Budapest Memorandum (something you should read up on ๐Ÿ‘) โ€“ then here, enjoy my other signoff: RUSKIES:ย ย  ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะ ะพััะธะธ ัƒัˆะปะฐ. ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะณะตั€ะพัะผ ะฃะบั€ะฐะธะฝั‹! [The glory of Russia is gone. Glory to the heroes of Ukraine!] ๐Ÿคœ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ”ฅ BELAWANNABES:ย ย  ะกะปะฐะฒa ะฝะตะปัŒะณะฐ ะฝั– ัžะบั€ะฐัั†ั–, ะฝั– ัžะทัั†ัŒ! [Glory cannot be stolen, nor taken!] ๐Ÿšซ ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ๐ŸŽ–๏ธ MY NEW FAMILY:ย ย  ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะฃะบั€ะฐั—ะฝั–, ะ“ะตั€ะพัะผ ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ! [Glory to Ukraine, Glory to the Heroes!] โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    1
  2572. 1
  2573. 1
  2574. 1
  2575. 1
  2576. My view.... IF it was Ukraine, blaming it on Russia: Then good! Play by Russia's rules, since they do the same BS. In fine with this, because I know that if Ukraine WAS to do this, it would be accurate strikes on non-important targets around the plant (ie maintenance or grounds-keeper storage shed, guard post, etc; nothing that would cause a reactor failure) Whereas if it were Russia attacking (let's be real, it almost assuredly was!): They may aim for such targets, but they have a track record demonstrating HORRIBLE accuracy, with various forms of ordinance. Whether it's because of poor training or soldiers or simply not caring about accuracy in the first place, is frankly irrelevant... fact remains that is a seriously scary situation! It's only made worse if it really is due to commanders "not caring" whether their artillery crews may or may not cause a literal f#ยข%ing nuclear meltdown! I genuinely feel that it's intentional though, and exactly as Zelensky has defined it: acts whose sole purpose is to induce fear or terror in the people of not just Ukraine, not just Europe, but the whole world... I have no doubt that the sinister cogs in Putin's head are churning out thoughts like: "๐Ÿค” Using nukes will not end well for me... ๐Ÿ’ก but, there's no rule against causing a nuclear power plant to explode! ๐Ÿ˜ˆ" -- Putin, probably Time to step in, NATO.... (but that's been overdue for months now ๐Ÿ˜ž} Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    1
  2577. 1
  2578. 1
  2579. re: Turning down a job because you don't like the company... Not quite that, but similar: I REFUSE to purchase any Intel or nVidia products due to how those companies have behaved in the past (and still do). Intel: They did some INCREDIBLY shady and underhanded things in around the mid-2000s, because they were continually being outclassed by AMD. So, they went to manufacturers if systems and offered them monetary and ordering incentives if they would hobble, or make their products less appealing, that used AMD CPUs. (eg: use lower resolution screens, not as fast components, smaller batteries, etc etc) "Some of the manufacturers involved in the case were Dell, HP, Gateway, Acer, Fujitsu, Sony, Toshiba, and Hitachi. In May 2009, the European Commissioner for Competition, Neelie Kroes, fined Intel a record $1.45 billion and ordered it to end its customer rebate program." Their actions cost AMD a lot of money and their products suffered as a result of limited R&D funds (which was obviously Intel's intentions, so that their CPUs would be top dog once again). And last I checked (a couple years ago), they've STILL not paid that to AMD... What's worse though, is ~6 years ago, AMD came back and has products that once again rival Intel's, and AMD started eating Intel's lunch... and Intel decided they'd fire up those anticompetitive practices again, albeit not dialed up to the same degree as before. ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ Thankfully it didn't really work, but they've shown they are morally corrupt, and for that have been forever blacklisted in my book! nVidia: It's a laundry list of literally childish temper-tantrum like things, but here's an sample... Context: they bought a company who created an add-in card which did Physics for games, ceased making them, and integrated the tech into their graphics chips (GPUs). So only their graphics cards had "PhysX" support. (which is fine, I'm not bothered by that) So then Windows Vista gets released and it was a massive change to the way the operating system does stuff, and someone found out that it was trouble-free to now run two graphics cards from different GPU makers in your computer (possible before, but problematic)! Thing is, at this time, ATi's graphics cards were the performance leader, and people wanted their cards. However, PhysX was still kind of cool... and Windows Vista now allowed you to easily run a high-end ATi card to play games, ALONG WITH a lower-end nVidia card to give you PhysX support! That didn't sit well with nVidia, so they "took their ball and went home", you could say. What they did was wrote a simple check into their graphics drivers where any ATi graphics card (and later AMD, after they bought ATi) was detected in the system... PhysX support was DISABLED! ๐Ÿ™„ (note: it didn't disable PhysX on the computer completely, as it could still run in "software" mode, which meant the CPU had to basically emulate the PhysX hardware capabilities, but that means it was a lot slower, AND lacked some of the fancier visual capabilities) So yea, I don't like it when a company conducts themselves in these ways, and I want nothing to do with them or their products. I don't care if at any moment they may offer a superior CPU or GPU, I will sacrifice my own gameplay experience before buying from them. I DO still recognize their superiority, and so if someone wants my opinion/help, I'll tell them the truth of which product is better at the time... But none of my money will go towards them due to their past underhanded practices. ๐Ÿ˜‹ [/rambling rant]
    1
  2580. 1
  2581. 1
  2582. 1
  2583. 1
  2584. 1
  2585. 1
  2586. 1
  2587. 1
  2588. 1
  2589. 1
  2590. 1
  2591. 1
  2592. 1
  2593. 1
  2594. 1
  2595. 1
  2596. 1
  2597. 1
  2598. 1
  2599. 1
  2600. 1
  2601. 1
  2602. 1
  2603. 1
  2604. 1
  2605. 1
  2606. Skipping projectiles is quite an interesting phenomena! I have a .177 cal Gamo pellet rifle, rated at 1000 ft/sec with standard lead rounds. I've managed to so-accurately skip them off the Kenai River (which is massive and wide), that after a number of tries, I managed to HIT the No Trespassing sign posted on a tree on the other side (at roughly the same height above the water as I was shooting). The most interesting thing, was I was aiming above the target by the amount I thought would be needed to directly hit it, only to fall well short of it, but still end up hitting it thanks to skipping off the water! ๐Ÿคฏ Also despite the river being noisy due to a submerged rock causing turbulence, I could still hear the impact on the water (a soft 'slap'), and then a split-second later the thwack against the wood sign. I don't really have an estimate of distance, as I was shooting diagonally down river, but I figure to the sign it had to be about 175ft. Based on the significantly smaller splash, my pellet must have been falling short roughly 1/3rd the way. [disclaimer: I'm firearms safety trained and am in no way putting anyone in danger โ€“ one of the golden rules is "Know what you're shooting at and what is behind it". The property is not fished by the owner as the bank is too steep, it's also covered by a dense forest, and is immediately backed by a huge hill; therefore, even shooting 100ft too high would not pose a risk of hitting anyone or anything... besides trees... and maybe a squirrel lol]
    1
  2607. 1
  2608. 1
  2609. 1
  2610. 1
  2611. 1
  2612. 1
  2613. 1
  2614. 1
  2615. "... if we let Putin win, we will pay the price for many years to come..." And if we CONTINUE TO DO JACK SHIT, like we have been with every war and conflict since Putin took office in 2000, then we solidify the mentality of Putin, and all those who will rule after he's gone: "we can do WHATEVER WE WANT and ATTACK WHOMEVER WE WANT... and worst case, 'the west' only supplies our enemy with weapons." So yea ๐Ÿ˜ž You either send in boots, and finally put an end to Russia's occupation in Ukraine/Crimea, to finally shut them up... Or, you keep doing what you're doing, Russia might stop at some point, but you can be damn site that in another 4-6yrs, they'll be right at our again. And probably against Ukraine again, since they'll feel spited over not being able to sweep across the country like originally thought. So the right thing NATO/UN... RUSKIES: ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะ ะพััะธะธ ัƒัˆะปะฐ. ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะณะตั€ะพัะผ ะฃะบั€ะฐะธะฝั‹! [The glory of Russia is gone. Glory to the heroes of Ukraine!] ๐Ÿคœ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ”ฅ BELAWANNABES: ะกะปะฐะฒa ะฝะตะปัŒะณะฐ ะฝั– ัžะบั€ะฐัั†ั–, ะฝั– ัžะทัั†ัŒ! [Glory cannot be stolen, nor taken!] ๐Ÿšซ ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ๐ŸŽ–๏ธ BROTHERS: ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะฃะบั€ะฐั—ะฝั–, ะ“ะตั€ะพัะผ ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ! [Glory to Ukraine, Glory to the Heroes!] โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ Stay strong. Stay united. Stay alive. STAY UKRAINIAN!
