Comments by "Judy Kraska" (@judykraska400) on "The Meng Wanzhou Affair: For the US a Brief Geopolitical Victory, But a Long Term Moral Defeat" video.

  1. Good to hear a voice of Africa on this matter. Thank you.🇦🇺🕊🇨🇳
    4
  2. I disagree. AM always presents his viewpoints as he sees them, he states, when he makes facts readouts, and he states, when he tells his personal views. Let him have his viewpoints, as you have yours. As his programs as he likes to state, have been threatened to be shut down, he has to be extremely careful, what, and how he says it. I can read well between his lines. If you would like very detailed information about Miss Meng’s arrest, and all the non proven existent accusations, you can watching all the Cyrus Janssen videos, if you have not done so. He also never rebukes anyone. I am just saying my point of view. l appreciated your comment too. 🇦🇺🕊🇨🇳
    4
  3. I believe in this process from the kidnapping side with ulterior motives has been nothing saved. They both showed their true colours, and Canada did not need to detain Ms Meng. They both lost face, but gained through their act over the period of 3 years, what Alexander said, the downfall of Huawei in the Western World, and in some Asian countries, including India. And missed out of being the no 1 phone, and equipment provider overtaking USA, and SKOREA. They accomplished to contain Huawei, but not destroy it. Chinese economics always looks at a challenge that way...”this was bad for us, but what is the bright side”...so they got more determined to overcome the seat back, and work harder to succeed, and they will — just my thoughts on the matter. Xi, and Wang Yi, Putin should contemplate, if they should attend summits, meetings with the Westerners in Western countries, they may have an accident, or get openly assassinated, better send some low keyed officials, they still will be much more educated and skilled than any Western Leader. It could be the next step after kidnapping. Thank you.
    4
  4.  @adama7752  You did not get the gist, did you. Yes, HUAWEI can claim copyright of their product, so can Nokia, and Ericsson. They share the profits of their patents. Capito.
    4
  5. It was said in many independent media, that they were real spies.
    4
  6. You said the same as Alexander. He also stated, that US succeeded in a short, brief term, bot not in the long run.
    3
  7. Thank you so much for your layman information. l understand from your information, the US did this, because it wants G5 out of its way, to introduced their own developed technology they only own, and can rule, and spy on everyone unprecedented, as they do already. Is this so? Or do they want to buy G5 out????? If it is a European/Chinese cooperation, why did Europe pulled out of Huawei???? I am still confused about the motives, and objectives from the Europeans. Waiting for your next explanation. Thank you 🙏.
    3
  8. Yes. I do not agree of letting these criminals go, but at least China has two less low lives to feed. 🇦🇺🕊🇨🇳
    3
  9. It did not. Why are so many here, who cannot understand, what the purpose was, to bring down Huawei. It did not succeed at the end, but for the past 3 years it did, Huawei is out of completion on the world stage for now — no doubt it will recover, band get back with 6G.
    2
  10. I hope you are right.
    2
  11. Despite kidnapping, Trudeau won still the election. ☹️
    2
  12. So, what is the prize the Canadian citizen paid? Having these two criminals back...
    1
  13. But China is rid of them, and does not to feed them.
    1
  14. Because you hear only what you want to hear. AM said clearly it was a short term success, as they harmed Huawei worldwhile, but not in the long term.
    1
  15. Me too. 🇦🇺🕊🇨🇳🤝🇷🇺❤️
    1
  16. Alexander said, he is not an expert on technology. If you know better, than you make such complicated matter transparent, and truthful in your own video. By the way everyone ( who wants to) knows for a long time, why the US took Huawei on, and down to the Western World, and everyone knows they will not succeed in the long term, because every evil doing will have backlash to the intention. But thank you for your information. I think AM’s points were more about, that kidnapping prominent Officials in high tech Companies is getting the norm, and China took counter measures to do the same. It is on another level. I think, l read in another comment somewhere to the Meng Wanzhou case, that she was passing through Canada with a Chinese scientist to attend a summit in South America, l think in Argentina, the scientist “committed suicide” in the USA shortly after MW arrest/kidnapping/Detention. I do not know, where this person got his information from, l have to research it again. Thank you. Cheers,
    1
  17. I disagree, this kidnapping case for geopolitical reasons could have been done arguably under any of the previous Presidents, especially under sly Obama, he would have had a better method.
    1
  18.  @GnirpsNaireip  that’s what Alex said.
    1
  19. Are you denying that Huawei was harmed, their products taken away by Europeans, India....of course it was a short term success...
    1
  20. Sorry, you did not get the gist of this whole geopolitical matter. Maybe watching Cyrus Janssen’s videos about this case will make you understand. Cheers, 🇦🇺🕊🇨🇳
    1
  21. Why do they have this Bank in China in the first place....
    1