Comments by "" (@thomasneal9291) on "Scott Manley" channel.

  1.  @sferrin2  "Show us the CEOs pulling down billion dollar salaries" ROFLMAO. please tell me you're kidding. what CEO of ANY multinational corp does NOT pull down billions is the better question.
    8
  2.  @user-jc5ff7tu5o  the curvature in the windows is insufficient to cause the effect Lee is talking about. but go ahead, keep deluding yourself.
    7
  3. "Backup heading to waypoint" "Tell 'em it looks purple!"
    6
  4.  @beaker2000  " Re-use is the only way to viably get to space." except we used to do it regularly without reusable boosters. just stop. you have no idea what you are talking about.
    4
  5.  @DingbatToast  "Due to the pressure, the melting point of the acrylic would also be far higher than at the surface." no. melting point is not affected by pressure, BOILING point is.
    3
  6. probably because it is. try flying more in the cheap seats.
    2
  7. If it involves Elon Munted... don't want it. only NASA should have the rights to take us to the moon, or beyond. screw privatized space exploration. it will only end badly, as has been shown repeatedly. TEN TIMES more money spent for 1/10th of the progress. I'm so tired of the neoliberals ruining literally everything.
    2
  8. "buzz aldrin saying they didn't go to the moon" Aldrin literally would have punched you in the face for saying that.
    2
  9. Elon Musk wants to talk to you.
    1
  10. get yourself a pair of 3d video glasses and load it up. there IS a 3d version of it.
    1
  11. You make just as many assumptions about that scene as NDT does. So is he wrong? Possibly. Are you wrong? Also Possibly.
    1
  12. ffs, nobody is as willfully stupid as a Flearther. nobody.
    1
  13. how about the astronomy labs charge all the companies putting up and relying on these satellites for the increased time and data loss ? I mean, fucking MUSK never asks anybody to do any of the crap he does. seems like he's the one that should be out of pocket for the effects his satellites have, right?
    1
  14.  @user-vy6vk7dq9i  it's far less than 1 degree. most people will not be able to see a declination of less than 1 degree over that kind of distance. try surveying in steps over several kilometers. you still will not be able to "see" the declination, but your measurements will prove it is there. as your friend if he knows how to survey a bridge. Or is that too "gay" for you, precious?
    1
  15. the display rotates. try it.
    1
  16.  @msidc1238  these crazy mofos always project. apparently it's the only way they can communicate.
    1
  17. dumbest question ever.
    1
  18. "Dedicate yourself to realize ..." that you failed English.
    1
  19. "there are weather balloons that reached 100 000 ft and No curve" your delusions are not fact. sooner you realize this, the better your life will become.
    1
  20. "LEVEL DOESN'T CURVE" and math doesn't english!
    1
  21.  @andygarcia5577  it's not a lens at all. it's a 3d projection of real world MEASURED data.
    1
  22. ...and then forget that such a lens would show the same curvature at every elevation. because they are stupid.
    1
  23. uh... do you speak english? gibberish seems to be your first language.
    1
  24. evidently, that's you.
    1
  25. this is literally constructed with real-world data. that is the entire point of it. it isn't going to prove to someone that the earth is a globe. not the point of it. if you aren't a complete moron, you already know the earth is a globe, because gravity exists.
    1
  26.  @mballer  "It's just too much curve being shown for the ISS elevation pics." Manly mentions the values are distorted in the simulation. watch the vid again. happy now? doofus.
    1
  27. still pretty low. the declination will be less than 1 degree at that elevation.
    1
  28. they've all already been done. let it go.
    1
  29. you need to think of your neighbor as having been coopted into a cult via a misinformation campaign. they need intervention and deprogramming, just as they would with any cult. I'm dead serious.
    1
  30. " independant weather balloons" five bucks says you saw those " independant weather balloons" displayed on a flat earther site. yet the literally hundreds of thousands of pictures on NON flat earther sites are?? all fake? which is easier to believe?
    1
  31.  @BuzzC-t3l  get lost clown
    1
  32. @Pronto "Second law of thermodynamics: there's a million ways things can go wrong...and only one way things can go right. 18 " lolwut? I hope that's a joke.
    1
  33. the display rotates, fool.
    1
  34.  @chikemadekwe5737  one, you clowns keep misquoting him. two, argument from authority. three, DeGrasse Tyson does not believe the earth is flat... so why do you dishonestly misquote him? doesn't that effectively just make you a liar? is that the BEST you can do? just outright lie? pathetic.
    1
  35. from Mike. I watched him get interviewed when he told a bunch of flat earthers that he would prove the earth is flat for them. so at best he was a scammer, which I can fully believe.
    1
  36. not high at all. just pull your head out of your ass.
    1
  37.  @mikeforner7797  "Your impetuous faith is disturbing." who even says shit like that? LOL what a doofus.
    1
  38. "airtight and irrefutable" Those words... I don't think they mean what you think they mean.