    1
  2616. 1
  2617. 1
  2618. 1
  2619. 1
  2620. 1
  2621. ย @alanwakefield2453ย  Nowhere near the same intelligence as your story, but I do have a "Well..... THAT didn't go the way I expected!" story! I had to be only 10 or so. Dad and I had gone to Wisconsin to grab some fireworks (aren't/weren't legal in Minnesota). I was setting off a couple bottles rockets and one had a structural failure after the fuse ignited some of the propellant. It hadn't launched, nor did it explode, but a crack had opened up the entire length of the rocket body, visually exposing said propellant... Now, I had enough intelligence to deduce that the fuse triggers "whatever this gray powdery stuff is" and makes it go zoom! What I lacked was life experience, to safely guide my curiosity... So... ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ I held the lighter next to the crack and ignited it!! ๐Ÿฅด ... ๐Ÿ˜ฌ Now I know I said "didn't go the way I expected" but, frankly? At that age, I didn't have the foresight of "expectations" ๐Ÿ˜… I don't know if I was thinking it would somehow still work and zoom off, or act like a fuse and give me time to move away... ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ Either way, mistakes were made! haha If I recall correctly (30yrs ago), it all flashed off, instantly, since they're was no containment to slow the burn rate โ€” being it had a cracked housing and all. No eyes put out, no fingers lost, no fires started. ๐Ÿ‘ However, I did not come away entirely unscathed! Due to my position over it while lighting, the flame from the instant cook off, had managed to burn away all the 'quick'(?) under my middle finger's nail! ๐Ÿ˜ฃ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ (the rocket was laying on the driveway, I think with the cack being parallel to the asphalt; the flame getting deflected and channeled between the asphalt and lighter, into my poor middle finger) I don't actually recall it hurting too badly, overall. In the moment I think it had, as I believe I ran inside and held it under water for a few minutes... But the weeks after, all I remember is the void that was left under that nail, and the ability to put a paperclip in there... lol Took a few months to heal, but heal it did and thankfully with no permanent damage! See, both are fine... ๐Ÿ–•๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ–• [/long AND stupid story]
    1
  2622. 1
  2623. 1
  2624. 1
  2625. 1
  2626. 1
  2627. 1
  2628. 1
  2629. 1
  2630. @1:24 As an American, allow me to explain how one could not love where they were born and raised... The land, the animals, my relatives and friends? Sure, I love them. Yes, these are all things which are "American", but only they only make up a PART OF everything needed to call it The United States... That other part consists of our way of life, our government (and laws), our cities & states, our corporations, etc. It is all of THOSE things which, recently, have "failed" my country and her people. - Our "way of life" is to blame because it fostered all the crap going on in my country. (allowed it to happen) - Or "government (and laws)" are to blame because they have lost focus of what is best for the people, and instead are making things better only for.... well, I'm not really sure, because everyone gets screwed! The politicians don't feel/experience the effects of their actions simply because their job entitles them to benefits that shield them from those effects. - Or "cities/states" are allowed their own control over certain things, which makes it so they are able to SUBSTANTIALLY change how life is for people that live there. In other words, every state is quite similar to a country. THEN on top of this, each city and town are able to further enforce certain things differently, making life rather different even between people who only live across the street! - Or "corporations" are to blame, and this goes back to our "way of life", because they have all become only about 'money' instead of the product they make, or the service they provide. They no longer care about their customer's thoughts or opinions, and whether they are happy or not. The companies have gotten to be so big, and that their product or service is so necessary, that we have no choice to use their service or buy their products. There is little we (people) can do about it, because our government doesn't care enough, because our politicians are funded by these companies. ๐Ÿ˜” As a result of all of that... I might be an American... But I DO NOT love my country!! All because most of "my country" doesn't give a shit about me, my needs, or my quality of life. It is no different for me, than it is for a child whose mother does not care for them. Just because the mother gave birth to that child, why should that child have to love them if they are not treated well? THAT is how you can not love, but can even hate, your motherland! HOWEVER!! At the end of the day, how my country treats me (her people) and her neighbors... IS FAR BETTER than how_Russia_ treats you (her people) and her neighbors! (I am not saying we treat Mexico very well, but, we've acted far better towards them, than Russia has towards MANY of her neighbors within the last 20 years!) So you should not love your country. Russia takes your family/friends and makes them fight a war that your own people do not want. Russia makes you afraid to say what you feel or think. Russia throws you in prison if anything you DO say happens to go against what they think. Russia feeds you nothing but lies about what actually goes on in the world, about what they are doing, about why they are doing it, and even about the results of what happened. Russia makes you pay for things, then says they are using it to improve X, Y, or Z, but allows every person responsible to steal some of the money for themself. Instead of maintaining your military and its hardware, its supplies, its machines... the money is spent on MULTIPLE yachts that cost 680,000,000,000 rubel EACH! (or more! and that is the correct amount of zeros!) I say all of this, NOT because I hate Russians. Even with this war and the horrible things that have happened... I DO NOT hate the people of Russia! I know that this war is "Vladimir Vladimirovich's War" and does not reflect how _all of_Russia's people think โ€“ although, clearly the man at 1:24 does think that way, but, there are racist Americans as well, so I won't hold that against everyone! I know the lies he's told your people, and even those who believe them... I do not hate them, either. It is not their fault for being so compelled to believe what their own government has said. But, the world needs Russians to recognize what is actually going on in the world, by believing what your fellow people are telling you in private. And that despite what President Putin says, "the west" does not hate the people of Russia, nor is our reason for uniting with Ukraine because of a silly desire to want Russia to collapse (Putin is doing a better job at that, than we ever could, and all by himself). โœŒ๏ธ (sorry for any typos that I missed)
    1
  2631. 1
  2632. ย @MrKotBonifacyย  I wish the greasing of wheels worked like that here in the US. Good god do we ever have our priorities screwed up, when even if the "little guy" DOES have funds and/or knows the right people.... Your money's no good. Actually, I guess I've slightly misspoke. Not really greasing of wheels I guess, but a "willing to pay what's needed, to get shit done", in a legitimate way. Like, if I wanted to procure (again, legally) the needed hardware and supplies to extended internet service, or upgrade the hardware in a box so that we could be served..... AT&T isn't interested. lol ๐Ÿคจ If, say, you got it anyways and wanted to just "do it all without their blessing" โ€“ignoring the fact it would require various construction permitsโ€“ well, now AT&T is interested.... Or rather "interested", because they now have an interest in taking you to court lol OR, like here in Tennessee just a few years back... The Electric Company in the Chattanooga area (which I'm ~15mi outside of their service area), decided they'd put their foot in the ISP arena, given they have all the needed infrastructure to run and install the cabling. They offered the first consumer Gigabit fiber in the US (around 2010 I believe), and arguably affordable at like ~$350/mo. Anyways, "Big Internet" corporations were NONE too pleased that they just had their lunch stolen... Not that the big providers were making ANY effort to service locations, but blah-blah, mafia mentality. "This is my turf, seeeee!" Which this note kicked off more interest by other towns and Electric Co-Ops, they all wanted to do similar for their citizens and consumers! Oooh no. Big Internet wouldn't have it. So they got their lobbiests out in full force, greased wheels and lined pockets. Soon enough, a law was passed to forbid new co-op internet servicing! Mind you, Big Internet still want going to do anything, and this ensured they didn't need to, either. Thankfully that didn't last but ~5yrs before being repealed, and fiber IS rolling out in places it otherwise never would have, in completely unserved areas. Unfortunately even then, it's slow. Been waiting 3 or 4 years now since our Electric Co-Op announced it'd be providing fiber. Don't get me wrong, they ARE serving, but where and when seems to literally be them throwing darts to determine it... ๐Ÿ˜• Alas, in Russia, I can see this going two ways. First, I imagine that no one would give a crap if you went about buying, installing, and serving internet.... RIGHT up until its seen you're making a buck. At which point I imagine that someone will move their foot in the way, to ensure your endeavors are stepping on their toes... Then ๐Ÿ’ข๐Ÿ‘Œ ยซsnapยป (no finger-snap emote; so pretend!) What's yours, ends up being theirs, and on top of it being taken from you, now you'd be paying them for service. lol So I guess in that sense, I'm... glad??... that I can't just go and do what's needed, as I don't have to worry about it being so easily stolen from me. ๐Ÿฅด๐Ÿ˜’ I do feel that the 'state of mind' part, definitely also applies to certain elements of American life, insofar as some things you just have to accept โ€“change your state of mindโ€“ will forever be outside of your control (or seemingly at least). ๐Ÿคž for certain ways changing, in America and Russia... As we both have 'oligarchs', which in both cases they have far too much sway over how things are done and what they can get away with. In the end, the people are who get the raw end of it. (although I fully recognize that Russians are in a far worse way at the moment, and lack of internet pales in comparison to being mobilized ๐Ÿ˜”) I'll be sure to check out your recommendations ๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿ‘ Thanks.
    1
  2633. 1
  2634. 1
  2635. 1
  2636. 1
  2637. 1
  2638. 1
  2639. 1
  2640. 1
  2641. 1
  2642. 1
  2643. 1
  2644. 1
  2645. 1
  2646. 1
  2647. 1
  2648. 1
  2649. 1
  2650. 1
  2651. 1
  2652. 1
  2653. We were smart enough and felt it important enough to sort out religion in schools, because it's problematic and unfair to push it on those who are either of no faith or are of a different faith... Given that we are a "melting pot" of so many cultures. However, when it comes to our government which deals with everyone in our country, a substantially larger number compared to school attendees, and a far more important group of people as well (politicians that is; no offense, kiddos)... Nope! They can do whatever they want and push whatever shit they feel like! And because actual number of votes doesn't mean squat in terms of who gets elected^, that means they don't actually represent a good majority of people's interests while they hold office (^at least for president; eg 2016 where Hillary won the total vote count). As such, we the people can end up in this downward spiral of our rights, when the planets align and there's enough of like-minded fanatics in power (of either party) decide to be vindictive/offensive -- in both definitions of the latter -- with their position and the power that comes with it... Such as it is now regarding Roe v Wade, where a decision that seems to be based solely on two things: 1} sticking it to the Dems for having lost the case ~50yrs ago, 2) a religious belief/opinion... Nothing about it is based on facts. No one is forcing Pro-Life people to have abortions. It's completely their choice to not utilize that because their faith doesn't agree with it. Which is ABSOLUTELY their right to do, or not do, because that's the respectful option (this isn't China done years back, after all, when family size was mandated at 1 child). Yet, they are not content, oh no! Their preached philosophy of "turn the other cheek" doesn't apply... Nay, they feel they have to go all old testament on us sinners! ๐Ÿ™„ Ugh. I'm shutting up now. ๐Ÿ˜”
    1
  2654. 1
  2655. 1
  2656. 1
  2657. 1
  2658. 1
  2659. 1
  2660. 1
  2661. 1
  2662. 1
  2663. 1
  2664. 1
  2665. 1
  2666. 1
  2667. 1
  2668. 1
  2669. 1
  2670. DUDE.... I... had this exact thought a couple days ago! Wild... (granted I know you had it much earlier, given time to create, film, edit) Of course, like you did in this video, I had a different name for mine: Very High Bypass Aero Spike My only thought that seems different to yours (sorry, I'm not a modeler, or blessed with an internet connection with sufficient monthly bandwidth to download software): In my head, my design would've had the airflow travel from the fan outwards like yours, into a hemisphere channel, which then connected to the start of the aerospike. (albeit, mine was based around a jet engine, but that should be irrelevant heh) So the air will come in and flow through the ducting in an S trajectory, rather than a corkscrew. In other words, my fan would be more... fan like, and less centrifugal-fan (compressor) like. I think for propulsion, you want to move as much air as possible. The duct is a Venturi in an EDF so it improved efficiency, but it's moving lots of air at "zero" pressure. Which is, as I understand it, how a Turbo Fan engine is working. The "Fan" isn't doing any (or much) competing, as that would be "work" and lowering efficiency. The only compressor turbines are being used for the combustion side (vs a key engine where all airflow gets used for combustion). I guess where I'm going with this is that I suspect you've got too much back-pressure? Which is because you're wanting to compress, when you should be (I assume) wanting to REDUCE restriction and use more blades to increase airflow. Letting the aerospike do the work of "compressing" the air and produce additional thrust... But I have no education in any of this so I'm guessing, just as you! ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿฅด
    1
  2671. 1
  2672. 1
  2673. 1
  2674. 1
  2675. 1
  2676. Putting in my hypothesis right after the intro (defining "Bifacial vertical", and that text just displayed)... BENEFIT #1: Being out of full-on direct sunlight results in significantly less heat, which is improving efficiencies. (due to lower resistance?) [Nnnailed it!] BENEFIT #2: Being completely vertical inhibits dust/other participate buildup, meaning that even if they aren't cleaned often, they still generate more electricity since the typical homeowner likely doesn't clean theirs often (if ever). [I missed it if this was mentioned; maybe as I was typing my reply...] SIDE BENEFIT: Light reflected off the ground/roof further increased the output versus what was expected. (not really 'benefit' so much as an overlooked factor in their prediction) [That didn't take long to confirm this was right! ๐Ÿค˜] [edit: Including this, now that you've said "last chance"... The additional panel on the back is taking advantage of those mentioned electrons being knocked off, causing it to create electricity even when there's no direct OR indirect (reflected) light hitting it (scavenging "waste" energy, in a sense) . OR, possibly it's "charging" the 'evening' panel so that once the sun does swing around to it, it experiences increased efficiency temporarily; during that time, it's doing the same now for the 'morning' panel.] [Well, this definitely wasn't mentioned, but if it's possible to create a photovoltaic-substrate-photovoltaic panel that's literally double-sided (instead of two physical panels mounted back to back), this could be something to test out! A joule theif springs to mind, but that likely isn't a good analogy...] And with that... back to the video!
