Comments by "Genocide the Fash" (@endloesung_der_braunen_frage) on "PragerU"
channel.
-
11
-
5
-
4
-
Ok normally I would not devote any time to the utter stupidity that prager U delievers on a daily basis, for my time would be better spend elsewhere divorced from their mental regression but this Absurdity of a video was so frustrating partly because many of the presented arguments are regurgitated that much by smooth brained conservatives that I just can't help but responding to it. To those who read it. Read and reply or don't, I do not care. So let's proceed to debunk this nonsense shall we?
0:11 Nobody I have ever met has ever claimed that white people were the only ones participating in slavery let alone creating it in the first place as that would be an expression of historical illiteracy. However if that statement is applied exclusivly to america then it would be absolutly factually correct to claim so.
0:11- 0:21 Yes, it is widely known that slavery was an integral component of the vast majority of civilisations before the colonization of America. You are attempting to debunk what essentially a Strawmen.
0:21 - 0:38 Again we know that slavery preceded the Colonization of North America etc. But most importantly what exactly is the Implication being made here? Are sugesting that the fact that slavery existed in pre-colonized North America among Native tribes somehow justifies the european settlers doing the same, following the logic of "iT iS oKaY SiNcE eVERyboDY dId iT"
0:38- 1:42 This is as I already stated a regurgitation of Facts already known to most people. It all relates to your attempt of debunking the idea that slavery is a "white phenomenon" which nobody believes in in the first place. The information regarding the context is meaningless. Your facts and stance here is NOT CONTROVERSIAL.
1:42- 1:50 That is factually INCORRECT. A cursory google search should abundantly reveal this truth to you.
Here are some sources:
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_abolition_of_slavery_and_serfdom
2.https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/07/12/haiti-was-first-nation-permanently-ban-slavery/
The Persian Empire for instance abolished slavery, so did China though the head of state was murdered by an angry mob. Haiti following it's Revolution ended slavery, it is not exclusive to white people. Also notice the white savior complex that is slowing but surely showing itself?
1:58 Slavery had already been abolished in multiple forms WAY before Britian even existed. You are trying to make it look like Britian was the only country that came up with the idea of making slavery illegal which it was most certainly not.
2:07 - 2:11 That is probalbly one of the major contentions I have with the video which compelled me to write this long comment. To be clear what is said is factually correct but relevant information is not mentioned which is VERY deceptive. The 13 th Amendmant had to passed after a lengthy civil war in which hundreds of thousands died among other reasons also to free the slaves. It was NOT natural to "THE GLORIOUS WHITE MEN", it took a war .The very people who partook on the side of the Confederacy by the way are being revered in the south which can be ascribed to the nationalist education there which distorts southern history for the sake of the states rights narrative.
2:16 Again Slavery was already abolished in various countries before the Us even existed annd secondly notice the white saviour complex? The language being used is pretty revealing of your deceptive intentions.
2:24 The civil war was white men fighting white men! I thought the glorious white men were in favor of the abolition of slavery then why were white men fighting each other. Also you do not get to take credit for the war effort of the Union when its is clear that you would have supported the confedaracy.
2:29 Pepelaugh yeah right, sure. Okay, but genuinly that is what have spend the entire video doing up until this point, showinf the universality of slavery to relativte if not outright justify that of white people and then painting them as saviors of alle the slaves in world. Again the white savior complex.
2:33 No you are Not trying to tell the truth at all. You are implicitly ascribing to non-existend people a position that noone holds then proceed to invoke a racialzed saviour complex as you tried to absolve white people of a guilt they do not even have to bear since they did not participate in these crimes.
2:39 How ironic! I THOUGHT YOU CONSERVATIVES LOVED THE IDEA OF INDIVIDUALITY. Skin colours (a rather races, what really wanted to say Pepelaugh) cannot be collectivly guilty only individuals of said skin colour. That is the whole premise you base the agrument around that white people should not feel guilty. One cannot assign blame to a group of people. Remarcable that I need to express this belief of mine towards of conservative... Well mabye it is because you really are not as individualist as think of yourself as Miss Owens :)
2:39- 2:54 Agian are you trying to suggest that because slavery was present in other civilisations (btw: very funny how you do not mention Nazi Germany) that therefore one cannot assign blame or express criticism to the actions of white people in the past by relativating them with those of other civilisations.
Also The Persian Empire did abolish slavery so did China at some point in it's many dynasties read the links I gave you
3:00 NOBODY BELIEVES THAT! THIS ENTIRE VIDEO IS BUILD ON A GODDAMN STRAWMEN, HOLY CHRIST!
3:12- 3:22 You came across a fotoshoped instagram post and the extrapolated from this that all leftists I assume thought like this.
2. Actually some tribes and peoples in Africa did have formidable civisations prior to the colonization like Mali Empire for instance.
Also again is the implication here that Africans are a backwards people who were saved by the superior Europeans, because Africa is still in bad shape today?
3:25
1. That does not make Europeans exempt from guilt because they still participated in the slave trade (which was a free market by the way)
2. The African slaves were sold by competing tribes for money and luxary not just the low value items that are depicted in this video. There was a Very high demand for slaves back then
3. Very important: Europeans bought these slaves because they it was more convenient not form moral reasons. It is cheaper to buy a slave from a King then it is to invade enslave and sell an entire people.
3:36
Wrong in some cases they did. But it was rather uncommon because buying them from the tribes was more profitable.
Well I am not done yet I will continue this...
4
-
Ok normally I would not devote any time to the utter stupidity that prager U delievers on a daily basis, for my time would be better spend elsewhere divorced from their mental regression but this Absurdity of a video was so frustrating partly because many of the presented arguments are regurgitated that much by smooth brained conservatives that I just can't help but responding to it. To those who read it. Read and reply or don't, I do not care. So let's proceed to debunk this nonsense shall we?
0:11 Nobody I have ever met has ever claimed that white people were the only ones participating in slavery let alone creating it in the first place as that would be an expression of historical illiteracy. However if that statement is applied exclusivly to america then it would be absolutly factually correct to claim so.
0:11- 0:21 Yes, it is widely known that slavery was an integral component of the vast majority of civilisations before the colonization of America. You are attempting to debunk what essentially a Strawmen.
0:21 - 0:38 Again we know that slavery preceded the Colonization of North America etc. But most importantly what exactly is the Implication being made here? Are sugesting that the fact that slavery existed in pre-colonized North America among Native tribes somehow justifies the european settlers doing the same, following the logic of "iT iS oKaY SiNcE eVERyboDY dId iT"
0:38- 1:42 This is as I already stated a regurgitation of Facts already known to most people. It all relates to your attempt of debunking the idea that slavery is a "white phenomenon" which nobody believes in in the first place. The information regarding the context is meaningless. Your facts and stance here is NOT CONTROVERSIAL.
1:42- 1:50 That is factually INCORRECT. A cursory google search should abundantly reveal this truth to you.
Here are some sources:
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_abolition_of_slavery_and_serfdom
2.https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/07/12/haiti-was-first-nation-permanently-ban-slavery/
The Persian Empire for instance abolished slavery, so did China though the head of state was murdered by an angry mob. Haiti following it's Revolution ended slavery, it is not exclusive to white people. Also notice the white savior complex that is slowing but surely showing itself?
1:58 Slavery had already been abolished in multiple forms WAY before Britian even existed. You are trying to make it look like Britian was the only country that came up with the idea of making slavery illegal which it was most certainly not.
