Comments by "J Smith" (@jsmithmultimediatech) on "CBS Mornings" channel.

You may find this really interesting: "That's Edward VII's work mostly when you look at the Palace now. Back in 1889 when Edward was the Prince of Wales, in a private event when he visited the real Moulin Rouge its reported this happened: "26 October 1890: His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales, the future Edward VII, who on a private visit to Paris, booked a table to see this quadrille whose reputation had already crossed the Channel. Recognising him, La Goulue, with her leg in the air and her head in her skirts, spontaneously called out "Hey, Wales, the champagne's on you!"." The birthplace of the modern can-can dance, though really the tune had existed before then since I believe least 1840 I think, when it was first created. Actually the tune associated with its the Internal Galop from Orpheus in the Underworld a form of Bouffon Operetta by Jacques Offenbach a bouffon Operetta being a comic form of Operetta believe it pokes fun at the scandals in politics of the 3rd French Empire lead by Napoleon III who gave Offenbach French Citizenship (was quite essentially German-French" Something I said just above this comment.
56
Which is owned by the tax payer though, she doesn't (nor does any member of the Royals) own Buckingham Palace and thus doesn't form part of the Crown Estate, (Sandringham is one of those the Monarch herself owns, believe Balmoral as well, least I think it does) it's more accurate to see the majority as an Office (if not the whole place) of State like the Home and Foreign Offices.
16
@Michael-jh9fd No not really it's like saying that the Duchy of Cornwall (what the Prince of Wales title) having their own private homes paid for by what that title entitles them to, it's like saying Buckingham Palace isn't a public office when it blatantly is, she doesn't own it the public does, rather in reality they actually finance themselves for the Monarchy through the Duchy of Lancaster least have a clue what you're babbling on about. Actually only costs the tax payer here 70p at most per year for the Monarchy.
5
Nah just some bumbling imbecile troll wanting attention.
4
On the contrary all I can hear is you dimwits whining about how Bill's been fired pmsl
3
That's Edward VII's work mostly when you look at the Palace now. Back in 1889 when Edward was the Prince of Wales, in a private event when he visited the real Moulin Rouge its reported this happened: "26 October 1890: His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales, the future Edward VII, who on a private visit to Paris, booked a table to see this quadrille whose reputation had already crossed the Channel. Recognising him, La Goulue, with her leg in the air and her head in her skirts, spontaneously called out "Hey, Wales, the champagne's on you!"." The birthplace of the modern can-can dance, though really the tune had existed before then since I believe least 1840 I think, when it was first created. Actually the tune associated with its the Internal Galop from Orpheus in the Underworld a form of Bouffon Operetta by Jacques Offenbach a bouffon Operetta being a comic form of Operetta believe it pokes fun at the scandals in politics of the 3rd French Empire lead by Napoleon III who gave Offenbach French Citizenship (was quite essentially German-French).
3
@Mohammed Patel Sure they dont lol
3
Like their truth about some private wedding ceremony that never happened, whether royal or not there has to be legally two additional people as witnesses not to mention their home not being an authorised venue as well C of E wedding or that are done within the C of E cant be arranged within 3 days takes least a week
3
@lionel8994 simply put the monarchy only owns 1.4% of the country's land, a good chunk of its either the aristocracy or gentry and the large remainder is unowned, get your facts in order for once please
3
@lionel8994 anyone with one working brain cell could be more accurate than the bs you post
3
@lionel8994 bit of competence wouldn't go a miss actually was more talking about how lands in the country here weren't stolen ie the OPs post? Come on daft pillock😂😂😂😂 Proving your incompetent nice one!
3
"Ken Schneider way too straightforward , but I believe time for monarchy is over in this world especially for countries who try to champion Democratic values." So that's why they're there by popular consent is it?
3
No they don't not entirely no, by what you've said I presume you're an american who clearly hasn't done any fact checking whatsoever, when you've bothered reading the constitution between Parliament and the monarchy then you can respond. As I said it's by popular consent they're there you numpty!
3
Go on whine and cry like an infant pmsl
2
@cecicharles-king9801 🤣🤣🤣🤣
2
@Michael-jh9fd "*and British overseas territories :)" Except they don't lol, not unless counting Scotland lol.
2
@Michael-jh9fd whats next lol the last of what remained of royal rule didn't go during Victoria's reign idiot? 😂😂😂
2
There's many different forms of them not just this there's the Dance band as well.
