Comments by "Gaza is not Amalek" (@Ass_of_Amalek) on "The New York Times" channel.

  1. who else noticed how shy all the cops were with their batons compared to how they handle leftist or black protesters?
    5
  2. peak passive voice
    3
  3. 10/10
    3
  4. 2:12 what is xi jinping doing there?
    2
  5. is it possible to get interpol arrest warrants for all these people so that they get arrested if they enter any country willingto vomply with the warrant?
    2
  6. prepare to be disappointed, there never is.
    2
  7. industrial society and its china
    2
  8. the fiancé's wait outside the consulate must have been horrible :(
    2
  9. I went into this with an open mind, but his excuses are super weak and he straight up seems like he's doing it because he enjoys killing.
    2
  10. this drone strike was a classic example of how the US military handles drone strikes. they consider every person killed to be a legitimate target until proven otherwise, and make no attempt to check themselves unless a shitstorm in western media forces them to do it.
    1
  11. oh, I didn't notice that this was on april 1st too, like i-country's failed declaration of war against iran. i-country's sense of humour is something else!
    1
  12. look up this c°l°nial state's real history of ma°°acres and ethnic cl°°nsing! it was founded on the exp°lsion of 750,000 native people, 80% of those living on the territory britain recognizes as the state today.
    1
  13. interesting factoid: the only isr°°°i k°°led during the entebbe raid was bibi net°°°ahu's brother. his posthumous national hero status was a major factor enabling bibi's entry into politics.
    1
  14. isr°°° is a narcissist. national narcissism is the state ideology.
    1
  15. I like that the new york times can't spell "protester".
    1
  16. a lawyer? :o
    1
  17. it was probably a mistake in the sense that some troops had not gotten the message that there was an "our guys" charity, that there was an exception to the rule of targeting aid workers. WCK is very nearly a US government project, and they were there to deliver some inadequate amount of food by sea in order to create conditions for i-country to invade raf°h, fully cut off the strip from egypt, and eliminate UN°WA to instead aet up aomething that pretends to replace it, but in reality only provides starvation rations of food that i-country can control more directly, while not fulfilling most of UNRWA's functions as the whole social safety net. and of course the actual floating pier the americans are building isn't for aid at all - it's built at i-country's request, but it could just let in as much aid as it wants through the land border. the only thing the pier enables that would not otherwise be possible is for locals to flee the territory without entering either neighbouring state, which officially both have asylum laws, so letting in people is likely to create terrible paperwork. aid by ship is just the excuse for america to build this gift to i-country. it's an emigration port.
    1
  18. wow that's a bizarre level of inaction!
    1
  19. the cops are most responsible.
    1