Comments by "" (@thomasneal9291) on "Astrum" channel.

  1. "The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long - and you have burned so very, very brightly, Cassini."
    38
  2.  @PongoXBongo  why is it a demotion? why do people get emotional tied up in what we name things? it's really weird.
    9
  3. frack the moon?? wtf are you even talking about.
    4
  4. model is not outdated. it has been refined. it's still commonly referred to as big bang, even though it's more detailed than that. as to the next, certainly you know how to use google?
    4
  5. "So due to perspective of earthly experiences NASA assumed all rocks are hard." nope. we know earth rocks can age and become brittle over time as well. "The Earth is very unique " Now THERE'S an assumption.
    3
  6.  @hardchemist  "Interplanetary travel needs a good business case" no, it doesn't. increasing our basic knowledge is ALWAYS justified.
    3
  7. the argument from ignorance is not an argument. it is a fallacy.
    3
  8.  @HVYMETL  " I do not forgive actual scientists for ignoring angular momentum which results in their false conclusions." show me a single example in a peer reviewed publication.
    3
  9.  @generaleerelativity9524  there's actually a lot more space than anything else... everywhere. including ourselves.
    3
  10.  @SimonSenaviev  none are so sure than those who know nothing.
    2
  11. ask yourself why you care so much. really. why.
    2
  12. neither do you. there are no plans for any other excursions to pluto atm.
    2
  13.  @georgeofhamilton  my guess is it was just due to simple weather conditions, which delayed the launching of the first probe until after the second was ready to go.
    2
  14. yes, why care about definitions of things you don't understand? just be contrarian because you enjoy being five years old and getting your way.
    2
  15. Just so long as we don't tell them about the Allspark.
    2
  16. the short answer is: simple math vs chaotic math. the long answer will take you years of study to understand. just don't pretend you understand anything without actually studying the subject first.
    2
  17. perhaps these things are left to minds that have actually spent the time studying them. don't hurt yourself worrying about it.
    2
  18. ^delusional
    2
  19. gravity. simple as that.
    2
  20. yeah, that's the gas that neoliberals breathe: MEEEEthane.
    2
  21. there might not be. there are not any currently planned.
    2
  22. no... the SURFACE is only 100 million years old, which means it gets rapidly recycled (geologically speaking).
    2
  23.  @zoranbeader6441  "Even we aren't destructive just for the sake of destruction." not so sure about that. humans can rationalize anything.
    2
  24. all you have to do is spend 10 million or so on your phone.
    2
  25. ...for this probe.
    2
  26. I'm holding out for wormholes.
    2
  27. because space x is not a nonprofit company. simple as that. this is why we NEVER should have left space exploration to private corporations, and why republicans who believe the market can to better are ALWAYS wrong.
    1
  28. renditions based on actual observations though, not imagination.
    1
  29. christ, what fucking insanity.
    1
  30. elon is little more than a childish narcissist, who got rich through self manipulation of his own stocks, illegally. ANYBODY else would and should have done better. If elon is the best mankind can produce to manage space exploration... we are all doomed.
    1
  31. how ignorant are you? want to buy a surefire way to get yourself out of traffic tickets?
    1
  32.  @louthinator  "no the reason earth and moon isn;'t called the earth system is because it orbits the sun and nothing else" this is entirely incorrect. both the earth system and all other planetary systems in our solar system orbit the sun, but all objects in it also orbit each other. all that matters visually is where the center of mass is for each level you define the system at. the ONLY difference between earth/moon and pluto/moon is the point of mass they both revolve around is much closer to the center of the earth for the earth system, because the mass of the earth relative to the moon is so much greater. all the objects in the solar system ALSO influence each other, but the distances between them allow us to separate them into systems. it is just nomenclature of a useful nature to define each major element as a system, divided into star systems, stars, planet systems, planets, etc. Any real astrophysicist already knows this. please stop attempting to mis-inform people.
    1
  33. that is not what the title was referring to. it was referring to images from THIS probe.
    1
  34. did he say "terrifying"? no? stfu.
    1
  35. well, that would literally NOT be falling now, would it. you are actively using energy to change your relationship to the gravity well.
    1
  36. why are people so emotionally attached to the concept of a "planet" being somehow "better" than a dwarf planet? it's damn weird.
    1
  37. maybe there are people who aren't you that haven't heard about the full story? you think the world revolves around just you, sunshine?
    1
  38. not from THIS probe.
    1
  39. not if we keep chaining ourselves to the outdated fairy tales of ancient goat herders.
