Comments by "Voix de la raison" (@voixdelaraison593) on "Leaked Supreme Court draft will ‘backfire’ on pro-abortionists: Sen. Roger Wicker" video.

  1. @SHEEP HURTER The Bible speaks about DeSantis, Trump, and you. 2 Corinthians 11:13-15 For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light. So it is no surprise if his servants, also, disguise themselves as servants of righteousness. Their end will correspond to their deeds.
    3
  2.  @carriecree1789  So do you also believe that women should not be educated beyond the 6th grade?
    2
  3.  @alantasman8273  If you Traitors can condemn a direct violation of our Constitution & and attempted OVERTHROW of our American Democracy, it seems a little petty for you to be worried about a leak.
    1
  4.  @The_Lord_has_it  So for kicks a giggles I did a deep dive on “Supreme Court Judges Being Threatened” Only media owned by Rupert Murdock are carrying this story. No local news, no regional news, no national news not owned by Murdock. Other media recognizes the need for increased protection but none report any actual threats. Which leaves you with one of two conclusions: 1. The entire aggregate of the news media has conspired to hide this story, or 2. Murdock has made up this story and is pushing Fake news.
    1
  5. Why stop with abortion? Let’s be honest how many think women shouldn’t be educated beyond 6th Grade?
    1
  6.  @burnedagain6187  Your ignorance need not be a life long affliction, there is a cure. If you read often, read deeply, and read quality scholarly materials you can be saved. ✌️
    1
  7.  @shaunsmith928  So for kicks a giggles I did a deep dive on “Supreme Court Judges Being Threatened” Only media owned by Rupert Murdock are carrying this story. No local news, no regional news, no national news not owned by Murdock. Other media recognizes the need for increased protection but none report any actual threats. Which leaves you with one of two conclusions: 1. The entire aggregate of the news media has conspired to hide this story, or 2. Murdock has made up this story and is pushing Fake news.
    1
  8.  @Ever8eliever  So for kicks a giggles I did a deep dive on “Supreme Court Judges Being Threatened” Only media owned by Rupert Murdock are carrying this story. No local news, no regional news, no national news not owned by Murdock. Other media recognizes the need for increased protection but none report any actual threats. Which leaves you with one of two conclusions: 1. The entire aggregate of the news media has conspired to hide this story, or 2. Murdock has made up this story and is pushing Fake news.
    1
  9.  @robertallred2763  So for kicks a giggles I did a deep dive on “Supreme Court Judges Being Threatened” Only media owned by Rupert Murdock are carrying this story. No local news, no regional news, no national news not owned by Murdock. Other media recognizes the need for increased protection but none report any actual threats. Which leaves you with one of two conclusions: 1. The entire aggregate of the news media has conspired to hide this story, or 2. Murdock has made up this story and is pushing Fake news.
    1
  10.  @anthonythomas1504  And how do your ears itch for Tucker & Jeannine? 2 Timothy 4:3 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions,
    1
  11.  @m_d1905  Your list was not long enough. It would have been easier if you had said: “The same goes News Media though out the Western World not owned by Rupert Murdock” aka Faux news.
    1
  12.  @carriecree1789  My apologies.
    1