Comments by "Scott Farner" (@scottfarner5100) on "'You Do Not Have The Right To Pass Thru 5 Other Countries Because You Want Free Stuff': McClintock" video.

The first country exception is embedded in title 8 usc 1158. It has certain requirements for a country to qualify. I've seen no evidence of any country in this hemisphere that it applies to except Canada and the US. Federal judge appointed by Trump stopped the use of that exception under Trump, another federal court stopped Biden from using that exception in 2023. From 2020- mid 2023, title 8 authority was mostly suspended under title 42, including this exception under title 8 USC 1158. Title 42 suspended title 8 laws and authority used to deter and penalize illegal border crossing. The Right was using it to undermine legal asylum under 8 US code 1158. It also suspended 8 US code 1325; the misdemeanor that carries a civil penalty for crossing the border illegally. And 8 US code 1326; stiffer penalties for crossing the border after deportation That left out any legal penalty or deterrent for those crossing and stopped legal asylum, with few exceptions under title 42. Makes it difficult to enforce immigration laws when Republicans are fighting in court to undermine our legal enforcement. With title 42 suspending enforcement many immigrants re-crossed multiple times causing apprehension numbers to be inflated. The current rate of multiple returns was about 40% of border crossers. We had a 11 year decline in southern border crossing to the lowest point in 50 years prior to Trump and his polices. By 2019 Trumps policies doubled the number of people crossing the southern border to 977,000. He only saw a reduction for the first 9 months of 2020 due to covid, before it went back to a 20 year monthly high in October of 2020. It has remained a 20 year high and increasing ever since under Trumps failed policies and Title 42.
12
The first country exception is embedded in title 8 usc 1158. It has certain requirements for a country to qualify. There is no evidence of any country in this hemisphere that it applies to except Canada and the US. Federal judge appointed by Trump stopped the use of that exception under Trump 5 years ago, another federal court stopped Biden from using that exception in May of 2023 in his new policy after the removal of title 42. From 2020- mid 2023, title 8 authority was mostly suspended under title 42, including this exception under title 8 USC 1158.
3
The first country exception is embedded in title 8 usc 1158. It has certain requirements for a country to qualify. There is no evidence of any country in this hemisphere that it applies to except Canada and the US. Federal judge appointed by Trump stopped the use of that exception under Trump 5 years ago, another federal court stopped Biden from using that exception in May of 2023 in his new policy after the removal of title 42. From 2020- mid 2023, title 8 authority was mostly suspended under title 42, including this exception under title 8 USC 1158.
3
We had a 11 year decline in southern border crossing to the lowest point in 50 years prior to Trump and his polices. By 2019 Trumps policies doubled the number of people crossing the southern border to 977,000. He only saw a reduction for the first 9 months of 2020 due to covid, before it went back to a 20 year monthly high in October of 2020 it was a record high for 5 months straight before Biden took office. It has remained a 20 year high and increasing ever since under Trumps failed policies and Title 42 expedited removal. Title 42 suspended title 8 laws and authority used to deter and penalize illegal border crossing. The Right was using it to undermine legal asylum under 8 US code 1158. It also suspended 8 US code 1325; the misdemeanor that carries a civil penalty for crossing the border illegally. And 8 US code 1326; stiffer penalties for crossing the border after deportation That left out any legal penalty or deterrent for those crossing and stopped legal asylum, with few exceptions under title 42. Makes it difficult to enforce immigration laws when Republicans are fighting in court to undermine our legal enforcement. With title 42 suspending enforcement many immigrants re-crossed multiple times causing apprehension numbers to be inflated. The current rate of multiple returns was about 40% of border crossers.
1
§1158. Asylum (a) Authority to apply for asylum (1) In general Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien's status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title...
1
@master11manifestor Yes due to the Right wing rhetoric and lies the Right feel our asylum law is a loop hole in the law that Right feel justified in undermining our long standing law and constitutional separation powers and calling an open border policy. While blaming Biden for the border failing due to the Rights arrogance and ignorance. We had meetings and the Right refused to compromise several times on changing the law. This is not a meeting it is a right wing show to pander to the low informed base and act as if they are doing something while they continue to blame Biden for following the law.Keyword apply for asylum that your leadership made absolutely sure they could not and they are doing it again now, in violation of the law.
1
@sikozen 8 U.S.C. § 1158 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 8. Aliens and Nationality § 1158. Asylum Current as of January 01, 2024 | Updated by FindLaw Staff (a)Authority to apply for asylum (1)In general Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien's status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title.
1
@946towguy2 The first country exception is embedded in title 8 usc 1158. It has certain requirements for a country to qualify. There is no evidence of any country in this hemisphere that it applies to except Canada and the US. Federal judge appointed by Trump stopped the use of that exception under Trump 5 years ago, another federal court stopped Biden from using that exception in May of 2023 in his new policy after the removal of title 42. From 2020- mid 2023, title 8 authority was mostly suspended under title 42, including this exception under title 8 USC 1158. The GOP knows this yet continues to lie. Senator Kennedy pushed for the same exceptions in congressional hearings, knowing the same information, yet still criticized Biden for not using it while title 42 was active.
