Comments by "Voix de la raison" (@voixdelaraison593) on "Jesse Watters: How STUPID is this NYC?" video.

  1. 23
  2. 8
  3. 6
  4. 2
  5.  @CrissContino  Now for the fun part. “The Civil War was not actually started over ‘slavery’. “ No Historical scholar of any merit would support your statement. Going back as far as the drafting of our Constitution Slavery was a dividing issue. The following are a sample of Slavery Dividing America leading to the Civil War: * The Three-fifths Compromise of 1787 was the first major contentious battle over Slavery. * On August 21, 1787, a bitter debate broke out in Congress over a South Carolina proposal to prohibit the federal government from regulating the Atlantic slave trade. Luther Martin of Maryland, a slaveholder, said that the slave trade should be subject to federal regulation since the entire nation would be responsible for suppressing slave revolts. South Carolina responded forcefully. "Religion and humanity have nothing to do with this question. Unless regulation of the slave trade was left to the states, the southern-most states "shall not be parties to the union." The controversy over the Atlantic slave trade was ultimately settled by compromise. In exchange for a 20-year ban on any restrictions on the Atlantic slave trade, southern delegates agreed to remove a clause restricting the national government’s power to enact laws requiring goods to be shipped on American vessels (benefiting northeastern shipbuilders and sailors). The same day this agreement was reached, the convention also adopted the fugitive slave clause, requiring the return of runaway slaves to their owners.
    2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1