Comments by "Gaza is not Amalek" (@Ass_of_Amalek) on "DW Planet A" channel.

  1. the most environmentally friendly options are always to avoid buying anything, or buy second hand.
    1000
  2. there are actually a lot of bottles in germany, both glass and plastic, that somehow skirt around the pfand legislation. plastic oil and juice bottles, any cleaning agent containers, all glass wine bottles and jars etc... all aluminium beverage cans have pfand, but the steel food cans don't. there seems to be a trend that products less likely to be consumed outside of people's homes are less likely to have pfand - beers, water and lemonades usually do, whereas wine and juice don't. beverage cartons never do. I'd say what's most unreasonable are the different pfand amounts for different container categories, because they don't reflect the comparative effort in collecting them from the streets like some homeless people or poor elderly people do a lot - the cans pay by far the most, plastic bottles are in the middle, and the lowest pfand per piece is paid for the heavy glass bottles.
    9
  3. 9:16 kind of an awkward clip to put into you talking about positive solutions
    4
  4. 1:10 amogus bike
    2
  5. 2:50 you idiot, you're supposed to return the bottles, not the beer! :'D
    1
  6. that polish inside job of investing in the company and then suing against bad business decisions is hilarious.
    1
  7. good topic, but oh god, the fucking rhymes and unicorn shit! what's the target audience? xD
    1
  8. ~yeah yöah~
    1
  9. props to the whistleblowers - they care enough about the ocean to risk their jobs! obvioudly there should be some governmental or supergovernmental (UN) satellite surveillance system to be used as conclusive evidence in court. the technology is good enough, the data just needs a judicially recognized chain of custody. also you can probably get prett conclusive evidence by checking those "clean drain" and sewage tanks for bilge oil residue, right?
    1