Comments by "Reconquista: Hinduism" (@reconquistahinduism346) on "The Hill" channel.

You can't be more wrong. French voters decisively rejected the far right with only 37% voting for it , which means 63% did not vote for it. A super majority did not vote for it. Pretty simple.
7
@christophergraves6725 @christophergraves6725 the political opponents can be added if they have common bigger goal or interest. Far right is a bad thing in France and in most liberal democracies including India. Even moderate right wing parties will never support far right. Alliances happen ALL the time to oppose a bigger evil in India , the Netherlands , Belgium , Spain etc. That brings compromises and sacrifices on various positions but the political parties and the voters are mostly ok with it. US and UK have single party democracies but most of other democracies are multiparty ones.
3
@christophergraves6725 alliances can be added to oppose a bigger evil. Happens all the time everywhere except UK and US. People are ok with it.
2
@christophergraves6725 nope. Left and centrist got 52% votes ..
1
@christophergraves6725 you dear you are totally wrong. The rightist coalition is leading neither in votes nor in seats ,else they would have got a chance to govern. The left and the centrists may be opponents , but their opposition to the right makes them friends. For them , the right is the bigger devil. Others are just bad humans. Others can be tolerated but right has to be finished. Their opposition to right will make them bury their differences or compromise on their stances. For a deeply leftist country like France , alliances to the right is neither considered as a bad by the other parties , nor by the voters. All the policy differences on climate change , economy , welfare are secondary to the opposition to the right which is considered the biggest evil in France.
1
@christophergraves6725 the political opponents can be added if the right is the bigger evil almost like a demon. For leftist and centrist ideals , opposition to the right is the most important thing everything else like policies on immigration , climate change , welfare , economy etc come later. Far right is a bad thing in France and in most liberal democracies including India. Even moderate right wing parties will never support far right. Alliances happen ALL the time to oppose a bigger evil in India , the Netherlands , Belgium , Spain etc. That brings compromises and sacrifices on various positions but the political parties and the voters are mostly ok with it. US and UK have single party democracies but most of other democracies are multiparty ones
1
@christophergraves6725 @christophergraves6725 the political opponents can be added if the far right is the bigger evil almost like a demon. For leftist and centrist ideals , opposition to the right is the most important thing everything else like policies on immigration , climate change , welfare , economy etc come later. Far right is a bad thing in France and in most liberal democracies including India. Even moderate right wing parties will never support far right. Alliances happen ALL the time to oppose a bigger evil in India , the Netherlands , Belgium , Spain etc. That brings compromises and sacrifices on various positions but the political parties and the voters are mostly ok with it. US and UK have single party democracies but most of other democracies are multiparty ones.
1
@christophergraves6725 see , the talk of national rally parties getting highest votes is deceptive BECAUSE it contested on ALL the 578 seats , whereas the leftist and centrist parties ceded space to each other on many seats and thus contested on fewer seats as compared to the right. So they are bound to get lesser votes. But the rightist parties could not cross 50% on more than 122 seats because of anti right consolidation on other seats. That is fine. This shows that the right wing is still a 37% party and given ONLY one anti right candidate per seat , right will be far behind in winning . That is not immoral or wrong or unethical. It is your fault that you don't have more than 50% votes on majority of the seats. The other side is just exploiting your weakness . Now , if the centrist and left totally screws up , fails in governance , cannot manage economy then Marine Pen's right will have a chance to go to the people , expose them , build trust and win a majority. But till then , it is not justified to keep on whining and blaming others. Strengthen yourself. Rest will follow. Others will follow.
1
@krillin876 That does not matter. If the left and the centrist were in alliance , their combined vote share which is more than 50% will count and NOT the centrist Macron party's vote share or far right vote share. 37% is lesser than 63% end of the story
1
@jamesevans1890 That's the correct way of democracy what France has done. UK has a very miniature view of democracy where 34% vote party brings 2/3rd seats like in this recent UK election. If most people wanted far right party in France , they would have done it both in terms of votes and seats. But it could not get 50% votes or 50% seats +1 seats either. 37% vote share for far right means 63% DID NOT want that party. That's a super majority of voters.
1
@christophergraves6725 but here we are not speaking of other blocks BECAUSE the centrists and the leftists have forged an alliance and their combined vote share is 63% .. So it's the right wing that has been defeated vs left and centrist alliance.
1