Comments by "Scott Farner" (@scottfarner5100) on "Vance To VP: 'How Dare You Call People A Racist For Wanting To Close Down That Wide Open Border?'" video.

Who called you a racist? And the border is closed and always has been. What you want t is to ignore our asylum laws that have been in place for 50 years without forcing your congressmembers to work on the problem.
8
@mikeedwards1978 there was a sale on everything.
2
@mikeedwards1978 no country other than the US and Canada qualify for thst section of the law under title 8 usc 1158. Under title 42 from 2020 to mid 2024 thst section of title 8 authority was suspended. A federal judge appointed by Trump tossed pit Trumps use of that first country exception 6 years ago. And a federal court did the same when Biden used it after title 42 was no longer in use. It's been under legal battle for over a year.
2
Yes he's good at lying to his base who are easily manipulated.
2
It would be easier if Trump supporters would just admit it.
1
@cynthiariley-om4ve Due to false claims of voter fraud, asylee’s not showing up for court, criminal activity, and just right wing claims used to breed hate. The Right has unilaterally decided to undermine legal asylum, as they feel it’s a loophole in the law. And have dubbed it as an open border policy and fed that buzz word to a right wing base who have no understanding of immigration laws. Trumps zero tolerance policy to separate children of legal asylum seekers, Remain in Mexico to deny asylum protections inside the US, and Title 42 to stop all legal asylum at the border under title 8 authority (with some exceptions after Biden took office). All attempts to stop legal asylum under US laws that have been in place for over 40 years (title 8 USC 1158). Yet now using it to trigger a base that is now openly full of hate on immigrants and this hate is now fed by GOP governors feeding off of that for votes from GOP supporters who immoral views support separating children from parents as a deterrent, use of lethal force, lying to immigrants to ship them to dem cities to stick it to libs, incarceration, and placing them in the hands of traffickers. All because of immigrants who may or may not have violated a misdemeanor that carries a civil penalty. Trumps immoral policies were violating US law by snatching children from legal asylum seeks as a deterrent. Courts overturned that policy that the Right still supports and defends. Harris was never appointed as border czar, by Biden. There are no 85000 missing children, and no these immigrants cannot use their driver’s license to vote. The Right does nothing but lie.
1
@anthonythomas6593 Due to false claims of voter fraud, asylee’s not showing up for court, criminal activity, and just right wing claims used to breed hate. The Right has unilaterally decided to undermine legal asylum. And have dubbed it as an open border policy and fed that buzz word to a right wing base who have no understanding of immigration laws. Trumps zero tolerance policy to separate children, Remain in Mexico, Title 42. All attempts to stop legal asylum under US laws that have been in place for over 40 years. Yet now using it to trigger a base that is now openly full of hate on immigrants and this hate is now fed by GOP governors feeding off of that for votes from GOP supporters who immoral views support separating children as a deterrent, use of lethal force, lying to immigrants to ship them to dem cities to stick it to libs, incarceration, placing them in the hands of traffickers. All because of immigrants who may or may not have violated a misdemeanor that carries a civil penalty. And the Right wing base just does not understand our law. Trumps immoral policies were violating US law by snatching children from legal asylum seeks as a deterrent. Harris was never appointed as border czar. There are no 85000 missing children and no they cannot use their drivers license to vote. The Right does nothing but lie.
1
@Sheba-bh7lc Due to false claims of voter fraud, asylee’s not showing up for court, criminal activity, and just right wing claims used to breed hate. The Right has unilaterally decided to undermine legal asylum, as they feel it’s a loophole in the law. And have dubbed it as an open border policy and fed that buzz word to a right wing base who have no understanding of immigration laws. Trumps zero tolerance policy to separate children of legal asylum seekers, Remain in Mexico to deny asylum protections inside the US, and Title 42 to stop all legal asylum at the border under title 8 authority (with some exceptions after Biden took office). All attempts to stop legal asylum under US laws that have been in place for over 40 years (title 8 USC 1158). Yet now using it to trigger a base that is now openly full of hate on immigrants and this hate is now fed by GOP governors feeding off of that for votes from GOP supporters who immoral views support separating children from parents as a deterrent, use of lethal force, lying to immigrants to ship them to dem cities to stick it to libs, incarceration, and placing them in the hands of traffickers. All because of immigrants who may or may not have violated a misdemeanor that carries a civil penalty. Trumps immoral policies were violating US law by snatching children from legal asylum seeks as a deterrent. Courts overturned that policy that the Right still supports and defends. Harris was never appointed as border czar, by Biden. There are no 85000 missing children, and no these immigrants cannot use their driver’s license to vote. The Right does nothing but lie.
