Youtube comments of bobbypaycheque (@bobbypaycheque).

  1. 244
  2. 120
  3. 78
  4. 61
  5. 48
  6. 47
  7. 37
  8. 29
  9. 28
  10. 27
  11. 25
  12. 25
  13. 19
  14. 18
  15. 17
  16. 16
  17. 14
  18. 13
  19. 11
  20. 11
  21. 11
  22. 10
  23. 10
  24. 9
  25. 7
  26. 7
  27. 7
  28. 7
  29. 7
  30. 7
  31. 6
  32. 6
  33. 6
  34. 6
  35. 5
  36. 5
  37. 5
  38. 5
  39. 4
  40. 4
  41. 4
  42. 4
  43. 4
  44. 4
  45. 4
  46. 4
  47. The CoC is vague and doesn't outline clear offences. That is the exact problem. Nothing Damore did was 'stupid,' unless you consider having the chops to be a Google dev and having a fact based opinion (that his employer asked for) "stupid." He did what was normal for people in his department to do, upload his opinion to a chat that was used for exactly that. It wasn't 'generally frowned upon' as it is why the chat existed. He wasn't a political activist, he is a software engineer. His memo also got leaked and was a private communication within the department before that. He rather rightly criticized the vague and unsubstantiated policies of the company against facts. What about his memo was so "serious?" I am going to assume that you don't work in CS, have never worked for a Big4 and generally aren't accustomed to how idiotic in practice the CoC is when loons start using it to push their agenda. Google shouldn't even have a political opinions as a company. They should not have instigated the conversation in the first place. Their goal should be to make money for them and their shareholders, crush their competition and get better at what they do. In that order. Period. Thank god I work at a place now where that is literally all they are concerned with and don't preach down idiotic identity politics to us. The CoC is trash, written by a snowflake (who said it is a political document meant to push an identity politics agenda) and adopted by sensitive little snowflakes who can't hack it in a merit based environment.
    4
  48. 4
  49. 4
  50. 3
  51. 3
  52. 3
  53. 3
  54. 3
  55. 3
  56. 3
  57. 3
  58. 3
  59. 3
  60. 3
  61. 3
  62. 3
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. It isn't anecdotal at all, it is evidenced not only in history but throughout the world today. You cannot integrate a group that has radically different core beliefs into a society peacefully. Those 'few generations' can be extremely bloody ones, as they were to Europeans during migration periods. It would be best to avoid that. The reality is the top ten most peaceful countries in the world have extremely low levels of cultural diversity: Iceland, Austria (pre-migrant crisis), New Zealand (essentially just natives and Europeans), Portugal, Czech Republic, Switzerland, Slovenia, Japan/Singapore (tie) and Canada (although this is changing rapidly as crime has trended up in Toronto and Vancouver.) When we look at the ten least peaceful countries we see tribal divides over ethnicity, culture and religion take their toll: Syria, South Sudan (constant strife between Dinka, Nuer, Bari, and Azande), Iraq (even before the Iraq War the oppression of the Kurds), Afghanistan (before the Russian invasion there was widespread conflict between the Pashtun and Tajik), Somalia (tribal conflicts and religious wars), Yemen (civil war over religion and tribalism), CAR (civil war between Seleka and government), Ukraine, Sudan (tribal, religion), Libya. Nowhere near the least peaceful countries are Russia and Brazil (despite the fact that Brazil is very diverse, Caucasian, African, Natives, Pardo etc.) so I don't know why you pointed to them as particularly violent. What we see as common threads throughout history to today is that migration and the melding of cultures breeds violence and conflict. This is avoidable by simply closing off borders to mass migration of undocumented people from cultures incompatible with liberal Western values. Either the liberal among us honestly look at the situation and admit the problem of mass migration into our society or we let the far right dominate the conversation and set the policy that will eventually deal with it. The path of least violence is the best and that is one of simply not allowing undocumented mass migration into Western society.
    2
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 1
  100. ***** Well, for one the human body is not proportioned to ten. So for making a doorway 7 feet is standard here. Easier to measure than 2.1336 meters. The proportions of a hand built chair is easier when using feet and inches rather than a decimal point of a meter or a large number of centimeters. Rarely in nature is the rule of ten observed, but there are natural ratios such as Phi, or The Golden Ratio for which there are rulers. I've never built anything where using metric would be more convenient and even though Canada is a 'metric nation' I don't know of a single carpenter, cabinet maker or bespoke furniture builder who uses metric. I get why metric is good for some things but for the day to day measurement of building materials, liquids like beer and petrol and the measurement of speed and distance most people here still casually use Imperial. I personally find it much more natural to say I was racing my motorcycle at 100mph rather than 160.9 kph. It is annoying that some people feel that metric is somehow more accurate, which just isn't true. The main difference is with metric everything is divisible by ten and with Imperial it isn't. But that doesn't make Imperial inaccurate or mean that metric is superior for every application and vice versa. In my opinion Imperial isn't even complicated (unless you're an idiot.) There are good real world application reasons there are wet and dry units in Imperial for instance, which critics of that distinction claim there is no need for. So I don't get the world hate for Imperial. Is it just me or do people seem snobby about metric? 
    1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. Jeremy Bowser People came together and built cities and infrastructure out of self preservation and later to accommodate greater economic output. Profit, basically. It isn't 'bitching,' as you so eloquently put it, to simply expect the same treatment as everyone else, regardless of how much money I make. Tax brackets are ultimately unfair. You basically say as much. You cannot legislate morality. If I had to pay a higher percentage of tax than someone who made half as much as I did, I wouldn't bother. Running a business is stressful, and is way more than 70 hours most weeks. If I only took home a small percentage more than the guy earning less, I would take a 40 hour a week job earning less. Money is the motivator. I don't owe you, or anyone else a living. Check you entitlement at the door and work hard like I did, and you WILL succeed. Keep whining about how the state is looking after you and prepare to whine for the rest of your life. High minimum wage will only result in A) more qualified people settling for the jobs the poor used to occupy because the money is so much better, and B) more automation, which simply eliminates those jobs and replaces them with very technical ones that the poor can't do. Either way, a high minimum wage punishes the very people it is trying to help. Let the market be free, and let people have a reason to seek self improvement. It is never your right to dictate that I owe more than anyone else or take the product of my labor by force. That is the very definition of tyranny.
    1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1