Comments by "Voix de la raison" (@voixdelaraison593) on "Kyle Rittenhouse reveals who he plans to sue" video.

Tucker Carlson is not a Journalist, his own lawyers filed documents with a Federal Court claiming: “The general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that Carlson is not 'stating actual facts about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in exaggeration and hyperbole commentary.” Tucker’s Lawyers went on to say: "That given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer arrives with an appropriate amount of skepticism about any statement he makes." And Tucker’s Lawyers also said to the court: "Context makes plain that no reasonable viewer would rely upon the accuracy and truthfulness of anything Mr. Carlson includes in his programming, Mr. Carlson is first and foremost an entertainer and not a news source.”
10
Tucker Carlson is not a Journalist, his own lawyers filed documents with a Federal Court claiming: “The general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that Carlson is not 'stating actual facts about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in exaggeration and hyperbole commentary.” Tucker’s Lawyers went on to say: "That given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer arrives with an appropriate amount of skepticism about any statement he makes." And Tucker’s Lawyers also said to the court: "Context makes plain that no reasonable viewer would rely upon the accuracy and truthfulness of anything Mr. Carlson includes in his programming, Mr. Carlson is first and foremost an entertainer and not a news source.”
3
@cameroneagle4370 Tuckers Lawyers say: “That no reasonable person should mistake Tucker’s exaggerated hyperbole as news”. It seems pretty definitive to me. By the way, why does Tucker praise dictators and defames Democracies? Please explain.
3
Tucker Carlson is not a Journalist, his own lawyers filed documents with a Federal Court claiming: “The general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that Carlson is not 'stating actual facts about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in exaggeration and hyperbole commentary.” Tucker’s Lawyers went on to say: "That given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer arrives with an appropriate amount of skepticism about any statement he makes." And Tucker’s Lawyers also said to the court: "Context makes plain that no reasonable viewer would rely upon the accuracy and truthfulness of anything Mr. Carlson includes in his programming, Mr. Carlson is first and foremost an entertainer and not a news source.”
2
@broitssnow Tucker: "Why is it disloyal to side with Russia but loyal to side with Ukraine?" Trump: “I went in yesterday and there was a television screen, and I said, ‘This is genius.’ Putin declares a big portion of the Ukraine—of Ukraine. Putin declares it as independent. Oh, that’s wonderful. So, Putin is now saying, ‘It’s independent,’ a large section of Ukraine. I said, ‘How smart is that?’ And he’s gonna go in and be a peacekeeper.”
2
@broitssnow Tucker Carlson is not a Journalist, his own lawyers filed documents with a Federal Court claiming: “The general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that Carlson is not 'stating actual facts about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in exaggeration and hyperbole commentary.” Tucker’s Lawyers went on to say: "That given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer arrives with an appropriate amount of skepticism about any statement he makes." And Tucker’s Lawyers also said to the court: "Context makes plain that no reasonable viewer would rely upon the accuracy and truthfulness of anything Mr. Carlson includes in his programming, Mr. Carlson is first and foremost an entertainer and not a news source.”
1