Comments by "POO CRAYON" (@poocrayon4588) on "Liberal Christians vs Conservative Christians | Middle Ground" video.

  1. Jesus didnt support causes other than the kingdom of heaven and the way there. During his own time Rome had occupied and controlled Jewish territories and and it was much much worse than anything going on in the US today. But he never even once bothered to mention it in the Bible.
    53
  2. Most no fault divorces would be a sin in Gods eyes. But I guess it was Eve that ate the apple and women do initiate 85% of divorce and feminists were the ones that fought for no fault divorce so its no surprise
    37
  3.  @christophersmith7850  Legitimacy has nothing to do with it, her arguments are just wrong and twist every legit conception of Christianity far beyond breaking point. Its like she became a woke liberal 1st then tried to think how to twist every aspect of Christianity to support that without a care for reality. Its clear her woke liberalism informs her Christianity and not the other way around. My name makes no difference Im not wrong - People mocked Jesus for saying he was the Son of God and preaching the word - they even killed him for it, they killed Paul for similar - they werent taken seriously but they were right - just like Im right about Brenda and you know it.
    34
  4. He dont think they are Christians which is his perogative.
    33
  5.  @PolarianSymphony  Getting to Heaven and showing Christs love are one and the same in concept. This is something real Christians understand.
    26
  6. Shes full of it. But she is an effective charlatan who knows what appeals to dopey young women (cos she is one) - Ill give her that.
    23
  7. Shes not a real Christian and should just stop pretending to be one. She only does it for the utube clicks from progressives. Its clear she has no understanding or interest in understanding Christianity or its ideas, only in forcing her own ideas onto Christianity.
    21
  8.  @lelasharp1144  Probably should have been fact checking the progressives as well but in truth there wasnt a single fact any of them said and thats a fact.
    20
  9. Americans have a big problem with literal Bible interpretation because they're so far from and know so little about the history and theory of the Church after the Biblical times - ie, the Roman Catholic and Orthodox history and their interpretations of Christianity that led to key ideas in much of the Western World (The Trinity, Ideas of Thomas Aquinas etc.). But because Americans were for a long time anti Catholic ideas they evolved a insular and cult like form of Christianity which relies heavily on literal interpretation or on Modern Cherry Picking. (this is also why there are so many Splintered off Christian groups in America that bear little resemblance to any previously recognized Christian Religion - They've forgotten their history and what made them who they are and have lost themselves)
    14
  10. wrong
    11
  11. of course it matters
    9
  12. ​ @MartialArtsCat101  Your mistaken - faith does inform character (at least to an extent) and Christians dont (always) twist Christianity to fit their political values - you may be coming from too cynical a POV to believe this but many Christians are capable of examining whether their political values are compatible with Christianity and changing them if they're not. A long time ago it was the Emporer Constantine who first put this into practice in a sweeping way when he banned Gladitoral games (basically human sacrifice of a sort) and death by torture as a spectacle - both decisions informed by his new found Christian values and not at all popular in his political circles and less than useless as political moves - just one early example of Christian values affecting politics which altered the course of society and affects us for the better to this day. Historically this questioning of whether politics of the day represent Christianity has actually been a source of conflict between the Church and individual christian figures and Goverment. So society may sometimes warp christianity to support its prevalant political values but individual Christians do usually not in such an overt and transparent way as this Brenda chick does - its as tho she has just written a list of woke values and thought - "how can I claim Christianity supports this and not think about whether it actually does or not". Your wrong about the Abrahamic religions too - you see Christianity doesnt stop at the end of the Bible - it goes on and on and many figures have added to it far after the fact in ways that have influenced society for the better and continue to do so to this day (see Thomas Aquinas). But in order to do so you actually have to have some knowledge and respect for what your talking about which Brenda doesnt. The reality of the Old Testament is that it has always been secondary to the New in the eyes of Christians and a collection or Moral and other lessons or simply the record of the times and important figures. It is the New Testament and the often imperfect and fallible musings or later prominent Christians which make up the spiritual basis of Christianities heart.