    1
  40.  @stephenpage-murray7226  and who made that god?
    1
  41.  @jeffdunhamvevo953  uh, no. there is no free oxygen on Titan. it's 98% nitrogen.
    1
  42.  @stephanieparker1250  " there’s a lot of dust and micrometeorites flying around out there" not really.
    1
  43. that's not what defines a planet on its own. words do have proper definitions.
    1
  44. nobody likes you?
    1
  45. I'd hate to see the egg they are meant to fertilize then!
    1
  46. ...from that probe.
    1
  47.  @MrWhizardsLizard  dude, trust me, you're delusional, and need serious mental health care.
    1
  48. also known as Trump voters?
    1
  49. that is not a correction, but rather outright incorrect. the mantle is in fact a very dense liquid. glass is also a liquid, btw.
    1
  50. based on???
    1
  51. it's not complicated. he was talking about from THIS probe.
    1
  52. it would be nice if you didn't misinterpret what the title is referring to.
    1
  53. er.. it's not hard. a probe we sent a while back just arrived at the sun recently.
    1
  54. why? because he's referring to the fact this probe will not be able to send us pictures any more? are you that dumb?
    1
  55. he likely meant from this probe.
    1
  56. why is that funny?
    1
  57. I'd rather work on something tangible, instead of something that does not exist, thanks.
    1
  58. no, the russians wasted all their money on producing oligarchs instead of improving their own research and technology. they are now left to stealing from their neighbors to fund basic needs.
    1
  59.  @richardaitkenhead  I look at numbers, not media. that's you're error you're projecting.
    1
  60. reported as spam.
    1
  61. because elements have specific and consistent reflection of light wavelengths. we have identified elements in this way for many decades now. your ignorance is not an argument, but a fallacy. stop pretending it matters what you think, when you know nothing.
    1
  62. You're completely delusional if you think climate science is a lucrative career
    1
  63. you can fast forward through the video, you know? don't speak for the rest of us.
    1
  64. it's all relative.
    1
  65.  @toby-xo6rb  "Don't worry, Elon will fix it." ROFLMAO you think there is mismanagment at NASA?? none of you elon fanboyz has a clue how poorly managed his businesses are, and how much money they waste.
    1
  66. worrying about your interactions with others... is the best way to not have any.
    1
  67. "nasa 99.9 % white men" wasn't even true when the US launched their first orbital. Not saying there wasn't sexism in ALL science that still exists, but 99.9% is quite the exaggeration
    1
  68. from this probe. duh.
    1
  69. I do wish streamers would take a tad more time to research the people they decide to advertise more often.
    1
  70.  @Emdee5632  he's being racist, but he doesn't want to take responsibility for that and get his comment deleted. I'll help him out and report it correctly as racist.
    1
  71. complete gibberish.
    1
  72. How much tidal heat would be generated on Pluto given Charon is so close?
    1
  73. seek medical assistance.
    1
  74. for this probe. duh.
    1
  75.  @Релёкс84  if that were true, neptune and uranus would have more moons.
    1
  76. depends on what you want to trust them for. models are used all the time to great effect. your computer would not now exist if we didn't use models to calculate the needed materials.
    1
  77. dwarf planet + all immediately orbiting objects. same as all other planets in our solar system.
    1
  78. you don't understand the function of models at all. do you want me to explain it to you, or would you prefer to continue in your current ignorance?
    1
  79. "Much of the planet's mantle consists of magma" -Nat Geo he's clearly referring to the mantle as magma, which is fine for generalized purposes.
    1
  80. no.
    1
  81. what are you babbling about?
    1
  82.  @leecowell8165  "we have no choice but to use a CHEMICAL rocket " incorrect. We will build either moon bases or orbital construction facilities in the relatively near future. no need to use energy to escape earth's gravity.
    1
  83. they are clearly referring to images from THIS PROBE. gees.
    1
  84. a black hole coming from where???
    1
  85. ever consider you might be misinterpreting it, and it simply refers to THIS probe?
    1
  86. yup. so do we. it's just not as exaggerated.
    1
  87. our solar system is moving through space in a specific direction. pretty easy to tell from just looking at stars over time. probe was launched so that it would meet the closest edge of the heliosphere. not hard.
    1
  88. I tend to avoid self proclaimed nonscientists, thanks.
    1
  89. we switched to a disposable economy in the late 1970s and never looked back, unfortunately.
    1
  90. all you need to do is spend 10 million on your own satellite connection. ezpz.
