Comments by "J Smith" (@jsmithmultimediatech) on "Why Growing Up As A British Royal Actually Sucks" video.

@ninifrancisca89 The thing is they used to quite correctly as most people will assume practiced inbreeding of a certain type though not really immediate family genuinely speaking as long as whom they marry isn't an more immediate family member then it's not per se as bad as say 1st cousins etc and yes even that here is perfectly legal it's just obviously not great for genetics.Problem is there's a lesser pool than compared to history of people to go for in that way obviously which is why it's becoming far more common to go for what is quite essentially marrying commoners and it variably works (more so its' not) but kate for example was eased into it relatively speaking so she got at least a taste of what it was like compared to Meghan did and that latter way doesn't or rarely works as well as being as such 'trained for it'. It's not really that different to (not sure exactly what it's like now though by comparison) in the Royal Family was rarely ever about love there's a whole host of Monarchs even who've had depends on what one wants to call them but misstresses is generally the accurate term who they'd love, but as long as it kept the line or the title going then yeah, heck was even the same for the aristocracy not sure again what it's like now by comparison, though they since '99 can't sit or vote in the House of Lords anymore, they need a writ of summons to be permitted for that, rather its fully of appointed (not elected like the House of Commons members or MPs) Life Peers for their achievements in some manner of speaking for the country.
1