    8
  13. No it’s not it’s perfect. Jesus didn’t care about earthly politics either
    7
  14. ​ @MartialArtsCat101  Im not disagreeing that people can use their faith to justify opinions and decisions that are purely political, but I find it strange you dont believe that - either for good or bad (or neither) the opposite can likewise occur. That personal experience and exposure to religion can influence how you interpret politics. If as you say spirituality is an oppurtunity for personal growth then it would stand to reason that if that personal growth was for the better - surely it could and would influence both political opinion and action? Again either for good or bad or simply difference? Perhaps you see politcal manipulation and those who have or seek the power to use it as inherently bad or amoral and so its hard to believe that such action can be inspired by personal faith and the desire to do good (note - not selflessly but good nonetheless) that can flow from it? (of course whether its actually for good is another thing but this definetly exists) I gave an ancient example of Constantine banning Gladitorial games above as an example of religion influencing politics for the better - this wasnt a popular decision at the time and was seen as de-stabilizing at a time when stability was needed. It was a greater risk politcally to ban the games than to do nothing and yet he did it anyway - what other explanation can there be other than religious belief influencing political thought which led to influencing political action? There are many examples of similar thru history.
    7
  15. You mean Catholic Christians and Protestants
    6
  16.  @hottiegirl4814  Jesus wasnt politcal. He wouldnt allow himself to be sucked into representing any cause of any group. If he wanted to touch on a subject like Racism he would do it thru a sermon or his words to an individual. And if he were to stand up for someone against racism it would be for an individual and on his own - not with a megaphone at the head of a mob.
    6
  17.  @thelma143  You dont need to pick a side at all. Your completely right and both things go together - you get it. The original comment was just made to show Conservatives as having a worse version of Christianity than Progressives and the commenter made up this argument that you need to pick your favourite between going to Heaven or doing good on earth as some kind of moral test. Its a very strange point of view to have and not one present in Christian theory anywhere. I think the original commenter just made a rather illogical argument because they got emotional about their political beliefs.
    6
  18. Its not surprising that a supposed "Christian" like Brenda has more atheists who love her that actual Christians. That should tell you something.
    6
  19.  @annikahunter247  She sounded like a fool to anyone not drinking the woke cool aid. Honestly she's not any kind of Christian at all and should just admit to it.
    6
  20. @the mr froggy A religious person commenting on a religious video? OMG! 😮
    5
  21.  @marythomaswatkins3860  Shes not a christian. Shes woke first and just uses CHristianity to draw attention to it
    5
  22. Neither of those things will stop you from getting to Heaven in the eyes of any legitimate form of Christianity
    5
  23.  @urbanexplorer6783  Why? its a real word you know. You may not have seen it used but it means a fraud. In the case of Brenda it means she's either lying to others or herself about actually being a Christian for the sake of the internet success with a simple minded woke audience. She's not really Christian to any real Christian.
    5
  24.  @Ash-gz9pr  They're actually wrong and your tangentially wrong. If they had just said Christianity, Islam and Judaism all come from the same original tradition and are slightly similar then sure - Christianity, Islam and Judaism are slightly similar so they're tangentially the same. BUT there's no overlap between actual definitions of the religions - you cant be tangentially Christian, if you dont believe Jesus is the son of God then your not Christian. Likewise you cant be tangentially Muslim, if you dont believe Muhammed was a prophet who talked to an Angel your not Muslim. And if you do believe one of those things you can not be the other religion - not even tangentially. In the same way you cant be both a Catholic and a protestant etc. etc. or a Jew and a Mormon.
    4
  25.  @PolarianSymphony  Lol, some forms of Christianity should be invalidated. I dont validate Snake handling revival Preachers as real Christians either. You misunderstand my point - getting to Heaven and doing godly deeds are THE SAME THING in concept. Wanting to be close to God reaches its ultimate expression of faith in a desire to go to Heaven and its ultimate earthly expression in Godly deeds. They both happen in conjuction with one another and so are the same exact thing. If you cant understand this you have missed a key concept of Christianity - something that has been present since the earlist church. This idea is as prevalent in Christianity as the similar idea of the Trinity and also as misunderstood because its not dumbed down enough for many pp. I urge you not to assume because u believe that your progressive ideas are right that therefore also proggressives ideas of Christianity must be right.
    4
  26.  @PolarianSymphony  As explained that isnt what I believe. And its you who is missing out on important parts of being a Christian because of your obvious lack of understanding of its key ideas. My other comment should also be taken as an answer to your question about would I believe in God if I knew I was going to hell. If you cant take it as an answer to that question its because you dont understand the Trinity of God. I suggest you study early Roman Christian history as well as Christianity thru the dark ages and early Medieval times as well as the work of Thomas Aquinas. Stop looking to American christianity either progressive or conservative. Youll only find ignorance and a lack of intellectual creativity (which is inspiration ie - the holy spirit) there.