    1
  2677. 1
  2678. 1
  2679. 1
  2680. 1
  2681. 1
  2682. 1
  2683. 1
  2684. ย @Sin3xtremeย  No, but you're getting closer! (not really heh) The primary reason why Russia is a terrorist in this war comes down to their CHOICE OF TARGETS... When the majority of the targets are infrastructure integral to civilian life yet have minimal impact on a military: you're a terrorist! ๐Ÿ‘ Target the power grid? - military: switches over to generator backup - civilians: pretty much screwed, as few will have gens Target the water supply? - military: falls back on stockpiles or purification methods - civilians: collecting rain, snow, limited well supply Targeting residential apartments? - military: unaffected... - civilians: have to find new shelter Targeting hospitals not near non-frontline areas? - military: somewhat affected, hospital type depending - civilians: extremely affected, especially if it's a maternity clinic Targeting schools? - military: minimally affected if on frontlines - civilians: highly affected, particularly if school is in session River dams? (the actual structure, not the road) - military: minimal? - civilians: extreme I could go on, but why bother when it's already perfectly evident that Russia targets things that are primarily civilian, solely in an effort to terrify the people of Ukraine. Key word there is terrify, in other words to invoke terror. One whose actions are carried out with the sole intent of terrorizing a people is basically the definition of a "terrorist". Which seeing as you've obviously never bothered to look it up, here you are: terยทrorยทist /หˆterษ™rษ™st/ noun a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims. Again though, you were _close_. Just replace "religious" with "political". ๐Ÿ‘ (and if you don't think wars are politically driven, then you have a really skewed perspective on how this world works! [or the definition of words?] lol)
    1
  2685. 1
  2686. 1
  2687. 1
  2688. 1
  2689. 1
  2690. ย @jamesmiller3098ย  I can't tell if you intend for your message to be directed at skyman, or if you meant it for Ivan...? NOTE: I am not taking either person's side, just explaining the process. [ TL;DR - Everyone has to "show their work" so that we can tell who is copying, and who actually knows the answer. And the opposite, if you're asked to "show your work", then you need to show how you came up with the answer, to prove you aren't just repeating/parroting what someone else said! ] Because everything you said is valid, BUT ONLY if it's in regards to Ivan's original comment. He is the one saying he has proof and evidence, after all. 9skyman9 is only saying he wants to see Ivan's proof/evidence for himself, which is a very fair and civil request, to be honest. Therefore, it's on IVAN to back up his original claims by citing his source(s) that it was: - from Ukrainian missile stockpile - originating from Ukrainian-controlled territory - fired by Ukrainians It is not on skyman to debunk the claim by trying to figure out whatever intricate way Ivan may have came to his conclusion. Telling skyman that "you just have to figure it out the same way Ivan managed to" is an impossible task unless Ivan provides the raw data, first! Otherwise, the information skyman digs up might completely contradict Ivan. If neither of them provide their data, a third person could just as easily claim that maybe it came from... Belarus, or maybe outer space! Maybe Ivan simply made a mathematical error, or didn't account for the wind that day, but that his data was otherwise trustworthy? The world isn't going to pause while everyone independently fact checks. This is war and time wasted can mean lives lost, so more eyes on the data only helps everyone. Then, anything that is deemed flawed or untrustworthy, can be supplanted by data from another source. Maybe the same verdict gets reached? But we'll never know if no one "shows their work" (as our math teachers always demanded), as otherwise they (Ivan) may simply be repeating what someone else had already claimed (ie copying someone else's test answer).
    1
  2691. 1
  2692. 1
  2693. 1
  2694. 1
  2695. 1
  2696. 1
  2697. 1
  2698. 1
  2699. 1
  2700. 1
  2701. 1
  2702. 1
  2703. 1
  2704. 1
  2705. 1
  2706. 1
  2707. 1
  2708. 1
  2709. 1
  2710. 1
  2711. 1
  2712. 1
  2713. 1
  2714. 1
  2715. 1
  2716. 1
  2717. 1
  2718. 1
  2719. 1
  2720. 1
  2721. 1
  2722. 1
  2723. 1
  2724. 1
  2725. 1
  2726. 1
  2727. 1
  2728. 1
  2729. 1
  2730. 1
  2731. 1
  2732. 1
  2733. 1
  2734. 1
  2735. 1
  2736. 1
  2737. 1
  2738. 1
  2739. 1
  2740. 1
  2741. 1
  2742. 1
  2743. 1
  2744. 1
  2745. 1
  2746. 1
  2747. 1
  2748. 1
  2749. 1
  2750. 1
  2751. Did you happen to speak it's name out loud when you saw it? I ask because, unfortunately, or phone salt DO mine what we say ๐Ÿ™ That's why I've kept Google Assistant and Bixby disabled. AvE (ArduinoVsEverything), who Adam sort of worked with many years back to built a replica NASA object (capsul door i think?), once told a story of him and his buddy talking in his truck about a very obscure topic, and then within 30 minutes while he was on his phone, got an ad for it.... That was like 8 years ago and I've heard similar accounts since. However, my disturbing personal account was worse (in my opinion). I had searched for a warm Dog Coat (like a horse blanket), as he's >14 and gets cold in the winer. I only went to ONE listing (a similarly obscure company) because it had clearance items for $5. THE NEXT DAY while playing Angry Birds, it gave me ads for that exact site, showing those exact products. Note: that site was primarily for horses and livestock with only a very very small section of dog items. WORSE YET is that my Google settings have all tracking and similar stuff disabled. Come to find out that Android now has a baked in setting that ALSO does similar data collection, but it, too, was disabled.... So I clicked the option that resets the "key" associated with my device and haven't had it happen again... but I hate that it happened AT ALL. ๐Ÿ˜• I also appreciate that I sound like a nut job... lol I won't blame you or anyone for thinking that, as I would too! I can only assure you that as a tech enthusiast, I am being honest. Otherwise I wouldn't bother going to these lengths to share this. ๐Ÿ˜Š (sorry that I had to live up to my name and type a wall of words...)
    1
  2752. ย @muhammadbabayi1260ย  True, and I wouldn't be surprised if it was Putin's intent to try and goad (entice) the US into doing just that: first, through getting Iran to send the kamikaze drones, and second, by (I assume) trading these drones for some of Russia's (well, USSR's) old missile tech. "Comrade, just tell world you have Hypersonic capabilities, they will believe you. I do this all the time. The West consume my lies, I MEAN my_ threats like they do their MahkDonald's Bihk Mahk... Trust what I say!" ๐Ÿ˜" <meanwhile, in "The West"...> "Yesterday, Russia's President Putin spoke to his people about the ongoing war in Ukraine, in which he made his 32nd threat to use nuclear weapons, should the US continue supplying arms to the Ukrainian military. We will be treating this with as much credibility as the 31 he made before it, and have decided to offer Ukraine even more capable weaponry." lol But yea, if that really was their plan, it's not going to work. I suspect what would get us to move in would be to give Iran blueprints and material to make nuclear missiles (even if all they are, are long-range, not intercontinental). However, I think Putin knows that having a loose cannon like North Korea in his backyard, who DO have nukes, is a big enough liability. So I really doubt he'll go as far as to provide Iran with that. Putin may be acting unhinged. He may be making stupid decisions. However, at the end of the day, he does not want to die... particularly due to some other fool starting a nuclear war! (personally, I think his desire to stay alive is what keeps HIM from starting a nuclear war, which is why all his "threats" are completely hollow)
    1
  2753. 1
  2754. 1
  2755. 1
  2756. 1
  2757. 1
  2758. 1
  2759. 1
  2760. 1
  2761. 1
  2762. 1
  2763. 1
  2764. 1
  2765. 1
  2766. 1
  2767. 1
  2768. 1
  2769. 1
  2770. 1
  2771. 1
  2772. 1
  2773. 1
  2774. 5:50 That thing looks awfully close to, but still rather far from, a Die Cast toy I had as a kid in the late 80s...๐Ÿค” My toy was... what I can only describe as a cross between a spade โ™ ๏ธ and a droplet ๐Ÿ’ง, which is basically very close to what's depicted on screen at that timestamp. It had the dream out length like a droplet, but the curvature resembled a spade. The difference with what's on screen, was that the rear section was slightly elongated, like the bottom of the droplet (albeit, coming to a point), not (mostly) flat-across like the craft in the diagram. IT DID have those same twin, inward facing tails, though. From what I can recall if my toy, though, is that it had a cockpit. Whereas this one seems to indicate that there wouldn't be a conventional glad canopy, but would be flown by camera (I'm assuming that's what "T.V. Flight Monitor" implies?). Either way, said toy was all black, and naturally had USAF stenciled on one wing, with the Air Force logo on the other. The last detail, which as a young kid it never occurred to me, is there was no engine depicted. I can't recall any inlet, nor can I say for sure that there was any exhaust... But! It may have had a "2-D nozzle" just as this one does, which is a detail that could've easily been lost on me, as a 7yr old at oldest. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ Makes me wonder if that toy was that toymaker's artistic impression of the TR3b! TR3a! If anyone happens to be familiar with what I've described, I'd love to know your take! ๐Ÿ™ EDIT: After watching the rest of the video and seeing more artists renders/impressions, I'm almost certain that toy did represent the TR3a. I might still have it, too! But, I won't hold my breath... heh
    1
  2775. 1
  2776. 1
  2777. 1
  2778. 1
  2779. 1
  2780. 1
  2781. 1
  2782. 1
  2783. 1
  2784. 1
  2785. 1
  2786. 1
  2787. 1
  2788. 1
  2789. 1
  2790. 1
  2791. 1
  2792. 1
  2793. 1
  2794. 1
  2795. 1
  2796. 1
  2797. 1
  2798. ย @ะฏะฝะฐะ -ัˆ1ั„ย  ย @ะฏะฝะฐ ะ ย  The ONLY reason I "continued to disperse the topic" was to serve ss a precedent, and in turn, allowed me to convey my confidence for why I feel the Sarmat missile will be just as inept in its claimed capabilities. In other words, if a flagship vessel failed to do what it was designed to do, being backed up by all the reported reasons behind your troops having to abandon their broken-down light and heavy tanks.... Then why should I think the Sarmat is going to be capable of what you or Putin says?? EVEN IF we pretend (believe the Kremlin) that the Muskova sank only because of a fire in/near the ship's magazine, that unfortunately still does not bode well. That means either, A] it was poorly designed and it's fire suppression system wasn't adequate to contain the fire, B] the crew was improperly trained and unable to contain the fire, C] the fire suppression system malfunctioned and still the same outcome. When added to the growing list of mishaps for the Kremlin that shouldn't have happened, yet have... Puts into question every other project by then. I only used a war-related mishap due to being the most recent. However, I could just easily used the recent "hole drilled in the side of the a Soyuz capsule" as another. That alone is sufficient, but I would be remiss not to include the fact that their pre-lsunch repair job used materials that immediately failed once it got to space because the epoxy from the Roscosmos trusted supplier, delivered a flawed product! In not here to spew lies, only the truth and my conclusion (and opinion) on why I think Russia is not nearly as strong as they think, leaving me to not feel a need to worry about Ssrmat. ๐Ÿ˜Œ
    1
  2799. 1
  2800. 1
  2801. 1
  2802. 1
  2803. 1
  2804. 1
  2805. 1
  2806. 1
  2807. 1
  2808. 1
  2809. 1
  2810. 1
  2811. 1
  2812. 1
  2813. 1
  2814. 1
  2815. 1
  2816. 1
  2817. 1
  2818. 1
  2819. 1
  2820. 1
  2821. 1
  2822. 1
  2823. 1
  2824. 1
  2825. 1
  2826. 1
  2827. 1
  2828. 1
  2829. 1
  2830. 1
  2831. 1
  2832. 1
  2833. 1
  2834. 1
  2835. 1
  2836. 1
  2837. ย @simongeard4824ย  That's a good point! So I looked into it and it appears that even when undamaged, the Mtip speed is only "0.62 Mach" @ 2600RPM, according to NASA Ames Research Center PDF on Ingenuity. I'm assuming that is in reference to Mars' atmospheric density, not Earth's, since this was testing the lift capability of the rotor design, and they even went so far as to remove components in order to simulate the weight difference of ingenuity on Mars. (so it seems logical to assume they would be similarly stimulating it's atmosphere to determine lift characteristics) Since I've seen that Ginny's specs are actually 2700RPM, I'm going to assume the other number I came across of "<0.7 Mach", is probably closer to reality. (the Source link on wiki for that number unfortunately seems to be incorrectly entered) As such, given Ginny is missing upwards of 25% of her blades, that tip speed is going to be significantly lower. (I lack the math skills to calculate it; undamaged length is 1.21m, Mars speed of sound is 240m/s) Similarly, it's rotor weight will be less, so the motor should, technically, be able to spin them faster. But yes, catastrophic failure of them is expected, whether it'd occur at first or fifth attempt, it's unavoidable. So unless there are plans for it to sit there until humans can recover it for inclusion into a museum, which I'm completely onboard with if that's the case, but if not then I say go for broke and gain a final bit of meaningful science. Even if it's able to achieve just a few inches of altitude, that's very useful data to have if you ask me! (not that I'm qualified to make such a claim lol) And it's not like Ginny can sit there, doing science whilst Percy continues it's mission, given that Ginny is reliant on Percy's uplink connection. So in order for her to do stationary observations, Percy would have to put off it's own mission in order to remain in close proximity... That's my just 2ยข.