2:07 - 2:11 That is probalbly one of the major contentions I have with the video which compelled me to write this long comment. To be clear what is said is factually correct but relevant information is not mentioned which is VERY deceptive. The 13 th Amendmant had to passed after a lengthy civil war in which hundreds of thousands died among other reasons also to free the slaves. It was NOT natural to "THE GLORIOUS WHITE MEN", it took a war .The very people who partook on the side of the Confederacy by the way are being revered in the south which can be ascribed to the nationalist education there which distorts southern history for the sake of the states rights narrative.
2:16 Again Slavery was already abolished in various countries before the Us even existed annd secondly notice the white saviour complex? The language being used is pretty revealing of your deceptive intentions.
2:24 The civil war was white men fighting white men! I thought the glorious white men were in favor of the abolition of slavery then why were white men fighting each other. Also you do not get to take credit for the war effort of the Union when its is clear that you would have supported the confedaracy.
2:29 Pepelaugh yeah right, sure. Okay, but genuinly that is what have spend the entire video doing up until this point, showinf the universality of slavery to relativte if not outright justify that of white people and then painting them as saviors of alle the slaves in world. Again the white savior complex.
2:33 No you are Not trying to tell the truth at all. You are implicitly ascribing to non-existend people a position that noone holds then proceed to invoke a racialzed saviour complex as you tried to absolve white people of a guilt they do not even have to bear since they did not participate in these crimes.
2:39 How ironic! I THOUGHT YOU CONSERVATIVES LOVED THE IDEA OF INDIVIDUALITY. Skin colours (a rather races, what really wanted to say Pepelaugh) cannot be collectivly guilty only individuals of said skin colour. That is the whole premise you base the agrument around that white people should not feel guilty. One cannot assign blame to a group of people. Remarcable that I need to express this belief of mine towards of conservative... Well mabye it is because you really are not as individualist as think of yourself as Miss Owens :)
2:39- 2:54 Agian are you trying to suggest that because slavery was present in other civilisations (btw: very funny how you do not mention Nazi Germany) that therefore one cannot assign blame or express criticism to the actions of white people in the past by relativating them with those of other civilisations.
Also The Persian Empire did abolish slavery so did China at some point in it's many dynasties read the links I gave you
3:00 NOBODY BELIEVES THAT! THIS ENTIRE VIDEO IS BUILD ON A GODDAMN STRAWMEN, HOLY CHRIST!
3:12- 3:22 You came across a fotoshoped instagram post and the extrapolated from this that all leftists I assume thought like this.
2. Actually some tribes and peoples in Africa did have formidable civisations prior to the colonization like Mali Empire for instance.
Also again is the implication here that Africans are a backwards people who were saved by the superior Europeans, because Africa is still in bad shape today?
3:25
1. That does not make Europeans exempt from guilt because they still participated in the slave trade (which was a free market by the way)
2. The African slaves were sold by competing tribes for money and luxary not just the low value items that are depicted in this video. There was a Very high demand for slaves back then
3. Very important: Europeans bought these slaves because they it was more convenient not form moral reasons. It is cheaper to buy a slave from a King then it is to invade enslave and sell an entire people.
3:36
Wrong in some cases they did. But it was rather uncommon because buying them from the tribes was more profitable.
Well I am not done yet I will continue this...
3
-
3
-
Ok normally I would not devote any time to the utter stupidity that prager U delievers on a daily basis, for my time would be better spend elsewhere divorced from their mental regression but this Absurdity of a video was so frustrating partly because many of the presented arguments are regurgitated that much by smooth brained conservatives that I just can't help but responding to it. To those who read it. Read and reply or don't, I do not care. So let's proceed to debunk this nonsense shall we?
0:11 Nobody I have ever met has ever claimed that white people were the only ones participating in slavery let alone creating it in the first place as that would be an expression of historical illiteracy. However if that statement is applied exclusivly to america then it would be absolutly factually correct to claim so.
0:11- 0:21 Yes, it is widely known that slavery was an integral component of the vast majority of civilisations before the colonization of America. You are attempting to debunk what essentially a Strawmen.
0:21 - 0:38 Again we know that slavery preceded the Colonization of North America etc. But most importantly what exactly is the Implication being made here? Are sugesting that the fact that slavery existed in pre-colonized North America among Native tribes somehow justifies the european settlers doing the same, following the logic of "iT iS oKaY SiNcE eVERyboDY dId iT"
0:38- 1:42 This is as I already stated a regurgitation of Facts already known to most people. It all relates to your attempt of debunking the idea that slavery is a "white phenomenon" which nobody believes in in the first place. The information regarding the context is meaningless. Your facts and stance here is NOT CONTROVERSIAL.
1:42- 1:50 That is factually INCORRECT. A cursory google search should abundantly reveal this truth to you.
Here are some sources:
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_abolition_of_slavery_and_serfdom
2.https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/07/12/haiti-was-first-nation-permanently-ban-slavery/
The Persian Empire for instance abolished slavery, so did China though the head of state was murdered by an angry mob. Haiti following it's Revolution ended slavery, it is not exclusive to white people. Also notice the white savior complex that is slowing but surely showing itself?
1:58 Slavery had already been abolished in multiple forms WAY before Britian even existed. You are trying to make it look like Britian was the only country that came up with the idea of making slavery illegal which it was most certainly not.
2:07 - 2:11 That is probalbly one of the major contentions I have with the video which compelled me to write this long comment. To be clear what is said is factually correct but relevant information is not mentioned which is VERY deceptive. The 13 th Amendmant had to passed after a lengthy civil war in which hundreds of thousands died among other reasons also to free the slaves. It was NOT natural to "THE GLORIOUS WHITE MEN", it took a war .The very people who partook on the side of the Confederacy by the way are being revered in the south which can be ascribed to the nationalist education there which distorts southern history for the sake of the states rights narrative.
2:16 Again Slavery was already abolished in various countries before the Us even existed annd secondly notice the white saviour complex? The language being used is pretty revealing of your deceptive intentions.
2:24 The civil war was white men fighting white men! I thought the glorious white men were in favor of the abolition of slavery then why were white men fighting each other. Also you do not get to take credit for the war effort of the Union when its is clear that you would have supported the confedaracy.
2:29 Pepelaugh yeah right, sure. Okay, but genuinly that is what have spend the entire video doing up until this point, showinf the universality of slavery to relativte if not outright justify that of white people and then painting them as saviors of alle the slaves in world. Again the white savior complex.
2:33 No you are Not trying to tell the truth at all. You are implicitly ascribing to non-existend people a position that noone holds then proceed to invoke a racialzed saviour complex as you tried to absolve white people of a guilt they do not even have to bear since they did not participate in these crimes.
2:39 How ironic! I THOUGHT YOU CONSERVATIVES LOVED THE IDEA OF INDIVIDUALITY. Skin colours (a rather races, what really wanted to say Pepelaugh) cannot be collectivly guilty only individuals of said skin colour. That is the whole premise you base the agrument around that white people should not feel guilty. One cannot assign blame to a group of people. Remarcable that I need to express this belief of mine towards of conservative... Well mabye it is because you really are not as individualist as think of yourself as Miss Owens :)
2:39- 2:54 Agian are you trying to suggest that because slavery was present in other civilisations (btw: very funny how you do not mention Nazi Germany) that therefore one cannot assign blame or express criticism to the actions of white people in the past by relativating them with those of other civilisations.
Also The Persian Empire did abolish slavery so did China at some point in it's many dynasties read the links I gave you
3:00 NOBODY BELIEVES THAT! THIS ENTIRE VIDEO IS BUILD ON A GODDAMN STRAWMEN, HOLY CHRIST!