    4
  27. Wrong. Her religion is woke. She just uses Christianity to get attention for it
    3
  28.  @hottiegirl4814  No its not. If you think Jesus would be supporting BLM or any large scale demonstration or cause thats crap. During Jesus own time his own people the Jews were having ongoing struggles and rebellion against the Roman empire which was occupying their terrotory and literally crucified those who fought back - it was much worse than anything in America today. And not only did Jesus not come out in support of their side he never even bothered to mention their cause. Likeweise he never bothered to fight against slavery or any other social injustice of his time. Thats because Jesus only cause was leading ALL peoples souls to the kingdom of Heaven and taking away their sins. The fact that you think your cause is so rightous that Jesus would support it when he never supported a single social cause during his own earthly life is crap and its the same crap as the right wingers you disagree with peddle. You are no better. BLM is still a group with a website and stated beliefs. The fact that people like you think that your cause is so right that of course God and Jesus would be on your side shows what is wrong with so many religous people throughout history. Ill repeat - Christs only cause was the Kingdom of Heaven - when he helped people directly on earth he helped individuals - end of story.
    3
  29.  @solberg7049  So true - part of the problem is protestantism disowned so much of the Catholic history that they grew from in a misguided attempt to demonize Catholics that they forget the intellectual and scholarly history of Christianity throughout the ages before they existed and became extremely dumbed down. I dont think they actually can look honestly at their history and theology and think about it alongside Roman Catholic (and Orthodox) ideas - to do so would be to cause their own implosion.
    3
  30.  @PolarianSymphony  So? Thats what the majority of Christians believe in. Its only American Protestants that dont.
    3
  31.  @PolarianSymphony  Its you who have missed the point and also the point of my comment. "Salvation" "Going to Heaven" "Good Deeds" and "a personal relationship with God" are all the same thing - they can not be seperated. Its not a transaction with God - The idea and desire of doing Christian things for others is merely an earthly expression of Heaven "On earth as it is in Heaven", and following that Heaven itself is the unearthly expression of the Good we do on earth. It all flows from the idea of the Holy Trinity - the idea that God the father is the same as God the Son and the same as God the Holy Spirit (the Holy Spirit is the God part present when we do things for others and in our personal relationship with God ) and so the good deeds and personal relationship with God are not thought of as a ticket to heaven but they are an earthly expression of heaven itself as heaven is an expression of them. If you cant understand this concept I think you should study it more and try to get your head around it. If you cant you can still be a Christian but you will never understand Christianity or its key concepts and advancements from other early religions, nor its most important difference to other Abrahamic based religions.
    3
  32.  @PolarianSymphony  Oh and "being good" has nothing to do with being Christian at all. Being Christian isnt about being teachers pet, plenty of real Christians and pivotal Chistian figures from history are far from good in many many ways. It makes no difference
    3
  33. Getting to Heaven is unseperatable from being a true Christian.
    3
  34.  @s.a5332  If your taking it from the Bible (which you must be as its the only source) that Jesus prayed to God, then why would you reject the same part of the bible in which many times Jesus is revealed as the Son of God? I dont care if you do or dont believe that Jesus is the Son of God but to take an example of Jesus praying to God and to try to use it as evidence of him simply being a messenger and not the Son of God makes no logical sense when the book your sourcing the fact of him praying to God from to disprove that he is the Son of God, also explains in no uncertain terms that he is the Son of God - thus making your claim of him praying to God disproving him as the Son of God nonsensical.
    3
  35. ​ @s.a5332  No, Im saying you contradicted your own logic and interpreted something from the Bible in a way that makes no logical sense.
    3
  36.  @s.a5332 No it doesnt - tho you just contradicted yourself in your previous argument
    3
  37. Another person who isnt religious who agrees with Brenda lol. Gee wonder why? Brenda isnt a Christian - her religion is being woke, she just USES Christianity to draw attention to it. It also doesnt surprise me that someone who is into woke ideas sees nothing arrogant about someone lecturing others and trying to be their "teacher" in the way Brenda does.
    3
  38.  @shul6495  "no true Scotsman" - Now theres an overused phrase people use when they want to sound clever but have nothing to add to the conversation if ever there was one
    3
  39.  @saraiherrerra2303  Of course I can comment on peoples opinions and whether they are truly Christian - the story about not casting the first stone is about not judging sin harshly because we all sin and no one is perfect. Its not about disagreeing with someones ideas or commenting on them - Jesus and others in the bible did that on the reg. That's pretty much what like a quarter of the bible is. If no one ever judged and evaluated others ideas or thoughts on Christianity, Christianity would make no coherent sense and absolutely anyone could define anything no matter how ridiculous as being real Christianity. Hell if someone told you super mario was a prophet of God or that the Virgin Mary appeared every night in their toilet bowl and told them to eat bats would you judge them and say their version of Christianity was wrong? I sure as shiz would and I'd be right to do so. Pleas try to think with a little nuance if you can
    3
  40. That grey Christian Chick should just stop trying to smash progressive ideas onto Christianity. Its ridiculous and obvious catering to the feminist "yass queen" crowd. Its obvi she has no understanding at all of Christian Theology.
