Comments by "Scott Farner" (@scottfarner5100) on "Texas border crossers could go to detention facilities instead of sanctuary cities" video.

Due to false claims of voter fraud, asylee’s not showing up for court, criminal activity, and just right-wing claims used to breed hate. The Right has unilaterally decided to undermine legal asylum, as they feel it’s a loophole in the law. And have dubbed it as an open border policy and fed that buzz word to a right-wing base who have no understanding of immigration laws. Trumps zero tolerance policy to separate children of legal asylum seekers that Homan continues to defend, remain in Mexico to deny asylum protections inside the US, and Title 42 to stop all legal asylum at the border under title 8 authority (with some exceptions after Biden took office). All attempts to stop legal asylum under US laws that have been in place for over 40 years (title 8 USC 1158). Yet now using it to trigger a base that is now openly full of hate on immigrants and this hate is now fed by GOP governors feeding off of that for votes from GOP supporters who immoral views support separating children from parents as a deterrent, use of lethal force, lying to immigrants to ship them to dem cities to stick it to libs, incarceration, and placing them in the hands of traffickers. All because of immigrants who may or may not have violated a misdemeanor that carries a civil penalty. Trumps immoral policies were violating US law by snatching children from legal asylum seeks as a deterrent. Courts overturned that policy that the Right still supports and defends. Harris was never appointed as border czar, by Biden. There are no immigrant children that went missing under this government, and these immigrants cannot use their driver’s license to vote. The Right does nothing but lie.
2
You mean follow the law and the process the Biden administration wanted that the Right has been fighting against.
1
@honeywest990405 bs you don't have the ability to debunk that information.
1
@honeywest990405 you are too low informed to offer any facts. Here are some irrefutable facts. Title 42 suspended title 8 laws and authority used to deter and penalize illegal border crossing. The Right was using it to undermine legal asylum under 8 US code 1158. It also suspended 8 US code 1325; the misdemeanor that carries a civil penalty for crossing the border illegally. And 8 US code 1326; stiffer penalties for crossing the border after deportation That left out any legal penalty or deterrent for those crossing and stopped legal asylum, with few exceptions under title 42. Makes it difficult to enforce immigration laws when Republicans are fighting in court to undermine our legal enforcement. With title 42 suspending enforcement many immigrants re-crossed multiple times causing apprehension numbers to be inflated. The current rate of multiple returns was about 40% of border crossers. We had a 11 year decline in southern border crossing to the lowest point in 50 years prior to Trump and his polices. By 2019 Trumps policies doubled the number of people crossing the southern border to 977,000. He only saw a reduction for the first 9 months of 2020 due to covid, before it went back to a 20 year monthly high in October of 2020. It has remained a 20 year high and increasing ever since under Trumps failed policies and Title 42.
1
@honeywest990405 East Bay Sanctuary vs Trump. Page 21 of the federal courts decision when they reversed Trumps policy of separating children from asylum seekers who crossed the border between check points. "Congress’s determination that place of entry not be disqualifying to an application for asylum is consistent with the treaty obligations underlying §1158’s asylum provisions. Congress enacted the Refugee Act of 1980, including 8 U.S.C. §1158, “to bring United States refugee law into conformance with the 1967 United Nations Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 19 U.S.T. 6223, T.I.A.S. No. 6577, to which the United States acceded in 1968.” Because the Protocol is not “self-executing,” it “does not have the force of law in American courts.” Khan v. Holder, 584 F.3d 773, 783 (9th Cir. 2009). Nonetheless, it provides “a useful guide in determining congressional intent in enacting the Refugee Act.” Id.(citation omitted); see also Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. at 436-37.Of particular relevance here, Article 31of the Protocol provides: The Contracting States shall not impose penalties, on account of their illegal entry or presence, on refugees who, coming directly from a territory where their life or freedom was threatened in the sense of [A]rticle 1, enter or are present in their territory without authorization, provided they present themselves without delay to the authorities and show good cause for their illegal entry or presence.19 U.S.T. at 6275 (emphasis added).Considering the text and structure of the statute, as well as the interpretive guide of the U.N. Protocol, reveals Congress’s unambiguous intent. The failure to comply with entry requirements such as arriving at a designated port of entry should bear little, if any, weight in the asylum process. The Rule reaches the opposite result by adopting a categorical bar based solely “[a]n alien present in the United States who has not been admitted or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters) shall be deemed for purposes of this chapter an applicant for admission.” Inadmissible aliens are generally placed in full removal proceedings" §1158. Asylum (a) Authority to apply for asylum (1) In general Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien's status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title...
1
@honeywest990405 each point in my initial statement can be easily proven by being actually informed on the issue and doing the research. Your side has already proven thst they feel the law is a loophole and feel justified in undermining the legal process. Homan openly admits that is his goal. And he has while defending Trumps separation policy since 2018, th policy that was snatching children from legal asylum seeks as a deterrent, because they felt all immigrants were invalid for asylum before they make it to the border. All easy to prove.
1
@honeywest990405 were you able to debunk any of my claims yet?