3:12- 3:22 You came across a fotoshoped instagram post and the extrapolated from this that all leftists I assume thought like this.
2. Actually some tribes and peoples in Africa did have formidable civisations prior to the colonization like Mali Empire for instance.
Also again is the implication here that Africans are a backwards people who were saved by the superior Europeans, because Africa is still in bad shape today?
3:25
1. That does not make Europeans exempt from guilt because they still participated in the slave trade (which was a free market by the way)
2. The African slaves were sold by competing tribes for money and luxary not just the low value items that are depicted in this video. There was a Very high demand for slaves back then
3. Very important: Europeans bought these slaves because they it was more convenient not form moral reasons. It is cheaper to buy a slave from a King then it is to invade enslave and sell an entire people.
3:36
Wrong in some cases they did. But it was rather uncommon because buying them from the tribes was more profitable.
Well I am not done yet I will continue this...
3
-
Ok normally I would not devote any time to the utter stupidity that prager U delievers on a daily basis, for my time would be better spend elsewhere divorced from their mental regression but this Absurdity of a video was so frustrating partly because many of the presented arguments are regurgitated that much by smooth brained conservatives that I just can't help but responding to it. To those who read it. Read and reply or don't, I do not care. So let's proceed to debunk this nonsense shall we?
0:11 Nobody I have ever met has ever claimed that white people were the only ones participating in slavery let alone creating it in the first place as that would be an expression of historical illiteracy. However if that statement is applied exclusivly to america then it would be absolutly factually correct to claim so.
0:11- 0:21 Yes, it is widely known that slavery was an integral component of the vast majority of civilisations before the colonization of America. You are attempting to debunk what essentially a Strawmen.
0:21 - 0:38 Again we know that slavery preceded the Colonization of North America etc. But most importantly what exactly is the Implication being made here? Are sugesting that the fact that slavery existed in pre-colonized North America among Native tribes somehow justifies the european settlers doing the same, following the logic of "iT iS oKaY SiNcE eVERyboDY dId iT"
0:38- 1:42 This is as I already stated a regurgitation of Facts already known to most people. It all relates to your attempt of debunking the idea that slavery is a "white phenomenon" which nobody believes in in the first place. The information regarding the context is meaningless. Your facts and stance here is NOT CONTROVERSIAL.
1:42- 1:50 That is factually INCORRECT. A cursory google search should abundantly reveal this truth to you.
Here are some sources:
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_abolition_of_slavery_and_serfdom
2.https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/07/12/haiti-was-first-nation-permanently-ban-slavery/
The Persian Empire for instance abolished slavery, so did China though the head of state was murdered by an angry mob. Haiti following it's Revolution ended slavery, it is not exclusive to white people. Also notice the white savior complex that is slowing but surely showing itself?
1:58 Slavery had already been abolished in multiple forms WAY before Britian even existed. You are trying to make it look like Britian was the only country that came up with the idea of making slavery illegal which it was most certainly not.
2:07 - 2:11 That is probalbly one of the major contentions I have with the video which compelled me to write this long comment. To be clear what is said is factually correct but relevant information is not mentioned which is VERY deceptive. The 13 th Amendmant had to passed after a lengthy civil war in which hundreds of thousands died among other reasons also to free the slaves. It was NOT natural to "THE GLORIOUS WHITE MEN", it took a war .The very people who partook on the side of the Confederacy by the way are being revered in the south which can be ascribed to the nationalist education there which distorts southern history for the sake of the states rights narrative.
2:16 Again Slavery was already abolished in various countries before the Us even existed annd secondly notice the white saviour complex? The language being used is pretty revealing of your deceptive intentions.
2:24 The civil war was white men fighting white men! I thought the glorious white men were in favor of the abolition of slavery then why were white men fighting each other. Also you do not get to take credit for the war effort of the Union when its is clear that you would have supported the confedaracy.
2:29 Pepelaugh yeah right, sure. Okay, but genuinly that is what have spend the entire video doing up until this point, showinf the universality of slavery to relativte if not outright justify that of white people and then painting them as saviors of alle the slaves in world. Again the white savior complex.
2:33 No you are Not trying to tell the truth at all. You are implicitly ascribing to non-existend people a position that noone holds then proceed to invoke a racialzed saviour complex as you tried to absolve white people of a guilt they do not even have to bear since they did not participate in these crimes.
2:39 How ironic! I THOUGHT YOU CONSERVATIVES LOVED THE IDEA OF INDIVIDUALITY. Skin colours (a rather races, what really wanted to say Pepelaugh) cannot be collectivly guilty only individuals of said skin colour. That is the whole premise you base the agrument around that white people should not feel guilty. One cannot assign blame to a group of people. Remarcable that I need to express this belief of mine towards of conservative... Well mabye it is because you really are not as individualist as think of yourself as Miss Owens :)
2:39- 2:54 Agian are you trying to suggest that because slavery was present in other civilisations (btw: very funny how you do not mention Nazi Germany) that therefore one cannot assign blame or express criticism to the actions of white people in the past by relativating them with those of other civilisations.
Also The Persian Empire did abolish slavery so did China at some point in it's many dynasties read the links I gave you
3:00 NOBODY BELIEVES THAT! THIS ENTIRE VIDEO IS BUILD ON A GODDAMN STRAWMEN, HOLY CHRIST!
3:12- 3:22 You came across a fotoshoped instagram post and the extrapolated from this that all leftists I assume thought like this.
2. Actually some tribes and peoples in Africa did have formidable civisations prior to the colonization like Mali Empire for instance.
Also again is the implication here that Africans are a backwards people who were saved by the superior Europeans, because Africa is still in bad shape today?
3:25
1. That does not make Europeans exempt from guilt because they still participated in the slave trade (which was a free market by the way)
2. The African slaves were sold by competing tribes for money and luxary not just the low value items that are depicted in this video. There was a Very high demand for slaves back then
3. Very important: Europeans bought these slaves because they it was more convenient not form moral reasons. It is cheaper to buy a slave from a King then it is to invade enslave and sell an entire people.
3:36
Wrong in some cases they did. But it was rather uncommon because buying them from the tribes was more profitable.
Well I am not done yet I will continue this...
3
-
Ok normally I would not devote any time to the utter stupidity that prager U delievers on a daily basis, for my time would be better spend elsewhere divorced from their mental regression but this Absurdity of a video was so frustrating partly because many of the presented arguments are regurgitated that much by smooth brained conservatives that I just can't help but responding to it. To those who read it. Read and reply or don't, I do not care. So let's proceed to debunk this nonsense shall we?
0:11 Nobody I have ever met has ever claimed that white people were the only ones participating in slavery let alone creating it in the first place as that would be an expression of historical illiteracy. However if that statement is applied exclusivly to america then it would be absolutly factually correct to claim so.
0:11- 0:21 Yes, it is widely known that slavery was an integral component of the vast majority of civilisations before the colonization of America. You are attempting to debunk what essentially a Strawmen.
0:21 - 0:38 Again we know that slavery preceded the Colonization of North America etc. But most importantly what exactly is the Implication being made here? Are sugesting that the fact that slavery existed in pre-colonized North America among Native tribes somehow justifies the european settlers doing the same, following the logic of "iT iS oKaY SiNcE eVERyboDY dId iT"
0:38- 1:42 This is as I already stated a regurgitation of Facts already known to most people. It all relates to your attempt of debunking the idea that slavery is a "white phenomenon" which nobody believes in in the first place. The information regarding the context is meaningless. Your facts and stance here is NOT CONTROVERSIAL.
1:42- 1:50 That is factually INCORRECT. A cursory google search should abundantly reveal this truth to you.