    1
  91.  @ssgssbeet4133  " there is proof" words have actual meanings. meanings you are choosing to ignore. just stop. you're embarrassing yourself.
    1
  92. which is it then? imagination is great, or the realm of fools? the only fool I see here... is you. I don't need imagination to reach that conclusion.
    1
  93. "these the same scientists that say humanities only 5000 year old" uh, no scientist says that. that would be religious nutters.
    1
  94. that is how it's pronounced. now you know.
    1
  95. uh... how would that speed things up? EM travels at light speed already. at best, you could magnify the signal through repeaters so you wouldn't need as strong a source transmitter... but it wouldn't speed things up any.
    1
  96. it's a dwarf planetary system. the earth and its moon is another planetary system, so is saturn, its moons and its rings.
    1
  97. yes, you are.
    1
  98. These are not theories, they are hypotheses. Please use the correct verbiage.
    1
  99. I'm sure they will greatly care. or, you know... not.
    1
  100. what if is a rather useless question out of context.
    1
  101. well, maritime implies ocean. any oceans on the moon? no? there's your answer.
    1
  102. might not be the case for much longer. new dark matter detector was recently completed.
    1
  103. that's a "you" problem.
    1
  104. another elon fanboy fantasist. why don't you actually take a look at how realistic/cost effective REAL engineers think Elon's plans are. He's a friggen conman.
    1
  105. "herp derp, herp derp."
    1
  106. why do you even care. you're not a scientist. you might as well call our sun a black hole too.
    1
  107. yes, methane is relatively unreactive, much like water. you can theoretically use it as a carrier of other gases. just keep it away from oxygen... and there is no free oxygen on Titan so... yeah.
    1
  108. was covered in the media about 3 years ago... then never again. Musk has been trying to influence the politics of other countries to get cheap lithium for over a decade now. he has ALWAYS sided with right wing authoritarians in these efforts. Musk is not the hero so many think he is. he's nothing but a narcissist.
    1
  109. if you could put your tongue on it, it would instantly freeze and disintegrate.
    1
  110. elon has terrible management problems, and wastes far FAR more money than the US govt ever has. Going private with the space program was the worst thing the US has done for space exploration... ever.
    1
  111.  @JohnGardnerAlhadis  only someone with no knowledge of the history of Tesla and Musk would say something like that... so if he is a boomer, you are little more than an infant.
    1
  112.  @JohnGardnerAlhadis  as if that had any relevance to anything. mine is a friggin "T".
    1
  113.  @worfoz  well, that gives spiteful sociopaths hope, I guess.
    1
  114. it's a shame you are so utterly delusional not to see it isn't "the left" doing that. it's you.
    1
  115. you are aptly nymed.
    1
  116. can't.
    1
  117. gravity: it's everywhere.
    1
  118. so much for the modern one too.
    1
  119.  @JMJ-k8f  God didn't do the years of study required to learn my talent. mostly because it doesn't exist.
    1
  120. uh.. it doesn't? hubble cannot show us something the size of pluto in a different galaxy.
    1
  121.  @lordoffleabottom136  easily fixed: 1. go outside on a sunny day at noon. 2. look up.
    1
  122. get an adblocker.
    1
  123. there are a least half a dozen sci fi movies I can recall that show things falling into black holes. even Disney movies. maybe you just aren't old enough to have seen them?
    1
  124. "based on evolutionary theory" WTF? lol you're a moron.
    1
  125. incorrect. if anything, musk's flailings are slowing everything down. worst thing the US ever did to space exploration was to privatize it. stop playing the game of the neoliberals. they have screwed everything up.
    1
  126. do you even have a point?
    1
  127. there literally is no such thing as centrifugal force. basic frosh physics man. you should know better if you want to argue this point.
    1
  128. there is an argument to be made that the profits generated from the disposable economy are what has generated most of our newer technologies.
    1
  129.  @SicariiDTenebris  probably not. I can't really say.
    1
  130. are you off your meds again? tsk tsk.
    1
  131. there is no free oxygen on Titan, hence... no way to combust anything.
    1
  132. does it matter?
    1
  133. we have no direct, or even indirect evidence of that though. It remains a simple assumption based on numbers. a very plausible assumption, but until we actually discover ANY evidence at all, still an assumption. same as any concept of the existence of any deity, though more plausible.
    1
  134. wtf is "disrespectful" about it? it's just a classification. do you get upset if someone changes the genus a specific fish belongs to?
    1
  135. you weep for the fact that we have so much promise, but we choose instead to blow each other up?
    1
  136. they don't always face the same direction, because they are not always transmitting.
    1