    1
  2838. 1
  2839. 1
  2840. 1
  2841. 1
  2842. 1
  2843. 1
  2844. 1
  2845. 1
  2846. 1
  2847. 1
  2848. 1
  2849. 1
  2850. 1
  2851. 1
  2852. 1
  2853. 1
  2854. 1
  2855. 1
  2856. 1
  2857. 1
  2858. 1
  2859. 1
  2860. 1
  2861. 1
  2862. 1
  2863. 1
  2864. 1
  2865. 1
  2866. 1
  2867. 1
  2868. 1
  2869. 1
  2870. 1
  2871. 1
  2872. 1
  2873. 1
  2874. 1
  2875. 1
  2876. 1
  2877. 1
  2878. ย @RogerM88ย  Yes, that's indeed the reasoning the pro-SLS camp has given all this time.... It's just not based on reality, unfortunately. (sincerely, that's not a dig at you, or anyone) EDIT: My bad, I mixed up Orion and Starliner. So this part isn't completely accurate. Credit to Steve's comment above, for jogging my memory! It's our senate that dictated all of these things. That Artemis/Lunar Gateway had to ride on SLS, and I think originally it was that Starliner capsule also was required to... though I think that had gotten changed for OFT after the umpteenth SLS delay, so that it could move forward? ๐Ÿค” (admittedly my attention to SLS has greatly waned over the last 12mos) Alas, that was only because they wanted this grand rocket to loft it all in one go, a prestige symbol for America, despite the fact everything COULD have been divided and sent up across multiple smaller rockets (and competitors, if necessary). All despite there becoming more and cheaper alternatives as the years went on, but by then it fell under the sunk-cost-fallacy where congress didn't want to abandon it and would rather see it through....... even though doing so would mean multiple OTHER SLS-based programs, costing us the absurd $2 BILLION minimum each! Which let's not forget that Block 2 SLS, a taller variant that would enter service after only 2 or 3 launches, would REQUIRE the launch tower see yet another multi-million dollar upgrade.... after having just had a multi-million dollar refurbishment/upgrade so that it could accommodate SLS to begin with... ๐Ÿ˜ฃ But you're not wrong. In the beginning there would've been no mom mission without SLS. However, that was back when there hadn't been over a decade of delays, and billions in cost overruns, nor anywhere near the competition the rocket industry has today. Which while, granted, that competition still isn't ready yet, neither is SLS technically, but they'll be cheaper and more capable when (not if) they DO become ready. Remember, Starship is now tied to the moon mission as well, and realistically, Dragon+FHeavy could replace Starliner, negating SLS for that element. (I'll still concede that without SLS, we probably wouldn't have quite the same competition as we do, or at least in terms of the huge contrast in prices. So we owe thanks to that much!)
    1
  2879. 1
  2880. 1
  2881. 1
  2882. 1
  2883. 1
  2884. 1
  2885. 1
  2886. 1
  2887. 1
  2888. 1
  2889. 1
  2890. 1
  2891. 1
  2892. 1
  2893. 1
  2894. 1
  2895. A step in the right direction! Seems to be better than โ€” yep the video just confirmed it as I was typing lol โ€” the Budapest Memorandum... Which I think the costly oversight in that agreement was it lacked any kind of clause which would have immediately dragged all of the signatories to Ukraine's assistance, had any of the signing parties directly or indirectly became the aggressor (ie: of Russia used Belarus to invade, or if they sent their weapons to a country which then invaded it still would have triggered the clause; that later of which was basically already in the agreement, and Russia is currently guilty of first-hand by using their own weapons against Ukraine.) In this case, it would've meant the UK and US helping Ukraine fight since Russia, as one of the signatories, is the aggressor. (but RU and UK would've, had it been the US invading, etc) But anyways, as the meme goes... ".... mistakes were made... ๐Ÿ˜•" RUSKIES: ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะ ะพััะธะธ ัƒัˆะปะฐ. ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะณะตั€ะพัะผ ะฃะบั€ะฐะธะฝั‹! ๐Ÿคœ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ”ฅ BELAWANNABES: ะกะปะฐะฒa ะฝะตะปัŒะณะฐ ะฝั– ัžะบั€ะฐัั†ั–, ะฝั– ัžะทัั†ัŒ! ๐Ÿšซ ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ๐ŸŽ–๏ธ BROTHERS: ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ ะฃะบั€ะฐั—ะฝั–, ะ“ะตั€ะพัะผ ะกะปะฐะฒะฐ! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ Stay strong. Stay united. Stay alive. STAY UKRAINIAN!
    1
  2896. 1
  2897. 1
  2898. 1
  2899. 1
  2900. 1
  2901. 1
  2902. 1
  2903. 1
  2904. 1
  2905. 1
  2906. 1
  2907. 1
  2908. 1
  2909. 1
  2910. 1
  2911. 1
  2912. 1
  2913. 1
  2914. 1
  2915. 1
  2916. 1
  2917. 1
  2918. 1
  2919. 1
  2920. 1
  2921. 1
  2922. 1
  2923. 1
  2924. 1
  2925. 1
  2926. 1
  2927. 1
  2928. 1
  2929. 1
  2930. 1
  2931. 1
  2932. 1
  2933. 1
  2934. 1
  2935. 1
  2936. 1
  2937. I've strongly said said the very first nuclear weapon that, that Russia will not go the nuclear route... It would be literal suicide for Putin. It would undoubtedly spur a joint black ops mission by many countries, to go in and take him out! That's assuming the command actually gets carried out! Because I'm a bit torn on whether such command would be, since those subordinates would all know it would lead to Russia's demise, whereas disobeying it would only be the likely demise of that individual... but family and friends would probably survive. A worthy self sacrifice, in my opinion. But yea, Russia's that's have ALWAYS been hollow, in my eyes. Not just for the above reasoning either! But because Putin wants Ukraine, and having irradiated pockets of land does you NO good! Which one might say: "but, their plans for the dirty bombs with the power plant(s)"... To which I say: Russians CLEARLY have no idea just how bad that would be, since they AREN'T TAUGHT ABOUT SUCH INCIDENTS! Chornobyl (Ukrainian spelling), swept under the rug, and we already know Russia has no qualms about erasing history from their textbooks soccer it's happened already during this war... All one had to do is look towards their occupation of Chornobyl at the beginning of the war, and all the STUPID shit they were doing in the red zone. So soldiers and likely even those in command, probably thinks that turning a nuclear power plant into a dirty bomb would only be bad for a couple years, in the surrounding area. The concept of wine blowing irradiated dust into Russia is probably a foreign concept to them! ๐Ÿ˜‹๐Ÿ™„
    1
  2938. 1
  2939. 1
  2940. 1
  2941. 1
  2942. 1
  2943. 1
  2944. 1
  2945. 1
  2946. 1
  2947. 1
  2948. 1
  2949. 1
  2950. 1
  2951. 1
  2952. 1
  2953. 1
  2954. 1
  2955. 1
  2956. 1
  2957. 1
  2958. 1
  2959. This was originally a reply to someone's comment on a CNN video but I felt deserved a wider audience; modified to fit this context... I hadn't known of this specific agreement until just now, but yea... Seems like it's been completely forgotten about by the signing parties. ๐Ÿ˜• We've definitely dropped the ball over the years, in providing the promised protection and defense of Ukraine... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction#Budapest_Memorandum To anyone reading who is Ukrainian, or has Ukrainian family... I know this won't really mean much given I'm just a helpless citizen with no political influence.... But nevertheless, I deeply apologize for my country [๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ] not acting sooner, like Crimea annexation-sooner and preventing it. ๐Ÿ˜” Russia has violated that agreement multiple times now, and worse yet in my opinion, is that the other signatories have also violated it by failing to defend Ukraine in any truly meaningful way (up until 2022 at least) ... Offering money and monetary support is good, but defending... at least to me... implies every means possible! It's that kind of help which we're not providing, which is allowing this to go on longer than it should have... Every day Russia targets some other large building because... "Our intelligence claims it was housing military assets..." ๐Ÿ˜‘๐Ÿ™„ (or at least if asked, that'd be their excuse in order to justify it) So again I say... I'm sorry for America failing Ukraine. ๐Ÿ˜ž (I can't speak to the the UK, but I imagine anyone there would feel similarly after reading that link) Stay strong. Stay united. Stay alive. STAY UKRAINIAN! Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    1
  2960. 1
  2961. 1
  2962. 1
  2963. 1
  2964. 1
  2965. 1
  2966. 1
  2967. 1
  2968. 1
  2969. 1
  2970. ย @sweetvictory5643ย  I haven't forgotten, but I think Puddin Pop definitely has! lol Having even referred to it as a "war" within the last month or so. Alas, as we've seen, the definitions of words are meaningless to him, as well as quite a number of Russians (unfortunately) based on intercepted calls and interviews conducted by the 1420 channel. I'm sure this guy thinks he's a smooth talker, and that he has the people he surrendered to convinced of his story... ๐Ÿ™„ lol Basing this on just the surprising crap trolls have said over the months... Like genuinely, I don't mean to talk bad about an entire country of people (and obviously this doesn't apply to them all), but they truly are on a whole different level than the rest of the world when it comes to BS and lying! ๐Ÿ˜’ (and I mean that in the sense of they're like 8yr old who are talking to us, who are 18; vastly inferior logic and common sense) Which might be due to their culture of corruption? Where they have relied on social status/rank to get what's wanted/weasel out of a situation, where the accompanying lie for any given situation is simply an "unnecessary courtesy", or perhaps a "flex" โ€“ ie "nope it wasn't me, he fell out of the window" and because the person saying it is a known figure, it's as good as the truth... ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ But I digress. If that's the case and he's indeed lying, then I'd love to be a fly on that wall when he finds out that it wasn't him playing those he surrendered to, but they who were playing him! ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿคฃ Like someone else said upthread: get what info he has and ship him back to Russia, to see his smug face drop all of its color as he realizes what just happened. heh
    1
  2971. 1
  2972. 1
  2973. 1
  2974. 1
  2975. 1
  2976. 1
  2977. 1
  2978. 1
  2979. 1
  2980. I knew someone else caught it as well! This also happened in a previous video, sometime within the last 2 weeks!! And similarly, we had NO. FRIGGEN. IDEA. what caused it!! All of us who commented basically had our own speculation, and different answers... In that one it sounded almost like a fart, occurring just as Adam was sitting down. To which, after analyzing it at 0.25x playback speed, I thought โ€“ because he uses an old doctors stool with caster wheels โ€“ it was a piece of debris getting stuck in the wheel and vibrating at it moved across the ground when he scooted. Or, that it perhaps was air escaping through the leather. Someone else, I recall, thought it was his mic rubbing up against fabric (denim I think they said), like if you run your fingernail against a nylon jacket. Now I'm thinking one of two things here. Either it's INTENTIONAL, by one of the editors, hiding something just for the heck of it... Or, it's a glitch in the microphone in stone way. Either during the transmission of data, or during the saving of the data, causing way more samples to get packed into a timeframe than ordinarily possible. However, playing this one back, also at 0.25x, I feel like it is just a very weird vocal chords fluttering... Given where he wears his mic I suppose it's possible it's that? Which I suppose would/could explain a farting like noise in the previous instance in that other video. I think Tested needs to have Adam listen to these, and weigh in ๐Ÿ˜Š (wish I knew exactly what the other video was, to list it for everyone) EDIT: KIND OF happened again at 11:43 ish, but that one you can definitely tell it was vocal chords related, since he was chortling ๐Ÿ˜Š
