Comments by "" (@pwrserge83) on "VICE News" channel.

  1. tyskbulle Yes, and the people living in Donbas have a right to not consider themselves Ukrainian. The key difference is that the ethnic Russians are an overwhelming MAJORITY in Donbas.
    2
  2. Roman Dudar Um... Go look at the history of the event. The only tanks driven into Donbas before the referendum were Ukrainian.
    2
  3. Yolo Swaggins Civilians that were in an aircraft that, on radar, looked like yet another Ukrainian military aircraft. An aircraft that was violating their airspace.
    2
  4. The Dutch Merchant You mean the same "horse fuckers" who crushed every major power on the planet at the time? Really? You do realize that Russia has not lost a war for hundreds of years? Right? Who was it again that kicked Napoleon's balls up into his throat when every other European power got their teeth kicked in?
    2
  5. Tommy England Them and what army? No, seriously. What army? The UK and Germany have no military to speak of. If it wasn't for NATO, Russia would already own you.
    2
  6. +David Hopwood You mean the crazy fifth that rapes children and straps themselves with explosives because a dark age child molester told them it's ok?
    2
  7. Iamtop Um... Bullshit. The largest domestic terrorist group in the US is the Democratic Party and their black supremacist gangbanger lackeys. Look at the stats. Almost 50% of all homicides in the US are committed by less than 4% of the population.
    2
  8. David Hopwood So it takes a "nut" to note that the Democratic party is sparking race riots, refusing to prosecute ganbangers, and ignores the fact that in 2013 50% of all homicides in the US were caused by their ganbanger lackeys?
    2
  9. brainflash1 So a natural trend in human behavior is somehow to blame for for the failure of an inherently unsustainable system? Is the failure of idiots to invest in a Ponzi scheme somehow to blame for the failure of the scheme? Do you even logic bro?
    2
  10. letreason reign The reason they don't have an oil embargo is that it would destroy them far more quickly than it would destroy us. They need the money they get from the oil from starving in the desert. The US actually exports more oil than we import. Look it up, it's hilarious. The only real reason we import oil is because the own the vast majority of the world's refining capacity. As for the KKK comparison... Most whites opposed the KKK, how many American muslims to you see protesting ISIS?
    2
  11. Abu Muthana We did that between 89 and 2001. How did that work out? Oh, yeah, they rammed three planes into buildings.
    2
  12. Abu Muthana Um... No... No we weren't. The reason I specified 89 was because that was the year the Soviets pulled out of Afghanistan. We weren't funding anyone there after that. Try again.
    2
  13. Abu Muthana Keep pushing us. We nuked the Japanese into the stone age. See what happens when we get actually pissed off. That's the difference between a civilized nation and Islam. It takes quite a bit to get us pissed enough to throw down the gauntlet. Think of it this way, for the past fifteen years we have been trying to HELP the middle east. What do you think will happen when we get pissed enough to try to actually hurt you fuckers?
    2
  14. Ryan Moorcroft The US never gave weapons to that Taliban fucktard. We armed the Mujahideen half a decade before the Taliban existed. Same thing for Hussein. We gave him weapons when he was being attacked by Iran, long before he went full Adolph. We are not responsible for what people turn into years after we sever ties with them. 
    2
  15. Who sent in the troops to resolve a political debate? Me thinks it was not the Russians. The Ukrainians could have negotiated. They decided to roll in the tanks. Oh... and did you miss how one of them admitted to using actual torture against a POW on camera? This is somehow equivalent to parading POWs through the streets? Really?
    2
  16. ***** I hate to break it to you, but we're not in Soviet Russia. A government has no authority to force a private business to move. Nor does it have the authority to violate legally binding contracts (i.e. permits) just because people bitch about them. As I said, if you move your dumb ass next to an oil rig, it's not the oil rig's problem.
    2
  17. ***** Actually, it does. Contracts are binding, even with the government. Why? Because the alternative is if you violate our agreement is I shoot you in the face. Would you prefer those terms?
    2
  18. Alex Mallinson What's the unemployment rate in Europe vs the UK again?
    2
  19. Alex Mallinson Yeah... If your unemployment rate DOUBLES, it will still be about the same as France.
    2
  20. Seth9809 You mean the sort of people who would actually be refugees? Gee, what a novel concept.
    2
  21. Jason K Yes... Jason, it couldn't possibly have anything to do with a fundamental moral objection to supporting a government that deals with protesters by rolling out the artillery... [/sarc]
    2
  22. nikolas aylta There are no British citizens. Only subjects. 
    2
  23. William Garcia Yes... That's how property rights work in a civilized society. You don't get to take shit from people every time you change governments.
    2
  24. Comrade Horsefucker ... well property rights as defined in international law for millennia would disagree. ... and that's why there is no stable government in Africa, because they are simply incapable of behaving like civilized people.
    2
  25. ***** What year did Mansa Musa exist? What happened to his empire? HINT: Its collapse had nothing to do with the Europeans. They were a bit busy dying from the Bubonic Plague.
    2
  26. Yonas G Bullshit. You're genociding each other every other week. Fact it, nobody on the African continent has evolved past the "bone in nose and pointy spear" stage of human development.
    2
  27. Comrade Horsefucker Oh really? So France just managed to imported insurgents into the country? Really? Or are you talking about the same Sankara who, himself, came into power via a military coup? The same clown who committed more crimes against humanity than any of his fellow tin pot dictators? The same one who was, himself, killed by a military coup? Me thinks you need to go read a bit of history. If you're looking for a model African ruler, a devout marxist dictator probably is not the man you're looking for.