    3
  41.  @Stacia33bliebers  Wrong he cares about our souls
    3
  42.  @sebces2576  She commented on a religious video where sexuality was an aspect of the video - in this case I feel its fair conversation since she brought it up first. And I would never say I was cisgender - I would just tell the truth and say I'm a man.
    2
  43.  @y.o.s6000  So not at all as neither Christians nor Muslims define Muslims as Christians or vice versa. But nice attempt at a clever comment bro
    2
  44. yes it is
    2
  45.  @Densoro  Latin is the original and all that matters - it says boy but as explained "boy" in this context doesnt mean actual little boy - it means a young man. This has all been studied and explained many times but of course your not interested in the truth so who cares right?
    2
  46.  @bencedukavits6271  It seems so dumbed down there tbh. Its a million years away from the Christianity Thomas Aquinas and other scholarly monks envisioned thats 4 sure
    2
  47.  @aomeke8368  You are doing the same sick thing as right wingers do and suggesting your politcal cause is so right that Jesus would support it. You know full well that Im not implying Jesus supports killing innocent people - it says something about you that you took this there. Once again - Jesus would not have supported ANY politcal causes or protest groups - his purpose was leading those to the kingdom of heaven and when he helped people on earth he helped individuals - never causes. Of all the terrible atrocities of Christs own time - Roman oprresion and invasion of the Jews (his own people) slavery in all cultures etc. etc. You know how many Jesus fought against? NONE! The one time he even mentioned politics and goverment was to say "render unto ceaser what is ceasers and render unto God what is Gods" - confirming his purpose - saving peoples souls. People like you are the reason that armies can fight each other and both do it in Christs name.
    2
  48.  @annanexton4682 And the only answer is that he wouldnt have supported BLM as a group because he would never stand with ANY group. That they have taken a "your either with us or against us" approach and think of not supporting BLM as = being a racist and supporting police brutality and think that Jesus "would be on their side" is exactly the kind of thinking which is the reason Jesus would never have sided with any group. He came to save ALL souls and to help ALL people - not only those who fight for a cause you agree with and even if you are right and BLM is a good cause - remember, Jesus didnt only come to save those who were on the side of "good". He came to save sinners. I know the left is all worked up about their own causes rightousness and think there on the side of good like so many thru history have thought - but the only cause Jesus fought for was the kingdom of Heaven. Those who cant understand that or wont admit it are incapable of learning from the wisdom of Jesus in the New Testament. Thats it, thats all, end of story.
    2
  49. Shes not a real Christian
    2
  50.  @eulyc.959  Are Protestants and Lutherans really CHristian tho?
    2
  51.  @ThaMobstarr  Brenda is wrong about God and so are Evangelicals.
    2
  52. ​ @maebymoore7210  Your loss for God truly works thru me. Sorry if thats too much for you to deal with
    2
  53. Nah. Her religion is being woke. She just uses Christianity to draw attention to it. Shes not a Christian and her ideas are anti Christian in nature.
    2
  54.  @ElijahJGraves  Amen to that! But Brenda false tounged ideas only appeal to dopey young woke girls anyway and they'd believe any old twitter wisdom type junk so who cares
    2
  55. Wrong, Most of the most influential figures in Christianity didnt read the Bible with the Historical circumstances in mind. How could any one living after the fall of Rome truly understand the historical Circumstances?
    2
  56.  @servantofyhwh6064  Lol, you have no idea what idolize means. Catholics dont literally worship statues, the statues are just representations of biblical figures - no one cares about the statues themselves. Unlike some more child like sects which evolved far later in Christianities history - catholics can understand that statues and pictures arent actually alive lol.
    2
  57.  @servantofyhwh6064  Lol, why go back to the start of the history of the religion you are a part of? r u kidding? This is the problem with the dumbed down American forms of Christianity - they totally lack all thought - actually they're closer to fundematalist old testament worshipers than actualy Christians in many ways. No curiosity, no creativity, no ideas, no culture, no great works and no great deeds. Yaaaawn. This is also why they splinter and break so easily.