1
@marcg.3830 status of the laws suit that challenges Bidens use of the safe third country exception. What’s the status of this case? CGRS and our co-counsel filed the legal challenge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on May 11, 2023, a few hours before the asylum ban took effect. On July 25, Judge Jon Tigar vacated the rule, finding it unlawful. The Biden administration appealed the decision, and on August 3 the Ninth Circuit granted its request for a stay of Judge Tigar’s ruling, pending resolution of the appeal, and put the case on a highly expedited schedule. After oral argument the parties filed a joint motion to hold the case in abeyance so that they might attempt to settle the case. On February 21, 2024, the Ninth Circuit issued a published decision granting the motion. On March 7, 2024, the states of Alabama, Kansas, Georgia, Louisiana, and West Virginia, filed a motion to intervene in the litigation, claiming that they will be harmed if the Rule is vacated, and the ban is lifted. Both the government and plaintiff organizations have filed responses opposing the states’ intervention. This ban currently remains in effect pending the outcome of settlement negotiations and/or the government’s appeal.
1
@jesureemarino7564 if that country qualifies under our laws and international treaty as a safe haven country and no country south of the US qualifies.
1
@bobbibarrall8351 States already have no say in immigration law that's why they are Sanctuary cities, they do not have the authority.
1
@marcg.3830 a lot of riight wingers using your feelings about laws you know nothing about, and those laws do not meet the narrative your puppet masters feed you.
1
Trump and the GOP are responsible for the failure our our border, the Right refused to do anything to secure our border other than fill a low informed base with misinformation for decades. And not one of you is informed enough to prove me wrong.
1
@Candy-O1776 not hard to confirm by doing your own research and getting out of your bubble of misinformation.
1
@BustedFlush-u3t "MEMORANDUM FOR: All Chief Patrol Agents All Directorate FROM: Rodney S. Scot Chief U.S Border Patrol SUBJECT: 42 U.S. Code Title 42 - The Public Health and Welfare U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and specifically the United States Border Patrol (USBP), are supporting the U.S. Government's response to the COVID-19 virus. Effective March 21, 2020 at 0001 hrs EST, USBP will exercise authorities derived under U.S. Code Title 42, Section 265,·'... suspension of entries and imports from designated places to prevent spread of communicable diseases... " as laid out in the attached Operation Order Capio. The Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), under the Authority of the Public Health Service Act, has directed CBP to prohibit the introduction of certain persons into the United States who, due to the existence of COVID-19 in countries or places from which persons are traveling, create a serious danger of the introduction of such disease into the United States. While operating under this authority, USBP will use Title 42 authority to immediately expel any individual encountered attempting to enter the United States in violation of travel restrictions. USBP will only apply Titles 8 and 19 authorities to subjects who are not amenable to expulsion under Title 42, or would otherwise be considered a high risk for the population (e.g., aggravated felons, relations to terro1ism, agent assaults, etc.). Watch commander approval is required for any authority used outside of Title 42 during this timeframe."
1
Not true at all. Your never read tgst bill and the gop lied about it.
1
Title 42 suspended title 8 laws and authority used to deter and penalize illegal border crossing. The Right was using it to undermine legal asylum under 8 US code 1158. It also suspended 8 US code 1325; the misdemeanor that carries a civil penalty for crossing the border illegally. And 8 US code 1326; stiffer penalties for crossing the border after deportation That left out any legal penalty or deterrent for those crossing and stopped legal asylum, with few exceptions under title 42. Makes it difficult to enforce immigration laws when Republicans are fighting in court to undermine our legal enforcement. With title 42 suspending enforcement many immigrants re-crossed multiple times causing apprehension numbers to be inflated. The current rate of multiple returns was about 40% of border crossers. We had a 11 year decline in southern border crossing to the lowest point in 50 years prior to Trump and his polices. By 2019 Trumps policies doubled the number of people crossing the southern border to 977,000. He only saw a reduction for the first 9 months of 2020 due to covid, before it went back to a 20 year monthly high in October of 2020. It has remained a 20 year high and increasing ever since under Trumps failed policies and Title 42.
1
 @robertjohnson-mt8pz Trump was not following immigration law in his first administration and he isn't now. You've never read our immigration laws.
1
 @robertjohnson-mt8pz no he is not.
1
Title 42 suspended title 8 laws and authority used to deter and penalize illegal border crossing. The Right was using it to undermine legal asylum under 8 US code 1158. It also suspended 8 US code 1325; the misdemeanor that carries a civil penalty for crossing the border illegally. And 8 US code 1326; stiffer penalties for crossing the border after deportation That left out any legal penalty or deterrent for those crossing and stopped legal asylum, with few exceptions under title 42. Makes it difficult to enforce immigration laws when Republicans are fighting in court to undermine our legal enforcement. With title 42 suspending enforcement many immigrants re-crossed multiple times causing apprehension numbers to be inflated. The current rate of multiple returns was about 40% of border crossers. We had a 11 year decline in southern border crossing to the lowest point in 50 years prior to Trump and his polices. By 2019 Trumps policies doubled the number of people crossing the southern border to 977,000. He only saw a reduction for the first 9 months of 2020 due to covid, before it went back to a 20 year monthly high in October of 2020. It has remained a 20 year high and increasing ever since under Trumps failed policies and Title 42.
1
The Right just lies.
1
@firestarter105G Yes really, everything coming out of his mouth and for the past decade about everything about the border.
1
Remain in Mexico was still in place last year and it was doing nothing to secure the border, it was being used to deny asylum protections by immigrants that used a port of entry. Catch and release was never stopped by Trump and was not reinstated by anyone, it is title 8 USC 1225 of our INA laws that have been in place for 40 years.
1