Comments by "boz" (@BOZ_11) on "U.K.'s Hammond Sees `Very Real' Risk of No-Deal Brexit" video.

@andrewwalsh3744 no because a lot of brexiters want a deal; no deal = anti democratic.
5
it means that people didnt know what they were voting for. The May plan didn't exist and the result unclear.
3
@bigfootbawls538 the question in the referendum didn't have the May plan, and that needs to be voted on, whenever its finalised (maybe march)
3
@andrewwalsh3744 "We the UK voted LEAVE" - whether you acknowledge it or not, the leave vote is split between Deal and No Deal; half the total vote sit with Remain. "controlled by elites"? Parliamentarians are elite, and things have never been freer; you can register a company for £12, you can trade with little to no friction with the richest trading block in the world (EU). You're in possession of the best passports in the world giving you near carte blanche access to the rest of the world. A No Deal would mean 26+ bilateral agreements, most of which will be less good than the terms we currently enjoy. Wholesalers will have to fill out manifest forms thicker than the bible for some of these countries. Our currency will plummet, making us all poorer. If there was some chance of a little teething trouble toward a brighter future, I'd be for it, but I've yet to see one good argument for a No Deal
3
@andrewwalsh3744 what you're missing is that we cannot devalue our way to prosperity. we will literally all be poorer in a No Deal
2
That's not true. The tiny smattering of business owners who've endorsed Brexit moved their operations abroad (Rees Mog and Dyson to name two)
1
@mre7550 the pound has already fallen against the dollar just on the mere news of Brexit, and we haven't left yet. Apparently the Brexiteers are in a major rush to become poorer
1
@bigfootbawls538 all that spiel, and yet the referendum is not legally binding. It's not against the electorate since the vote was split. You tards act like it was 70/30. It was 51.8%
1