1
@mikeedwards1978 first country rule does not apply.
1
@mikeedwards1978 does what?
1
@johngoodwin3468 when has the border been closed in the last 200 years? Don't say under Trump because it was not.
1
@johngoodwin3468 Due to false claims of voter fraud, asylee’s not showing up for court, criminal activity, and just right wing claims used to breed hate. The Right has unilaterally decided to undermine legal asylum. And have dubbed it as an open border policy and fed that buzz word to a right wing base who have no understanding of immigration laws. Trumps zero tolerance policy to separate children, Remain in Mexico, Title 42. All attempts to stop legal asylum under US laws that have been in place for over 40 years. Yet now using it to trigger a base that is now openly full of hate on immigrants and this hate is now fed by GOP governors feeding off of that for votes from GOP supporters who immoral views support separating children as a deterrent, use of lethal force, lying to immigrants to ship them to dem cities to stick it to libs, incarceration, placing them in the hands of traffickers. All because of immigrants who may or may not have violated a misdemeanor that carries a civil penalty. And the Right wing base just does not understand our law. Trumps immoral policies were violating US law by snatching children from legal asylum seeks as a deterrent. Harris was never appointed as border czar. There are no 85000 missing children and no they cannot use their drivers license to vote. The Right does nothing but lie.
1
@lovesyorkies3395 how would traveling to a border state change any of the facts and data, do you know how many on the Right who live on the border have absolutely no clue wtf is going on at the border . Just like you.
1
@lovesyorkies3395 Due to false claims of voter fraud, asylee’s not showing up for court, criminal activity, and just right wing claims used to breed hate. The Right has unilaterally decided to undermine legal asylum. And have dubbed it as an open border policy and fed that buzz word to a right wing base who have no understanding of immigration laws. Trumps zero tolerance policy to separate children, Remain in Mexico, Title 42. All attempts to stop legal asylum under US laws that have been in place for over 40 years. Yet now using it to trigger a base that is now openly full of hate on immigrants and this hate is now fed by GOP governors feeding off of that for votes from GOP supporters who immoral views support separating children as a deterrent, use of lethal force, lying to immigrants to ship them to dem cities to stick it to libs, incarceration, placing them in the hands of traffickers. All because of immigrants who may or may not have violated a misdemeanor that carries a civil penalty. And the Right wing base just does not understand our law. Trumps immoral policies were violating US law by snatching children from legal asylum seeks as a deterrent. Harris was never appointed as border czar. There are no 85000 missing children and no they cannot use their drivers license to vote. The Right does nothing but lie.
1
@BondiAV What you seem to ignore is that you don't have any clue what our asylum laws are Immigrants have a legal right to cross our border at any point and request asylum and be put through that process without penalty for the misdemeanor for crossing the border. That is clearly written in our INA laws, in our treaty obligations in article 31 of the Geneva Convention and confirmed in our federal courts in East Bay Sanctuary vs Trump. There is not such thing as illegal entry for asylum That border crossing law falls under statute title 8 USC 1135 and 1136, asylum falls under 1158. And yes every country that is a signatory of that Geneva Convention obligation has similar laws.
1
@BondiAV East Bay Sanctuary vs Trump. Page 21 of the federal courts decision when they reversed Trumps policy of separating children from asylum seekers who crossed the border between check points. "Congress’s determination that place of entry not be disqualifying to an application for asylum is consistent with the treaty obligations underlying §1158’s asylum provisions. Congress enacted the Refugee Act of 1980, including 8 U.S.C. §1158, “to bring United States refugee law into conformance with the 1967 United Nations Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 19 U.S.T. 6223, T.I.A.S. No. 6577, to which the United States acceded in 1968.” Because the Protocol is not “self-executing,” it “does not have the force of law in American courts.” Khan v. Holder, 584 F.3d 773, 783 (9th Cir. 2009). Nonetheless, it provides “a useful guide in determining congressional intent in enacting the Refugee Act.” Id.(citation omitted); see also Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. at 436-37.Of particular relevance here, Article 31of the Protocol provides: The Contracting States shall not impose penalties, on account of their illegal entry or presence, on refugees who, coming directly from a territory where their life or freedom was threatened in the sense of [A]rticle 1, enter or are present in their territory without authorization, provided they present themselves without delay to the authorities and show good cause for their illegal entry or presence.19 U.S.T. at 6275 (emphasis added).Considering the text and structure of the statute, as well as the interpretive guide of the U.N. Protocol, reveals Congress’s unambiguous intent. The failure to comply with entry requirements such as arriving at a designated port of entry should bear little, if any, weight in the asylum process. The Rule reaches the opposite result by adopting a categorical bar based solely “[a]n alien present in the United States who has not been admitted or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters) shall be deemed for purposes of this chapter an applicant for admission.” Inadmissible aliens are generally placed in full removal proceedings"
1
@BondiAV No under title 42 most were placed in expedited removal and free to recross the border multiple times as there was no penalty in place under title 42, this inflated border crossing numbers. It was federal courts that started allowing unaccompanied children and families with small children to be allowed under our asylum laws when Biden took office. All you are spreading is rhetoric while ignoring the legal process and the fact that the Trump administration dismantled it. And there is also a bipartisan bill the Right refused to negotiate on that would speed up the process and force them to remain at the borer during process, exactly the way the GOP wanted it. And they backed out due to Trump and the election. Nice try, your rhetoric fails when you follow the law and the truth.
