Comments by "Schock Therapy" (@supriseimblack) on "Alleged Victim Testifies Against Father | Boy in a Box Trial" video.

  1. The prosecutor is strategically conflating issues of parenting style vs malicious child abuse Example: “Did Tim consult you about how you felt about his rules as a co•equal business partner?” 👆🏾 That's a very disingenuous question from Miss Oakley The media is also conflating issues but that's their job. That's why I like in the koberger situation the judge will put a gag order to protect the defendant not to protect the state. The state loves the sensation..
    1
  2. There is a woman abused like 60 dogs. According to the IQ level of the people in the chat and the comments: Whoever legally represent that individual has zero legal acumen or understanding of any of the constitutional issues involved. How do we know this? Unlikability of Client = increased probability of absence of legal acumen and cognitive athleticism.. You know just like how Kouri Richins attorney has zero legal acumen because if she did, while else would she represent a meanie bo beanie like Ms.Richins 👇🏾 Therefore even though Tim Ferreter is in great legal hands--all things considered--let's all call his lawyer racist slurs and talk about how she got her law degree from 7-11... Because that makes sense..
    1
  3. This kid was a demon child. He actually was essentially a masochist. Think of it logically: why wasn't his other Asian twin treated like that? I do not trust this kid at all. But y'all can let him live in YOUR house unsupervised. He's clearly precocious and evil.. It's a deadly combination. He's basically an Ethan Crumbley...
    1
  4. If this kid murdered another kid like that one kid who was 15, everyone in the comments would be sending such hateful bs comments towards this couple. They would be saying the same things they say about every other child Killers’ parents...
    1