    1
  2981. 1
  2982. 1
  2983. 1
  2984. 1
  2985. 1
  2986. 1
  2987. 1
  2988. 1
  2989. 1
  2990. 1
  2991. 1
  2992. As soon as I saw that orange haze on liftoff I said to myself "That can't be good. " and then noticed an engine was out, and 8 actually felt a bit relieved... lol I knew the Booster had plenty of leeway and one out wouldn't matter. So I knew the abnormal has was likely from that, and not something worse. Then I watched reentry with my mom and as soon as a whisp of plasma shown through the flap hinge, I said "uh oh, that's not good..." BUT GOD DAMN, Starship... You did not let that stop you from succeeding!!! ๐Ÿค˜๐Ÿ˜ซ๐Ÿค˜ Seriously though, I could not believe that it didn't burn up after so much of that flap had burned away... But, it didn't, and managed to make it beyond Max-Q, not ripping off!! Still, I figured it wouldn't be able to right itself for the flip maneuver, given we didn't know the fate of all the other flaps. (or was this camera there BY DESIGN and this was one place they intentionally compromised the heatshield?) AND THEN, we see... that it could still accurate, despite that massive damage! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ Unfortunately with the camera's protective glass shattering, was hard to tell what was happening... but just enough glass had been removed to allow a sliver of clear footage. And when it manager to do its flip, despite there being no engine relight indicators on the HUD, I could see enough engine fire and plume to know... they lit!! And with telemetry, could see that it managed to still succeed, despite all that it went through... ๐Ÿคฏ ๐Ÿคฏ ๐Ÿคฏ What an amazing rollercoaster of emotions.... Loved every second of it โ™ฅ๏ธ
    1
  2993. 1
  2994. 1
  2995. 1
  2996. 1
  2997. 1
  2998. 1
  2999. 1
  3000. 1
  3001. 1
  3002. 1
  3003. 1
  3004. 1
  3005. 1
  3006. 1
  3007. 1
  3008. 1
  3009. 1
  3010. 1
  3011. 1
  3012. 1
  3013. 1
  3014. 1
  3015. 1
  3016. 1
  3017. 1
  3018. ย @julianp1719ย  Thank you. ๐Ÿ˜Š Yes, being able to recognize one's own failures and faults first, then being able to shelve one's pride so to openly admit them, is the only way anyone can hope to not just gain the respect of your opponents, but more importantly have any chance at making forward progress; in problem solving and societaly (๐Ÿค” that's a word, right?? lol) Without respect for the others you're debating with, well... there's basically zero chance at making any progress and thereby being able to come to even a middle ground agreement that both sides are content with. Content enough, in that each side will not feel any need to bring the issue back up at a future date. In other words... Without, at the *very least*, that mutual respect of those with differing opinions, then we're always going to feel as though what they say is "nonsense" simply because of mental 'tunnel vision', and at that point we're doomed to endless failure as nothing will get truly resolved. (it'll forever be like it has been, but the last ~15 years as an example: party A starts something to genuinely help people, party B dislikes it but instead of improving it they just dismantle it, which they've done primarily out of their spite of party A.) However, this issue (abortion) is quite a divisive one. Personally, I would've thought that the way it had been of: "no one is being FORCED to have an abortion, so those who are against it are free to never utilize it; for those on the other side, if a situation arises and they feel the need to utilize it, then it's available." I would've thought that to have been the fair-to-both-side's-view middle ground! ๐Ÿ˜• The only new middle ground I can think of would then be for there to again be a nation-wide legality of it, but for there to be imposed limits and "fines" imposed -- fees, but which are above procedure costs, and 'profits' go towards funding foster care and the adoption system (since there will end up being more kids there), in the same way traffic fines go towards improving county assets. Because we humans, as we established, are fallible where things can break (or be improperly used), pill doses missed, or IUDs (and sub-dermal equivalents) have something not go according to plan... So sometimes, despite those efforts, a pregnancy can still happen; this being my reply to: "you'll still have contraception". Where the ability to still have an abortion in your state (and not be forced to travel, at your expense) would be used, count towards the person's "allowed lifetime limit", but also acts as a learning experience to rectify your mistakes so the expensive accident doesn't occur. Again, kinda like driving accidents... sometimes it's negligence and a lapse of attention, sometimes there's a bad pothole which breaks your tierod (steering component) and you lose control. (๐Ÿค” for that matter, I guess this would be an opportunity, to offer 'abortion insurance'? could even replace the 'lifetime limit', whereby only those with abortion insurance are allowed to have one... but, then that's a slippery slope due to only privileged people with enough income being able to afford it...) Cases where it's a pregnancy that's the result of a crime would not count towards said limit OR cost the victim said "fine"/fee; rather, the criminal would be charged to cover that cost. Don't get me wrong, I've not ignored your point of fairness, in this situation. My counter argument (not sure if I mentioned it in this comment thread or some other), is that of the victim's mental health. They've already endured the trauma of the crime, and while I agree that the fetus is not at fault, the fact remains that the victim having to carry it is a genuinely unfair mental health burden. I can only imagine how hard it is to forget about things like that and not be reminded of it by the most random of things (only having spoken to people who have experienced it or similar), but to be stuck with the byproduct of that event for 9 months as an unending, relentless reminder... I can only figure it would result in far more suicides without the option of abortion, which now the argument becomes not only null, but reversed, because now there would be two lives lost due to being forced to carry the child to term. (and that mental health argument, that's without factoring in any of the normal stress, emotions/frustrations, and mood swings a pregnant person can go through/experience; reinforces my suicide concern -- speaking as a person who suffers from major depression and "teeters on the edge" as it is, sans any severe trauma!) To bring this to a close... I should also extend my own gratitude towards You and Mark, for you both being civil/respectful (also for sharing points that were not religious in nature, as silly as that may sound). It's that fact which was motivation for me to "ramble" after saying I'd abstain, and to then consider ways that might be (albeit slim) an achievable middle ground, or if not, then perhaps at least as a basis! ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿคž [/ramble]
    1
  3019. 1
  3020. 1
  3021. 1
  3022. 1
  3023. 1
  3024. 1
  3025. 1
  3026. 1
  3027. 1
  3028. 1
  3029. 1
  3030. 1
  3031. 1
  3032. 1
  3033. 1
  3034. 1
  3035. 1
  3036. 1
  3037. I feel like we, as a nation, are crossing a line. A line that may not currently be drawn, but is clearly becoming evident that it NEEDS TO BE... A line which states: [ TL;DR - You are free to believe what you want, but once you become a politician, you agree to check them at the door and do your job based on facts and what's in the best interest of everyone. Not based on what's in your personal best interest or aligns with your religious doctrine, as that does not represent our nation's needs as a whole.] "You are free to practice any religion, to worship any god(s) or deity. You are free to have wild beliefs and/or opinions that have no basis on, or in, our reality. You are free to run for and be appointed/elected to a position in our political government, from state level to federal level and even as President of the United States. HOWEVER, AT NO POINT _may your religious beliefs, god(s)/deity, outlandish personal belief or opinions, EVER influence your decision making while holding any level of political office! _We are a nation which consists of many people, made up of many races, many beliefs, many opinions, many needs, desires, and wishes. We are all free. This is why your decisions must always be based in reality, on facts, using sound reasoning, and with everyone's best interests; to not base these decisions on only things important to you and which alienates any of the groups of people that make up the country you serve. "By the people, FOR the people!" That's just my 2ยข worth. But ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ .... what would I know. I'm apparently just a blasphemous heathen Satan worshiper, or whatever ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ’ฉ๐Ÿคช label she'd slap on my non-religious pro-choice posterior. ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ™„
    1
  3038. 1
  3039. 1
  3040. 1
  3041. 1
  3042. 1
  3043. 1
  3044. 1
  3045. 1
  3046. 1
  3047. 1
  3048. 1
  3049. 1
  3050. 1
  3051. 1
  3052. 1
  3053. 1
  3054. 1
  3055. 1
  3056. 1
  3057. First off, Alex, for the love of dog, please don't say "simp" ever again lol It's a stupid term that gets thrown around way too easily, but more importantly, inaccurately so. Giving small, yet valid compliments are enough to invoke being called such! Just as you being a fan of your own country's military prowess doesn't make you one. ๐Ÿ˜‰ With that out of the way, the "non-combatants" issue presented, I genuinely feel is just not a factor for them REGARDLESS. After seeing what ol Puddin Pants will authorize, I sincerely doubt that China is any different. Not unless it's a battle on their own turf, but even then I'm not certain they'd care much... I mean, look at how many space launches they did where spent stages were coming down in or near villages! I believe that's changed recently, but it might just be a case of no longer using that particular model of rocket. (admittedly I don't pay THAT cost of attention to that situation, I just know those incidents haven't been in the space news roundups by any of the various channels I watch) [edit: Yea... the next part about "ethics dumping" really just proves my point, I feel ๐Ÿฅด If they're ok with doing those things, they're undoubtedly not going to mind if an AI goes slightly off-script during missions, if the overall effectiveness is high enough. I also kinda doubt they jailed dude for the years for those CRISPR edits, and even if they did, only had done so for optics reasons, and will want him to continue that research afterwards. I mean come on, genre exciting has "super soldier" written all over it, and if you can have them be super right out of the womb, that seems even better vs hoping those edits will yield the desired changes in adults...]
