Comments by "PAPAZA TAKLA ATTIRAN İMAM" (@papazataklaattiranimam) on "MasterofRoflness" channel.

  1. In the west the Seljuq invasion of Asia Minor began the process which was to make it the modern land of the Turks and the base from which the greatest Islamic empire of the past 600 years would expand into southeast Europe .
    6
  2.  @ilosada2933  The Hellenic peoples are a community that has been ruled by others throughout history and became independent with European support. What a great success :-D
    6
  3. The Arabs themselves, divided and fragmented, were being increasingly challenged by Turkic steppe warriors who were militarily superior to the commercially minded urban populations of the region. The Arab-Muslim expansionary movement that had begun with Muhammad's first conquests in the early part of the seventh century, had proceeded with fits and starts before it came under pressure from external menaces and had started to wane by the tenth century. But, if conquest had all but ceased, Arabic culture and language was continuing to expand both east and south into sub-Saharan Africa. At the same time, Persian culture was making a comeback of sorts, while the Turks were rapidly gaining a steady foothold among the elite of the Arab armies. In time, this Turkish military presence would soon prove indispensable and it would logically translate into political power.
    6
  4. Ottomans came Anatolia from modern day Turkmenistan/Merv after collapse of Khwarezmian Empire but their deep ancestors came to Turkmenistan from Western Mongolia.
    6
  5. Eastern part of Roman Empire was not part of Greek history. The most important and long lived dynasties were not Greeks except Komnenos.
    6
  6.  @persianguy1524  Stop reading pan-iranist social media posts🤣
    6
  7. Persian turtle remix lmfao
    6
  8. Europe stood in awe of the Ottomans who crushed many states and conquered vast territories, going, as all patriotic Turks will proudly point out, "all the way to the gates of Vienna." European literature is replete with the depictions of the Turk as the hated enemy. The English often thought of the Turk as awe-inspiring and destructive. Thomas Fuller wrote in The Holy Warre (1639): "The Turkish Empire is the greatest... the sun ever saw. ...Grass springeth not where the grand signior's horse setteth his foot."
    6
  9. NIGJA
    6
  10. 1:01 Niggadir Shah 😂
    6
  11. Abbas Mirza was not a ruler 🐰
    6
  12.  @cyrusthegreat7030  The Ilkhanid realm was officially known as land of Iran or simply Iran.[10][11]
    6
  13.  @محمدالفدعاني-ط2ث  Ibn Khaldun was a Pan-Tork bro😂
    6
  14.  @azarshadakumuktir4551  As is well known, Louis subsequently began his ignominious retreat that lead to the surrender of himself and his army. This is how Ibn al-Furat sums up the great victory at al-Mansura: Things were near to a total defeat involving the complete destruction of Islam, but Almighty God sent salvation. The damned King of France (al-malik raydafrans < roi de France) reached the door of the pavillion of the Sultan al-Malik al-Salih and matters were at the most critical and difficult state. But then the Turkish Bahri squadron and the Jamdaris, mamluks of the Sultan, amongst them the commander Rukn al-Din Baybars al-Bunduqdari al-Salihi al-Najmi, showed their superiority and launched a great attack on the Franks which shook them and demolished their formations … this was the first encounter in which the polytheist dogs were defeated by means of the Turkish lions (wa-kanat hādhahi al-waq`a awwal wāqi`a untusira fīhā bi-usūd al-turk `alā kilāb al-shirk). 15 I hope that you have noticed the nice rhyme at the end: turk/shirk. The latter term has extremely negative connotations in Islam, harking back to the opponents of Muhammad in Mecca and their pagan religion. The labeling of the Christians in this context is not a coincidence and more than just a desire for a proper rhyme. The Franks are associated with the worst enemies in Islam. But this is an aside. What is important for our purposes here is the Mamluks are exalted for their hero-ism, and recognized for their Turkishness. The latter is what enabled the former. If the price for protection against Franks and Mongols was rule by a foreign born caste of slave soldiers, so be it. Amitai, ‘Military Slavery in the Islamic World: 1000 Years of a Social-Military Institution,’ published online in Medieval Mediterranean Slavery: Comparative Studies on Slavery and the Slave Trade in Muslim, Christian, and Jewish Societies (8th–15th Centuries), – (August 2007)
    6
  15.  @bghn4114  We must consider the fact that, from about 977 until 1925, hence for about 1,000 years, Turkish (and Mongolian) dynasties reigned over Iran. The Turkish vocabulary in Persian belongs preponderantly to the fields of government ate, law, army, warfare, armaments, and booty. Turkish was the language of the soldiers and the court. While the court of Delhi, i.e., the Turkish court of India, spoke Persian, the official language of the Safavi court (six teenth century onward) was Azerbaijan Turkish, so that Kaempfer¹⁹ remarked in 1685 "ut pene nunc turpe sit in Persiâ viro alicujus nominis ignorare Turcicam . . . ita ab exteris diligitur quae in ipsâ patriâ sordet magnatibus," "that it is almost ugly in Persia for a man of any renown to ignore Turkish, and so that [the Persian language] is esteemed abroad which in its own country is despised by the noble men." Many aristocratic titles were Turkish, just as the English titles Hovannisian, R. and Sabagh, G., 1998. The Persian presence in the Islamic world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.240.
