Comments by "Voix de la raison" (@voixdelaraison593) on "Day of reckoning is coming, stay tuned: Graham on Russia probe origins" video.

  1. 5
  2. 4
  3. 3
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. Jim Ellis Does the Senate sit as jurors in an Impeachment Trial? Answer: No The senators deciding President Trump's fate are frequently referred to as "jurors." But at the last impeachment trial, one senator strongly objected to that label. The presiding Chief Justice of the Supremacy Court Agreed. How is the Senate Different than a jury? 1. Regular jurors are not supposed to know each other - not so here. 2. Regular jurors cannot overrule the judge - not so here. 3. Regular jurors do not decide what evidence should be heard or the standards of evidence, nor do they decide on witnesses or what witnesses shall be called. 4. Regular jurors do not decide when a trial is to be ended. WILLIAM REHNQUIST: The chair is of the view that the senator from Iowa's objection is well taken, that the core - the Senate is not simply a jury. It is a court in this case. And therefore, counsel should refrain from referring to the senators as jurors. Therefore, the Senate can only choose to impeach or not impeach, there is No Acquitted or Not Guilty. Of course these legal subsidies are beyond your ability to comprehend but WORDS HAVE MEANING - words such as “No Collusion”. Collusion is not a legal term and therefore not a Crime. The technical term is Criminal Conspiracy, a whole different world with a nearly impossible standard of proof. Why do you think AG Bill Barr said no Collusion? Because he can technically be correct while still being fundamentally wrong - but again subtleties beyond your grasp.
    1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1