Comments by "Gaza is not Amalek" (@Ass_of_Amalek) on "“WHO THE F*** ARE YOU?!”" video.

  1. nobody expects the reverse spanish inquisition!
    28
  2. 1:34 I think the main limiting factor to the reach of TMR is sam's aimlessly rambling disordered speech. he should see a speech pathologist and start making an effort to not waste the audience's time with painfully slow meaningless strings of noises and words.
    5
  3.  @trapadvisor  what threat to society real AS is there and how do you know? I don't think a relatively rare and relatively mild form of r°cism constitutes a threat to society. what I do expect is that some minority of those people who take note of and disapprove of the control the c°l°ny and its minions exert in many countries will attribute this, much like the c°l°ny promotes, to the religion or the people too broadly. but while the repression absolutely is a threat to society, I don't see a backlash plausibly of similarly large societal impact as plausible in any country. I do think that the c°l°ny's despicable actions, and the fact that °°°ish organizations abroad almost all voice only support (protest groups formed for the purpose of dissent from it and the few who have always rejected the c°l°ny as incompatible with religious scripture being the only exceptions) have made °°°s less safe around the world. but the fact that no major attack against them has occurred in response yet proves how small of an issue that still is, and there certainly is no threat to society of that kind, that's really ridiculous.
    2
  4.  @sandrajones1609  words hold power, but those words don't.
    1
  5.  @Fink02  to what AS occurrences are you referring? the thing is that the biggest current day authorities on what AS is have all unironically conspired to include most or all of what one might call ant°z°°°ism, because almost all °°wish organizations and all AS-focused hate-monitoring groups are run by z°°°ists who believe that the most important thing for °°°ish security is i-country, and who are willing to bend the truth to provide support. the most relevant definition, officially adopted by the US, UK, germany and several other countries in recent years, known as the IHRA definition (international h°°°°aust rem°mbrance association) includes among other ways to target i-country critics the very straight-forward claim that "delegitimizing" i-country is AS. but the perceived legitimacy of this country is founded on ignorance of its history and continuing criminality, as a c°l°nial aparth°°d state that was founded on the exp°lsi°n of 750,000 nat°ve people - 80% of those then living in today's commonly recognized territory, without the lat%er added east jer°s°lem and the syr°°n gol°n heights, where btw. they exp°lled 95% of the 100,000 inhabitants, that's why there is little trouble in the g°lan today). the g°°° strip has been a gh°°to filled since its creation in '48 with ref°g°°s from what is i-country, and it's been a closed gh°°to under siege for almost 20 years. thr w°st b°nk is de facto ann°xed, i-country citizens can freely live there under the exact same laws as in the official territory, but the nat°ve non-citizens who can't vote live in an open gh°°to network under a separate set of laws administered by military tribunals. they'renot even allowed to use many of the roads. do you think those facts delegitimize i-country? if so, according to the IHRA definition, those are ant°°°°°°ic facts. personally I think it's wrong and extremely dangerous to °°°s to define AS to include facts, but that is what i-country demands - because z°°°ism and AS are two sides of the same coin. more AS means more legitimacy for the state, which means allied support for more land theft and oppr°ssion/exp°lsions, and it means more °°°s from around the world move there.
    1