Comments by "Violet Joy" (@VioletJoy) on "FOX 4 Dallas-Fort Worth"
channel.
-
101
-
55
-
16
-
12
-
12
-
10
-
6
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@garkmr6200 It seems your idea of instantly incinerating a person who harms a child is much more moral than God's. I think most people would agree. Why create people capable of such things? Why create Satan?
I find it very confusing that you see "sins" as equal. I'm not sure the majority of Christians really truly believe that. So you see raping and murdering a child equal to say, desiring something that someone else has? Honestly.
Where do we draw the line? How about at the very least, not allowing the torturing of children? That would be my choice. How about at least that?
Do you believe there is free will in heaven? What evidence do you have of the afterlife?
If you consider nature to be evidence of God, then you'd have to look at all of nature. Sure, there are the nice parts, the pretty things, but the horrors and messy parts can't be ignored.
Our bodies can't handle the sun or weather (hot and cold temperatures), we can get sick by eating certain foods, animals kill each other for food, there is flesh eating bacteria, gnats, ticks, mosquitoes that carry disease, ocean water is plentiful (71% of earth), but our bodies can't use it, MANY diseases, genetic defects, poisonous plants, earthquakes, lightning, tsunamis, floods, volcanoes, hurricanes, drought, landslides, avalanches... It's like a fight to be able to survive nature.
To be blunt, I didn't hear of any "overwhelming" evidence. If following the scientific method, saying nature is evidence is simply not applicable.
1
-
1