Here are some sources:
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_abolition_of_slavery_and_serfdom
2.https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/07/12/haiti-was-first-nation-permanently-ban-slavery/
The Persian Empire for instance abolished slavery, so did China though the head of state was murdered by an angry mob. Haiti following it's Revolution ended slavery, it is not exclusive to white people. Also notice the white savior complex that is slowing but surely showing itself?
1:58 Slavery had already been abolished in multiple forms WAY before Britian even existed. You are trying to make it look like Britian was the only country that came up with the idea of making slavery illegal which it was most certainly not.
2:07 - 2:11 That is probalbly one of the major contentions I have with the video which compelled me to write this long comment. To be clear what is said is factually correct but relevant information is not mentioned which is VERY deceptive. The 13 th Amendmant had to passed after a lengthy civil war in which hundreds of thousands died among other reasons also to free the slaves. It was NOT natural to "THE GLORIOUS WHITE MEN", it took a war .The very people who partook on the side of the Confederacy by the way are being revered in the south which can be ascribed to the nationalist education there which distorts southern history for the sake of the states rights narrative.
2:16 Again Slavery was already abolished in various countries before the Us even existed annd secondly notice the white saviour complex? The language being used is pretty revealing of your deceptive intentions.
2:24 The civil war was white men fighting white men! I thought the glorious white men were in favor of the abolition of slavery then why were white men fighting each other. Also you do not get to take credit for the war effort of the Union when its is clear that you would have supported the confedaracy.
2:29 Pepelaugh yeah right, sure. Okay, but genuinly that is what have spend the entire video doing up until this point, showinf the universality of slavery to relativte if not outright justify that of white people and then painting them as saviors of alle the slaves in world. Again the white savior complex.
2:33 No you are Not trying to tell the truth at all. You are implicitly ascribing to non-existend people a position that noone holds then proceed to invoke a racialzed saviour complex as you tried to absolve white people of a guilt they do not even have to bear since they did not participate in these crimes.
2:39 How ironic! I THOUGHT YOU CONSERVATIVES LOVED THE IDEA OF INDIVIDUALITY. Skin colours (a rather races, what really wanted to say Pepelaugh) cannot be collectivly guilty only individuals of said skin colour. That is the whole premise you base the agrument around that white people should not feel guilty. One cannot assign blame to a group of people. Remarcable that I need to express this belief of mine towards of conservative... Well mabye it is because you really are not as individualist as think of yourself as Miss Owens :)
2:39- 2:54 Agian are you trying to suggest that because slavery was present in other civilisations (btw: very funny how you do not mention Nazi Germany) that therefore one cannot assign blame or express criticism to the actions of white people in the past by relativating them with those of other civilisations.
Also The Persian Empire did abolish slavery so did China at some point in it's many dynasties read the links I gave you
3:00 NOBODY BELIEVES THAT! THIS ENTIRE VIDEO IS BUILD ON A GODDAMN STRAWMEN, HOLY CHRIST!
3:12- 3:22 You came across a fotoshoped instagram post and the extrapolated from this that all leftists I assume thought like this.
2. Actually some tribes and peoples in Africa did have formidable civisations prior to the colonization like Mali Empire for instance.
Also again is the implication here that Africans are a backwards people who were saved by the superior Europeans, because Africa is still in bad shape today?
3:25
1. That does not make Europeans exempt from guilt because they still participated in the slave trade (which was a free market by the way)
2. The African slaves were sold by competing tribes for money and luxary not just the low value items that are depicted in this video. There was a Very high demand for slaves back then
3. Very important: Europeans bought these slaves because they it was more convenient not form moral reasons. It is cheaper to buy a slave from a King then it is to invade enslave and sell an entire people.
3:36
Wrong in some cases they did. But it was rather uncommon because buying them from the tribes was more profitable.
Well I am not done yet I will continue this...
2
-
Ok normally I would not devote any time to the utter stupidity that prager U delievers on a daily basis, for my time would be better spend elsewhere divorced from their mental regression but this Absurdity of a video was so frustrating partly because many of the presented arguments are regurgitated that much by smooth brained conservatives that I just can't help but responding to it. To those who read it. Read and reply or don't, I do not care. So let's proceed to debunk this nonsense shall we?
0:11 Nobody I have ever met has ever claimed that white people were the only ones participating in slavery let alone creating it in the first place as that would be an expression of historical illiteracy. However if that statement is applied exclusivly to america then it would be absolutly factually correct to claim so.
0:11- 0:21 Yes, it is widely known that slavery was an integral component of the vast majority of civilisations before the colonization of America. You are attempting to debunk what essentially a Strawmen.
0:21 - 0:38 Again we know that slavery preceded the Colonization of North America etc. But most importantly what exactly is the Implication being made here? Are sugesting that the fact that slavery existed in pre-colonized North America among Native tribes somehow justifies the european settlers doing the same, following the logic of "iT iS oKaY SiNcE eVERyboDY dId iT"
0:38- 1:42 This is as I already stated a regurgitation of Facts already known to most people. It all relates to your attempt of debunking the idea that slavery is a "white phenomenon" which nobody believes in in the first place. The information regarding the context is meaningless. Your facts and stance here is NOT CONTROVERSIAL.
1:42- 1:50 That is factually INCORRECT. A cursory google search should abundantly reveal this truth to you.
Here are some sources:
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_abolition_of_slavery_and_serfdom
2.https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/07/12/haiti-was-first-nation-permanently-ban-slavery/
The Persian Empire for instance abolished slavery, so did China though the head of state was murdered by an angry mob. Haiti following it's Revolution ended slavery, it is not exclusive to white people. Also notice the white savior complex that is slowing but surely showing itself?
1:58 Slavery had already been abolished in multiple forms WAY before Britian even existed. You are trying to make it look like Britian was the only country that came up with the idea of making slavery illegal which it was most certainly not.
2:07 - 2:11 That is probalbly one of the major contentions I have with the video which compelled me to write this long comment. To be clear what is said is factually correct but relevant information is not mentioned which is VERY deceptive. The 13 th Amendmant had to passed after a lengthy civil war in which hundreds of thousands died among other reasons also to free the slaves. It was NOT natural to "THE GLORIOUS WHITE MEN", it took a war .The very people who partook on the side of the Confederacy by the way are being revered in the south which can be ascribed to the nationalist education there which distorts southern history for the sake of the states rights narrative.
2:16 Again Slavery was already abolished in various countries before the Us even existed annd secondly notice the white saviour complex? The language being used is pretty revealing of your deceptive intentions.
2:24 The civil war was white men fighting white men! I thought the glorious white men were in favor of the abolition of slavery then why were white men fighting each other. Also you do not get to take credit for the war effort of the Union when its is clear that you would have supported the confedaracy.
2:29 Pepelaugh yeah right, sure. Okay, but genuinly that is what have spend the entire video doing up until this point, showinf the universality of slavery to relativte if not outright justify that of white people and then painting them as saviors of alle the slaves in world. Again the white savior complex.
2:33 No you are Not trying to tell the truth at all. You are implicitly ascribing to non-existend people a position that noone holds then proceed to invoke a racialzed saviour complex as you tried to absolve white people of a guilt they do not even have to bear since they did not participate in these crimes.
