Comments by "" (@pwrserge83) on "A Vanishing History: Gullah Geechee Nation" video.

  1. Funny how when developers do it to minorities it's an outrage. When the BLM does it to white ranchers and miners, it's normal government behavior and people who speak up against it are "terrorists"... #yallqueda #fullretard #SJWracists
    34
  2. I love this quote... "Either you have to be Progressive, or you will be taxed out, run out, or moved out. Eventually, it will happen." That's exactly what's wrong with progressivism.
    10
  3. BobWaffleMan The hubbub in Oregon is over a federal land grab identical to this situation, except the victims happen to be white. I notice how these guys aren't being charged with terrorism.
    3
  4. jmoushm0uth right... because how dare people mistreated by the government arm themselves... Oh... Wait... http://www.pbs.org/hueypnewton/actions/actions_capitolmarch.html I guess it's only a problem when they are white.
    3
  5. quarry creek Do you even English Bro?
    2
  6. brainflash1 No, they are selling it to solar farm developers and giving it over to random animals. You're a racist.
    2
  7. brainflash1 Oh really? If they legally sold the land, why is the BLM demanding to exercise the right of first refusal when they sell it?
    2
  8. ***** There was no poaching. All evidence to that effect was thrown out... and no convictions exist. As for "hundreds" of acres... The total was less than 150 in a fire they had permission to set. (It spread from their farm, shit happens.) Oh, and according to the BLM survey at the time, the value of the land was improved. The "illegal" fire burned less than one acre...
    2
  9. ***** Bureau of Land Management. Black Lives Matter are racist assholes, but they are not seizing anybody's property. They just burn down the occasional neighborhood and loot the occasional CVS.
    2
  10. ***** Black Lives Matter can't burn down a chunk of downtown Baltimore... Where was the call for airstrikes and "shoot to kill" orders there? The Bundy situation is a peaceful sit-in. Nobody was hurt. They didn't break in, they had keys. Their protest is closer to MLK than Black Lives Matter ever is.
    2
  11. BobWaffleMan They repeatedly said that they will use force to defend themselves against violence. That's their right in a free country.
    2
  12. ***** Well, unlike the Bundys, the Black Lives Matter sociopaths have a tendency to cause mass property damage. Unlike against Black Lives Matter, the US government has a bad history of dealing with protests by white people. Waco, Ruby Ridge, etc... If Waco was occupied by a non-white "minority" group, there would have been riots in every US city.
    2
  13. BobWaffleMan Oh really? So the sit-ins were more morally justified because they didn't prepare to defend themselves against unjustified violence? Really? They were breaking the exact same laws. Black Lives Matter occupies government buildings all the time. Occupy Wall Street shut down dozens of public roads and parks. Where were that calls to murder them?
    2
  14. walkwithme No, but when they take decisive action, they are not shy about arming themselves to resist government violence. I find it telling that nobody rioted over Waco where the US government burned dozens of women and children alive. I guarantee you that if they were black, there would have been riots in every major US city. That's nothing less than simple racism.
    2
  15. BobWaffleMan If you don't see the moral authority of defending yourself against unjustified violence then we have nothing to discuss.
    2
  16. jmoushm0uth Who is doing the shooting? The only thing that they said they are going to do is defend themselves. Just as at the Bundy ranch two years ago, nobody is going to get hurt if the government doesn't start shit.
    2
  17. jmoushm0uth Nobody works there. The building is unused during winter months. It's no different than the Black Panthers' march on the California state capitol. I don't seem to remember anybody threatening to shoot them or calling them terrorists.
    2
  18. K.O. Illuminati Oh really? [CITATION NEEDED] Saying you are ready to defend yourself is not a death threat. Oh, and I guess it's only terrorism when white people do it? I guess that when Black Lives Matter burns down chunks of Baltimore that's a "peaceful protest"? One that needs to be given "room to destroy"? Face it, you're just a racist.
    2
  19. jmoushm0uth Oh really? So parking an armed group in the California state hall is not "occupying"? Really? There are no threats here either. Saying "If you attack me, I will fight back" is not a death threat.
    2
  20. K.O. Illuminati Except that's not what they said. They said that if they are attacked, they are ready to defend themselves. What they are doing is exercising their first amendment right to protest and using their second amendment right to make sure that force is not used against them.
    2
  21. K.O. Illuminati No breaking in happened. They had keys. I see little difference between occupying a BLM office and occupying a state house.
    2
  22. K.O. Illuminati You're the ones who brought the Brady bunch into it. I was talking about how the BLM is using trumped up BS charges to drive ranchers off their land.
    2
  23. K.O. Illuminati Neither are the Hammonds, whose mistreatment the Bundys are there to protest.
    2
  24. K.O. Illuminati Terrorists? Really? Do you even English bro? What does that make Black Lives Matter? It's an odd terrorist group that does not kill anyone or threaten to do so unless attacked. But hey, they're white. Guess that makes them terrorists in your racist mind view.
    2
  25. K.O. Illuminati I was actually talking about the clowns who invade university libraries and shout at students about their "white privilege". But the point is that these guys are actually as peaceful as you claim Black Lives Matter are. They haven't hurt anyone. They took over some unused buildings. The only differences are... 1. They are white. 2. They are prepared to defend themselves. Please tell me how that makes them "terrorists".
