Comments by "Matuse" (@Matuse) on "Flat Earth Theory - How Was It Debunked 2,000 Years Ago?" video.

  1. If the object is tall enough, you can see it. However, your vague proclamation with no evidence of any kind just shows how little flat earthers care about the truth.
    6
  2.  @happyfridge1  You're not doing anything for me. Supplying basic information about data you claim to have collected is BARE MINIMUM. Why should I trust a word you say? I have no reason to do that. All flat earthers lie every time about everything. No exceptions. You have zero credibility of any kind on any topic. Chicago at 53 miles ground level...is meaningless. It literally means nothing. Laser test? What? Again: Meaningless. I doubt you could do the 8 inches per mile squared formula accurately, and even if you did, there are 4 variables in the visibility of an object: Viewer height, target height, distance between viewer and target, and the index of refraction. Please detail how "8 inches per mile squared" accounts for those variables. Because if you can't account for most of the variables, then your claim is empty nonsense.
    5
  3. It's easy to prove. It's impossible to get you flerf imbeciles to admit you're wrong.
    3
  4. So...you are flat.
    1