2:39 How ironic! I THOUGHT YOU CONSERVATIVES LOVED THE IDEA OF INDIVIDUALITY. Skin colours (a rather races, what really wanted to say Pepelaugh) cannot be collectivly guilty only individuals of said skin colour. That is the whole premise you base the agrument around that white people should not feel guilty. One cannot assign blame to a group of people. Remarcable that I need to express this belief of mine towards of conservative... Well mabye it is because you really are not as individualist as think of yourself as Miss Owens :)
2:39- 2:54 Agian are you trying to suggest that because slavery was present in other civilisations (btw: very funny how you do not mention Nazi Germany) that therefore one cannot assign blame or express criticism to the actions of white people in the past by relativating them with those of other civilisations.
Also The Persian Empire did abolish slavery so did China at some point in it's many dynasties read the links I gave you
3:00 NOBODY BELIEVES THAT! THIS ENTIRE VIDEO IS BUILD ON A GODDAMN STRAWMEN, HOLY CHRIST!
3:12- 3:22 You came across a fotoshoped instagram post and the extrapolated from this that all leftists I assume thought like this.
2. Actually some tribes and peoples in Africa did have formidable civisations prior to the colonization like Mali Empire for instance.
Also again is the implication here that Africans are a backwards people who were saved by the superior Europeans, because Africa is still in bad shape today?
3:25
1. That does not make Europeans exempt from guilt because they still participated in the slave trade (which was a free market by the way)
2. The African slaves were sold by competing tribes for money and luxary not just the low value items that are depicted in this video. There was a Very high demand for slaves back then
3. Very important: Europeans bought these slaves because they it was more convenient not form moral reasons. It is cheaper to buy a slave from a King then it is to invade enslave and sell an entire people.
3:36
Wrong in some cases they did. But it was rather uncommon because buying them from the tribes was more profitable.
Well I am not done yet I will continue this...
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
@bornepayne242 That is Bad Logic AS Well. If a historical actor Acts because of an Idea, that animated him, Then the Idea is the cause for historical Action, hence IT can be reasonably blamed.
If People try and fail to achieve Communism over and over again and commit attrocities in the process over and over again Then
1. One can deduce that their Motivation stemmed from the Idea of realizing Communism
2. IT can reasonably infered that These atrocities Are inherent to the process of realizing Communism
Conclusion: Communism can be blamed, even If IT was never truly realized.
For If ideologies need to be truly and fully IMPLEMENTED, for them to Stop being exempt from responsibilty, Then by that Logic I could Claim that Nazism does Not deserve any blame, because the National Socialists did Not actually achieve their ideological Goals (ie. Livingspace for the Aryan Race, total extermination of the Jews, enslavement of the Slavs etc.) Many of whom are Essential to the Ideology. Of course Nobody in His right mind would argue that the Nazis were Not Nazis, Just because they failed to achieve what their Ideology called for, Same with commmunism
1
-
That is Bad Logic AS Well. If a historical actor Acts because of an Idea, that animated him, Then the Idea is the cause for historical Action, hence IT can be reasonably blamed.
If People try and fail to achieve Communism over and over again and commit attrocities in the process over and over again Then
1. One can deduce that their Motivation stemmed from the Idea of realizing Communism
2. IT can reasonably infered that These atrocities Are inherent to the process of realizing Communism
Conclusion: Communism can be blamed, even If IT was never truly realized.
For If ideologies need to be truly and fully IMPLEMENTED, for them to Stop being exempt from responsibilty, Then by that Logic I could Claim that Nazism does Not deserve any blame, because the National Socialists did Not actually achieve their ideological Goals (ie. Livingspace for the Aryan Race, total extermination of the Jews, enslavement of the Slavs etc.) Many of whom are Essential to the Ideology. Of course Nobody in His right mind would argue that the Nazis were Not Nazis, Just because they failed to achieve what their Ideology called for, Same with commmunism
1
-
1
-
1
-
Hitlers genocidal Regime was in no shape or form incompetent in the "art of killing" in fact they are absolute masters, or does Auschwitz - Birkenau, Sobibor, Belzec, Treblinka, Kulmhof, Buchenwald and much MUCH MORE sound like incompetence to you?
Also it is very telling that despite 6 years of war, Hitler manages to make it on the list of greatest mass murders in human history, demonstrating quite a high extermination rate. The only reason his bodycount is "relativly low" (that being third place) is that he did not have the means to implement his overtly Genocidal Dystopia.
Also the National Socialists killed far more than one anticipates. Hitler is DIRECTLY responsible for the death of over 20 million people of which at least 12 Million can be attributed to the Holocaust and indirectly caused the death of arround 50 million europeans. As a consequence he killed about the same amount if not even far more the highest estimates of Joseph Stalins Body Count only overshadowed ny Mao depending on how somebody counts.
The fact is Hitler is in Europe oncontested Massmurdere number 1.
1.My main Source is:
Democide
Nazi Genocide and Mass Murder
By
R. J. Rummel
The two other links are related to the source
2.https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NAZIS.CHAP1.HTM
3. https://scottmanning.com/content/nazi-body-count/
National Socialism made the extermination and enslavement of those considered racially inferior its modus operandi.
1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost
2. https://gplanost.x-berg.de/generalplaneast.html
3.http://www.worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/GPO/gpo%20sources.htm
4.https://military.wikia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost
Also Mein Kampf underlines the Genocidal and Imperialist Ambitions of the National Socialists.
Advocacy for Genocide
1. Genocide
"The soul of the people can only be won if along with carrying
on a positive struggle for our own aims, we destroy the opponent
of these aims.
The people at all times see the proof of their own right in ruthless
attack on a foe, and to them renouncing the destruction of the
adversary seems like uncertainty with regard to their own right if
not a sign of their own unriglxt.
The broad masses are only a piece of Nature and their sentiment
does not understand the mutual handshake of people who daim
that they want the opposite things. What they desire is the victory of the stronger and the destruction of the weak or his
unconditional subjection.
The nationalization of our masses will succeed only when, aside
from all the positive struggle for the soul of our people, their
international poisoners are exterminated."
The international poison is obviously the J E W S.
2. Racial Imperialism
"The folkish movement must not be the champion of other
peoples, but the vanguard fighter of its own. Otherwise it is
superfluous and above all has no right to sulk about the past. For
in that case it is behaving in exactly tbe same wav. The old
German policy was wrongly determined by dynastic
considerations, and the future policy must not be directed by
cosmopolitan folkish drivel. In particular, we are not constables
guarding the wellknown 'poor little nations,' but soldiers of our
own nation.
But we National Socialists must go further. The right to possess
soil can become a duty if without extension of its soil a great
nation seems doomed to destruction. And most especially when
not some little negro nation or other is involved, but the
Germanic mother of life, which has given the presentday world
its cultural picture. Germany will either be a world power or
there will be no Germany. And for world power she needs that
magnitude which will give her the position she needs in the
present period, and life to her citizens.
And so we National Socialists consciously draw a line beneath
the foreign policy tendency of our preWar period. We take up
where we broke off six hundred years ago. We stop the endless
German movement to the south and west, and turn our gaze
toward the land in the east. At long last we break of the colonial
and commercial policy of the preWar period and shift to the soil
policy of the future.
If we speak of soil in Europe today, we can primarily have in
mind only Russia and her vassal border states.
