Comments by "J Drake1994" (@JDrakeify) on "BBC News" channel.

  1. 5
  2. 4
  3. 2
  4. Sublimation I was not talking about the history of one particular country, but of the world in general. And, as with the examples of people like Christopher Columbus, Cecil Rhodes, or even at times Winston Churchill, historical figures can still be remembered as international heroes despite their blatant racism. It is true we do not remember the crimes of some Eastern Empires from that long ago, but it is also true that crimes by whites such as Caesar's wars in Gaul, or Cromwell's wars in Ireland, go under reported too. We do also revile many Asian figures too, such as Genghis Khan, and Mao.  As for racial profiling, it is not necessarily the case that police have a better reason to target black kids over white ones. After all, it is a well known fact that whites have done most kind of drugs at a higher rates than blacks, and yet it is black people who are continuously subjected to stop and search. And looking at the incidents where black people have got shot by police or self appointed vigilantes because of the shooters own racial bias, it makes little difference whether blacks are more likely to commit crime, because it is still unlikely that they are criminal, even if it is statistically more likely than if they were white, and even if they are, they have likely not committed a crime that warrants being killed, and if they had, they had a right to a fair trial first. So it doesnt really matter whether blacks are more likely to commit a crime in that regard- the chances are they still did not deserve to be shot.
    2
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. Sublimation I think you forget just how much white men still have going for them. The people who run almost everything up and down the country are white men, and it is easily provable that basically everyone has a subconscious racial bias, and therefore it is far easier to get by in a world run by people exactly the same as you are.  If you are applying for a job or asking people for help in a public place it helps to be a white male. And the police are a lot less likely to harass you or kill because of their subconscious racial assumptions.  As for the academia, most of it is still composed of white men. White men are not reviled in any sense. What you are referring to is merely a wave of historical revisionism that looks back and realizes that previous biases have led us to emphasize the role of white males who were sometimes terrible people over people of other races. Politicians do not talk about them as rapists or murderers, either consciously or by implication. For instance, thinking 'hey, Christopher Columbus was a terrible person who clearly murdered thousands of people, maybe we shouldnt give him a day where we celebrate him' is a perfectly fine, especially when the focus of history is still, even after a bit of revisionism, overwhelmingly focused on white men.  It is pretty insecure to see any attempt to even things out a bit from a society where white males are overwhelmingly priviliged as an attack on them and making them into the most reviled group in society?
    1
  8. 1