    2
  58.  @servantofyhwh6064  Lol, I know there are many of them - they keep splitting and weakening all the time. The problem is they're willful simpletons who dont truly follow Christs (and Pauls) example because they dont question and go outside their comfort zone. For this reason they misinterpret the Bible itself. They dont understand basic concepts of Christianity like the Trinity and believe in a childlike version of Heaven and salvation. They're not a creative or thinking people and wont last as a part of Christianity. Roman Catholics will be around long after American Prespertitrian sects are forgotten.
    2
  59. She is cherry picking and twisting interpretation so far and so much shes lying to herself and others
    2
  60. Would you like to be a Nun now? Its the best of both worlds for ya
    1
  61.  @Ash-gz9pr  No. He quite literally said that Muslims were tangentially Christian. Read his original comment again (unless its been edited)
    1
  62.  @Ash-gz9pr  I said they were tangentially similar and if he had of made that point I would have agreed. But he didnt he said Muslims were tangentially Christian. There is a difference so no Im not "literaaally" agreeing with his point at all. If he wasnt clear and meant something other than he wrote then that isnt my problem. Please try to learn to think with some nuance
    1
  63.  @rodrigofigueroaperalta8457  Without the Catholic Church christianinty itself would have long since vanished. Even if you dont agree with everything it does you should be thanking it for that. Roman Catholiscism (and Orthodoxy which split from it later) was far from all powerful in their beginnings and if there hadnt of been a Roman Catholic church those "real" chrisitians as you put it would probably be praising Muhummad right now as nothing would have stopped Islamic forces from overruning half the world.
    1
  64.  @Ash-gz9pr  What point? I didnt misconstrue anything - I responded exactly to what was written
    1
  65.  @deshonjoseph1292  American Society
    1
  66.  @alecmagsombol4168  American Conservatives are rarely Catholic. American protestant and baptist conservatives arent the same at all as Catholic ones from other countries. It's not the same, they lack the intellectual ideas and curiosity of the best Catholic conservatives.
    1
  67.  @pocketfulloffun  And shes still a deluded charlatan not a true Christian
    1
  68. ​ @pocketfulloffun  It says when I see someone like Brenda obviously saying unChristian things while using Christianity to draw attention to them I have the knowledge to call it out - that's what it says. Only God can judge in the next world - but I do get to make my judgement in this one - and I say Brenda is not a Christian and is either very misguided and illogical or is a liar. I hope for the sake of her soul she's misguided.
    1
  69.  @pocketfulloffun  You would be wrong
    1
  70.  @JollyOliW  But still that would mean that if the Bible influenced individuals it inderectly influenced politics anyway. And sometimes when there are attempts to crack down on religious freedoms religion has no real choice but to get politcal. Ie- The ban on wearing a crucifix in France etc.
    1
  71.  @AllwaysKING  Yeah - which basically confirms his non politcal outlook and mission. He could have fought Rome but he didnt.
    1
  72.  @hottiegirl4814  And what makes you think Jesus would have "done a lesson" on BLM? Did he "do a lesson" on the Jewish Rebillions of the time fighting against Roman occupation and cruelty? No he did not. If Jesus were to intervene in any racism it would be in a direct instance of it - say someone was being harrassed by racists etc. - this is the kind of thing Jesus would intervene in and then he would seek to change the minds of the individual racists who were there. BUT that does not mean you would see Jesus the next day at a protest or stating "i support BLM" - you would not. That you think otherwise shows you either fundementally misunderstand Jesus purpose on earth, or that you dont actually know much about the new testament or that you want to lie about the way Jesus actually acted so you can claim he would support the cause your fired up about. No serious Christian could ever believe Jesus would actively support or come out in support of BLM or any other politcal OR purely social cause. That is a fact.
    1
  73.  @adriana12995  And to you 🙏✝
    1
  74.  @hottiegirl4814  Of course he wouldnt support racism but he would also never come out and say "I support BLM" (as you've basically admitted here) so when people (like you earlier) are saying he would support BLM you are wrong. You have confused yourself and your own thoughts on Jesus by thinking you must support BLM directly otherwise you are a racist. You have also confused your own argument about Jesus by seeming to assume that any argument or statement against racism is somehow support for BLM. It isnt, BLM doesnt = all fighting against racism and nor do you get to claim such without your obvious miss assumptions pointed out. If you cant admit it here, then at least admit to yourself that your own argument that Jesus would support BLM is one you had based on your own passion for your cause and doesnt reflect the reality of Jesus purpose on earth.