Here Fate itself seems desirous of giving us a sign. By handing P
ussia to Bolshevism, it robbed the Russian nation of that
intelligentsia which previously brought about and guaranteed its
existence as a state. For the organization of a Russian state
formation was not the result of the political abilities of the Slavs
in Russia, but only a wonderful example of the stateforming
efficacity of the German element in an inferior race. Numerous
mighty empires on earth have been created in this way. Lower
nations led by Germanic organizers and overlords have more
than once grown to be mighty state formations and have endured
as long as the racial nudeus of the creative state race maintained
itself. For centuries Russia drew nourishment from this Germanic
nucleus of its upper leading strata. Today it can be regarded as
almost totally exterminated and extinguished. It has been
replaced by the Jew. Impossible as it is for the Russian by
himself to shake off the yoke of the Jew by his own resources, it
is equally impossible for the Jew to maintain the mighty empire
forever. He himself is no element of organization, but a ferment
of decomposition. The Persian I empire in the east is ripe for
collapse. And the end of Jewish rule in Russia will also be the
end of Russia as a state. We have been chosen by Fate as
witnesses of a catastrophe which will be the mightiest
confirmation of the soundness of the folkish theory.
Our task, the mission of the National Socialist movement, is to
bring our own people to such political insight that they will not
see their goal for the future in the breathtaking sensation of a
new Alexander's conquest, but in the industrious work of the
German plow, to which the sword need only give soil."
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ok normally I would not devote any time to the utter stupidity that prager U delievers on a daily basis, for my time would be better spend elsewhere divorced from their mental regression but this Absurdity of a video was so frustrating partly because many of the presented arguments are regurgitated that much by smooth brained conservatives that I just can't help but responding to it. To those who read it. Read and reply or don't, I do not care. So let's proceed to debunk this nonsense shall we?
0:11 Nobody I have ever met has ever claimed that white people were the only ones participating in slavery let alone creating it in the first place as that would be an expression of historical illiteracy. However if that statement is applied exclusivly to america then it would be absolutly factually correct to claim so.
0:11- 0:21 Yes, it is widely known that slavery was an integral component of the vast majority of civilisations before the colonization of America. You are attempting to debunk what essentially a Strawmen.
0:21 - 0:38 Again we know that slavery preceded the Colonization of North America etc. But most importantly what exactly is the Implication being made here? Are sugesting that the fact that slavery existed in pre-colonized North America among Native tribes somehow justifies the european settlers doing the same, following the logic of "iT iS oKaY SiNcE eVERyboDY dId iT"
0:38- 1:42 This is as I already stated a regurgitation of Facts already known to most people. It all relates to your attempt of debunking the idea that slavery is a "white phenomenon" which nobody believes in in the first place. The information regarding the context is meaningless. Your facts and stance here is NOT CONTROVERSIAL.
1:42- 1:50 That is factually INCORRECT. A cursory google search should abundantly reveal this truth to you.
Here are some sources:
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_abolition_of_slavery_and_serfdom
2.https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/07/12/haiti-was-first-nation-permanently-ban-slavery/
The Persian Empire for instance abolished slavery, so did China though the head of state was murdered by an angry mob. Haiti following it's Revolution ended slavery, it is not exclusive to white people. Also notice the white savior complex that is slowing but surely showing itself?
1:58 Slavery had already been abolished in multiple forms WAY before Britian even existed. You are trying to make it look like Britian was the only country that came up with the idea of making slavery illegal which it was most certainly not.
2:07 - 2:11 That is probalbly one of the major contentions I have with the video which compelled me to write this long comment. To be clear what is said is factually correct but relevant information is not mentioned which is VERY deceptive. The 13 th Amendmant had to passed after a lengthy civil war in which hundreds of thousands died among other reasons also to free the slaves. It was NOT natural to "THE GLORIOUS WHITE MEN", it took a war .The very people who partook on the side of the Confederacy by the way are being revered in the south which can be ascribed to the nationalist education there which distorts southern history for the sake of the states rights narrative.
2:16 Again Slavery was already abolished in various countries before the Us even existed annd secondly notice the white saviour complex? The language being used is pretty revealing of your deceptive intentions.
2:24 The civil war was white men fighting white men! I thought the glorious white men were in favor of the abolition of slavery then why were white men fighting each other. Also you do not get to take credit for the war effort of the Union when its is clear that you would have supported the confedaracy.
2:29 Pepelaugh yeah right, sure. Okay, but genuinly that is what have spend the entire video doing up until this point, showinf the universality of slavery to relativte if not outright justify that of white people and then painting them as saviors of alle the slaves in world. Again the white savior complex.
2:33 No you are Not trying to tell the truth at all. You are implicitly ascribing to non-existend people a position that noone holds then proceed to invoke a racialzed saviour complex as you tried to absolve white people of a guilt they do not even have to bear since they did not participate in these crimes.
2:39 How ironic! I THOUGHT YOU CONSERVATIVES LOVED THE IDEA OF INDIVIDUALITY. Skin colours (a rather races, what really wanted to say Pepelaugh) cannot be collectivly guilty only individuals of said skin colour. That is the whole premise you base the agrument around that white people should not feel guilty. One cannot assign blame to a group of people. Remarcable that I need to express this belief of mine towards of conservative... Well mabye it is because you really are not as individualist as think of yourself as Miss Owens :)
2:39- 2:54 Agian are you trying to suggest that because slavery was present in other civilisations (btw: very funny how you do not mention Nazi Germany) that therefore one cannot assign blame or express criticism to the actions of white people in the past by relativating them with those of other civilisations.
Also The Persian Empire did abolish slavery so did China at some point in it's many dynasties read the links I gave you
3:00 NOBODY BELIEVES THAT! THIS ENTIRE VIDEO IS BUILD ON A GODDAMN STRAWMEN, HOLY CHRIST!
3:12- 3:22 You came across a fotoshoped instagram post and the extrapolated from this that all leftists I assume thought like this.
2. Actually some tribes and peoples in Africa did have formidable civisations prior to the colonization like Mali Empire for instance.
Also again is the implication here that Africans are a backwards people who were saved by the superior Europeans, because Africa is still in bad shape today?
3:25
1. That does not make Europeans exempt from guilt because they still participated in the slave trade (which was a free market by the way)
2. The African slaves were sold by competing tribes for money and luxary not just the low value items that are depicted in this video. There was a Very high demand for slaves back then
3. Very important: Europeans bought these slaves because they it was more convenient not form moral reasons. It is cheaper to buy a slave from a King then it is to invade enslave and sell an entire people.
3:36
Wrong in some cases they did. But it was rather uncommon because buying them from the tribes was more profitable.
Well I am not done yet I will continue this...
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ok normally I would not devote any time to the utter stupidity that prager U delievers on a daily basis, for my time would be better spend elsewhere divorced from their mental regression but this Absurdity of a video was so frustrating partly because many of the presented arguments are regurgitated that much by smooth brained conservatives that I just can't help but responding to it. To those who read it. Read and reply or don't, I do not care. So let's proceed to debunk this nonsense shall we?
0:11 Nobody I have ever met has ever claimed that white people were the only ones participating in slavery let alone creating it in the first place as that would be an expression of historical illiteracy. However if that statement is applied exclusivly to america then it would be absolutly factually correct to claim so.
0:11- 0:21 Yes, it is widely known that slavery was an integral component of the vast majority of civilisations before the colonization of America. You are attempting to debunk what essentially a Strawmen.
0:21 - 0:38 Again we know that slavery preceded the Colonization of North America etc. But most importantly what exactly is the Implication being made here? Are sugesting that the fact that slavery existed in pre-colonized North America among Native tribes somehow justifies the european settlers doing the same, following the logic of "iT iS oKaY SiNcE eVERyboDY dId iT"
0:38- 1:42 This is as I already stated a regurgitation of Facts already known to most people. It all relates to your attempt of debunking the idea that slavery is a "white phenomenon" which nobody believes in in the first place. The information regarding the context is meaningless. Your facts and stance here is NOT CONTROVERSIAL.
1:42- 1:50 That is factually INCORRECT. A cursory google search should abundantly reveal this truth to you.
