Comments by "David McCulloch" (@davidmcculloch8490) on "The Independent" channel.

  1.  Yurt Dweller  Spoken with the usual clarity and logic of a pseudonym account.
    3
  2. "who cares???" You obviously don't care about the offence of misleading parliament? About Johnson taking the p1ss out of people suffering the indignity of separation from gravely ill loved ones? About the incompetence and hubris of a serial liar in government? Answer: I CARE, AND SO DO MANY OTHERS. Is that clear enough?
    3
  3. So you judge the validity of his argument from a point of personal prejudice. Don't join the legal profession. I humbly recommend a course in critical thinking.
    2
  4. Exactly how? Such a pathetic excuse spawned by intellectual laziness.
    1
  5.  @lovemussb1940  unfortunately that's intellectual laziness. If you can't see the difference, don't vote.
    1
  6.  @lovemussb1940  I don't expect coherence from a pseudonym account. Read the reports for yourself, look at the source, and see if you can spot the difference in scale. I'm no fan of Starmer but they are not all the same. Johnson's government has raised the level of corruption to an industrial scale. The worst by far in my lifetime.
    1
  7.  @englishjona6458  ????
    1
  8. Yes. One should resign; the other investigated as a war criminal. Two wrongs don't make a right.
    1
  9. Those who did not follow the rules were fined by police. As a leader of a minority-elected government he sets an example. The rules were actually written into legislation using emergency powers. I see so many vacuous attempts at defence from pseudonym accounts. Welcome to the world of inanity.
    1
  10. Poor Boris. Did ums. He leads a minority-elected government mired in perpetual corruption, as a sociopathic serial liar. Just search on the good law project if in doubt.
    1
  11. Who exactly are you referring to with "He didn't..." Presumably Johnson?
    1
  12. @The Padded Cell guess you don't vote then? Otherwise your comment is either intellectually lazy or hypocritical
    1
  13.  @QUEEG500_  did you stop at that point? He explained why Johnson's apology was false then took him apart. Watch the evidence. Johnson had nowhere to hide.
    1
  14. @The Padded Cell that's no defence of Johnson. If both are true, we should have two resignations.
    1
  15. He must be gutted!
    1
  16. If you think they're all the same, you presumably don't vote. Or is it called intellectual laziness?
    1