    1
  75.  @annanexton4682  So "its not about sides" but according to u its about "whats right and what u stand for" - which basically translates as "it is about being on the side which is right and stands for the right thing" - which means it is about sides to u, just admit it. Jesus didnt take sides other than the side of the Kingdom of Heaven, which doesnt have jack to do with your cause. You are all worked up over BLM and have let yourself become willfully confused over the nature of Jesus cos of it. Jesus didnt stand up against slavery or the Roman injuistices against his own people the Jews - so it is so arrogant of u to think that Jesus would stand up against the injustice you perceive in America. You believe your cause is so important that it is the sole earthly one Jesus would support? Humble yourself for you dont know Christ and what you say is unChristian in nature.✝☁⚡🔥
    1
  76.  @annanexton4682  None of which means he would support BLM. And that is what the hypothetical question (or statement rather) asserted and what I correctly said was wrong. You adding the "question was hypothetical" changes nothing about that -perhaps you think hypothetical means something it doesnt, idk and Idc
    1
  77. @V King Yeah, because past sins can be forgiven but living in sin cant be. You dont ask for forgiveness for a sin when your in the middle of committing it - Thats the point. These pp see themselves as sinning sometimes and being forgiven but think those whose lifestyles they disagree with are "living in sin" (if they claim to be CHristians)and so cant be forgiven as Christians as long as that remains the case. I doubt most see watching porn as a sin anyway - I dont think thats mentioned in the Bible lol. Also adultery can be forgiven according to biblical rules. But living in sin cant be forgiven UNTIL it ends.
    1
  78.  @victoriarose8158  Wow, wise comment
    1
  79.  @wrnm0051  Its not about the promise of Heaven. To Christians the idea of the Immortal soul has a lot to do with doing good on earth and cant be seperated from the soul lasting after death (ie - going to Heaven). The two things are part of the same concept. Heaven and the nature of Christianity arent the coloring book kiddy concept they're often presented as - if you can understand this you will understand what I mean. And being a Christian has nothing to do with whether your "a good person in your heart", nothing at all - obviously you cant be a totally bad person within and expect to go to heaven as your deeds will ultimately match your soul, but one of the ideas of Christianity is Jesus dying for our sins - and there are some pretty bad sins which can be forgiven in Christianity - so obviously Christians are capable of having both good and bad in their hearts (as most humas do) but ultimately the bad can be forgiven in the hereafter and the soul still be worthy of salvation. This is a pretty basic and extremely important Christian idea and a cornerstone of the entire religion.
    1
  80.  Fredrik Nilsson  What do you think the three Gods are? What do you think the Holy Spirit is? You clearly misunderstand the concept of the trinity. That's alright - its an adult concept. But pray tell us - what is your religion that has it so right?
    1
  81.  Fredrik Nilsson  Straightforward accounts and answers are for children and simpletons. Christianity isnt a crayon coloring book level of faith - there are concepts within such as the trinity that take some level of mind to be understood. If you like things to be simpler thats your perogative. Not everyone needs things to be simple to understand them.
    1
  82.  @yourmom-ig6di  Thats what protestants believe. But works are a valid pathway in older, larger and more influential denominations.
    1
  83.  Fredrik Nilsson  I understand perfectly - its not our fault you cant comprehend that the trinity is The One God.
    1
  84.  Fredrik Nilsson  Again - if your religion is so great -why are you afraid to say what it is? A christian would never be afraid to say they were christian.
    1
  85.  Fredrik Nilsson  Lol "out of all religionists"? Wtf u talkin bout? 🤣 You clearly dont and cant understand the theology of the trinity , or the nature of a Christian monotheistic God - its explained perfectly - God is the father, the Son and the Holy Spirit within us, the heavenly made everday and vice versa - the fact the concept goes over simple heads isnt my fault. The Christian God isnt just a simple big sky daddy thats made up for the comfort of childish minds. But stay angry 😂
    1
  86.  Fredrik Nilsson  And your name? Not Jewish. Not Middle Eastern. So what religion are you? Or are you some kind of European or westerner with a bizzare form of agnostic/atheist thinking going on? That would explain the anger lol. You just dont understand the power of the idea of the trinity or of Christianity in general. Like Thomas Aquinas said - for a non believer, no amount of proof will ever be enough.
    1
  87.  Fredrik Nilsson  So again you wont tell me what religion or lack of it you are? Very telling my friend - why hide your beliefs if you truly believe them? Why be ashamed or scared to share them? Dont make demands lol, rephrase your demand for answers as a question and do it politely and I will answer. Neither I nor God owe you answers and if your not fit you wont receive them.
    1
  88.  Fredrik Nilsson  I already told you what it waas - you simply dont seem capable of understanding it. But speaking of straight answers, I asked you - what do you believe in?
