Comments by "Scott Farner" (@scottfarner5100) on "" video.

  1. 3
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. Due to false claims of voter fraud, asylee’s not showing up for court, criminal activity, and just right wing claims used to breed hate. The Right has unilaterally decided to undermine legal asylum. And have dubbed it as an open border policy and fed that buzz word to a right wing base who have no understanding of immigration laws. Trumps zero tolerance policy to separate children, Remain in Mexico, Title 42. All attempts to stop legal asylum under US laws that have been in place for over 40 years. Yet now using it to trigger a base that is now openly full of hate on immigrants and this hate is now fed by GOP governors feeding off of that for votes from GOP supporters who immoral views support separating children as a deterrent, use of lethal force, lying to immigrants to ship them to dem cities to stick it to libs, incarceration, placing them in the hands of traffickers. All because of immigrants who may or may not have violated a misdemeanor that carries a civil penalty. And the Right wing base just does not understand our law. Trumps immoral policies were violating US law by snatching children from legal asylum seeks as a deterrent. Harris was never appointed as border czar. There are no 85000 missing children and no they cannot use their drivers license to vote. The Right does nothing but lie. Title 42 suspended title 8 laws and authority used to deter and penalize illegal border crossing. The Right was using it to undermine legal asylum under 8 US code 1158. It also suspended 8 US code 1325; the misdemeanor that carries a civil penalty for crossing the border illegally. And 8 US code 1326; stiffer penalties for crossing the border after deportation That left out any legal penalty or deterrent for those crossing and stopped legal asylum, with few exceptions under title 42. Makes it difficult to enforce immigration laws when Republicans are fighting in court to undermine our legal enforcement. With title 42 suspending enforcement many immigrants re-crossed multiple times causing apprehension numbers to be inflated. The current rate of multiple returns was about 40% of border crossers. We had a 11 year decline in southern border crossing to the lowest point in 50 years prior to Trump and his polices. By 2019 Trumps policies doubled the number of people crossing the southern border to 977,000. He only saw a reduction for the first 9 months of 2020 due to covid, before it went back to a 20 year monthly high in October of 2020. It has remained a 20 year high and increasing ever since under Trumps failed policies and Title 42..
    1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77.  @motofunk1  Glad you took the time to reply. Those questions were to start discussion not to impose an answer. I had the answers His street interviews started with the premise there was a crisis and it was someones fault. Maybe there is a crisis, maybe there is fault. The answer would be the fault of the GOP who have been undermining US immigration laws for the past 5 years. Better questions and discussion might get people to see this issue clearly and work towards a solution that doesn't just create another country people want to run from. Maybe it will lead to creating more places people want to run to. What is the process to cross the border legally? That was not the question I asked. Your Thoughts: Depends on the individual for asylum it’s irrelevant. Mine: It's relevant. All people trying to enter the country should know the legal way of doing so, asylum seekers included. That’s the problem you do not know the legal way and crossing at any point along the border is legal for asylum. Not having a process that is followed leads to chaos and crisis. No undermining the working process to unilaterally shut down legal asylum is the problem Should a person be able to cross the border illegally? Your Thoughts: Yes if they are requesting asylum. Mine: No. They should go through the legal points of entry per the process and request asylum there. That is not required and the GOP forcing that issue was a violation of the law with it’s policies. Ellis Island and Angel Island performed this task well in the past. Current entry points should be defined clearly and based on methods of travel to the border. What should happen to a person that is caught crossing the border illegally the moment they are caught? Your Thoughts: They should be processed under our INA laws. Mine: Agreed. Now learn that process. How does a person who is here illegally pay taxes? Your Thoughts: That would depend on your definition of illegal Mine: See INA laws. That would need to be your first step is to review those laws. If in violation of those laws do you think they pay taxes? Depends. How do people without money find their way all the way across the world to the border? Your Thoughts: Not that it’s relevant, but they earn it. Mine: I disagree on relevance. Maybe they earn it. You don’t know like everything else so you will use your feelings to come up with a narrative you want. Did they do that legally? Go ahead stick them all into one batch like your puppet master taught you. Were they funded by other sources? Irrelevant. Where did those funds come from? Irrelevant. Should a person willing to break US law be capable of earning citizenship? Your Thoughts: Depends on what law was violated. Mine: Fair point. Let's start with crossing the border illegally. That’s a misdemeanor that carries a civil penalty and does not apply to asylum seekers. How many is too many? Your Thoughts: Depends on who you are talking about. Mine: Why does it matter who they are? Because it clearly does just not to you. Who are the ones that make it too many or not enough? ?? Should the entire population of the world come to the US? Your Thoughts: No kind of a stupid question. Mine: I disagree. You will not realize how stupid the question is. Without considering a limit to the US population and limits on immigration you are ok with the entire world being here. No I’m not, that doesn’t make the question less stupid. If you don't agree with everyone here, you are for setting some limits. No sh it, are you really that stupid to think this is what the left wants? The Right caused this I’ll prove that to you later. What are those limits and why? We already have limits. Why are people leaving their original countries and what should be done to correct that? Your Thoughts: Many different reasons, try learning. Mine: Agreed there are many reasons. Why does the Right want to put them all in one box and claim they all do not qualify before making an asylum request? If the reasons for coming are not corrected or addressed in the original location, are you open to unlimited migration regardless of reason? You are under the false assumption this was the left’s plan. This is the left following the law that Trump was not. How many people are born in the US each year since 2020? How many people died in the US each year since 2020? How many new citizens were created in the US since 2020? Your Thoughts: Who cares. Mine: Goes to population levels and how many people the economy can support and at what levels. Then you are extremely clueless on that front as well. look at the studies. US birthrates are in decline, we need immigration workers to fill the US
    1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1