    5
  16. Aman aman
    5
  17. 25 iq race
    5
  18. During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries , understanding the Turks ' military organization , given the credit for the greatest empire since antiquity , became a major European preoccupation . Speake, J., n.d. Literature of travel and exploration. p.891. By the middle of the 16th century, the Turks arguably possessed the greatest empire in the world. A History of the Middle East Paperback – March 15, 2006 by Saul S. Friedman (Author) p.181
    5
  19.  @Orgil.  According to various early islamic sources, they even existed before mongols :-)
    5
  20.  @Orgil.  What Para-Mongolic speaking Rouran or Turkic speaking Xiongnu has to do with Mongolic peoples?
    5
  21. Crobosalgarbians
    5
  22. Karabogas😎
    5
  23.  @theanglo-lithuanian1768  Didn’t the Crusaders make your Baltic pagan ancestors Christian😂
    5
  24.  @acommoncommenter9364  🤲🏿🤲🏿🤲🏿🍼🍼🍼
    5
  25. Imad al-Din Zengi continued his attempts to take Damascus in 1145, but he was assassinated by a Frankish slave named Yarankash in 1146. Zengi was the founder of the eponymous Zengid dynasty. In Mosul he was succeeded by his eldest son Saif ad-Din Ghazi I, and in Aleppo he was succeeded by his second son Nur ad-Din. According to Crusader legend, Zengi's mother was Ida of Austria (mother of Leopold III of Austria), who had supposedly been captured during the Crusade of 1101 and placed in a harem. She was 46 in 1101, Zengi was born in 1085, and his father died in 1094 so this is not feasible. Zengi was courageous, strong in leadership and a very skilled warrior according to all of the Muslim chroniclers of his day. Unlike Saladin at Jerusalem in 1187, Zengi did not keep his word to protect his captives at Baalbek in 1139. According to Ibn al-‘Adim, Zengi "had sworn to the people of the citadel with strong oaths and on the Qur’an and divorcing (his wives). When they came down from the citadel he betrayed them, flayed its governor and hanged the rest.” According to Ibn 'al-Adim: The atebeg was violent, powerful, awe-inspiring and liable to attack suddenly… When he rode, the troops use to walk behind him as if they were between two threads, out of fear they would trample over crops, and nobody out of fear dared to trample on a single stem (of them) nor march his horse on them… If anyone transgressed, he was crucified. He (Zengi) used to say: "It does not happen that there is more than one tyrant (meaning himself) at one time." Some of his battle victories: Battle of al-Atharib (1130) Siege of Hama (1130) Battle of Rafaniyya (1133) Battle of Qinnasrin (1135) Zengid campaign against Antioch (1135) Battle of Ba'rin (1137) Siege of Aleppo (1138) Siege of Baalbek (1139) Siege of Edessa (1144) Fall of Saruj (1145)
    5
  26. 0:44 1000000% true
    5
  27. Nah. They called Romans as Rums. Almost all islamic sources called them Rums.
    5
  28. Al-Jahiz, the renowned ninth century Arab prose writer, wrote an essay entitled “The Virtues of the Turks.” In this essay al-Jahiz describes the various contingents that formed the Abbasid army and argues that the Turks were far superior to the other groups when it came to fighting, riding, discipline, and war.