    1
  89. @UCEHCILqD0Pmweza0StzIM1w Ive already explained it to you - I will do so again if you ask politely. Monotheist isnt a religion - state which one you are if your not ashamed of it or scared to defend it if need be. Or can you only make illogical attacks on others religions and not defend your own? Its funny, you probably think your getting under pps skin or trolling them by using terms like "idol worshipper" or "polytheist", but your really not, its actually laughable and it seems to me that only someone with childlike thinking could see Christianity that way, somebody that needed a simpler more dumbed down explaination of god like "he a big man in da sky" lol. Ive explained it all to you already - were not afraid of statues and we only believe in one God - that you cant understand the nature of that God is not my problem.
    1
  90. Progressives (especially feminists) are incapable of compromise tho. Where can you go with that?
    1
  91. If he's truly religious then in his mind he cant be trul married in the eyes of God anyway. Only by state law.
    1
  92. Lol Tattoos aint a sin. Also Jesus himself was clear that Divorce is a very bad sin
    1
  93.  @anabananagang  You dont have a coherent point, but still, I responded to what your wrote
    1
  94.  @anabananagang  So dont be a Christian then. No one cares of is trying to force you to be
    1
  95. Americans have a big problem with literal Bible interpretation because they're so far from and know so little about the history and theory of the Church after the Biblical times - ie, the Roman Catholic and Orthodox history and their interpretations of Christianity that led to key ideas in much of the Western World (The Trinity, Ideas of Thomas Aquinas etc.). But because Americans were for a long time anti Catholic ideas they evolved a insular and cult like form of Christianity which relies heavily on literal interpretation or on Modern Cherry Picking. (this is also why there are so many Splintered off Christian groups in America that bear little resemblance to any previously recognized Christian Religion - They've forgotten their history and what made them who they are and have lost themselves)
    1
  96. ​ @aliscafrancois3185  Yes and going to Heaven is inevatiable if you truly have a relationship with God - "On Earth as it is in Heaven" .The two things are one and cant be separated as concepts to a real Christian who knows and understands their religion. Its not all about Praising and yelling "praise Jesus" and having rock concerts in Church like so many seem to think.There is far far more to Christianity than just praising God mindlessly.
    1
  97.  @yourlocalbritishcigarette  Outside of Hinus they're havent been real Pagans for many many centuries. Any westerners claiming to be Pagans are following some made up Hollywood version that never existed in reality.
    1
  98.  @weallknowwho  "Sooo" what? It's a story and is called an apple because apple meant any (especially new) fruit to Greeks and Romans. Educate yourself and stop eating apples that ruin men's lives.
    1
  99. Some Proggressives are deluded about Christianity and think they're wishful thinking can make it something its not. Others like that Brenda girl are not really Christian. Her religion is the religion of being woke. She just USES Christianity to draw attention to it. If anything shes anti Christian.
    1
  100.  @painter-midge  Hello Communist wars and cultural revolutions. If anything, aethist systems have been even more controlling of peoples personal lives than religious ones
    1
  101.  @joshuaponce7730  Marriage back then was in some ways more loving than the marriage today where the divorce rate is over 50% and 85% of divorces are initiated by women. That isnt based in love either, but in a one sided business arrangment which protects womens interests. I see the life long choice to enter into a lasting agreement with someone to build a family and life over the course of your life as more loving than the agreement to enter into a short term fling version of marriage that can be ended at any time including with children because some one lost that high school crush feeling for their spouse. Ie - Old vs new Marriage.
    1
  102.  @joshuaponce7730  Im saying that tho it had faults then, it also has faults now. If women choose to leave that often then marriage in its current form wont last. My argument was that the idea of building a life with someone and loving them over the long term - even as passion and the "feeling" of romantic love goes or comes and goes is imo a greater form of love than staying with someone just while the "feels" are there then leaving them and splitting the family. Basically love as a mature rational type which is represtend in long term commitment and deeds vs modern marriage type love which is more like a high school girls crush. (except when it ends so does family) Both have faults. Today is no better, some would say worse.
    1
  103. "has to have a plan against property"? What? Also their are major parties all over Europe that arent Pro Choice. Europe is more than just Germany and the Scandanavian Countries ya know?
    1
  104.  @daibuhey  So what? Im not American. I was pointing out that Europe is far larger than just a handfull of the more progressive countries there.
    1
  105. They've certainly been rewritten and paraphased in American style Cristianity
    1
  106.  @abby-xw1yr  Everyone who believes in Christ is Christian. Some may be crazy AF and go about it in a weird way but they're all Christian. Christian is a far less broad term than "person of faith" which could easily be taken as a follower of any religion at all.
