Comments by "Fox" (@tomlxyz) on "How Money Works" channel.

  1. Well, most times it's often impossible to find definite evidence of a connection. So it seems reasonable to not even allow trading certain securities for certain people.
    6
  2. 3:21 why did Google pacman eat Amazon?
    6
  3. Most people using these alternative Investments do it for high return, not to keep the same wealth.
    5
  4. I work in an area where we have to deal with clients (indirectly) and someone has this joke of "work would be much easier without clients"
    5
  5. Long term there's no guarantee that the interest in wine doesn't shrink
    5
  6. 4x doesn't seem that bad tbh for an outsider.
    5
  7. Insulting people isn't very productive tho, that's more entertainment than anything
    5
  8. ​ @jesse_- it's only dumb if you do it despite knowing better.
    5
  9. My problem is more that you could make more money with short term trading than long term (more successful trades mean more profit). So there's even more incentive for CEOs to not care about long term success.
    5
  10. Any automaker who failed to adopt to EVs were short sighted in their profit making
    5
  11. Same would have happened if it wasn't rich people. It would still have seen big withdrawal in the housing crisis and collapse.
    5
  12. They'll sign it if you buy the collateral with it
    5
  13. ​ @jtgd  productivity has been steadily increasing over the decades but wages haven't kept up. It's totally feasible to do it
    5
  14.  @MsPiinkFllamingo  it's not a moral question but financial. With a company banks and other creditors are aware of the limited liability and can calculate that in. With personal liability your own life is part of the collateral to make a hyperbole and to lose control over that is objectively bad, regardless of fault
    4
  15. Most white collar jobs are not feasible up to old age. These rich people have a lot of other people to offload work to. And there's probably younger people who would do their job better but they don't have a boss that gets rid of them
    4
  16. ​ @supitschillbro  it used to be that someone could start a small company relatively easy in the US but now many industries have become so concentrated that a new business can't compete
    4
  17. Last sentence is important. It's pretty bad if you aren't
    4
  18. Hmmm, so according to your comments most competitors are not sober when showing up, sounds like something about it keeps most sober people away or makes people take stuff
    4
  19.  @jasonpark7600  You don't need to ruin the company, just send it into temporary shock after you shorted it. Maybe on the low then buy long and tell good news
    4
  20. ​ @befer right, we shouldn't put cisgender on screen either, because gender is related to having sex and children shouldn't be exposed to that
    4
  21. If you don't understand what you're doing, then yes
    4
  22. At the same time old people become a bigger and bigger demographic in elections
    4
  23. You don't seem to know what controversial means. It has nothing to do with being true or not
    4
  24. Is it really common on large scale though? The fact that his blew up without banks knowing the risk they got themselves in makes me believe that it's not
    4
  25. ​ @stevengayler8447  only problem is that this doesn't play out when you look at the numbers. The change didn't come with feminism but with neolibralism. That's the point where you can see a clear detachment from wage growth and profit growth.
    4
  26. Hedge funds don't really hedge nowadays tho and you usually can't get your money out of one easily Also, dollar cost averaging underperforms when compared to just investing everything at once the moment you get the money
    4
  27. ​ @wumi2419 the increased co2 causes more storms and draughts, which will harm yield far more than the increased photosynthesis activity will give. Sinking ground water levels are already causing problems worldwide
    3
  28.  @angelr194  what is innovative about applying a common business practice on something else?
    3
  29. It's just capitalism
    3
  30. So the government pays interest to the fed which it pays back for the most part?
    3
  31. ​ @The.Harsh.Truths what deregulations? The problems mentioned in the video aren't regulations and they're allowed because there's no regulations from being anti competitive. We'd need regulations to increase competition.
    3
  32. ​ @Demmrir i find sport betting less than gambling than MLM not being a pyramid scheme because there are actually people who can predict those well (and get squeezed out because they don't like people winning)
    3
  33. For a start, that has nothing to do with colonialism. Second thing, this channel and many others do talk about many fraud cases in the west. Also, do you think it's all legit business with this particular company?
    3
  34. ​ @Jeebus-un6zz you're not everyone, especially if you travel year round
    3
  35. ​@-lord1754 it's not that hard to identify. The original comment is very generic and has little to do with the video topic aside from being finance related. Human made comments aren't like that
    3
  36. These bosses then better not have an income above 75k or their argument is void
    3
  37. American cars did continue getting more expensive for many years with people still buying them. Wasn't predictable beforehand when it'll end
    3
  38.  @spencert94  That's wrong. The government investing has huge returns. Basically comes down to be able to collect more taxes without raising the tax rate. In countries were they keep putting money in things that don't have a return high enough are basically the ones that fail eventually. The only difference to corporations is that the government can invest in things which have a hard to accurately measure return, like education, infrastructure, etc.
    3
  39.  @fatboyRAY24  living paycheck to paycheck can be "achieved" even when you earn a lot.
    3
  40. I like this recent trend of both leaning into memes while also clearing up bs information
    2
  41. I just got on the channel to see if there was something new - now this video was posted only 10 minutes ago
    2
  42.  @anthonyandrade5071  what did you hear exactly? And did you actually have proof for it?
    2
  43. They aren't effective but the leadership has no incentive for long term strategies
    2
  44.  @dannybeane2069  In most cases the highest skilled people tend to flee in the highest percentage
    2
  45. Of course "boring" companies need to pay more than exiting ones. Everyone is flocking to the exciting ones, creating downward pressure
    2
  46. I wonder how that wealth distributation compares to the distribution before the French revolution.
    2
  47. I have some doubts with that. If that's actually true then that would mean adults are incapable to deal with children given they're technically less intelligent. It seems more like a socializing issue, with people being better at socializing wouldn't put their intelligence up front but rather adapt to each situation
    2
  48. I knew about the time in the market thing but didn't expect that even timing the market correctly could make you underperform
    2
  49. How can you "start a business" driving Uber when you work for one company exclusively, being told what to do and having no negotiation power? Only difference to a regular employee is clocking in and out like you want but even that's possible with certain employments
    2
  50. I think they get more blame than Vanguard because of their different history.
    2