Comments by "DeoMachina" (@DeoMachina) on "ContraPoints"
channel.
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Interesting argument - so trans teens don't have the maturity to commit to decisions with permanent consequences...so what if a trans teen decides to NOT transition? Isn't that equally permanent?
Come to think of it, what about cis teens who want the same type of healthcare? Young cis men get mascectomies sometimes - should that practice end? Interested to hear what your opinion on that is.
Additionally, some points you brought up are incorrect:
It's been a long time since Rowling was 'benign' or 'factual'. The terf position is incorrect from a scientific perspective - read some advanced biology for details. Also, Rowling has gone way off the deep end, and has publicly claimed we cannot assume trans people to be innocent before guilty. (This is one of the less offensive things she's said)
" If you weren't shameless hypocrites, you'd probably be attacking Islam for its views on 'LGBTQ' issues. For now, though, you have a cease-fire agreement, because you see Muslims as another victimized minority, shivering beneath the same Intersectionalist umbrella"
Interesting you'd choose to frame it this way while a majority-muslim population are facing genocide. Should we NOT see them as victims?
Regardless: Islam isn't a person. Who are we meant to 'attack' exactly? The inventors of Islam are long dead. There are also LGBTQ Muslims, don't they deserve support?
Not as interested in hearing what you have to say on those corrections - these aren't really 'opinions' - you're just wrong.
4