Comments by "Straight2Dpoint" (@4evertrue830) on "The Jimmy Dore Show"
channel.
-
428
-
235
-
220
-
68
-
34
-
32
-
29
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
23
-
23
-
20
-
20
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
9:45 No Jimmy, it is not that simple. Cancelling all students' loan debts does not benefit the entire US economy. It will only creat unforseen consequencies, in other financial related sectors of the US economy, that such funds are tied to. Banks that issue those loans, will need federal help to write them off, since such funds were sourced from deposits of customers in the first place. If help does not come from the federal govt, the Banks affected will have to look for new sources to compensate for the loss..Also in what way does it encourage students, to learn to be responsible for their actions. Most college students are grown ups in their mid 20s to their 30s, ages of maturity that is expected of them to take sound financial responsibilities regarding their future. I do agree some debts should be cancelled for the more vulnerable (e.g $50,000 for those earning less than $90,000/yr), but certainly not ALL STUDENTS LOAN DEBTS.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alexkorneev6469 Well based on research by economists in the last 35 something years, China has lifted over 700 million people in her country out of poverty and her GDP per capita has risen from less than $500/yr to over $17,000/yr in 2020. This achievement was made through what china calls a "socialist free market system" which is a form of capitalism that places the most essential economic sectors squarely in the hands of govt. Such sectors as, land and it's resources, large scale agriculture, airports, seaports, railways, airlines, major banks, electricity and large scale infrastructure, are all central govt and state govt owned. The opposite is the case in the west. Doing this the central govt ensures the poor and middle-class are not affected by whatever negative agenda the wealthy rich in the country have to control the living standards of the people. Which is why goods manufactured in China are cheap and very affordable when exported. They compete very well with expensive western brands. And its working.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@toma3025 If you believe today that China's entire economy is totally in the hands of the private sector (i.e free market capitalism), am sorry to burst your bubble it is definitely NOT! China practices what she calls, "Centralised Socialist free market economic system" which still has a lot to do with central planning the economy. Which is how they consistently have a 10yr plan, or a 15yr economic plan. It is not the liberated capitalist free market system placed in the hands of the private oligarchs the west is known for. What this means is, all the land in China and its resources, including major key industries like - sea ports, airports, airlines, inland water transportation, railways, mining, oil and gas, Banking, insurance, equity/stock exchange, electricity generation and distribution, water resources, healthcare, agriculture, infrastructure are public/state owned. The only part of her economy that is capitalist in nature is just the commercial sectors. Like i said in my previous comment, the west strong hold on the worldwide monetary system which prevented outside collaboration in trade made things difficult for them. It perhaps led China to warm up closer to the USSR at the time leading to a closing of borders with the rest of the world. Did China not open her borders later on in the late 80s, when trade became more difficult with the Soviets? Perhaps she foresaw the Soviets forth coming economic crisis. However, you can't deny that the western capitalist economic model is definitely NOT what China practices.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@forfun6273 A false, delusional interpretation of socialism and communism from a person living in a fantasy western world stolen by crony, predatory capitalists. Are you not living paycheck to paycheck? How can you tell if true socialism and communism is what you describe it as is? All those people in leadership positions in favour of the benefits of socialism or, communism and want it as their people's way of life in their own country, have been overwhelming 'taken out' through assassinations, wars, economic sanctions, by nations that see themselves as capitalist. If such countries you're referring to were allowed to have and embrace the political and market system they prefer and it later fails on its on accord, then and only then can you justifiably say what you're saying in this comment section now but, you have no proof of its failure in any country to point to, do you? Point to any country in the world today that has not been made to pay dearly by the US and the west for daring to have socialism or, communism in its entirety..smh.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1