Here are some sources:
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_abolition_of_slavery_and_serfdom
2.https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/07/12/haiti-was-first-nation-permanently-ban-slavery/
The Persian Empire for instance abolished slavery, so did China though the head of state was murdered by an angry mob. Haiti following it's Revolution ended slavery, it is not exclusive to white people. Also notice the white savior complex that is slowing but surely showing itself?
1:58 Slavery had already been abolished in multiple forms WAY before Britian even existed. You are trying to make it look like Britian was the only country that came up with the idea of making slavery illegal which it was most certainly not.
2:07 - 2:11 That is probalbly one of the major contentions I have with the video which compelled me to write this long comment. To be clear what is said is factually correct but relevant information is not mentioned which is VERY deceptive. The 13 th Amendmant had to passed after a lengthy civil war in which hundreds of thousands died among other reasons also to free the slaves. It was NOT natural to "THE GLORIOUS WHITE MEN", it took a war .The very people who partook on the side of the Confederacy by the way are being revered in the south which can be ascribed to the nationalist education there which distorts southern history for the sake of the states rights narrative.
2:16 Again Slavery was already abolished in various countries before the Us even existed annd secondly notice the white saviour complex? The language being used is pretty revealing of your deceptive intentions.
2:24 The civil war was white men fighting white men! I thought the glorious white men were in favor of the abolition of slavery then why were white men fighting each other. Also you do not get to take credit for the war effort of the Union when its is clear that you would have supported the confedaracy.
2:29 Pepelaugh yeah right, sure. Okay, but genuinly that is what have spend the entire video doing up until this point, showinf the universality of slavery to relativte if not outright justify that of white people and then painting them as saviors of alle the slaves in world. Again the white savior complex.
2:33 No you are Not trying to tell the truth at all. You are implicitly ascribing to non-existend people a position that noone holds then proceed to invoke a racialzed saviour complex as you tried to absolve white people of a guilt they do not even have to bear since they did not participate in these crimes.
2:39 How ironic! I THOUGHT YOU CONSERVATIVES LOVED THE IDEA OF INDIVIDUALITY. Skin colours (a rather races, what really wanted to say Pepelaugh) cannot be collectivly guilty only individuals of said skin colour. That is the whole premise you base the agrument around that white people should not feel guilty. One cannot assign blame to a group of people. Remarcable that I need to express this belief of mine towards of conservative... Well mabye it is because you really are not as individualist as think of yourself as Miss Owens :)
2:39- 2:54 Agian are you trying to suggest that because slavery was present in other civilisations (btw: very funny how you do not mention Nazi Germany) that therefore one cannot assign blame or express criticism to the actions of white people in the past by relativating them with those of other civilisations.
Also The Persian Empire did abolish slavery so did China at some point in it's many dynasties read the links I gave you
3:00 NOBODY BELIEVES THAT! THIS ENTIRE VIDEO IS BUILD ON A GODDAMN STRAWMEN, HOLY CHRIST!
3:12- 3:22 You came across a fotoshoped instagram post and the extrapolated from this that all leftists I assume thought like this.
2. Actually some tribes and peoples in Africa did have formidable civisations prior to the colonization like Mali Empire for instance.
Also again is the implication here that Africans are a backwards people who were saved by the superior Europeans, because Africa is still in bad shape today?
3:25
1. That does not make Europeans exempt from guilt because they still participated in the slave trade (which was a free market by the way)
2. The African slaves were sold by competing tribes for money and luxary not just the low value items that are depicted in this video. There was a Very high demand for slaves back then
3. Very important: Europeans bought these slaves because they it was more convenient not form moral reasons. It is cheaper to buy a slave from a King then it is to invade enslave and sell an entire people.
3:36
Wrong in some cases they did. But it was rather uncommon because buying them from the tribes was more profitable.
Well I am not done yet I will continue this...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Hitlers genocidal Regime was in no shape or form incompetent in the "art of killing" in fact they are absolute masters, or does Auschwitz - Birkenau, Sobibor, Belzec, Treblinka, Kulmhof, Buchenwald and much MUCH MORE sound like incompetence to you?
Also it is very telling that despite 6 years of war, Hitler manages to make it on the list of greatest mass murders in human history, demonstrating quite a high extermination rate. The only reason his bodycount is "relativly low" (that being third place) is that he did not have the means to implement his overtly Genocidal Dystopia.
Also the National Socialists killed far more than one anticipates. Hitler is DIRECTLY responsible for the death of over 20 million people of which at least 12 Million can be attributed to the Holocaust and indirectly caused the death of arround 50 million europeans. As a consequence he killed about the same amount if not even far more the highest estimates of Joseph Stalins Body Count only overshadowed ny Mao depending on how somebody counts.
The fact is Hitler is in Europe oncontested Massmurdere number 1.
1.My main Source is:
Democide
Nazi Genocide and Mass Murder
By
R. J. Rummel
The two other links are related to the source
2.https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NAZIS.CHAP1.HTM
3. https://scottmanning.com/content/nazi-body-count/
National Socialism made the extermination and enslavement of those considered racially inferior its modus operandi.
1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost
2. https://gplanost.x-berg.de/generalplaneast.html
3.http://www.worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/GPO/gpo%20sources.htm
4.https://military.wikia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost
Also Mein Kampf underlines the Genocidal and Imperialist Ambitions of the National Socialists.
Advocacy for Genocide
1. Genocide
"The soul of the people can only be won if along with carrying
on a positive struggle for our own aims, we destroy the opponent
of these aims.
The people at all times see the proof of their own right in ruthless
attack on a foe, and to them renouncing the destruction of the
adversary seems like uncertainty with regard to their own right if
not a sign of their own unriglxt.
The broad masses are only a piece of Nature and their sentiment
does not understand the mutual handshake of people who daim
that they want the opposite things. What they desire is the victory of the stronger and the destruction of the weak or his
unconditional subjection.
The nationalization of our masses will succeed only when, aside
from all the positive struggle for the soul of our people, their
international poisoners are exterminated."
The international poison is obviously the J E W S.
2. Racial Imperialism
"The folkish movement must not be the champion of other
peoples, but the vanguard fighter of its own. Otherwise it is
superfluous and above all has no right to sulk about the past. For
in that case it is behaving in exactly tbe same wav. The old
German policy was wrongly determined by dynastic
considerations, and the future policy must not be directed by
cosmopolitan folkish drivel. In particular, we are not constables
guarding the wellknown 'poor little nations,' but soldiers of our
own nation.
But we National Socialists must go further. The right to possess
soil can become a duty if without extension of its soil a great
nation seems doomed to destruction. And most especially when
not some little negro nation or other is involved, but the
Germanic mother of life, which has given the presentday world
its cultural picture. Germany will either be a world power or
there will be no Germany. And for world power she needs that
magnitude which will give her the position she needs in the
present period, and life to her citizens.
And so we National Socialists consciously draw a line beneath
the foreign policy tendency of our preWar period. We take up
where we broke off six hundred years ago. We stop the endless
German movement to the south and west, and turn our gaze
toward the land in the east. At long last we break of the colonial
and commercial policy of the preWar period and shift to the soil
policy of the future.
If we speak of soil in Europe today, we can primarily have in
mind only Russia and her vassal border states.
