Comments by "Gaza is not Amalek" (@Ass_of_Amalek) on "RealLifeLore" channel.

  1. I'm no fan of turkey, but the way you repeatedly stress the international support for eastern libya's general haftar, while almost entirely omitting the much greater international support (US, UN, EU except for france, greece and cyprus) for the tripoli government in order to paint a picture of turkish isolation is laughable. in the foreign involvement in libya, it's not turkey that's the odd one out, it's france, greece and cyprus (mostly france, the other two are irrelevant) who are weird for sideing with russia.
    739
  2. holy 💩 that is so sloppy! 👎 that number did seem very strange to me. I could see it being true for a city, but not for such a big largely rural area. I didn't look it up, but I definitely would have checked that before I put it in a youtube video.
    449
  3.  @ArkanceloAutore  whose propaganda?
    135
  4. the west bank is functionally an internally normally open (now closed) and externally closed ghetto network within a racially selectively martial-law-administered de facto annexed region of israel (israelis and foreigners can freely move and live in it by israeli law as if it was israel, but for palestinian non-citizens, martial law is applied by military occupation courts).
    21
  5.  @MAGAWillSaveTheWorld  america is the only NATO country that has ever been the beneficiary of NATO's collective defense.
    15
  6.  @turkcukayi  no, they didn't. the americans abandoned their kurdish allies after turkey announced that it was going to attack them, and those kurds then eventually, weeks or months later after the turks and their friends from islamists anonymous had already captured a lot of territory, managed to negotiate and implement a lesser evil option of inviting the syrian government alongside russian troops back into most cities in rojava to shield them against turkish attacks (turkey generally doesn't attack syrian and certainly not russian troops). the kurds negotiated some form of largely continued self-governance, but it's clear that assad and putin intend to use the leverage they have through the occupation of rojava to gradually erode all that autonomy and reestablish central governance. how that's going I don't know, it's been long enough that I would expect substantial changes for the worse. I believe the deal at least did not include the kurds giving up any weapons.
    11
  7. so what you're saying is frexit, yes?
    8
  8. yeah he misrepresented libya quite ridiculously (at least twice) to paint the turkish isolation picture.
    6
  9.  @turkcukayi  bull**it, the russians were not in the region. any US bases that were left were handed over to the kurds. maybe elsewhere in syria at another time did the US hand over something to russia, but not in kurdish territory.
    4
  10.  @quvy338  never happened. turkey may have destroyed that stuff in possession of ISIS and SDF, but turkey has never attacked assad's forces. in syria, turkey has attacked about 80% kurds and 20% ISIS (for a long time it only bombed ISIS on paper, since in reality it was still supporting ISIS - it stuck with that for a really long time). you got a source reporting turkish attacks on syrian government troops?
    4
  11.  @Pan472  who is "we" and who is "you"?
    2
  12.  @berniefynn6623  whether or not you call the arabs of pale°°ine pale°°inians is irrelevant to the fact that that is their land that i°°rael is stealing. if arabs from somewhere else came and stole the land, it wouldn't rightfully be theirs either.
    2
  13. because it's all swamps?
    2
  14.  @lester44444  they said the mississippi IS. that means right now, not in the past.
    2
  15. interesting, I would not have guessed that iraq is so nothing like egypt
    1
  16.  @senatorjosephmccarthy2720  poop emoji
    1
  17.  @quvy338  no, they don't. turkey has never attacked syrian government forces deliberately to any noteworthy extent in this war. though I would assume that they count on their proxy forces from islamists anonymous to defend the territory they occupy collaboratively if the syrian government ever does decide to attack them.
    1
  18.  @randomcrashingfacility31  turkey supported ISIS for a long time.
    1
  19.  @Auguryable  lol yeah I guess I stopped paying attention to syria before turkey decided to commit ground troops to securing islamist control over idlib now, too. that wasn't a turkish ovservation post that was bombed, that was a 400 man mechanized infantry brigade on the move. and apparently it was the russians who bombed them. you know, I and everybody else were indeed preoccupied with something more inportant than some turkish and syrian soldiers dying in syria. dropping bombs on people is really just how they say "khello" in idlib. turkey was ISIS' biggest state supporter. and with their amorphously named idlib islamic moderate book club and the turkish version of the free syrian army up north, turkey still supports the closest thing to ISIS as a territorial califate they can find in syria.
    1
  20.  @BlackadderFunk  cede power to whom? the only other authority to cede power to is the less legitimate dictator-to-be haftar. and you do realise that tripoli can't conduct a vote while controlling 20% of the country, right?
    1
  21. no, I love it.
    1
  22. they aren't refugees because they're pale°°inians, they are refugees because they are stateless, and their parents or grandparents were forcibly displaced by is°°el. rohingya infants who were born in bangladesh to parents from myanmar are refugees, too - because they're stateless. this is a false talking point, it's a h°zbara lie.
    1
  23. 10:50 *azeris, not azerbaijanis. azerbaijanis are the citizens of azerbaijan, azeris are the dominant ethnic group of azerbaijan.
    1
  24.  @nightprowler6336  general sisi was so democratically elected that they gave the election a name, it's called the rabaa massacre.
    1