Comments by "Andrea M" (@H3CL) on "RealLifeLore" channel.

  1. Up the shut fuck
    7
  2. LMAO explain exactly how, then I'll destroy your excuses.
    3
  3. - You cannot see as far as you want, because the Earth is NOT flat. Once an object has totally gone beyond the horizon you CAN'T bring it back no matter how powerful your camera's zoom is, and there are plenty of videos showing it, yet you are able to dismiss it anyway. - The horizon is NOT always at eye level, you can prove it with a theodolite app on an airplane, again there are videos showing it. And even without those, you would have no means to back up your statement, only parroting what those conmen on youtube spoon-feed you. - No, the "machine" does not teach us that the earth curves at 8 in x mile because equation is WRONG, again another clear demonstration that while you love calling those who don't believe you "sheep", you are indeed the sheep yourself because you never take the chance to verify what those idiots on YT tell you. - Sunsets can never work on a Flat Earth, and you do not understand how perspective actually works. - Long range non-stop flights in the Southern hemisphere can only happen on a Globe. - Nothing on a FE makes actual sense.
    3
  4.  @Godisinkontrol  How cute. You could not address a single one of the points I brought up. You are nothing but a parrot.
    3
  5. There is no map and nobody uses it. Quit the excuses.
    3
  6. Truth burns huh?
    2
  7. And you have to keep bragging about how wrong and gullible you are, so...
    2
  8.  @allthingsbing1295  But flatearth does.
    2
  9.  @allthingsbing1295  I gave it to you, you dismissed it with lies. Those are all you have.
    2
  10.  @allthingsbing1295  Still hanging on your excuses I see. As stubborn as a mule.
    2
  11.  @Godisinkontrol  You talk about evidence and believe in God? See the irony here? If you did not care what others think you would not have posted a comment in the first place. There is no evidence for flat earth, only ignorance exploited to gain following and money. Use math and see that the Sun would never set on the FE for starters, but you won't, because you can't. FE is nothing but an excuse to be willingfully ignorant, that is the truth. I won't convince you because it is an emotion-driven belief, so facts and demonstrations will never do.
    2
  12. That's not stressing, it's simply how airline economics work. If there is demand for a route, they will schedule it, if not, they will take you to your destination via multiple stops, even if it takes much longer. They care about profit, not time.
    2
  13. Which means you do care, at least a little.
    2
  14. He did you moron
    2
  15. Obvious to you maybe...
    1
  16. Except there are direct flights between Australia and South Africa proving your whole imaginary world wrong. So there.
    1
  17. It is not.
    1
  18. Go support Trump, science is not for you.
    1
  19. Why is it crap? We are not talking about the Sun in Antarctica, why di you have to bring that up? Keep your flerf shit out of here.
    1
  20. Nobody uses Gleason's map and there are direct flights between Sydney and Johannesburg that disintegrate your model. Or Auckland to Santiago, same concept. You know nothing.
    1
  21. ​ @thetwogardens6048 No, they don't. It's a useless map because earth Is not flat. Go ahead and trace a line between Sydney and Johannesburg and another between Dubai and LA. The First line Is almost twice as long as the second one, yet the First Flight takes 14 hours and the second one takes 16. Weird huh.
    1
  22. Why? What are you getting to? I am already laughing
    1
  23.  @allthingsbing1295  Ah the good old excuse: "I can't do it so it can't happen". This is exactly what I was talking about. It takes a sunset to prove you wrong. Start thinking.
    1
  24.  @allthingsbing1295  Uhm no, if the Sun was small and local It would have to appear to change size and apparent Speed throughout the day like the laws of perspective Say It should. Why does this not happen? How High Is the Sun? I'll wait.
    1
  25.  @allthingsbing1295  Water Curves all the time, come on now, let's talk like grown ups, that's the weakest evidence you people have ever come up with
    1
  26.  @allthingsbing1295  I cannot measure water curving One degree in 110km, how do you suggest we do that? Ships keep disappearing bottom first. And no, I never implied anything, that's something you Need to tell yourself because you cannot explain what we observe.
    1
  27.  @allthingsbing1295  Why don't you try and be the first one to explain this Little thing I noticed on the flatearth map: the distance between Sydney and Johannesburg Is almost twice as long as the distance between Dubai and LA, yet the First Flight takes 14 hours and the second 16. Weird huh?
    1
  28.  @allthingsbing1295  Why did you run away?
    1
  29.  @allthingsbing1295  No for the Sun to set its enough for It to appear to move. And again, you are not listening, if the Sun was local it would have to appear to change size, this does not happen. Like I said, all you people have Is excuses, what you Just said Is an excuse
    1
  30.  @allthingsbing1295  And no, increasing the amount of zoom does not make the hidden part of the ship visibile again, this Is a falsity that you never even tested. Zooming in Simply increases the size of far away objects.