    5
  29. Kaan Chaddil 😼
    5
  30. (Turks vs Turks vs Turks) * (9^9^9)
    5
  31. Cringy
    5
  32. @The east Not really. For example Hittites were only 10% European by dna… Because the population were Hattians.
    5
  33. Afghans were under the rule of Turkic empire at that time. And so call graveyard got ruled by foreign states in most of history.
    5
  34. Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire.
    5
  35. THE TURKS AND THE WEST. Europe stood in awe of the Ottomans who crushed many states and conquered vast territories, going, as all patriotic Turks will proudly point out, "all the way to the gates of Vienna." European literature is replete with the depictions of the Turk as the hated enemy. The English often thought of the Turk as awe-inspiring and destructive. Thomas Fuller wrote in The Holy Warre (1639): "The Turkish Empire is the greatest... the sun ever saw. ...Grass springeth not where the grand signior's horse setteth his foot."
    5
  36.  @PsiensGate  take your copium
    5
  37. @V Turkic peoples actually ruled Iranic peoples 1500 years i mean not only Persians but all Iranic peoples from East Iranic Sogdians, Bactrians, Chorasmians, Pashtuns to West Iranic Persians, Lurs, Goranis etc.
    4
  38.  @GreaterAfghanistanMovement  No other sentence could be expected from a 20 iq primat living in the 7th world country. Where were those so-called men while foreign empires ruled and invaded Afghan women for thousands of years?
    4
  39.  @user-jw2hq5yj4d  saying by Iranized Elamite Kassite🤣
    4
  40.  @aidin4708  👾
    4
  41. In the classical Persian literary tradition – the entire vocabulary of which consists of stock phrases and images - "Turk' and 'Tajik' are stand-in terms for easily recognizable social stereotypes: one simple but violent; the other wily but civilized. Rūmi turns this on its head, however, in the following couplet: Attack upon attack came the darkness of night/Be strong like a Turk, not soft like a Tajik' (Yek hamleh va yek hamleh, āmad shab va tārīkī/chosti kon va "Torki' kon, na narmī va ‘Tājīkī'). Often ‘Turk' was also used to refer to the poet's beautiful young (unattainable) beloved, as in the following lines from Sa'di: 'Maybe they'll tell the King/"Your Turk (i.e., your Beloved) has spilled Tajik blood" (Shayad ke be padshah begüyand/Tork-e tö berikht khūn-e Tājīk), or elsewhere, 'Show your Tajik face, not Abyssinian black/That the Heavens may obliterate the face of the Turks' (Ru-ye Tājīkāna-t benmā, tā dagh-e habash/ Asman chehre-ye Torkān yaghma'i keshad). Since Turkic men often ‘married up’ and started families with Tajik women, the bloodlines tended to become increasingly mixed over the generations. (Recent DNA studies in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan have shown no notable genetic difference between modern Uzbeks and Tajiks.) And since children typically spent their first years within the harem, the influence of Tajik mothers in constructing the identity of their mixed-race children was surely much greater than is admitted in the patriarchal written sources of the time. Military figures in particular often made much of their tough Turkic heritage, even as they sought to demonstrate their own cultivation by speaking Persian and patronizing Persian courtly culture. The Tajik scribes, for their part, were naturally required to flatter their patrons, but they flattered themselves as well in whatever subtle ways they could. — Richard Foltz, Chapter 4, Tajiks and Turks, The Turk–Tajik symbiosis
    4
  42. 0:17 Lol
    4