1
@BondiAV Yeah and then there was Trumps policies that overwhelmed border patrol while removing penalties for border crossing and refusing to allow legal asylum access to protections under out laws while snatching children from legal asylum seekers and not returning them to their parents. Asylum seekers can be bonded or paroled to allow them into the country while they wait out their case if they pass a creditable fear interview, USC 1225. What the Right calls catch and release has been a law for decades. It's used mostly with families as we can not detain s children for more then 72 hours under the Flores settlement. That Trumps policies also violated and failed to meet with requirements in the law. Do you still call these friends illegals? Even when they have followed the legal process and are here legally under our laws?
1
@BondiAV It is the case in reality. That is why the GOP feels our asylum laws are a loophole in the INA law that allows an immigrant to cross our border and lie about their request asylum, and get lost in the long line of the system. And when it came time for another bipartisan border discussion, the Right backed out of all the efforts to fix that loophole, because then they would have to admit they have been lying about the law and the process for decades. So then the Right felt justified in ignoring our asylum laws and started charging legal asylum seekers with a crime and taking their children, until that policy was stopped in federal court. Then through the use of remain in Mexico to deny protections under our asylum laws ,and then title 42 to deny asylum all together. That forced immigrants to travel between check points to get around Trumps hardline policies that were failing to keep anyone out and made the border worse with the bottle neck Trump created at the border.
1
@BondiAV no he made it more difficult to request asylum through check points, thst is why they went between checkpoints. Trumps first attempt was by violation usc 1158 by charging asylum seekers with a crime for crossing between checkpoints. Then he refused protection for those who used a checkpoint with remain in Mexico. Then he cut off access at checkpoints to even request asylum under the misuse of title 42. You have to read and understand the entire comment amd understand it, not just read what fits the narrative you want.
1
@BondiAV Yes as President he was, as it falls under the DHS that falls under his administration. Trumps job was to carry out immigration laws passed by congress and not use authority he did not have to undermine those asylum laws to fit a party agenda. Learn how government works. When did Trump make it more secure when border crossing were in decline for over a decade until Trumps policies doubled the number of people crossing to a 50 year high in 2019. When was his policies securing the border when border crossings were at record levels for 5 months strait before Biden took office? We don't have an open border, we have asylum laws your puppet masters call an open border policy to feed to low informed Right wing voters who have no understanding of our asylum laws that have been in place for over 50 years. It's not my narrative it's the law and it's easy to confirm by reading it. You have become a useful idiot for Right wing propaganda and rhetoric.
1
This is the new talking point for the Right.
1
We had a 11 year decline in southern border crossing to the lowest point in 50 years prior to Trump and his polices. By 2019 Trumps policies doubled the number of people crossing the southern border to 977,000. He only saw a reduction for the first 9 months of 2020 due to covid, before it went back to a 20 year monthly high in October of 2020. It has remained a 20 year high and increasing ever since under Trumps failed policies and Title 42. Title 42 suspended title 8 laws and authority used to deter and penalize illegal border crossing. The Right was using it to undermine legal asylum under 8 US code 1158. It also suspended 8 US code 1325; the misdemeanor that carries a civil penalty for crossing the border illegally. And 8 US code 1326; stiffer penalties for crossing the border after deportation That left out any legal penalty or deterrent for those crossing and stopped legal asylum, with few exceptions under title 42. Makes it difficult to enforce immigration laws when Republicans are fighting in court to undermine our legal enforcement. With title 42 suspending enforcement many immigrants re-crossed multiple times causing apprehension numbers to be inflated. The current rate of multiple returns was about 40% of border crossers.
1