    1
  39. nope, you gotta get HIGHER dude. seriously, you have to do at least a half ounce in a couple of hours. make sure you video it or nobody will believe u!
    1
  40. do you think he's a flat earther? of course you don't. which means you are misrepresenting him. which means... you are lying. and that's all you idiots have. you lie to yourselves, and you lie to others. that's it.
    1
  41. " two extremes that are just as crazy as they believe the others are." let me introduce you to the fallacy of the golden mean....
    1
  42. I can believe it, what I can't believe is why we are LETTING people believe this crap.
    1
  43.  @AlexRubio  you KNOW deGrasse Tyson is not a flat earther. so why are you trying to misrepresent what he said? it just means you are literally slandering someone, and making yourself out to be a liar at the same time. stop lying to yourself. stop lying to others.
    1
  44. ah, but you aren't actually SEEING the curve (the declination) at sea level, you are seeing an EFFECT of the fact the earth is curved.
    1
  45.  @RogHawk  also? that nym should be reported to youtube. violates their TOS.
    1
  46. if you have a book, apparently you missed a chance to try and sell it. Hell, it isn't even listed on your own site. LOL
    1
  47. such projection, so little time
    1
  48.  @scottmanley  "Truth is, I don't really change that much when I'm really drunk." the truth is that your friends are the proper judge of THAT.
    1
  49. how can people be so stupid when there are schools?
    1
  50.  @freefreepalestine360  so... the picture taken from the moon of earth is... ? high enough? not high enough? wtf are you even talking about?
    1
  51. like your skull.
    1
  52. you can pretty easily look that up.
    1
  53. "I could do that on my first time in space" so... you spend a lot of time in space? I... see.
    1
  54. "If the earth were a wet salty ball" please don't EVER say "wet salty balls" ever again. the globe will thank u.
    1
  55. braindead levels of "high".
    1
  56.  @tonyornelas9374  you're completely delusional. seek medical assistance.
    1
  57. yes, you are.
    1
  58. ok, but what about the merch? it ain't no thing if it ain't got that swing!
    1
  59. do you enjoy lying and slandering people? because that is what you are doing when you take someone who does NOT believe in your concept of a flat earth, and then quote mine and misrepresent him. you lie. to yourself, and to everybody else.
    1
  60.  @rockbottom1014  stop projecting. you are literally the only person in this conversation that is lying. the only one. to yourself, and to everybody else.
    1
  61. it's not. it's literally a simulation based on real-world data. if you aren't using a VR headset, then you see a projected 3d image instead. there is no "fish eye" involved at all.
    1
  62. if the effect was from a lens, the distortion would be exactly the same no matter what elevation you were, right? but... it isn't.
    1
  63. nah, Scott, you did not research this very well. anybody using carbon fiber will tell you that it does NOT perform well when repeatedly put under pressure/release. each time the sub dove, it would have become more and more brittle and subject to implosion. it wasn't just an issue of sheer physical ratings, because even the navy does not have those, despite that you found they play around with it a bit. How on earth did you miss all the materials testing? How did you miss WHY the university refused to help him build this thing? HOW? do better man, do better.
    1
  64. you need a VR helmet. otherwise, you have the projected image in the video you can move around using the controls at the top of your screen.
    1
  65. no, that was actually a description of how society is going.
    1
  66. "Why People Used To Drink Rocket Fuel" fake title. they still do.
    1
  67. they are too stupid to be able to earn the cash needed. too busy flipping burgers at McDs.
    1
  68. it entirely depends on which way you have rotated the display, using the little controls at the top.
    1
  69. as another Thomas... you give us a bad name, thomas. Please never leave your parent's basement, and FFS, NEVER BREED.
    1
  70.  @georgeemil3618  also? if all it was was fish-eye distortion, that distortion would look the same at 30 miles or 30 feet. it doesn't. why are flat earthers so stupid? best question.
    1
  71. with a 3 degree angle. which he said repeatedly. which apparently you don't even understand what the word curvature means. goddamn, why do so many idiots become literally proud of their own stupidity.
    1
  72. five bucks says you misquoted him.
    1
  73. I still would happily piss on the grave of Reagan for destroying the US space program. Imagine where the world would be if the neoliberals like Reagan and Thatcher had never taken power?
    1
  74. figured that out all by yourself? genius! LOL
    1
  75. mine cannot go low enough to even hypothesize how to test it.
    1
  76. it's not FOR them. they're too dumb to tell the difference between a model and reality anyway.
    1
  77. "whole", not hole. you hole.
    1
  78. I wonder why idiots feel the need to make 3 comments instead of one.
    1
  79. we obviously slipped into an alternate dimension around 2015.
    1
  80.  @mjfw10  untrue. back in the 50s-70s, NASA was well funded. screw your drug addled memory.
    1
  81. ...would show the same curvature at every elevation. duh.
    1