  43.  @yaqubleis6311  “Turkic history is joke” Then reality strikes🤣 In the classical Persian literary tradition – the entire vocabulary of which consists of stock phrases and images - "Turk' and 'Tajik' are stand-in terms for easily recognizable social stereotypes: one simple but violent; the other wily but civilized. Rūmi turns this on its head, however, in the following couplet: Attack upon attack came the darkness of night/Be strong like a Turk, not soft like a Tajik' (Yek hamleh va yek hamleh, āmad shab va tārīkī/chosti kon va "Torki' kon, na narmī va ‘Tājīkī'). Often ‘Turk' was also used to refer to the poet's beautiful young (unattainable) beloved, as in the following lines from Sa'di: 'Maybe they'll tell the King/"Your Turk (i.e., your Beloved) has spilled Tajik blood" (Shayad ke be padshah begüyand/Tork-e tö berikht khūn-e Tājīk), or elsewhere, 'Show your Tajik face, not Abyssinian black/That the Heavens may obliterate the face of the Turks' (Ru-ye Tājīkāna-t benmā, tā dagh-e habash/ Asman chehre-ye Torkān yaghma'i keshad). Since Turkic men often ‘married up’ and started families with Tajik women, the bloodlines tended to become increasingly mixed over the generations. (Recent DNA studies in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan have shown no notable genetic difference between modern Uzbeks and Tajiks.) And since children typically spent their first years within the harem, the influence of Tajik mothers in constructing the identity of their mixed-race children was surely much greater than is admitted in the patriarchal written sources of the time. Military figures in particular often made much of their tough Turkic heritage, even as they sought to demonstrate their own cultivation by speaking Persian and patronizing Persian courtly culture. The Tajik scribes, for their part, were naturally required to flatter their patrons, but they flattered themselves as well in whatever subtle ways they could. — Richard Foltz, Chapter 4, Tajiks and Turks, The Turk–Tajik symbiosis The Iranians thought the Turks coarse and uncouth, lacking any appreciation for poetry and the other fine arts. The Turks, on the other hand, looked down on the Persians as effete and unable to pacify and protect their own country. This conflict is said by one recent commen- tator to have been a major cause for the collapse of the regime. The Safavid emperors were never able to integrate the two types into a coherent, unified governing system." Blake, S. (1991). Courtly and popular culture. In Shahjahanabad: The Sovereign City in Mughal India 1639–1739 (Cambridge South Asian Studies, pp. 122-160). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. FURTHERMORE: ”Fifty thousand Persians in full armour and riding at full gallop could not buckle and route a single Minggan (thousand) of Turks” - Al Maqrizi 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    4
  44.  @yaqubleis6311  The Achaemenids and Sassanids got destroyed by a Hellenic and Arabic tribe respectively Parthians had their capital countless times sacked by Romans and post Islamic Persia was basically a playground for Arabs, Turks, and Mongols as we all know
    4
  45.  @yaqubleis6311  Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, shaping the history of Balkans, Islamization of Northern India, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire. What about Lurs??? Literally nobodies of history🤣
    4
  46.  @yaqubleis6311  The fact that formerly Iranic inhabited regions like Azerbaijan and much of modern Central Asia have become Turkic populated lands now says a lot about who dominated whom
    4
  47.  @yaqubleis6311  In history, “Turkish people” are famous for their strength, there is even a French expression referring to it: Il est fort comme un Turc = He is strong as a Turkish. What about Persians? the Arabic proverb cited by the North African analytic historian Ibn Khaldun of the fourteenth century: dawlah 'ind al-turk, din 'ind al-'arab wa adab 'ind al-furs Power (rests) with the Turk, religion with the Arab, and culture with the Persian.
    4
  48. Être fort comme un Turc (‘to be strong like a turk’): This expression originates in the 15th century when the Turks had a reputation for being strong, almost unbeatable warriors due to their numerous victories. At the time, the Ottoman Empire ruled large parts of south-east Europe, north Africa and western Asia. It is said that François I, King of France, was gifted Turkish armour by Suleiman the Magnificent (the tenth and most famous sultan of the Ottoman Empire) during their alliance. When he wore it, he is said to have exclaimed: “Here I am now, strong as a Turk!”.
    4
  49. Become the imaginary “byzantine empire” 😅
    4
  50.  Letnistonwandif your ancestors were nobodies of history before 1500s🤣🤣🤣
    4