    2
  26. K.O. Illuminati I hate to break it to you, but you can't hijack an unoccupied building. As I said. Do you even English bro?
    2
  27. K.O. Illuminati Oh really? So buildings where there are no people for months at a time are "occupied"? Really? Sounds like you do not, in fact, English.
    2
  28. K.O. Illuminati Except a car is not a building. You can hijack a car, you cannot hijack a building, by definition. Words have meanings fucktard.
    2
  29. K.O. Illuminati By your definition, the Black Lives Matter students are "hijacking" that library. That makes THEM terrorists. Go fuck yourself you racist piece of shit.
    2
  30. K.O. Illuminati Yes... You're so "kind" calling a bunch of peaceful protestors "terrorists"...
    2
  31. K.O. Illuminati Saying you will defend yourself if attacked is not a threat, and buildings cannot be "hijacked" by definition. As I said earlier. Do you even English bro? Go read a fucking dictionary you SJW sack of shit.
    2
  32. K.O. Illuminati Yeah... No, you really haven't your racist piece of shit. Don't you have a cross burning to get to?
    2
  33. XWolf211 If they start shooting, they won't be the only ones. We won't tolerate another Waco.
    2
  34. faROCK03 Actually, you have no idea what that case is about. They had valid leases. This is about ranchers who set a few routine controlled fires getting charged with terrorism as a way to leverage them out of their ranch.
    2
  35. Miykah LeYisrael I'm the guy with the law and criminology degree that knows what the hell is going on.
    1
  36. ***** Ranchers getting charged with terrorism as a method for the BLM to leverage them out of their ranch. Please try to keep up you racist piece of shit.
    1
  37. ***** So the BLM displacing locals is somehow different than companies doing the exact same thing? Really?
    1
  38. ***** Really? It's private land seized through legal strong arming. Why you steal my wallet is irrelevant against the fact that you stole it.
    1
  39. ***** "Kill off nature freely" are you fucking high? It was their land for over a century. They did far more to maintain it than the government ever did. (If they didn't they would have been out of business decades ago.) Go away you racist piece of shit.
    1
  40. ***** Bullshit. The "refuge" exists because the BLM strongarmed farms into selling the land to them by artificially lowering the property values. As for "over hunting"... You do realize that there are ten times more deer in the US today than in the 1700s? Right?
    1
  41. ***** Really? Is that why nobody was ever convicted of poaching and why deer are practically an invasive species in the area? Go away little racist. You don't know shit about the case. Oh, and the difference between me and a SJW is that a SJW wants the government to force people to do shit at gunpoint. I want the government to leave people the fuck alone.
    1
  42. ***** Yes fucktard. When deer, that have no natural predators, overpopulate an area, they become an invasive species by moving into habitats where they previously didn't exist. That's exactly what is happening to deer all over the fucking country.
    1
  43. MsTokies Ok... You need to read up on where the land in that "nature preserve" came from and get the full story of what the BLM has been up to in Oregon. Basically, they have been doing everything they can to buy up all the ranches around the "preserve" by strong-arming the owners.
    1
  44. MsTokies Fucktard, you do realize that they are not ALLOWED to buy the land? Right? Most ranchers would be more than happy to buy all the land they use, however, due to a eco-faggot putsch in the BLM ~50 years ago, they have a policy of not selling land. Oh and ranchers do not degrade the value of the land they use. Most of the time, they vastly increase it by providing improvements and management that the BLM refuses to.
    1
  45. MsTokies Bullshit. There is more forest coverage in North America today than in 1700.
    1
  46. MsTokies Yeah... Last time I checked, I can say whatever the fuck I want. That's the beauty of living in a free country.
    1
  47. MsTokies It's easier when I own my own business.
    1
  48. cinnireseisri Good to know. Just remember you said that when we get fed up with your shit and start putting statist fucks like you up against the wall.
    1
  49. MsTokies Yeah... Too bad it's a free country. No court has the authority to tell a private business how to run.
    1
  50. MsTokies So sorry, I don't need a license to engage in private transactions. What part of "private business" do you not understand. No government has the authority to tell me what I can and cannot do with my property.
    1
  51. ***** Really? [CITATION NEEDED] Ancient history doesn't count. Shit happened, sucks to be you. Not my problem. You don't see me demanding that the US pay me reparations for the property taken from my family by the Bolsheviks with US approval?
    1
  52. ***** Yeah, they mostly vote Demokkkrat. Or did you forget who the Dixiecrats were. There's a reason why the DNC has not won the south since the end of segregation.
    1
  53. ***** Yeah, putting an uncut passage in quotes makes it irrelevant. Again... 50% of homicides, 30% of police shootings. So again, go fuck yourself.
    1
  54. ***** Bullshit. I already produced a source. You keep pulling numbers out of your ass.
    1
  55. ***** Yeah... No... You need to go look up how citations work. Putting bullshit in quotes ain't it. But please, keep pushing your racism on others. Sooner or later your projecting might make you feel better.
    1
  56. Would you prefer we just gassed you fuckers? Don't forget, we are still the overwhelming majority and have most of the guns.
    1