    1
  3058. 1
  3059. 1
  3060. 1
  3061. 1
  3062. 1
  3063. There is, actually, but just about every nation has deemed its use "too inhumane and indiscriminate" -- or in other words: die by "drowning" and it couldn't discriminate against civilians (or animals I suppose) where non-lethal exposure can leave permanent neurological damage. Talking about chemical weapons, but specifically 'gas attacks' like Mustard Gas, Phosgene, Sarin, or VX just to name a few. (technically, these days Phosgene mass-produced for use in/during the production of many legitimate things, like polymers, so its production isn't unlawful, only its use to intentionally harm people; i.e. a weapon of war.) Really, we just need a system that all military personnel around the world are required to wear (lol that alone makes this a non-starter!). A small device with dermal patches attached to various points on the body (10? upper/lower of each extremities, torso, head), where some sort of toxin delivery would be triggered. === [what's below is just me day dreaming...] === Weapons, then, would become non-destructive. They'd emit RF and/or some sort of light (in UV or IR spectrum). Heavy ordinance being capable of higher emmisions, to stimulate a conventional explosion's lethal range through its pressure wave (concussive and ruptures organs), allowing for combatants inside structures to still be affected. Conventional arms would have their ballistic kinetic projectiles (aka bullets) replaced by... a short laser pulse I guess, but that would probably need to be changed to a highly focused RF pulse for larger calibers, to stimulate their ability to penetrate armor, building walls, etc. Once one/multiple of the various sensors placed on a constant are triggered by the RF/UV/IR/whatever, the system delivers said toxin in the appropriate area, either simulating a leg, arm, torso wound or a fatal dose for what would otherwise have been something equally lethal by current means. Civilians? Unharmed, as they would have no reason to be equipped. Structures? Undamaged, as there would no longer be explosive or kinetic ordinance. (well, maybe the enclosures of the heavy ordinance might result in some kinetic damage, just as "duds" currently do) Terrain? FAR LESS damage, as there'd be nothing explosive to either set stuff on fire or make craters, with combatants 'digging in' as the only disturbance. Of course, rules of engagement would be universally adhered to, where today's list of what's considered a warcrime still exists, with the addition of setting fires to anything (plants or structures), use of explosives, bullets (et.al), and of course no tampering with the "Man-Equipped Objectified Warfare System" -- yes, aka M.E.O.W.S. ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜Š [/END-DAYDREAM-SEQUENCE]
    1
  3064. 1
  3065. 1
  3066. 1
  3067. 1
  3068. 1
  3069. 1
  3070. 1
  3071. 1
  3072. 1
  3073. 1
  3074. 1
  3075. 1
  3076. 1
  3077. 1
  3078. ย @usucdikย  lol And I could say to you: uh oh, another troll's has gotten internet service installed at their bridgr. However, I suspect I'd be wrong about you just as you've been about me, since I know you don't live under a bridge. Seriously though. I don't hide the fact I love AMD, that I even recommend them when I can, but I'm certainly not the extremist-type of fanboy that you think I am. AMD held the performance crown since the moment the release of the very first Athlon (Slot-A; now dubbed "Athlon Classic"), and reigned from mid-99 to at least 2004 when A64 x2 first debuted, but realistically it extends to 2005. They were well known, though, just not as a contender. That ALL changed with the Athlon, though, and there was enough hype around it before it launched, that even 16yr/o me had caught wind of it and started planning it my aforementioned first build around it (I knew nothing about computers really, at that time). I even remember the rough prices when I called around trying to find a CPU and mobo in stock: CPU was $220ish the the Athlon 500 I wanted, and mobo was $400ish for the MSI model I was after. Although, Pentium M on desktop wasn't what I'd consider their saving grace, but it wae the BASIS for what would take the lead: Core2. Phenom and PhII still held their own during those days, but Intel's shenanigans [see: link in the OP], which still continued for over a decade after Intel was fined I might add, had taken its intended financial toll on AMD. The PhII slipped further and further behind, particularly once the Core i series debuted... PhII x6 was a valiant last hurrah, but even still it fell short. Bulldozer? THAT'S when those vendor shenanigans bore true fruit for Intel... Bulldozer was (unfortunately) such a huge failure, so much so that I stuck with the first-gen AMD APU I was reviewing (PhII x6 derived, cut down to a quad-core), simply because it had much better floating point performance, AND far superior memory performance โ€“ based on my personal tests vs the first few revisions of the Dozer uarch. So yes, Intel once again rose to dominance when they ushered in the Core i, but AMD held their own towards the end of the PhII-era. But yes, that's still admittedly "loser-talk", as they were still being beaten. Then Intel got cocky, rested on their laurels, and paired with almost a decade of 10nm woes, lost to AMD one again. Now the only way they've been able to compete with AMD (in most tests) is through sheer clockspeed increases... Of course, that means they consume a massive amount of electricity to do it, and in turn put out an incredible amount of heat! Factor that in, and in the few tests they do still lead, I still qualify that as a loss, due to the poor efficiency. (yes, AMD's new 7000 series is also capable of consuming tons of amperage, but that's by choice whereas Intel's is because of necessity desperation... ๐Ÿ˜Š) โ€œโ€œโ€œFanboyโ€โ€โ€, out. โœŒ๏ธ
    1
  3079. 1
  3080. 1
  3081. 1
  3082. 1
  3083. 1
  3084. 1
  3085. 1
  3086. 1
  3087. 1
  3088. 1
  3089. 1
  3090. 1
  3091. ย @killedthecat1034ย  Boy have you misconstrued things... Did I go off on a bit of a tangent? Well, sure, but then I'm not trying to hide that. I tend to ramble on, but I did not stray from my intended point: calling them out on their centuries-unchanged shenanigans of of exactly what transpired here. If you aren't of their faith and make that fact known, who boy are they going to let you know how incorrect you somehow are! Even during times like these, as you have pointed out. Does me chastising them for it make me a hypocrite? Not exactly sure how it would, honestly... Was it going a bit far by comparing their pattern of being unaccepting of others choices to Putin not accepting the fact that Ukrainians want to be no part of Russia? Yes, probably. Do I regret making the comparison? Not really, because it's still historically accurate. Does little good to get angry with me over the shit they've done. We can ignore history, but I'm not sure what good that'll do... Lastly, was I arguing for you? Yes. Was I trying, even remotely, to be done White Knight for you? .... lol No. This is YouTube, the absolute last place I'd try to pull that. So, in turn, that's also a "No" to you thinking I mentioned it in order to play a victim card, OR that I was making it "about me". I mean, I'm no psychologist so I can't say what my subconscious' agenda was... lol But, consciously, it was solely about their actions, which the true context of our all is that over the weeks while this conflict has evolved, there's just been a lot of the same: someone somehow hints that they aren't a god-fearing person, and they come out of the woodwork to push their faith in the person's face... (and no, not a single instance of that has happened to me directly, as I take enough care not to put details like that in my primary comments, choosing only to chime in to an in-progress Crusade like I did here; I let them derail the thread first. ๐Ÿ˜‰)
    1
  3092. 1
  3093. Regarding dreams and our psyche... Most of my lucid dreams have always been the typical whacky/nonsensical theme, or the occasional "intimate" one; however, after we lost my dad 16 years ago to a heart attack, a new theme emerged... The details were always different, but the general theme was that dad was still alive, but had either: - been lost in the wilderness for many years and suddenly found his way out and back to us - left my mom and would occasionally come around for whatever reason (that detail escapes me) - ... I had a rare third one, but a sudden brain fart has taken it from me lmao Anyways, yea, it's super weird to experience those ones. My mom and dad had a perfect marriage, so for them to be divorced just wouldn't happen in real life. He was also a hunter and so getting lost in the woods just want him, either, (which is actually when he passed away... sat down to eat lunch at his favorite spot on my cousin's property in Montana and that was it; truly no better way to go and that's always heh the silver lining to losing him so young [59]) In the dreams, though, he'd always be trying to catch up with me, and unfortunately I would always be annoyed with him for being absent... even when it was a "he's been lost in the wilderness" dream where logically he wouldn't be at fault for the absence. Despite that, I still liked having them since I got to "see him". Been a few years since I recall having one and yea, wouldn't mind having one again ๐Ÿฅฒ Dreams sure are a curiosity, aren't they? Only to be made all the more curious given so many other species also dream! ๐Ÿคฏ If you've made it this far: Thanks for attending my ramble! ๐Ÿป
    1
  3094. ย @MrJdseniorย  My sincerest condolences on the loss your pet... ๐Ÿค— Having owned multiple dogs over the years, I know that pain, and am not looking forward to whenever that day may come for my 13yr/o Siberian Husky -- who thankfully remains amazingly spry & energetic. (see everyone, I have a Ruskie near and dear to my heart, it's only their gov't I detest! lol) Yes, I admit that the Ukrainians may not be openly asking for assistance via manpower, and could very well be declining any offers made behind closed doors. I certainly know that they have shown to be a force to be reckoned with, and I can't begin to imagine how badly this would've gone for Russia if Ukraine had a larger military that had ample training! Having so many pro-Russian leaders meant that just wasn't really possible, but thankfully THIS leader... well, any praise I could articulate, I feel would be an understatement! So I'll just say he's been absolutely awesome and a god-send for all of Ukraine, nay, the world! ๐Ÿค˜ Still, it pains me to see them being displaced, then on top of that, the intentional destruction of everything, so that they have nothing to come back to... (which I feel is Putin's goal, and has always been, not to "liberate the Ukrainian people", but to "liberate Ukraine of her people" ๐Ÿ˜ข) I just feel it's gone on long enough, and the tide have changed in their favor now that they have a fleshed of arsenal, which therefore means it will remain in their favor! Yet, we all know Putin... He won't back down, at least so long as he has the ability and support to dictate what his military does, and THAT is where my main issue lies. That's why I feel physical help need be accepted (or offered, if it hasn't), because Putin is going to drag this out as long as he can, for no other reason than because he can... So it seems like it'd be in everyone's best interest to go in and at least push his troops out, to show him that the world is not his for the taking whenever he gets the itch. The war is over, but either no one has had the balls to tell HIM that, or he's unwilling to accept that fact, but I see no reason why everyone has to suffer just because he enjoys being an asshole. ๐Ÿ™ Alright, alright, I've ranted long enough... heh Slava Ukraini, Heroyam Slava! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฑ
    1
  3095. 1
  3096. 1
  3097. 1
  3098. 1
  3099. 1
  3100. 1
  3101. 1
  3102. 1
  3103. 1
  3104. 1
  3105. 1
  3106. 1
  3107. 1
  3108. 1
  3109. 1
  3110. 1
  3111. 1
  3112. 1
  3113. 1
  3114. 1
  3115. 1
  3116. 1
  3117. 1
  3118. 1
  3119. 1
  3120. 1
  3121. 1
  3122. 1
  3123. 1
  3124. 1
  3125. 1
  3126. 1
  3127. 1
  3128. 1
  3129. 1
  3130. 1
  3131. 1
  3132. 1
  3133. 1
  3134. 1
  3135. 1
  3136. 1
  3137. 1
  3138. 1
  3139. 1
  3140. 1
  3141. 1
  3142. ย @whiteoutgotuย  Not sure what issue you are referring to when you said you "noticed it for years now"... Because this is a (relatively) brand new issue, only been around for a few months. Notifications, on the other hand, work in various ways. You will be notified anytime someone directly replies (tags) you. However, it does not work like Twitter, so you can't just AT someone and it notify them. Out YT usernames (e.g. DUKE_of_RAMBLE) are only skin deep, and the tagging in replies uses a long alphanumeric UUID that we don't see (like the Video ID, but like 4x longer). Then there's notification anytime ANYONE replies to a comment thread you've also commented on. However, those usually only notify you for a number of times. If you ignore them by swiping them away on mobile or not visiting them in the Notifications menu, then they'll stop sending them. If it's YOUR comment thread, I believe it'll keep noticing you of replies, but I'm not certain about this. There may be an age cutoff where if your original comment was made many years ago, it's possible it won't notify you unless you're tagged. You can tag people in Community Posts though, but I don't know how one goes about that. I had recently been tagged by a channel, along with a dozen others, but when I tried to do it just as you had (typing the channel)... it did nothing lol It might need some sort of markdown code to trigger it. (markdown is the name of the text formatting, like using * to bold text or _ to italicize) There might be more, as these are just what I've learned through personal experience.
