Youtube comments of (@Yxbdyehehdudbdbdudurhfhrfh).
-
24
-
15
-
10
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
A grown man,felt peer pressured,to go back up to said hotel room.
Then,had sex twice with N.
Everything was lovely ect.
Apart from the one time after they had,had sex the second time.
N got a little upset.
N vehemently stated L and herself did not ever have sex.
L states D and himself,definitely had sex
Three times.
D denies having sex with L three times.
D states L and herself had sex once and once only.
In conclusion,
Sworn in,under oath.
L states he had consensual sex five times.
C states he had consensual sex 2 times.
Sworn in under oath
D states she had consensual sex once and once only.
N states she was raped once.
Reiterating,
Sworn in under oath means,
To tell the whole truth,nothing but the truth or so help me God.
Which most of the world population would,understand.
Is Perjury applicable in a High Court Civil Case?
Or is it only applicable in a High Court
Criminal Case?
I am neither for or against either party.
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@CC-nj8zw i didn’t read this Comment properly I was half asleep.
Yes Nate is notorious for his cardio and durability.
Connor has that one punch power,he’s known to be one of the best strikers of all time.
Nate doesn’t come on strong,
Nate hardly ever shoots on anyone.
He keeps it on the feet,most opponents shoot on him.
Notice now,All the Caucus region fighters,who only used to take it to the ground,are now putting in a lot of work on the feet striking and boxing.
All the,the predominantly boxers,strikers,kick boxers are concentrating on ground game.
Which I think is only obviously better for t bf d fighter.
I mean it’s MMA,every fighter has their weaknesses and strengths.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ajdoyle9559 I know,I understand why you’re saying that as there is a huge stigma for and against made by both men and women.
I responded to your comment because you said 90% of woman,will find him guilty anyway.
However,you didn’t say 90% of the women that are posting comments online are saying he’s guilty.
First of all,
I’m neither for or,against either party.
What I state isn’t my opinion nor am I referring to this present court case being held.
Unfortunately,for both Men and Women.
The “cry rape”, is a terminology for a sexual encounter,that is either true or not.
Although there’s always grey areas regarding anything.
Sadly,The women who do this purely on purpose,for whatever reasons that may be,
and are successful,
Destroy not only the man’s life but also his family,friends career etc.
Innocent men can go to jail.
Sadly,said situation has created an enormous amount of uncertainty and doubt,for the women who are true Victims who do get raped.
The man goes free.
The theory of men and women who side together,
Simply because they are of the same sex.
Basically tar everyone with the same brush.
Is it fair? No.
Is it ignorant and narrow minded? Yes.
Is it hypocritical? Yes.
Is it judgmental? Yes.
Generally no one actually knows the real truth unless,they were involved.
I could go on and on.
I don’t give my personal opinion.
My opinion isn’t relevant.
2
-
@lululiga333 I’m a woman and I don’t just blindly believe,another woman in regards to these types of situations,just because I’m a woman.
As that would be a contradiction,
If I had the same opinion about men,
assuming that all men,would just believe a man,
simply because he’s a man.
What I am saying applies mostly to the men,
who think this about women.
I agree with a lot of what you’re saying.
It’s also ignorant and a narrow minded view towards women,just because as you say they female and make a claim.
I think some men have this view,as whenever this situation occurs with a celebrity.
It’s plastered all over the media.
Making it seem like this is always the case.
Men and Women,aren’t as aware that men get raped by men.
As the victim who is a man,hardly ever reports it.
Hence it being not known this does happen a lot.
Which isn’t anyone’s fault,as it’s not general knowledge.
The media turns everything into a circus with so many non factual renditions of snippets any case regarding these matters.
They take everything out of context.
People don’t know the whole case.
Atm I’m neither for or against either party.
How can I give an opinion when idk every detail?
I can’t.
I have some theories.
Which I wouldn’t propose publicly.
Excellent and extremely valid points.
Thankyou for your insight.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@DailyBrainBenderTV I simply asked a question.
Toward you specifically,as it seemed to me,that you were quite well versed in the subject
Even though,
You were condescending,
Which is irrelevant to me.
“It’s really not that hard to listen to the evidence”
No,it’s not hard to listen ,to the evidence.
I explained why ,in my previous post.
Listening without reading or watching the CCTV
can be misconstrued.
I asked you to correct me.
I was interested in your response.
As what I wrote is misleading in itself.
I certainly wasn’t asking you,to be my short cut
to finding out,stuff for me.
You misconstrued what I wrote,
by giving the answer that you did.
Not hard to deceive someone.
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@IDK-bt3kl Yes,I have the same thoughts and a lot more.
I’m neither for or against each party involved.
Atm.
Im trying to think out of the box.
That is difficult to do,without of course reading the transcripts and the actual timeline.
Witness statements ect.
Even then justice doesn’t always prevail,
For either party.
It’s really hard when the media is posting or reporting on the case and there is small discrepancies in each report from the media.
We are hearing everything second hand and definitely all of it.
The media that is covering the case that are present in the court room,have a duty of care to not repeat certain things to the public.
I’m studying the case with a non biased view.
I have a few theories.
Everything you say is completely valid to try and put the pieces together.
A few scenarios I’ve put together.
She’s lying about everything and Conner and the other man are completely innocent.
They’re all lying to a degree and no one knows what really happened except the 4 of them.
I know they all definitely not telling the whole truth.Regardless of all of what we’ve seen and heard.
The memory loss,blackouts whether they are true or not.
Could have some connection and inconsistencies that could be attributed to some of her recollections,
Could be,she may have ingested,
Rohypnol or GHB or something similar without knowing it.
These drugs all have a short half life.
Depending on the time of administration in conjunction to her getting bloods and urine testing.
The cocktail of Alcohol,Coke,Zoloft and possibly one of these other drugs,
Probably not eating anything.
Could attribute to her behaviour.
I am in no way suggesting this happened.
I’m not making excuses for her.
Just a few theories.
This one is quite
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1