Comments by "Unbias" (@cccpkingu) on "" video.

Cities are not good for the environment, and the crowding of them is not driven by the interest of people it is done to.
3
Zoning laws are there to facilitate stratification of society. If you lose your high-trust society to non-homogeneity it means having to do zoning, selling gated communities as a service, or driving. You would be insane to cycle through the non-homogeneous areas of NA. Just because an area is "diverse" and productive doesn't mean it isn't a hard selector for raw intelligence.
2
Correlation does not imply causation. Don't delude yourself into thinking the people in the financial district don't have cars. The more productive people is a selection bias, and you will find them in the more humane areas. Unproductive people and the areas they inhabit will not turn into economic powerhouses just because cars are removed. That being said, it is a good idea to remove the dependency on cars from cities from an economical standpoint, but you didn't touch on it.
1
@tomasfernandez9045 What do you think makes areas productive as a measure of average income?
1
@uignireddngfiurdsgfiurdse That is fabrication. I am pointing out the correlation between people as productive or not on the areas they inhabit. You will find productive people move out of unproductive areas at the earliest of opportunity. It is not a binary, but rather a market system with a Pareto distribution. Making areas more habitable grants its inhabitants more economic sovereignty, as independent from car dependence, and healthier by reduction of noise, etc.
1