Comments by "Cottidae" (@CottidaeSEA) on "Asian Boss"
channel.
-
1400
-
1400
-
513
-
435
-
301
-
253
-
238
-
232
-
201
-
184
-
168
-
162
-
137
-
112
-
105
-
104
-
102
-
92
-
89
-
88
-
85
-
I feel like the problem with sexual harassment is that it's both vague and difficult to prove.
In the case of rape, even if it can be proven that sexual intercourse happened, proving that it was rape can be quite difficult in many cases.
Then there's the things people say, and while I get it, I've experienced some even as a guy, I don't think it's bad enough to report someone for it most of the time. If someone is really vicious and maybe even threatens or poses a threat in general, then it's much more relevant, but that's more a case of crime prevention rather than anything else.
Basically, there are no right answers a lot of the time. While you can trust that the offended is right the majority of the time, you still can't blindly trust someone. That'd cause more false reports to pop up, and as a result, even more cases would be questionable, effectively hurting the real victims.
71
-
58
-
58
-
51
-
49
-
46
-
44
-
40
-
36
-
35
-
31
-
In terms of varied cast, I think it's about as varied as the actual population in USA, possibly even favoring minorities. However, considering the global market, they are still lacking Asian people. I don't think it's that bad, but I do wish they'd pick Asian cast for Asian characters, black cast for black characters and so on.
Even looking at history, I don't think that things have been that unfair from a business standpoint. White characters have been popular because white people have been the main market. You don't see many white people in Chinese fiction, which makes sense. There haven't been many white people in China throughout history after all. The thing is, Chinese fiction has in general not become globally popular while the "whitewashed" stuff has. Why? Probably marketing and through English becoming more used through colonization and such, making the products easier to sell in other countries.
The people behind Hollywood are businessmen, they do it for the money. Therefore they'll obviously move to where the money is. If Asian countries become a bigger market, then they'll have more Asian characters when possible. People might be hurt by their decisions, but there's no racism involved there at the very least. Only cold and objective business.
31
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
Not only that, but there are influences from other languages as well, such as Spanish. I'm used to multiple languages as I'm from Sweden. We have 5 minority languages and our main language obviously being Swedish. However, loads of people can speak English as well, to the point where it's quite difficult to find someone who doesn't. So if they decided to make English a national language, it wouldn't make much of a difference. We learn English as soon as we start going to school, and the exposure to English is big even before that, so it's not uncommon for kids to know simple words even before that.
Besides, I just read the subtitles and didn't really care much for anything else. I don't speak Tagalog, so it's not like it'd matter to me whether they switch between languages. As you say, it's common in multilingual countries.
26
-
25
-
24
-
21
-
Honestly, preferring white skin to black skin is kind of obvious. Even if you aren't racist, you tend to look for similarities, and white people have more in common with them than black people do. Even animals do that.
As you say though, the racism is more widespread toward black people, which is a shame. To some extent, I think you should expect there to be racism, but when you can't function as normal people in society, that's when I think racism becomes a real issue. As Sam mentioned, being on the subway or trying to get a ride in a taxi, when you're being discriminated in such circumstances, then the racism is problematic. Just some person being rude once in a while isn't an issue.
18
-
cmq23 what you're saying is not wrong, but the thing is, age is kind of irrelevant once you get to a certain point. Anyone who is within 3-5 years of your own age is basically the same as you once you've reached 25 or so. Politeness is one thing, but I don't get why it's such a big deal. You'd generally use formalities with strangers either way, and when it comes to people who are close to you, you kind of relax a bit more. That stays true no matter where in the world you get. Yet South Korea has this seemingly forced system. That's what I don't understand. Why is it such a big deal to treat someone who is just a few years older than you like someone who is the same age as you? Why is that so wrong?
Based on what they are saying, it's about experience, skills, etc. It makes sense. However, you'll find that a lot of people have different experiences. Not many people can say they've received death threats, I can. That's an experience that others might not have. How should we value that? Can we value it? Some people have worked at 10 jobs at the age of 25, some have worked at 1 job, some are still looking for a job. Which of these are of the highest value? Technically, the one who has worked at 10 jobs has the most varied experiences, but the one who has worked at 1 job might be the most skilled, while the one who hasn't found a job might be studying something extremely important for the society. Who do we value highest?
It's a system based on arbitrary factors. I can accept the system and use the system, but that does not mean I agree with it. Something like superiority at a workplace, that makes more sense, because there you actually have somewhat defined borders. Age though? Unless there's a large gap, it makes little to no difference. Oh, and another thing regarding age, since they count it based on the year, there can be a really large difference, simply because of that.
18
-
18
-
18
-
18