Comments by "Reconquista: Hinduism" (@reconquistahinduism346) on "Novak Djokovic Visa Rejected In Australia Amid Vaccine Exemption Dispute" video.

@darvinmilevic7418 having Covid within 6 months doesn't form a part of exception. And the two independent doctors may have certified anything but that doesn't count because a civilized democracy stands up against injustice and wrong things and that's what was done. The outrage against him is s sign of healthy , vibrant and enlightened democracy they Australia is.
5
@DeLoxley86 Australia is not embarrassed. It's the Novac Djokovic who should be ashamed for his superstitious , science denial and vaccine denial attitude.
4
@DeLoxley86 that's wrong. The 5 people who were exempted had "genuine medical conditions" that allowed them being unvaccinated. Novac had no such medical conditions and exemptions. 2 medical panelists may have okeyed him , but to err is human. It's better that the mistake was rectified by the border oficial by asking for exemption documents.
3
@DeLoxley86 no.. may be that Novac forged his documents. Or may be the state medical panelists did a mistake. But as I said , aberrations happen. What is more important is that he is a science and vaccine denier and had no justified medical response to justify his exemptions. Science doesn't work on "personal choice". And it's good yhAt the federal government noticed that he had no genuine medical exemptions and rejected him. That's what happens in a democracy. There are various levels of checks and balances so that if one goofs up , the higher level can rectify the mistake that they did. Science denial has its own costs.
3
@villamara9632 so what has that got to do with this ? Covid restrictions, precautions and mandates are not Na-zi dictates. In fact correlating the two proves the point that vaccine denial is stupid , superstitious , irrational , threatening and dangerous to others just like 1936 Germany thay was dangerous to others.
2
@darvinmilevic7418 no.. may be that Novac forged his documents. Or may be the state medical panelists did a mistake. But as I said , aberrations happen. What is more important is that he is a science and vaccine denier and had no justified medical response to justify his exemptions. Science doesn't work on "personal choice". And it's good yhAt the federal government noticed that he had no genuine medical exemptions and rejected him. That's what happens in a democracy. There are various levels of checks and balances so that if one goofs up , the higher level can rectify the mistake that they did. Science denial has its own costs.
2
No. He is not getting any chance. Australia works on rules and laws and science unlike America. No exemption for the unvaccinated.
2
So you are proud to be superstitious , science denier , vaccine denier and endanger others lives by being a tickling Covid time tomb of Covid ? Sorry we are not living in stone age Levant caves.
1
@villamara9632 the restrictions are not unreasonable. Those who understand and respect science , wont say that. Science is not based on race or community. That's why Covid mandates are for ALL and Novac Djokovic is not an exemption. just because he is a privileged white male tennis champion. Science doesn't go on perception. Just because "he appears aesthetically fit" doesn't mean he is exempt from vaccination. He can still be the carrier and transmitter of infection.
1
@bigfellamike1913 Djokovic is a superstitious christian science denier. I never said vaccines reduce case load. They induce secondary immunity in the form of antibodies , reduce hospitalizations and severe illness. The effectiveness ranges between 50-75% at least. Vaccination should be encouraged. If a celebrity like him is rejecting vaccination , it sends bad message and signal to the society and so he should be named and shamed . Besides there is weak evidence to suggest that increased antibodies can also lead to reduced transmission because of improved health of the contact and weak infectious nuclei. In the era of pandemic , even an act having theoretical possibility and weak evidence should be encouraged because something is always better than nothing.
1
It's not a technicality. He is denied entry because of his science and vaccine denial attitude.
1