Comments by "boz" (@BOZ_11) on "Former Israeli PM, Naftali Bennett, responds to power cuts affecting life support in Gaza" video.

  1. the white guy is literally being a n@z1 by espousing ethnic cleansing of Palestinians
    2
  2.  @jettser17UK  between the land within its 1967 borders, East Jerusalem, Area C and its control of borders/airspace in the remaining areas, some estimates put Israel's total control at around 90% of the former Mandatory Palestine territory. Palestinians have no standing army (just rag-tag two-bit militia), so 96% of all dead people in this conflict since the 1940s, are Palestinian. It's not "defence", it's land grabs and ethnic cleansing
    1
  3.  @jettser17UK 785 Please read what I write. I said Israel should have abided by the United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine (1947). The plan was approved, but Israel kept up with their land grabs and ethnic cleansing. You say the Jews should be there, but not the Palestinians; if you're happy with ethnic cleansing and/or genocide, then just say that. Quicker
    1
  4. ​ @jettser17UK  Jews haven't had an administration there since the Babylonian exile, back in 600BC. Moreover, the Palestinians are genetically linked to Levantine Jews (the irony). Moreover, you didn't know that the Siege of Jerusalem (636) was Arabs vs Eastern Romans (Greeks, not Jews). It was a change in administration, and a large chunk of the population were not only Jews, but Byzantine Greeks, Samaritans, Arabs (arrived before the Rashiduns from the Arabian peninsula), Persians, and Armenians. The Palestinians rejected the UN plan, but that was no reason to take 90% of Mandatory Palestinian, initiate an apartheid regime, ethnic cleansing, and the forced removal of 700,000 Palestinians from their homes (Nakba). Moreover, the plan was disliked because it gave most of the agriculturally and commercially valuable land, including the central coast and the Negev desert, to Israel. The Palestinian state was left with mainly hilly regions. Palestinians argued that since they made up the majority of the population in the region, they should be given more land and sovereignty; giving the Jewish minority the majority of the territory made no sense given their respective populations. The British left because of terrorist attacks on British police (stations, posts, officers) by Zionist Jews. Start as you mean to go on, eh? "and your side lost and the rest is history" It's hilarious that you think the Palestinians are my "side". You're so painstakingly obtuse, that you earnestly believe that my objections could not be moral, in nature, but some partisan tribal allegiance. I'm neither Arab, nor Palestinian, nor Muslim. I simply acknowledge Nazism when I see it, which is ironic because the current Jewish settlement is entirely modern, and are there because of the nazi pogrom in the 1930s. One last thing about Nazism, look into the 'Havaara Agreement' between the nazis and Zionist jews. I'm sure you can manage a search engine
    1