Comments by "Scott Farner" (@scottfarner5100) on "SCOTUS: Web designer doesn't have to make gay wedding site | NewsNation Live" video.

Just opened up the ability to deny service to any protected class.
3
Yes what it means is now any business owner can refuse service based on someone who belongs to a protected class.
2
@chrisgullett4332 And none of those examples are a protected classes in accommodation laws.
2
malus1426 No reason to refuse a request to do work for a gay couple either.
2
@StinkFingerr Yes a protected class.
1
@macberg5806 So a business should be able to refuse business to someone because they are of a different race?
1
@macberg5806 Can we refuse business to someone because they were divorced in a previous marriage? When it comes to the point when you are in the position that you will be refused on your beliefs, tell me your not going to have an issue about it
1
@scarpfish No they should not, not if they are serving the public. If they want to serve only private member that would be different. That's why these laws have worked so well. Where is the freedom when a person can be turned away from a public business because the owner hates what you do with your personal life. Who is next to be turned away for not fulfilling biblical scripture that every Christian in this century violates?
1
@scarpfish I guess the state will now legally be able to cancel here business license based on her religious views.
1
@scarpfish and now this ruling will allow both.
1
It was a hypothetical case, to challenge the state accommodation laws. The owner had not been asked to create anything by a gay customer. And state accommodation laws are clear to any business operator.
1
@southernbreeze3278 They should not have to be discriminated because hate filled people want to pick and choose what part of their faith they want to follow that allows them to hate. This is why we have accommodation laws to protect classes of people in a public business, like religious nuts.
1