Comments by "Voix de la raison" (@voixdelaraison593) on "Ingraham: Trump confronts the panic pushers" video.

Harry Cojones Russian Hoax again and again. A senior judge of the U.S. District Court for D.C., nominated by George W. Bush after appointments to lower judgeships by Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush and a stint in the latter’s White House. His ruling, and words, carried all the more weight when he wrote an order last week rejecting the Trump administration’s attempt to keep hidden the redacted portions of Robert Mueller’s report. Walton said, quite simply, that Attorney General Bill Barr MISLED THE PUBLIC — and that the BILL BARR CAN’T BE TRUSTED TO TELL THE TRUTH.
2
Bolt Nation The Mueller Report never went away no matter how badly you want to bury it. An American president seeking help from and receiving help from a Russian Spy Agency is NEVER acceptable.
2
outdoordoc1971 How ignorant are you? A senior judge of the U.S. District Court for D.C., nominated by George W. Bush after appointments to lower judgeships by Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush and a stint in the latter’s White House. His ruling, and words, carried all the more weight when he wrote an order last week rejecting the Trump administration’s attempt to keep hidden the redacted portions of Robert Mueller’s report. Walton said, quite simply, that Attorney General Bill Barr MISLED THE PUBLIC — and that the BILL BARR CAN’T BE TRUSTED TO TELL THE TRUTH.
1
Gmail user “thats fox for you... we have a medical situation but fox calls in politicians...anything to try to glorify the dear leader. pathetic. now that the gop has died leaving only the fascist rino trump cult in its place, all patriots will vote blue” I would add to your statement “vote blue and force the Republican Party to restore its sanity”
1
Bolt Nation Treasonous Trump IS THE VIRUS. A senior judge of the U.S. District Court for D.C., nominated by George W. Bush after appointments to lower judgeships by Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush and a stint in the latter’s White House. His ruling, and words, carried all the more weight when he wrote an order last week rejecting the Trump administration’s attempt to keep hidden the redacted portions of Robert Mueller’s report. Walton said, quite simply, that Attorney General Bill Barr MISLED THE PUBLIC — and that the BILL BARR CAN’T BE TRUSTED TO TELL THE TRUTH.
1
Bolt Nation Treasonous Trump fired his last Director of Intelligence - just weeks ago - for acknowledging to congress that he Russian are helping TT again.
1
Bolt Nation Did you even read the report? Can you read? Vol I is all about Treasonous Trump seeking help from and receiving help from the Russian GRU (Formerly known as the KGB).
1
Fredd smith If you had been watching or reading real news you would know that no one abandoned the Mueller Report. The Ukraine Quid Pro Quo was seen as the clearest, and most concise, example of this presidents corruption. You can present a very clear case on corruption, but like the OJ verdict, if the jury wants to play games they can. Out of all the Senate Republicans only Mitt Romney feared God and respected his Oath of office.
1
Fredd smith Did you even read the Mueller Report? Can you tell me what is on page 33 and 34, or what is in the footnotes?
1
Fredd smith “The Mueller Report was written by Clinton lawyers” 😂🤣😂🤣 and when Treasonous Trump re writes our Constitution are you to claim it was written by the Founding Fathers? 😂🤣😂🤣
1
Fredd smith Yes Fred, I read all 498 pages of the Mueller Report. I also read all pages of the IGs report, and the House’s Intelligence Report. One should never post about anything they have no knowledge of. Tell me Fred, does the fact that I READ make you just a little insecure... because it should.
1
Fredd smith BS. You never read the report and this post just proves it.
1
Fredd smith 😂🤣😂🤣 Never read the Mueller Report but somehow you are an expert 😂🤣😂🤣 Do you know how that sounds?
1
Fredd smith Why no charges Vol I of the Mueller Report. Because Criminal Conspiracy is incredibly hard to prove. The Element of "Intent" As with other specific intent crimes, a person's intention is key. But the court will also care about the mental states of the alleged partners in crime. Other individuals in the conspiracy must intend to agree, and all must intend to achieve the outcome. Merely associating with people known to be involved in crime doesn't make you a co-conspirator. For instance, just because your friend tells you he is going to burglarize a house doesn't mean you are part of the conspiracy. Not unless you also agree to participate by acting as a getaway driver or helping him scope out the property ahead of time. [Seeking help from or receiving help from the Russians is not itself a crime. It is despicable, it is UnAmerican, but not criminal unless you commit a Overt Act, and the prosecution can demonstrate your intent] The "Overt Act" Requirement In most jurisdictions, at least one co-conspirator must take some concrete step in furtherance of the plan. In the bank robbery example, this could be rental of a car to use in the crime. The requirement of an overt act prevents people from being thrown in jail for merely talking about a crime. [Seeking help from or receiving help from Russian Spies is not a crime, it is despicable, it is Un American, it is a betrayal, but it is not a crime] However, Obstruction of Justice is a crime and Volume II of the Mueller Report very clearly lays out 10 fine examples of Obstruction of Justice. Why did the House not choose to prosecute for Obstruction? Because they thought they had a sure thing with the Abuse of Power Charge. Remember the House Prosecutes and the Senate Deliberates. When the Senate is stacked against you, much like the OJ trial, Justice is not served. The Alt Republicans have lost their way and no longer have a Moral Compass.
1
Fredd smith I don’t deal in Conspiracy Theories. Judicial Watch (JW) is an American conservative activist group[1] that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate claimed misconduct by government officials. Founded in 1994, JW has primarily targeted Democrats, in particular the Presidency of Bill Clinton, the Presidency of Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton. The organization has described climate science as "fraud science" and has filed lawsuits against government climate scientists. JW has made numerous false and unsubstantiated claims that have been picked up by right-wing news outlets. Courts have dismissed the vast majority of its lawsuits.[1]
1
Fredd smith You read the Mueller Report and get back to me. Until then you are just another MAGA Maggot running your mouth without engaging your brain. Not trying to be mean here but you can’t have an opinion on something you never read.
1