Comments by "Voix de la raison" (@voixdelaraison593) on "Washington Post walks back criticism of COVID origin theory" video.

@MikeJones69696 Prime Example Faux Propaganda. WAPO reported that the Energy Department has LOW CONFIDENCE that COVID-19 escaped from Wuhan Lab. Other Agencies totally disagree. That’s it, that is ALL they reported in the article. They didn’t push or dispute DOE only that other Agencies Disagreed.
2
Faux Propaganda. WAPO reported that the Energy Department has LOW CONFIDENCE that COVID-19 escaped from Wuhan Lab. Other Agencies totally disagree. The point is they reported what the Energy Department said and in no way “backed away” or “pushed” anything. This is what journalism does.
2
@sircampbell1249 Faux Propaganda. WAPO reported that the Energy Department has LOW CONFIDENCE that COVID-19 escaped from Wuhan Lab. Other Agencies totally disagree. The point is they reported what the Energy Department said and in no way “backed away” or “pushed” anything. This is what journalism does.
2
@residentpotato6023 Prime Example Faux Propaganda. WAPO reported that the Energy Department has LOW CONFIDENCE that COVID-19 escaped from Wuhan Lab. Other Agencies totally disagree. That’s it, that is ALL they reported in the article. They didn’t push or dispute DOE only that other Agencies Disagreed.
2
Faux Propaganda. WAPO reported that the Energy Department has LOW CONFIDENCE that COVID-19 escaped from Wuhan Lab. Other Agencies totally disagree. The point is they reported what the Energy Department said and in no way “backed away” or “pushed” anything. This is what journalism does.
2
@georgehenderson7783 Prime Example Faux Propaganda. WAPO reported that the Energy Department has LOW CONFIDENCE that COVID-19 escaped from Wuhan Lab. Other Agencies totally disagree. That’s it, that is ALL they reported in the article. They didn’t push or dispute DOE only that other Agencies Disagreed.
1
@Laury Mc Faux Propaganda is the enemy of truth. ✌️🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸✌️
1