2
Except she was 17, UK law regarding sexual consent is 17 it's not rocket science.
2
@clarak.mallah4137 Is that a hard concept to grasp then, something as simple as not being lawfully a paedophile when over the age of consent? lol Also it's pardon you're clearly a cheap commoner with language like that
2
It's not a debate of the right to, it's never a right to have an audience with the monarch, its an honour.
1
Also what must be understood is we as taxpayers of this country pay for the state visit effectively.
1
Same here really no different lol, though really with what I said about paying for state visits from foreign nations at least partly is funded by the taxpayer, its how for a certainly a large proportion of what makes up the funding of the Privy Council (a group within the Treasury who deal with the monarchies finances and pay for the upkeep of the residences of the Monarchy). I mean also goes with the fact it's all a facade with the government and the opposition in a large way to go for the same things pretty much to give the illusion of change, but I mean part of the problem I think on both sides of this pond lol, is the fact you go for something like which ever and then you end up back where you started again and it'll keep going around in circles as it continously does and never getting anywhere.
1
The way to stop or prevent rather that from happening is to get both sides talking with each other and that simply is not happening.
1
Bill O'Reilly prior to his sacking has never once shown he's barely informed about anything he talks about, as far as I am aware.
1
@stretfordender11 It's held in Trust by the Crown Estate but it certainly doesn't belong to the Monarch at all
1
@hannahedwards4493 Had you bothered reading I didn't say it was owned by the tax payer and I'm a Brit 🤦‍♂
1
@hannahedwards4493 Not sure what you're talking about the National Trust, has absolutely nothing to do with them lol.
1
It's not a 300 year old Palace it's a 300 year old what was called Buckingham House, before Victoria moved the HQ of the Monarchy there, its really only been a palace for little over 100 years. Was designed originally by the Duke of Buckingham (without whats at the front) that came from Victoria's eldest son who became Edward VII (who widened the Mall, the road going up to it as well) as what is pretty much what's never changed inside there since his reign.
1
Which the white house being funded by your tax system the same way our Monarchy as a whole is lol, actually rather recently (compared to the whole history of Monarchy that is) their spending's made public as well. Her residence being Balmoral when she moves up to Scotland for the summer, ever since Victoria's spouse and Consort (namely Albert) bought her the Balmoral Estate. Effectively being in the Highlands and is certainly greeted by the 2nd Battalion Scots Guards (namely the Highland Fusiliers aka their nickname the Right Hard Fcuckers). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXUWFLSKP88
1
Go on whine and cry like an infant pmsl
1
85 where are they then?
1
"John Taratuta lol he can’t read or write" Would make sense since he couldn't even write the art of the deal by himself.
1
My Name Is Daniel Nor could you Hitler or Stalin to be quite honest dumb Yank, what you're really known for is starting wars you can't finish pmsl
1
M L whilst she probably loving every minute of it then the metoo movement 😂😂😂
1
M L btw loved your first comment lol and yeah I agree
1
@dianastein7431 you really aren't too bright are you dumb feminist?
1
Nor the word pláid either, or get the correct translation....
1
@mecha7419 Yes he's shut down government hasn't he, what a great person he is note my sarcasm what a bellend that orangutan is
1
@lionel8994 actually no the CIA was taken from a model by the Commandos you idiot, is there anything you can come out with thats barely at least accurate, like the Monarchys funding actually the vast majority doesn't come from the tax payer you daft mong 😂
1
@TheMattsem and also was least a few years prior when people were already talking about this, he just amplified it and fell on deaf ears
1
@luanhatyoutube Just stop talking bollox or go please don't need your bs
1
@tomessmith911 you mean implicated himself obviously, he's been charged of nothing as yet though would be highly dubious if hes actually innocent. 16-18 (depending on the state vs just 16 in UK) isnt much of an age gap obviously so don't have the foggiest what you're talking about.
1
@Xendrius the amusing thing is ever since Edward IV back in think was 1463 when he succeeded the throne was effectively illegitimate you idiots lol
1
The reality is (what's evidently clear that you simply aren't getting) is it's a two way process again do some fact checking, she was considering suspending the weekly audience with the PM over Thatchers comments about Apartheid (the Commonwealth), which would have been hugely embarrassing when she was in power. Honestly you're an incredible idiot.
1