    1
  31.  @allthingsbing1295  No, It won't. Plenty of video show this. Plus your opinions are irrelevant, those so called facts are Simply delusions. And you are dodging the topic of sunsets because you know it proves you wrong.
    1
  32.  @allthingsbing1295  I am laughing so hard right now. - Water curves all the time, we know the dimensions of the earth, no need to measure what we know, ships disappear bottom first and no amount of zoom brings them back - Nobody said rocks can fly, totally unrelated - Orbits are possible and I dare you to prove the opposite - Nukes exist and I dare you to prove the opposite - Explain exactly why the space shuttle cannot glide. - We don't need TV to know the shape of Earth
    1
  33.  @allthingsbing1295  And I wonder why nobody has ever been able to see a ship thousands of miles away with a powerful telescope. Or the Sun for that mater, since it simply gets far at sunset. Weird huh. Oh and of course you neglected the problem of the flights. Literally no one of you can give me a valid explanation. Maybe you'll be the first?
    1
  34.  @allthingsbing1295  Plus why do you keep ignoring the other facts? Unable to respond? Sad.
    1
  35.  @allthingsbing1295  The fact that you have never seen It bend does not mean It cannot. It takes a Little Wind to change the shape of the surface, sorry that you have to call lies the facts that don't fit your narrative.
    1
  36.  @allthingsbing1295  Repeating something does not make it right and you still fail at answering the other points. Why?
    1
  37.  @allthingsbing1295  Why did you run away?
    1
  38.  @allthingsbing1295  Explain the flights then. What are you afraid of?
    1
  39.  @allthingsbing1295  Nice escape technique, very common amongst you. Ships disappear bottom first, changing the zoom does not bring the hidden hull back. This is the convexity of water that you discard with lies. You are simply unable to do anything scientific.
    1
  40.  @allthingsbing1295  And you don't even know what level is. Stop listening to charlatans. Your approach to this topic is ever so pseudoscientific. If you were intellectually honest you would know that you would not expect water at rest to bend if not in the oceans. Why and where would we expect to see water bend at rest on the globe? You have to be able to visualize both scenarios, if you can't that's your own problem. And the fact that you don't even try and address other things that empirically disprove your model wrong means you care more about your bubble than reality. This, this is the truth.
    1
  41.  @allthingsbing1295  You just lost every shred of credibility thinking that airplanes would fly off into space when flying level. Ignorance is not a valid argument. Also, you think you would feel it when following the curve? Laughable. You think you know, you don't.
    1
  42.  @allthingsbing1295  The fact that you still cling to that pitiful evidence of water not bending says a lot more about you. You are simply embracing the only version of reality you are able to comprehend, but reality does not depend on that. I told you how you can very easily poke holes in your model with flights and a map, but you don't care about doing that because your bubble is way too important.
    1
  43.  @allthingsbing1295  Funny how you are using opinions and I am using facts. Nice damage control. Empty rebuttal as always
    1
  44.  @allthingsbing1295  LMAO you have measured water over what distance? Good for you boy. You are stil clinging to the one and only thing you are able to keep pivoting around, when I made plenty of points that disintegrate your model and you keep ignoring them. Pretty weak.
    1
  45.  @allthingsbing1295  I found it in the only place I am supposed to find it: oceans. When ships disappear bottom first. I do not expect to see it in a glass, I do not expect to see it in a pool, I do not expect to see it in a 15km long lake. So no, you should show me something I should not see, not what I do expect. This, this is what science does, but what do you know?
    1
  46.  @allthingsbing1295  Since you think that an airplane would fly off into space of no corrections are performed, I really suggest that you go back to the basics before playing the Expert, it really becomes embarrassing at this point.
    1
  47.  @allthingsbing1295  And you ran away again. What a Surprise.
    1
  48.  @allthingsbing1295  So that's the onty evidence you have huh? Told you to Watch a ship disappear bottom first. You cannot bring It back. Stop lying. Plenty of video proof ti prove you wrong.
    1
  49.  @allthingsbing1295  Say, how High Is the Sun above the allegedly flat realm you think we live on?
    1
  50.  @allthingsbing1295  Say, if there Is no curve, why do ships disappear bottom first no matter the amount of zoom? If the Sun sets due to perspective, why has no One been able to see It with a powerful enough telescopi 1 hours After sunset? Why us pilots use formulas to calculate routes on a sphere? Why do we see stars rotate counterclockwise around Polaris and clockwise around the Southern Cross if we are supposed to have a half dome?
    1