Comments by "Voix de la raison" (@voixdelaraison593) on "Tucker releases exclusive photos of Sen Feinstein in airport without a mask" video.

  1. Tucker Carlson wins against law suit brought by Karen McDougal. In reaching her decision, Judge Vyskocil relied in part on an argument made by Fox News lawyers: that the “general tenor” of Mr. Carlson’s program signals to viewers that the host is “engaging and is nonliteral commentary.’” The judge added: “Given Mr. Carlson’s reputation, any reasonable viewer would hold anything said with a huge amount of skepticism’”. In other words, Mr. Carlson’s viewers know that everything he says is BS and should not be believed.
    2
  2. Tucker Carlson wins against law suit brought by Karen McDougal. In reaching her decision, Judge Vyskocil relied in part on an argument made by Fox News lawyers: that the “general tenor” of Mr. Carlson’s program signals to viewers that the host is “engaging and is nonliteral commentary.’” The judge added: “Given Mr. Carlson’s reputation, any reasonable viewer would hold anything said with a huge amount of skepticism’”. In other words, Mr. Carlson’s viewers know that everything he says is BS and should not be believed.
    1
  3. Glenn Davis So if the Tax Returns are “Fake” according to Treasonous Trump, how can publishing them be illegal? Unless he is living, and all information revealed is accurate? Can’t have it BOTH ways MAGA Maggot.
    1
  4. Fox News Lawyers argue in court that a reasonable person would not believe anything Tucker Carlson says because it is a fiction and hyperbole.
    1
  5. Tucker Carlson wins against law suit brought by Karen McDougal. In reaching her decision, Judge Vyskocil relied in part on an argument made by Fox News lawyers: that the “general tenor” of Mr. Carlson’s program signals to viewers that the host is “engaging and is nonliteral commentary.’” The judge added: “Given Mr. Carlson’s reputation, any reasonable viewer would hold anything said with a huge amount of skepticism’”. In other words, Mr. Carlson’s viewers know that everything he says is BS and should not be believed.
    1
  6. Tucker Carlson wins against law suit brought by Karen McDougal. In reaching her decision, Judge Vyskocil relied in part on an argument made by Fox News lawyers: that the “general tenor” of Mr. Carlson’s program signals to viewers that the host is “engaging and is nonliteral commentary.’” The judge added: “Given Mr. Carlson’s reputation, any reasonable viewer would hold anything said with a huge amount of skepticism’”. In other words, Mr. Carlson’s viewers know that everything he says is BS and should not be believed.
    1
  7. Tucker Carlson wins against law suit brought by Karen McDougal. In reaching her decision, Judge Vyskocil relied in part on an argument made by Fox News lawyers: that the “general tenor” of Mr. Carlson’s program signals to viewers that the host is “engaging and is nonliteral commentary.’” The judge added: “Given Mr. Carlson’s reputation, any reasonable viewer would hold anything said with a huge amount of skepticism’”. In other words, Mr. Carlson’s viewers know that everything he says is BS and should not be believed.
    1