Here Fate itself seems desirous of giving us a sign. By handing P
ussia to Bolshevism, it robbed the Russian nation of that
intelligentsia which previously brought about and guaranteed its
existence as a state. For the organization of a Russian state
formation was not the result of the political abilities of the Slavs
in Russia, but only a wonderful example of the stateforming
efficacity of the German element in an inferior race. Numerous
mighty empires on earth have been created in this way. Lower
nations led by Germanic organizers and overlords have more
than once grown to be mighty state formations and have endured
as long as the racial nudeus of the creative state race maintained
itself. For centuries Russia drew nourishment from this Germanic
nucleus of its upper leading strata. Today it can be regarded as
almost totally exterminated and extinguished. It has been
replaced by the Jew. Impossible as it is for the Russian by
himself to shake off the yoke of the Jew by his own resources, it
is equally impossible for the Jew to maintain the mighty empire
forever. He himself is no element of organization, but a ferment
of decomposition. The Persian I empire in the east is ripe for
collapse. And the end of Jewish rule in Russia will also be the
end of Russia as a state. We have been chosen by Fate as
witnesses of a catastrophe which will be the mightiest
confirmation of the soundness of the folkish theory.
Our task, the mission of the National Socialist movement, is to
bring our own people to such political insight that they will not
see their goal for the future in the breathtaking sensation of a
new Alexander's conquest, but in the industrious work of the
German plow, to which the sword need only give soil."
In Regards of the Ukraine topic it must be said that the attrocities of the National Socialists far outweigh those of the Soviets despite the common claim that the Soviets were the sole butchers of the Ukraine.
The Nazis were indeed far worse and inflected deaths and casulties in some estimation as high as twice the size of the Holodomor on the Ukraine.(That of cource dows not make the Soviets exempt from any kind of guilt for those of you who are mentally deficient enough to title my a "Marxist apologist")
Sources:
1.https://www.britannica.com/place/Ukraine/The-Nazi-occupation-of-Soviet-Ukraine
2.http://www.infoukes.com/history/ww2/page-19.html
3.https://www.theholocaustexplained.org/life-in-nazi-occupied-europe/occupation-case-studies/ukraine/
4.http://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%5CN%5CA%5CNaziwarcrimesinUkraine.htm
5. https://old.uinp.gov.ua (search for WW2
5.1 https://old.uinp.gov.ua/page/ukrainska-druga-svitova
5.1 type in this link "https://old.uinp.gov.ua +files/pdf Ukraine ww2" (just copy what I wrote in quotations) in the searchbar and you will recieve an eyeopening pdf about the suffering of the Ukrainians at the hand of the National Socialists.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ok normally I would not devote any time to the utter stupidity that prager U delievers on a daily basis, for my time would be better spend elsewhere divorced from their mental regression but this Absurdity of a video was so frustrating partly because many of the presented arguments are regurgitated that much by smooth brained conservatives that I just can't help but responding to it. To those who read it. Read and reply or don't, I do not care. So let's proceed to debunk this nonsense shall we?
0:11 Nobody I have ever met has ever claimed that white people were the only ones participating in slavery let alone creating it in the first place as that would be an expression of historical illiteracy. However if that statement is applied exclusivly to america then it would be absolutly factually correct to claim so.
0:11- 0:21 Yes, it is widely known that slavery was an integral component of the vast majority of civilisations before the colonization of America. You are attempting to debunk what essentially a Strawmen.
0:21 - 0:38 Again we know that slavery preceded the Colonization of North America etc. But most importantly what exactly is the Implication being made here? Are sugesting that the fact that slavery existed in pre-colonized North America among Native tribes somehow justifies the european settlers doing the same, following the logic of "iT iS oKaY SiNcE eVERyboDY dId iT"
0:38- 1:42 This is as I already stated a regurgitation of Facts already known to most people. It all relates to your attempt of debunking the idea that slavery is a "white phenomenon" which nobody believes in in the first place. The information regarding the context is meaningless. Your facts and stance here is NOT CONTROVERSIAL.
1:42- 1:50 That is factually INCORRECT. A cursory google search should abundantly reveal this truth to you.
Here are some sources:
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_abolition_of_slavery_and_serfdom
2.https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/07/12/haiti-was-first-nation-permanently-ban-slavery/
The Persian Empire for instance abolished slavery, so did China though the head of state was murdered by an angry mob. Haiti following it's Revolution ended slavery, it is not exclusive to white people. Also notice the white savior complex that is slowing but surely showing itself?
1:58 Slavery had already been abolished in multiple forms WAY before Britian even existed. You are trying to make it look like Britian was the only country that came up with the idea of making slavery illegal which it was most certainly not.
2:07 - 2:11 That is probalbly one of the major contentions I have with the video which compelled me to write this long comment. To be clear what is said is factually correct but relevant information is not mentioned which is VERY deceptive. The 13 th Amendmant had to passed after a lengthy civil war in which hundreds of thousands died among other reasons also to free the slaves. It was NOT natural to "THE GLORIOUS WHITE MEN", it took a war .The very people who partook on the side of the Confederacy by the way are being revered in the south which can be ascribed to the nationalist education there which distorts southern history for the sake of the states rights narrative.
2:16 Again Slavery was already abolished in various countries before the Us even existed annd secondly notice the white saviour complex? The language being used is pretty revealing of your deceptive intentions.
2:24 The civil war was white men fighting white men! I thought the glorious white men were in favor of the abolition of slavery then why were white men fighting each other. Also you do not get to take credit for the war effort of the Union when its is clear that you would have supported the confedaracy.
2:29 Pepelaugh yeah right, sure. Okay, but genuinly that is what have spend the entire video doing up until this point, showinf the universality of slavery to relativte if not outright justify that of white people and then painting them as saviors of alle the slaves in world. Again the white savior complex.
2:33 No you are Not trying to tell the truth at all. You are implicitly ascribing to non-existend people a position that noone holds then proceed to invoke a racialzed saviour complex as you tried to absolve white people of a guilt they do not even have to bear since they did not participate in these crimes.
2:39 How ironic! I THOUGHT YOU CONSERVATIVES LOVED THE IDEA OF INDIVIDUALITY. Skin colours (a rather races, what really wanted to say Pepelaugh) cannot be collectivly guilty only individuals of said skin colour. That is the whole premise you base the agrument around that white people should not feel guilty. One cannot assign blame to a group of people. Remarcable that I need to express this belief of mine towards of conservative... Well mabye it is because you really are not as individualist as think of yourself as Miss Owens :)
2:39- 2:54 Agian are you trying to suggest that because slavery was present in other civilisations (btw: very funny how you do not mention Nazi Germany) that therefore one cannot assign blame or express criticism to the actions of white people in the past by relativating them with those of other civilisations.
Also The Persian Empire did abolish slavery so did China at some point in it's many dynasties read the links I gave you
3:00 NOBODY BELIEVES THAT! THIS ENTIRE VIDEO IS BUILD ON A GODDAMN STRAWMEN, HOLY CHRIST!
3:12- 3:22 You came across a fotoshoped instagram post and the extrapolated from this that all leftists I assume thought like this.
2. Actually some tribes and peoples in Africa did have formidable civisations prior to the colonization like Mali Empire for instance.
Also again is the implication here that Africans are a backwards people who were saved by the superior Europeans, because Africa is still in bad shape today?
3:25
1. That does not make Europeans exempt from guilt because they still participated in the slave trade (which was a free market by the way)
2. The African slaves were sold by competing tribes for money and luxary not just the low value items that are depicted in this video. There was a Very high demand for slaves back then
3. Very important: Europeans bought these slaves because they it was more convenient not form moral reasons. It is cheaper to buy a slave from a King then it is to invade enslave and sell an entire people.
3:36
Wrong in some cases they did. But it was rather uncommon because buying them from the tribes was more profitable.
Well I am not done yet I will continue this...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1