1
@honeywest990405 You mean you leaving your opinion that is not based on any facts just a narrative your puppet masters feed you. Your claims lack any critical thinking and shows a complete lack of understanding of what I wrote. I was not claiming that none of those things ever happen by immigrants. I'm saying that the Right is using those excuses to ignore our existing immigration laws and the legal process. That you know nothing about. The Right is clearly undermining legal asylum and you have never read our existing immigration laws. Trumps separation policy was in violation of title 8 USC 1158 Trumps remain in Mexico policy was in violation of title 8 USC 1225. There is no such thing as an open border policy it's what your puppet masters call legal asylum. Immigrants have a legal right to cross our borders at any point and request asylum and go through that legal process. That is what the right calls an open border. There is no evidence at al of Biden opening the border and you can not point to one policy that caused it, he was following asylum laws. What caused the border to be over run was title 42. The zero tolerance policy was being used to charge every immigrant who crossed between check points with a crime for the federal misdemeanor that carries a civil penalty under title 8 USC 1325, and separate their children as a deterrent. That included asylum seekers who cannot be penalized for crossing the border of a safe haven country. That policy was reversed in federal court. Those children were lost and not reunited with their parents and that is why tax payers were sued for that policy. Remain in Mexico was a complete failure and just pushed immigrants into the hands of traffickers and cartels, border crossing have increased since it began and it was doing nothing to secure our border, but to punish immigrants for coming to a check points. You are a liar everyone on the right is still cheering on Trumps separation policy 6 years after it was reversed in court. Look it up. That is not what sanctuary city status is for. You don't know anything about what it entails. Harris was at no point ever appointed border czar by Biden that was your puppet masters. There is no official border czar position there is a DHS secretary. Only an idiot would continue to make this claim. There is no evidence of 300000 missing immigrant children this again is a claim your puppet masters made up. When an unaccompanied minor is apprehended CBP has 72 hours to turn them over to family services who must quickly find family in the US or a sponsor to take that child. Once that child has been turned over to that family or sponsor, that ends the government’s responsibility to that child. The Government does make a 30-day check in call to those children or sponsor. The child and sponsor are not required to take or return the call. The government reported during a short period of time that a percentage of calls went unanswered. A reporter took that percentage against the total number of unaccompanied minors’ apprehensions and came up with that bogus number of children who the government lost contact with. The Right decided to change that wording from lost contact to missing children. Stats absolutely reflect my claims about border crossing and are irrefutable. Your claim of 9 out of 10 not qualifying for asylum is also a made up claim by your puppet masters, with no evidence.
1
@honeywest990405 These people don’t actually qualify for asylum. That’s your opinion based on right wing rhetoric. Loopholes? Isn’t that Biden’s MO? That is the claim from the Right and the rights justification for unilaterally undermining our immigration laws. This is documented and not one of your opinions based on your feelings. How do you think all these people came to be here? People from other countries have come here ahead of their children…leaving their children behind. Then paying coyotes to get their young children across the border…alone. There has to be common sense and care used in allowing people across our borders into our country. And it was not until Trumps failed policies of trying to dismantle legal asylum that the border crossing began to increase. We had a 11 year decline in southern border crossing to the lowest point in 50 years prior to Trump and his polices. By 2019 Trumps policies doubled the number of people crossing the southern border to 977,000. He only saw a reduction for the first 9 months of 2020 due to covid, before it went back to a 20 year monthly high in October of 2020 it was a record high for 5 months straight before Biden took office. It has remained a 20 year high and increasing ever since under Trumps failed policies and Title 42 expedited removal. Do you realize that Biden has been flying in plane loads of illegal aliens? He’s flying immigrants who qualified for asylum who can pay their own way, instead of having them come to the border They were then given all legal documentation needed to vote. They are given drivers licenses with no lessons and drive with no insurance. No that is made up claim and a lie to feed to a low informed base who has no understanding of what is going on. Those particular people are scattering now that Trump has been elected. They are aware that their documentation isn’t legal and that they will be deported. Again your opinion based on no facts I mean, who doesn’t understand we have to draw a line somewhere? We cannot take these people on and provide for them indefinitely. Then follow our existing laws that were working before the right decided to go on their own and make a mess of the border. Are you a newer citizen of the US? I am not. We have much invested in this country and are not inclined to give it away. Our tax dollars are something we are not willing to give away either. These people have a home. They have had centuries to build their country as we did. They had the same resources we did. Wouldn’t you agree? BLABLABLA, all I hear is the right wing base complaining about an issue you caused in your ignorance of what your puppet makers have done with our existing laws. Do you realize that you can’t just pop into any other country and expect to be supported by their government? Your Title 42 as I recall is no longer in effect. You mean the law that placed most immigrants in expedited removal for 5 years with no penalty in place for those crossing the border multiple times. That Republicans fought in court to keep in place long after its need in order to continue denying asylum request. It was Covid related and appropriate. A number of diseases have been brought in with this mass of Biden illegals. No due to your ignorance of what your puppet masters were doin. Title 8 is perfectly logical. What can you possibly find wrong with it? I have nothing wrong with title 8. I have a problem with the Right ignoring it to fit their own agenda. You must not have children or a family that would cause you to worry about the state of our nation. I do that is why people like you making excuses for your puppet masters to ignore our laws to fit a party agenda and use presidential authority to carry out our laws instead of what congress intended. We have to preserve this country and leave it for our children and their children. Immigration is fine in a controlled manner, not a free for all. You are doing the exact opposite, you are just to ignorant of a cultist to see it.
1
And the Trump administration didn't need to charge them with a crime and separate children from legal asylum seeks. Causing more to be sent with cartel traffickers.
1