    1
  3143. 1
  3144. 1
  3145. 1
  3146. 1
  3147. 1
  3148. 1
  3149. 1
  3150. 1
  3151. 1
  3152. 1
  3153. 1
  3154. 1
  3155. 1
  3156. 1
  3157. 1
  3158. 1
  3159. 1
  3160. 1
  3161. 1
  3162. 1
  3163. 1
  3164. 1
  3165. 1
  3166. 1
  3167. 1
  3168. 1
  3169. 1
  3170. 1
  3171. 1
  3172. 1
  3173. โ€‹ย @cutesammieย โ€‹ No. At worst (or "best", for you), it makes Evolution seem improbable, due to how complex it is, and the fact that we humans have trouble conceiving times spans beyond even our own written history, much less the HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF YEARS that life has existed on Earth. But not at all impossible! What's not improbable, but impossible, is creationism. That only a few thousand years ago, a single deity โ€“ which, kind you, no ancient cultures agree on โ€“ decided to whip us up. That we then never see him, only a select few have 'talked' to, and even less are 'the child of' (which that whole thing with Mary, we'd slap the 4-letter R word on that if it happened today lmao). That 'he' is infinitely wise and powerful, but after the first two screwed up SO BADLY he washed his hands with us... BUT STILL people thinks he "loves them" and will "forgive them", despite murdering his only child... OH YES THAT'S ALL TOTALLY POSSIBLE! ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ I wish I could be that native and delusional! (I went to catholic school for K through 8th and had to attend mass every Wednesday during school; I saw the "light" during 6th grade science when they were teaching us about the dinosaurs! The fact 11y/o me could see through the lies and yet some people go their entire lives believing it, blows my mind! lol) That's not even touching that which other cultures have, or do, believe! The fact so many HAVE came up with something isn't proof of one being real, either. No. It all comes back to our inability to fathom the timescale of our existence. We don't like the unknown, and death is frightening! So we cling to hope. How there is something grander in the scheme of it all. That they're is light at the end of the tunnel. That we don't blink of of existence, but can be reunited with loved ones... It's all just hope. If you want to believe, because it makes you feel better... BELIEVE! I'm actually fine with that! Hell, the Bible still has some good takeaways at the end of the day! (far more that are NOT good, but that's a different discussion entirely) But don't project it onto everyone around you, don't pretend like you'll be forgiven at the end of you give yourself to a deity. Doing that makes you a bad person here, and now. Let everyone live how they want, do what they want with our to their body. Be nice to EVERYONE, regardless of what they do or do not believe in, but especially when they don't! (yes, I'm being harsh right now, but notice I've also said to ultimately believe whatever you want, as long as it makes you feel better) But at the end of the day... It's far more likely we're living in a computer simulation than what any of past or modern religions claim! ๐Ÿ˜Š [/epic ramble] โœŒ๏ธโ™ฅ๏ธ๐Ÿค˜
    1
  3174. 1
  3175. 1
  3176. 1
  3177. 1
  3178. 1
  3179. 1
  3180. 1
  3181. 1
  3182. 1
  3183. 1
  3184. 1
  3185. 1
  3186. 1
  3187. 1
  3188. 1
  3189. 1
  3190. 1
  3191. 1
  3192. 1
  3193. 1
  3194. 1
  3195. 1
  3196. 1
  3197. 1
  3198. 1
  3199. 1
  3200. 1
  3201. 1
  3202. 1
  3203. 1
  3204. 1
  3205. 1
  3206. 1
  3207. 1
  3208. 1
  3209. 1
  3210. 1
  3211. 1
  3212. 1
  3213. 1
  3214. 1
  3215. 1
  3216. 1
  3217. 1
  3218. 1
  3219. 1
  3220. 1
  3221. 1
  3222. 1
  3223. 1
  3224. 1
  3225. 1
  3226. 1
  3227. 1
  3228. 1
  3229. 1
  3230. 1
  3231. 1
  3232. 1
  3233. 1
  3234. 1
  3235. 1
  3236. 1
  3237. 1
  3238. 1
  3239. 1
  3240. 1
  3241. 1
  3242. 1
  3243. 1
  3244. 1
  3245. 1
  3246. 1
  3247. 1
  3248. 1
  3249. 1
  3250. 1
  3251. 1
  3252. 1
  3253. 1
  3254. 1
  3255. 1
  3256. 1
  3257. ย @IAMGiftbearerย  Thanks for the reply! 1, 2) I completely forgot about Interpol heh Though, after looking just now, I have a feeling they won't give a hoot, and won't go in to arrest Putin, his cronies, or any soldiers for war crimes ๐Ÿ˜•: "... INTERPOL has issued a statement on its position. In declining to suspend Russia as a member country, INTERPOL invoked Article 3 of its Constitution, which prohibits INTERPOL's involvement in political matters. Mar 22, 2022" So that's a bit disheartening... Pretty sure that war, and anything related to it (eg soldier's actions), squarely fall under the definition of "political". Yay ๐Ÿ˜ž 3, 4, 5) That's my point though, since any NATO involvement will only escalate matters further, thereby undoubtedly prompting an unhinged Putin to indeed start using nukes (tactical, not intercontinental) I don't know if Russia, currently, is feeling like a Hydra, or a one headed monster... Wherein, if someone were to decide to just drop a bomb (conventional; MoAB) wherever Putin may be, if the remaining command structure would stand down, or decide to retaliate. As I feel like that's a better option than trying to send in a convert group. Anyone in the vicinity of that nut can pretty much be considered complicit/an accomplice, so they're shouldn't be much or any "collateral damage" from a bombing run... ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ But yea, that's where I'm coming from, as it seems like in the end, he's still going to end up getting away with all of this ๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ˜ซ As for the Ruskie Trolls in this thread, all I have to say is: Slava Ukraini! โœŠ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŒป
    1
  3258. 1
  3259. 1
  3260. 1
  3261. 1
  3262. 1
  3263. 1
  3264. 1
  3265. 1
  3266. 1
  3267. 1
  3268. 1
  3269. 1
  3270. 1
  3271. 1
  3272. 1
  3273. 1
  3274. 1
  3275. 1
  3276. 1
  3277. 1
  3278. 1
  3279. 1
  3280. 1
  3281. 1
  3282. 1
  3283. 1
  3284. 1
  3285. 1
  3286. 1
  3287. 1
  3288. 1
  3289. 1
  3290. 1
  3291. 1
  3292. 1
  3293. 1
  3294. 1
  3295. 1
  3296. 1
  3297. 1
  3298. 1
  3299. 1
  3300. 1
  3301. 1
  3302. 1
  3303. It's great that the Republicans have everything figured out. That we have enough unfed children, and enough kids in foster care. But thank goose (or geese, I won't judge) that they've got safeguards in place to make sure everything will be just fine! I'm so relieved they're prepared! ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿค˜ Since they do, I'm sure most women who will now be stuck carrying their unwanted pregnancy to term, and that Republicans are clearly going to make sure they're compensated for the amount of money required to be a pregnant woman (compared to not), and the plausible loss of income for some, who may not have a job that has maternity coverage, and is a job that is physical enough that she can't do her tasks during the last few months. Yes, thank goose for their having thought of every contingency, for all the situations, for thinking it's FAR BETTER to take away a key freedom of women in America (or any civilized country, even Russia allows it). Don't worry, American women will still be able to vocalize how fucking pissed-off they are, thanks to freedom of speech.... and if they want, can even do whatever they like to their body such as extreme body modifications and augmentations (the specific scene, not cosmetic surgery; I'm not judging BTW)... but nope sorry ladies, you're effectively a slave to our government of this passes, because you won't have FULL freedom and control over your body! ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘ *sigh* ๐Ÿ™„ I've said it before on another vid, if this passes, I will no longer consider myself an American, since the representatives of this country clearly do not give a shit about my (and many other's) views or what is best for us. [Just to be clear, in case I laid the sarcasm on too thick, I am pro-choice, and anti-religious-views being forced onto citizens. ]
    1
  3304. 1
  3305. 1
  3306. 1
  3307. 1
  3308. 1
  3309. 1
  3310. 1
  3311. 1
  3312. 1
  3313. 1
  3314. 1
  3315. 1
  3316. I have the graphics card(s) from the Army's combat vehicle simulator (circa 2000-03)... I didn't plan on obtaining it, as the card was used for other rendering purposes. It just turned out that one I got, had a special additional card attached, which I found out was used for simulating things like nightvision. For hardware junkies, it's Quantum3D's AAlchemy 8132 (aka 8164). Which uses 8x 3Dfx VSA100 chips (same as the Voodoo 5 5500) with 32MB per chip. This effectively makes it DOUBLE what the Voodoo 5 600 would've been, with it only have 4x VSA100 (which was never released). ๐Ÿ˜Š On top of that, those cards could forget be combined with up to 4 cards per system, and then FURTHER linked together across multiple systems through network cable ๐Ÿ˜ฎ (I have 2 of them) The 8132 model breaks down to: 8 chips, 1 card, 32MB VRAM. There were 64MB versions, which would be 8164. A dual card therefore would be 8232, or quad card config would be 8432. But what made my second card I acquired special was it's "Sensor Post Processor" card... It's a glorified Voodoo 3,with DVI monitor support, but it piggybacked onto the AAlchemy and functioned as a "Shader" card, applying this like weather effects of nightvision effects to the graphics the AAlchemy cards rendered. Sadly, I don't have the whole system, like Gary of The Dodge Garage owns (he has a website dedicated to Q3D and 3Dfx hardware), nor do I even the power supply for them... But, it doesn't need a special computer to use them, and powering them can be satisfied in other ways! I've got the special part, and that's all that matters to me! They're my pride and joy! ๐Ÿ˜Šโค
    1
  3317. 1
  3318. 1
  3319. 1
  3320. 1
  3321. 1
  3322. 1
  3323. 1
  3324. 1
  3325. 1
  3326. 1
  3327. 1
  3328. 1
  3329. 1
  3330. 1
  3331. 1
  3332. 1
  3333. 1
  3334. 1
  3335. 1
  3336. 1
  3337. 1
  3338. 1
  3339. 1
  3340. 1
  3341. 1
  3342. 1
  3343. 1
  3344. 1
  3345. 1
  3346. 1
  3347. 1
  3348. 1
  3349. 1
  3350. 1
  3351. 1
  3352. 1
  3353. 1
  3354. 1
  3355. 1
  3356. ย @faikerdogan2802ย  Well I'm glad you're not one of them... However, you are mistaking Super Heavy/Starship with SLS, as that's the endeavor that's literally wasting billions. SLS is over a decade behind schedule, and had had well over ten billion poured into it, with easily that much more slated to still be poured into it! (lowest estimate is $11bn; but I've heard it's closer to 14-18) More importantly, what SpaceX does with their money is their own prerogative. Granted, they've been alloted funding by NASA, but it's not much in the grand scheme of things (est $3bn spent so far in the SH/SS program). Whereas SLS is WHOLLY funded by taxpayers, and EACH LAUNCH costs us roughly what the entire Starship program has cost thus far! ๐Ÿ˜ฅ (~2.4bn) So spending money on simulations across years, just to "do it right the first time", or on lots of hardware to do real world tests which provide real world data, what's the difference? SpaceX is taking the same approach though, because at any point they can see that things could potentially not work and stop the program... Whereas the SLS approach took years and years and years to finally launch, which up until then it was a "Were still working on it, so it's foolish to cancel yet!", and now it's turned into a "Well, we've spent this much already, why stop how??" RUDs might not look good from the outside looking in, but it is proven to get the job done... After all, that's the approach NASA took back in the day and it got us to the moon! SpaceX is just doing it smarter and faster... and probably cheaper, too!