    2
  28. quagmire444 1. Fascism is actually a far left ideology, not far right. The massive state power required for fascism is directly opposite what the right wing supports. 2. He blames the people responsible. It's not rocket science. Oh, and you can't be racist against all but one of those groups, by definition. 3. Reagan signed the first massive immigration reform in US history. The one that was supposed to lead to a secured border according to Democrats. Funny how we still don't have a secure border. 4. Being pro-immigration is not the same thing as pro-open border. Illegals should be stood up against a wall and shot like any other criminal scum that invade our country. 5. You're a politically illiterate racist cunt. Please save the human race some valuable oxygen and go have yourself a nice bleach cocktail.
    2
  29. ***** 1. Slavery stopped being a thing long before America came to be a superpower. 2. Abuse of women was NEVER tolerated in America. 3. "Minorities" with a chip on their shoulder should feel free to get the fuck out. 4. You're confusing America with Islam.
    2
  30. quarry creek Do you even English Bro?
    2
  31. brainflash1 No, they are selling it to solar farm developers and giving it over to random animals. You're a racist.
    2
  32. brainflash1 Oh really? If they legally sold the land, why is the BLM demanding to exercise the right of first refusal when they sell it?
    2
  33. ***** There was no poaching. All evidence to that effect was thrown out... and no convictions exist. As for "hundreds" of acres... The total was less than 150 in a fire they had permission to set. (It spread from their farm, shit happens.) Oh, and according to the BLM survey at the time, the value of the land was improved. The "illegal" fire burned less than one acre...
    2
  34. ***** Bureau of Land Management. Black Lives Matter are racist assholes, but they are not seizing anybody's property. They just burn down the occasional neighborhood and loot the occasional CVS.
    2
  35. ***** Black Lives Matter can't burn down a chunk of downtown Baltimore... Where was the call for airstrikes and "shoot to kill" orders there? The Bundy situation is a peaceful sit-in. Nobody was hurt. They didn't break in, they had keys. Their protest is closer to MLK than Black Lives Matter ever is.
    2
  36. BobWaffleMan They repeatedly said that they will use force to defend themselves against violence. That's their right in a free country.
    2
  37. ***** Well, unlike the Bundys, the Black Lives Matter sociopaths have a tendency to cause mass property damage. Unlike against Black Lives Matter, the US government has a bad history of dealing with protests by white people. Waco, Ruby Ridge, etc... If Waco was occupied by a non-white "minority" group, there would have been riots in every US city.
    2
  38. BobWaffleMan Oh really? So the sit-ins were more morally justified because they didn't prepare to defend themselves against unjustified violence? Really? They were breaking the exact same laws. Black Lives Matter occupies government buildings all the time. Occupy Wall Street shut down dozens of public roads and parks. Where were that calls to murder them?
    2
  39. walkwithme No, but when they take decisive action, they are not shy about arming themselves to resist government violence. I find it telling that nobody rioted over Waco where the US government burned dozens of women and children alive. I guarantee you that if they were black, there would have been riots in every major US city. That's nothing less than simple racism.
    2
  40. BobWaffleMan If you don't see the moral authority of defending yourself against unjustified violence then we have nothing to discuss.
    2
  41. jmoushm0uth Who is doing the shooting? The only thing that they said they are going to do is defend themselves. Just as at the Bundy ranch two years ago, nobody is going to get hurt if the government doesn't start shit.
    2
  42. jmoushm0uth Nobody works there. The building is unused during winter months. It's no different than the Black Panthers' march on the California state capitol. I don't seem to remember anybody threatening to shoot them or calling them terrorists.
    2
  43. K.O. Illuminati Oh really? [CITATION NEEDED] Saying you are ready to defend yourself is not a death threat. Oh, and I guess it's only terrorism when white people do it? I guess that when Black Lives Matter burns down chunks of Baltimore that's a "peaceful protest"? One that needs to be given "room to destroy"? Face it, you're just a racist.
    2
  44. jmoushm0uth Oh really? So parking an armed group in the California state hall is not "occupying"? Really? There are no threats here either. Saying "If you attack me, I will fight back" is not a death threat.
    2
  45. K.O. Illuminati Except that's not what they said. They said that if they are attacked, they are ready to defend themselves. What they are doing is exercising their first amendment right to protest and using their second amendment right to make sure that force is not used against them.
    2
  46. K.O. Illuminati No breaking in happened. They had keys. I see little difference between occupying a BLM office and occupying a state house.
    2
  47. K.O. Illuminati You're the ones who brought the Brady bunch into it. I was talking about how the BLM is using trumped up BS charges to drive ranchers off their land.
    2
  48. K.O. Illuminati Neither are the Hammonds, whose mistreatment the Bundys are there to protest.
    2
  49. K.O. Illuminati Terrorists? Really? Do you even English bro? What does that make Black Lives Matter? It's an odd terrorist group that does not kill anyone or threaten to do so unless attacked. But hey, they're white. Guess that makes them terrorists in your racist mind view.
    2
  50. K.O. Illuminati I was actually talking about the clowns who invade university libraries and shout at students about their "white privilege". But the point is that these guys are actually as peaceful as you claim Black Lives Matter are. They haven't hurt anyone. They took over some unused buildings. The only differences are... 1. They are white. 2. They are prepared to defend themselves. Please tell me how that makes them "terrorists".
    2