Comments by "Son of None" (@SonOfNone) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

@WanderingExistence Correct. Kids used to be given firearms as birthday and holiday gifts and there weren't mad max situations unfolding at every school or public function in the 1950s. Read more history.
28
@WanderingExistence When has that happened? You're making up fake situations and pretending like its genuine pretext for violating millions of people's rights. Before gun control, people could indeed possess such weapons as grenades, AND gift them to their children. Yet I've never heard of that happening, let alone a child using a grenade inappropriately.
18
@nuclearmusic77 The line was already drawn as "shall not be infringed." I'm not sure what's so difficult to understand- do you think law-abiding citizens magically become criminally intentioned once they possess a certain weapon? The weapons are not the problem, it's the criminals. And criminals, by their very virtue of being criminal, will not follow the very gun laws people think keeps them safe.
17
@shade9272 That's your take? It's so weak and pathetic the next comment literally proved it false.
4
Shills, probably bots to be honest. They're all over this and none of them have a cogent argument. Just blathering about nothing, trying (and failing) to discredit her and conservatives as a whole.
3
@erroneous3493 Swing and a miss- I don't watch fox news. Maybe stop assuming things? I thought the left was against making assumptions of people?
3
Yes, more legislation against assault hurricanes - no one needs that much wind or water.
2
@WanderingExistence Are there restrictions on children, say 3 years old, owning a chainsaw? What about a musket, matchlock or black powder rifle? There are no current [federal] laws against this. There are all manner of "hyperbolic" scenarios you could come up with, all being irrelevant to reality. Children aren't ad hoc independent creatures roaming the world of their own devices- they require parents to make them. You could argue the quality in parenting has waned dramatically in the past century, but again, this isn't a genuine pretext to deprive millions of their rights. Do you think grenades didn't exist before the 1930s? Do you think fully-automatic weapons didn't exist before then? The question I was answering in regard to age dealt with mere firearm ownership, which yes, in the 1950s kids had firearms and even brought them to school for firearms instruction classes. Again, I recommend some history, though it would seem you might be stuck in your way of thinking and aren't open to the possibility you're latched on to solving hypotheticals instead of real-world problems.
2
Religious people attack and ridicule people? That's quite a bigoted statement when you consider how many Muslims, Jews, and Christians (let alone all the other denominations) are in the US. They can't all be as discriminatory as you claim, but you seem eager to discriminate against ALL of them. Quite intolerant of you.
1
@rsellers7090 Nothing is being done legally via religion, whether Christian, Jewish, or Muslim, or any other denomination. History proves we ALL have bloody pasts, again, whether religious or not. Besides, history is not a pretext to deprive anyone of their rights, let alone to seek vengeance. I hope in time you can come to be more tolerant of others, not only for the sake of humanity, but for your sake too. Good luck in life, friend.
1
The number of bots and shills on this video definitely shows how much it touched the nerves of the left.
1
@oryxfirstnavigator4795 Democrats? Obviously- they're the only ones taxing the poor even when they said they wouldn't (Brandon's famous 'no one under 400k will see their taxes increase').
1
The US is secular in its laws. It has a judeo-christian founding, sure. But it's laws are neutral to religion, except insofar as protecting the rights of its citizens to express themselves religiously. Perhaps that's too much for you to comprehend, but that makes it no less true.
1
@erroneous3493 You have no idea what a fascist is. The democrats of today hold more in common with ww2 Germany and Mussolini. Your username is a perfect assessment of your opinions.
1
@erroneous3493 Most of that exactly describes the left. If you substitute the nation with ideology, it exactly defines the left. No tolerance of opposition or difference of opinion. Hilarious you can't see it. On Trump, I'll believe it when I see it. Your opinion, as I stated before, is completely erroneous. Good luck in the election.
1
I think you're thinking of a different hurricane or storm (note that I'm not saying he didn't, just that it wasn't Katrina). Katrina happened in 2005 before Obama was president.
1
"Religious spaces" were separated from "retail and other essential spaces" in the opening to this subject. It implies Forbes editors don't believe religious institutions/functions are essential. One only need look as far as the First Amendment of the US Constitution to recognize religion is essential, being placed in the number 1 spot along with free speech and expression. Whether you're a religious person or not, you don't get to define for others whether religion is essential. A Christian cannot define mosques or synagogues as non-essential anymore than the other way around. The same is true for agnostics and atheists defining religious spaces as "non-essential." Had it not been in the Constitution, perhaps legislators and judges could legislate or interpret the law however they saw fit, but it's quite cut and dry. Such revisionists need to be called out and kept from offices of power, lest they abuse them and the public.
1