Comments by "Voix de la raison" (@voixdelaraison593) on "Growing opposition to impeachment in battleground states as House Judiciary gears up for hearings" video.

  1. Colin Faust Oh please, please, please let the witnesses testify. For some reason Treasonous Trump does not want any primary witnesses to testify. So which is it? You can’t claim you want witnesses to testify but prevent witnesses from testifying. Kinda awkward... No?
    8
  2. Frankie C In 1654, the expression quid pro quo was used to generally refer to something done for personal gain or with the expectation of reciprocity. Quid pro quo would go on to be used, by English speakers in legal and diplomatic contexts, as an exchange of equally valued goods or services and continues to be today. In the United States, if the exchange appears excessively one sided, courts in some jurisdictions may question whether a quid pro quo did actually exist and the contract may be held void. In cases of "Quid Pro Quo" business contracts, the term takes on a negative connotation because major corporations may cross ethical boundaries in order to enter into these very valuable, mutually beneficial, agreements with other major big businesses. In these deals, large sums of money are often at play and can consequently lead to promises of exclusive partnerships indefinitely or promises of distortion of economic reports, for example.
    2
  3. limeypam Treasonous Trump has a perverse Midas Touch. He ruins or corrupts everything he touches.
    1
  4. Frankie C Quid Pro Quo becomes bribery only when there is an identifiable exchange between the contribution and official acts, previous or subsequent, and the term quid pro quo denotes such an exchange.
    1
  5. Maryann Dickson It is unfortunate that a stupid persons vote counts the same as an educated persons vote. But you do the best you can to educate the willing.
    1