    1
  107. Yeah but the so called Liberal Christians arent really Christians and are also bigots sooo
    1
  108. I think he would have cared about stopping the spread of Covid more. This is the same guy who said "render unto Ceaser.....
    1
  109.  @gbekeee858  They are very similar (more so to each other than Christians) but cant accept one another because the Quaran has many anti Jewish parts so Muslims cant accept Jews and Jews would see the Quaran as a later ungodly rip off of their religion by a charlatan.
    1
  110.  @noniverse  Im glad you accept it as the truth. Christ be with you and I hope one day Brenda will find him too
    1
  111.  @newfontherock  She clearly doesnt agree with Christians on the fundementals at all. And I would be srsly surprised if she read the bible - unless she reads it just looking for quotes to support her woke view point that is.
    1
  112.  @lauranichols8456  Pretty sweet aint it
    1
  113. It's against Biblical teaching I guess. I mean why would you want to be married in a Church which was philosphically against what you were doing anyway?
    1
  114.  @Opinionated22  He can respect them but not think they are following the Christian Religion (and so not welcome them into its Churches to follow its customs). Lets say two Hindus want to get married - I respect them as people and love their culture but I wouldnt expect a Christian Priest to marry them in the name of Ganesha. Same thing here - in his mind, allowing them to be married under his religion would be against his religion - it doesnt mean he wishes them harm or cant be friends with them.
    1
  115. Americans are so far from and know so little about the history and theory of the Church after the Biblical times - ie, the Roman Catholic and Orthodox history and their interpretations of Christianity that led to key ideas in much of the Western World (The Trinity, Ideas of Thomas Aquinas etc.). But because Americans were for a long time anti Catholic ideas they evolved a insular and cult like form of Christianity which relies heavily on literal interpretation or on Modern Cherry Picking. (this is also why there are so many Splintered off Christian groups in America that bear little resemblance to any previously recognized Christian Religion - They've forgotten their history and what made them who they are and have lost themselves)
    1
  116. Her religion is being woke. She just uses Christianity to draw attention to it. Im not surprised at the high amount of followers she has who arent even religious.
    1
  117.  @servantofyhwh6064  Lol, they are the original Churches and are in a direct historical line from them. American Protestants and other American splinter groups are modern inventions who have forgotten their history and follow an extremly dumbed down version of Christianity.
    1
  118.  @akmil807  He said he loved them but that they also couldnt marry. He meant that every human waas created by God and so was loved by him - he didnt mean the Catholic church had changed its position on Gay marriage in any way.
    1
  119.  @maggie3327  Americans have a big problem with literal Bible interpretation because they're so far from and know so little about the history and theory of the Church after the Biblical times - ie, the Roman Catholic and Orthodox history and their interpretations of Christianity that led to key ideas in much of the Western World (The Trinity, Ideas of Thomas Aquinas etc.). But because Americans were for a long time anti Catholic ideas they evolved a insular and cult like form of Christianity which relies heavily on literal interpretation or on Modern Cherry Picking. (this is also why there are so many Splintered off Christian groups in America that bear little resemblance to any previously recognized Christian Religion - They've forgotten their history and what made them who they are and have lost themselves)
    1
  120.  @servantofyhwh6064  American Protestants are so far from and know so little about the history and theory of the Church after the Biblical times - ie, the Roman Catholic and Orthodox history and their interpretations of Christianity that led to key ideas in much of the Western World (The Trinity, Ideas of Thomas Aquinas etc.). But because Americans were for a long time anti Catholic ideas they evolved a insular and cult like form of Christianity which relies heavily on literal interpretation or on Modern Cherry Picking. (this is also why there are so many Splintered off Christian groups in America that bear little resemblance to any previously recognized Christian Religion - They've forgotten their history and what made them who they are and have lost themselves) They follow a bizzare modern form of religion that can scarcely be called Christian
    1
  121.  @servantofyhwh6064  Catholics arent afraid of Statues like Children. That would be ridiculous.
    1
  122.  @sharoneappen3843  She isnt a Catholic of any sort other than in her deluded mind
    1
  123.  @servantofyhwh6064  Its just a cheap knock off which took root
    1
  124.  @abby-xw1yr  Its debatable if Protestants are actually Christians. Their Church was started by a bigoted German who lived 1500 years after Christ.
    1
  125.  @servantofyhwh6064  Lol. Ok whateva. If you want a dumbed down childlike version of Christianity which started 500 years ago and was changed a great deal when it got to America ages later then enjoy your Rock Concert faith healing Protestant Church or your snake handling pastor or whatever it is. I cant take that srsly. And watch out for them statues mate! They could come to life any moment - avert your eyes!😂
    1