Comments by "Voix de la raison" (@voixdelaraison593) on "Tucker: There's nothing authentic about Kamala Harris" video.

  1. There is nothing authentic about Tucker Carlson. His own lawyers in an attempt to defend him filed a legal brief with court that essentially said: NO REASONABLE PERSON WOULD MISTAKE TUCKERS “HYPERBOLE” AND “EXAGGERATIONS” AS FACTS. “EVERYONE SHOULD UNDERSTAND THAT EVERYTHING IS THEATER NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH NEWS”. For you own edification consult the Karen Mcdougall Case to fact check me.
    5
  2. There is nothing authentic about Tucker Carlson. His own lawyers in an attempt to defend him filed a legal brief with court that essentially said: NO REASONABLE PERSON WOULD MISTAKE TUCKERS “HYPERBOLE” AND “EXAGGERATIONS” AS FACTS. “EVERYONE SHOULD UNDERSTAND THAT EVERYTHING IS THEATER NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH NEWS”. For you own edification consult the Karen Mcdougall Case to fact check me.
    3
  3. There is nothing authentic about Tucker Carlson. His own lawyers in an attempt to defend him filed a legal brief with court that essentially said: NO REASONABLE PERSON WOULD MISTAKE TUCKERS “HYPERBOLE” AND “EXAGGERATIONS” AS FACTS. “EVERYONE SHOULD UNDERSTAND THAT EVERYTHING IS THEATER NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH NEWS”. For you own edification consult the Karen Mcdougall Case to fact check me.
    3
  4. There is nothing authentic about Tucker Carlson. His own lawyers in an attempt to defend him filed a legal brief with court that essentially said: NO REASONABLE PERSON WOULD MISTAKE TUCKERS “HYPERBOLE” AND “EXAGGERATIONS” AS FACTS. “EVERYONE SHOULD UNDERSTAND THAT EVERYTHING IS THEATER NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH NEWS”. For you own edification consult the Karen Mcdougall Case to fact check me.
    2
  5. Maxime Prometheas Merci beaucoup
    2
  6. There is nothing authentic about Tucker Carlson. His own lawyers in an attempt to defend him filed a legal brief with court that essentially said: NO REASONABLE PERSON WOULD MISTAKE TUCKERS “HYPERBOLE” AND “EXAGGERATIONS” AS FACTS. “EVERYONE SHOULD UNDERSTAND THAT EVERYTHING IS THEATER NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH NEWS”. For you own edification consult the Karen Mcdougall Case to fact check me.
    2
  7. There is nothing authentic about Tucker Carlson. His own lawyers in an attempt to defend him filed a legal brief with court that essentially said: NO REASONABLE PERSON WOULD MISTAKE TUCKERS “HYPERBOLE” AND “EXAGGERATIONS” AS FACTS. “EVERYONE SHOULD UNDERSTAND THAT EVERYTHING IS THEATER NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH NEWS”. For you own edification consult the Karen Mcdougall Case to fact check me.
    2
  8. There is nothing authentic about Tucker Carlson. His own lawyers in an attempt to defend him filed a legal brief with court that essentially said: NO REASONABLE PERSON WOULD MISTAKE TUCKERS “HYPERBOLE” AND “EXAGGERATIONS” AS FACTS. “EVERYONE SHOULD UNDERSTAND THAT EVERYTHING IS THEATER NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH NEWS”. For you own edification consult the Karen Mcdougall Case to fact check me.
    1
  9. There is nothing authentic about Tucker Carlson. His own lawyers in an attempt to defend him filed a legal brief with court that essentially said: NO REASONABLE PERSON WOULD MISTAKE TUCKERS “HYPERBOLE” AND “EXAGGERATIONS” AS FACTS. “EVERYONE SHOULD UNDERSTAND THAT EVERYTHING IS THEATER NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH NEWS”. For you own edification consult the Karen Mcdougall Case to fact check me.
    1
  10. There is nothing authentic about Tucker Carlson. His own lawyers in an attempt to defend him filed a legal brief with court that essentially said: NO REASONABLE PERSON WOULD MISTAKE TUCKERS “HYPERBOLE” AND “EXAGGERATIONS” AS FACTS. “EVERYONE SHOULD UNDERSTAND THAT EVERYTHING IS THEATER NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH NEWS”. For you own edification consult the Karen Mcdougall Case to fact check me.
    1
  11. There is nothing authentic about Tucker Carlson. His own lawyers in an attempt to defend him filed a legal brief with court that essentially said: NO REASONABLE PERSON WOULD MISTAKE TUCKERS “HYPERBOLE” AND “EXAGGERATIONS” AS FACTS. “EVERYONE SHOULD UNDERSTAND THAT EVERYTHING IS THEATER NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH NEWS”. For you own edification consult the Karen Mcdougall Case to fact check me.
    1