Comments by "Schock Therapy" (@supriseimblack) on "Tim Ferriter's Attorney Reacts to Verdict | Boy in a Box Trial" video.

  1. I'm wondering why she didn't subpoena the psychiatrist that prescribed the clonnidinde. Or Ronan’s Family Doctor Or Ronans Psychologists + Psychiatrists so that they could tell the jury the advice that they told Tim and Tracey 👆🏾 Because they kept getting blocked by hearsay or motions in limine
    1
  2. People are SOO sSOo delusional and NARCISSISTIC and small-minded that rather than questioning their own disproportionate racist hatred of this defense attorney. They then attack courttv and Julia Janae. Julia Janae who somehow was reasonable her entire true Crime reporting career--but then just randomly had a brain aneurysm for just this SPECIFIC case. You should see how they freaked out when Vinny did a piece on this case that was actually OBJECTIVE meaning he didn't just spend 40 minutes talking about how these parents are the devils spawn. He actually juxtaposed these parents with the Oxford parents. That requires intellectual and cognitive athleticism..👇🏾 All of a sudden Vinnie has an aneurysm too. He's drinking some magic Kool-Aid. Hes crazy as well. OR 🤔 Could it be that these people are being objective and you're insulated in your own and self-righteousness. And it's usually the wine want types if you look at the usernames of these people that are so indignant they usually have a picture of their dog or it says like ‘super mama365’ as their username. When people like Vinny and Julia Janae have dedicated their lives to covering court cases. People like Ms. Maraud apparently had an aneurysm as well. Its funny it's always the most accepting people that turn into intellectual fascists when you disagree with them. So they think they have numbers because if you disagreed and you're a deleuded spawn of satan as well...
    1
  3. Wait so she's not a delusional hook*r that got her law degree from McDonald's...?!?!?!?! 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯
    1
  4. By the way, you don't appeal the facts of the case. You appeal the structure of the case. It's not a guilt/ innocence matter. It's a due process matter. If you went on a pill it's going to be because the jury misconduct. He went on a pill it's going to be because of Discovery violation. If you went on a pill it's going to be because adjudge made a wrong ruling causing ‘reversible error’ meaning the error could reverse the outcome of the case. The judge made some very very questionable calls.. And you can appeal all the way to the Supreme Court if they if they feel you have standing and they're willing to hear it... So to say that appealing is a waste of time is profoundly inaccurate..
    1
  5. 5:45 The Barrage of Objections from Ms.Roachley. Boy did she make a scene out of her objections. The objection count had to have been at 1,000k from Ms. Roachley..
    1