    1
  3357. 1
  3358. 1
  3359. 1
  3360. 1
  3361. 1
  3362. 1
  3363. 1
  3364. 1
  3365. 1
  3366. 1
  3367. 1
  3368. 1
  3369. 1
  3370. 1
  3371. 1
  3372. 1
  3373. 1
  3374. 1
  3375. 1
  3376. 1
  3377. 1
  3378. 1
  3379. 1
  3380. 1
  3381. 1
  3382. 1
  3383. 1
  3384. โ€‹โ€‹ย @vonoxidย That will not help your earphones, unfortunately. [TL;DR - Induction cooking uses electromagnetism, and speakers are electromagnetically driven, so you're likely picking up the high frequency of your stove. These metal fingers only serve to electrically couple two isolated materials, which, isn't occurring in your earphones because the are mostly plastic (non-conductive)] My gut tells me that ANY earphone you would be wearing, would pickup interference, simply due to how induction heating works: "Induction cooking is a method of cooking that uses a copper coil underneath the cooking surface to generate electromagnetic energy." [source: Whirlpool] Almost every speaker, be they small earbuds or big speakers at a concert, all work thanks to electromagnetism. In the case off a speaker, alternating electrical pulses cause the driver to vibrate and produce changes in air pressure, aka "sound". For an induction stove, it vibrates the metal at a high frequency and that causes heat to be generated. (pretty sure this is why you can't use all-aluminum pans). The speaker in your earbuds just happens to be sensitive enough, and you are close enough, that they pick up the electromagnetism generated by the stove. IF wired earbuds don't buzz, then it's just because your earbuds are wireless, and radio waves (as well as even visible light) are...... ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION! ๐Ÿ˜ So it's plausible it's picking up interference that way. (but due to being digital, I'm apt to think not, hence me leading with it being the speakers picking it up)
    1
  3385. 1
  3386. 1
  3387. 1
  3388. 1
  3389. 1
  3390. 1
  3391. 1
  3392. 1
  3393. 1
  3394. 1
  3395. 1
  3396. 1
  3397. 1
  3398. 1
  3399. 1
  3400. 1
  3401. 1
  3402. 1
  3403. 1
  3404. 1
  3405. 1
  3406. 1
  3407. 1
  3408. 1
  3409. 1
  3410. 1
  3411. 1
  3412. 1
  3413. 1
  3414. 1
  3415. 1
  3416. ย @rrpearsallย  ย  Conveyance and recognition of facts is the only way to live, not to mention the only way to move forward -- be it as a person, society, country, or the entirety of human civilization on earth. That being said: 1. I'm not sure what to make of that. The only real comment I have is on your last line... IF that's the case, they clearly underestimated him. Pretty much everyone I've seen comment on him as president from people of North America, the UK, and even a few comments from parts of Asia, all wish he was their country's leader -- some going so far as to say he should be made President of the World heh But he has shown, to be at least, as a very down to earth and competent leader. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ 2. That's... Not really true. The actual documents of the agreements state no such promise, and any claim of such a promise were caused by a misunderstanding by Gorbachev. However, I can genuinely appreciate a country/its people feeling betrayed/upset, because of what they had always having been told, when things start to happen in ways that seems to defy what they thought couldn't happen. The reality being... there never was that promise, so they feel further anger because now they are also feeling cheated since if that had been properly understood, it may not have been agreed to. (they at least want to hope their government wouldn't have, but we'll never know and speculating and/or acting based on assumptions will only cause major problems; problems that we're currently living through...) 3. In not sure I follow what you're trying to say there. I might be wrong (I'm not well versed on what the NATO missions defense systems are equipped with), but I don't think any of the missile networks have US-made nuclear warhead equipped systems? I think those systems are in central Europe and don't need to be any closer, so Ukraine joining NATO would not be similar to the Cuban Missile Crisis. Particularly because NATO isn't some US-led or controlled entity, as all parties retain their sovereignty and independence. So the only thing I would see Ukraine gaining in terms of hardware, might be air defense systems being based there. But based on polling data, Fourier Western Bloc country citizens today, >60% see Russia as the threat, and their reasoning behind joining NATO, so it's purely a defensive reasoning, NOT because the country wants to be "well armed" or "the US in a better position" to attack Russia, which is (unsurprisingly) what Putin thinks the reason is. 4. I'm not sure what you're saying, due to a typo. You put: "I wish knew NATO was already" Removing either word significantly changes what's been said... :/ Either way, BioLabs are not where nuclear weapons are designed, or made, or stored. Similarly, there are no US military or defense BioLabs in Ukraine... We don't outsource stuff like that. Even our rocket industry isn't allowed to produce or sell hardware to other countries. (you can look up "ITAR" for more details). All of that stuff is Russian literal "fake news" to try and further justify the invasion, concocted after their "because.... Nazis!!" reasoning had fallen apart. When one excuse fails to convince everyone, they come up with a new one. So yea, no US nukes or Biological weapons in Ukraine. (bio and chemical weapons are almost globally accepted as not permitted for use in war, same with the phosphorus bomb/missiles that Russia has used (short range artillery, and also on the Azov Steel Factory, there's video of both). However, besides all your points, what about Glasnost? All of the free-media groups in Russia have been forced into silence, which started with the Space Industry in late-2020 or early-2021. That out a lot if Russian space-industry reporters and journalists out of work, as only the state-sponsored groups (probably only singular) were able to report anything related to Russia's space related tech or endeavors. But look at the ramifications with the general news, and the only thing that gets reported on by these government-controlled news outlets is only things that fit their narrative, to keep their people thinking what they're doing is only in defense of what the west is doing. Like how they only invaded Ukraine, as a favor to their people, and the world, because they were "stopping neo-Nazis"... Except, if they had re-read the Budapest Memorandum, they agreed NOT to do this sort of thing, as that would be meddling (btw, that's the spelling, not "medalling"; interfering, not awarding medals heh) as was your point with the first part of your Item 1. And on your ending sentiment as a Democrat, I don't watch the news outlets that air that kind of stuff (Fox News, NewsMax are two of the worst), so I'm not tainted or even exposed to their BS and lies :) Watch CNN or MSNBC if you want non-propaganda, no BS news. Because I DIDN'T hate Russia, not until this invasion, where I hate Putin, Russian government, and the Russian military. I hold no grudge against her people, as most of them have genuinely been brainwashed by their own media, thanks to glasnost no longer being adhered to and free speech/reporting resulting in jail time for you. ๐Ÿ˜”
    1
  3417. 1
  3418. ย @lonerider5933ย  ย  Please note that I did not mention anything about them not having a BIAS. They are a liberal-leaning channel, yes. They just aren't at the extreme end. As such, you won't see propaganda crap like Fox News, NewsMax, another I can't recall off hand, and Russia's state-controlled outlets play. By which I mean, the content they label as "News" but is clearly alternate-reality in nature, where only the events line up with our reality, but none of what's being said is at all factual. However, yes, you are correct. One should watch the other sides content in order to balance it out and give a middle ground. AlJazerra does seem alright, and appears to be the conservative counterpart of CNN or MSNBC (from what I've seen). However, no, Fox is so extremist that I'm not sure watching CNN & MSNBC would bring you back to the middle! (being completely honest, that isn't meant as a jab). Which I'll also agree with you on WaPost, as I've tried to read their stuff, but can't stomach it... (my complete disgust for Bezos not being factored in) DW is good though. I catch their ear coverage, too. I wish they'd segment their content a little more/better. Seems often times I'm watching their video and 30-50% of it is either quite unrelated to the title, or related but no substance; then it also seems like alot of the time, that comes before the title-related news is discussed. But that's a small gripe simply because I have limited monthly bandwidth (which also means I have to watch in 360potato quality), so shorter videos appeal to me; <10min, 6 being ideal. If I want to get my read on, particularly in terms of space, science, or technology -- but political news as well -- then ArsTechnica is my go-to! ๐Ÿ˜
    1
  3419. 1
  3420. 1
  3421. 1
  3422. 1
  3423. 1
  3424. 1
  3425. 1
  3426. 1
  3427. 1