Comments by "Genocide the Fash" (@endloesung_der_braunen_frage) on "Biographics"
channel.
-
4
-
2
-
1
-
@SteelSunday
1.Hitler wasn't a fascist. Do you even know what fascism is?
2. Hitler was a National Socialist which completly distinct form fascism both politically and philosophically. They are similar They aren't the same thing! And it isn't even the case that National Socialism is an expression of fascism, it simply doesn't contain fascist thought at all.
Let me define the terms:
Fascism:
Fascism can be regarded as the final totalitarian and collectivist synthesis between palingentic Nationalism, Syndicalism and Actualism. In other words Fascism is an ultranationalist and totalitarian expression of syndicalism. James A. Gregor in his book "Mussolinis Intellectuals" does a fantastic Job describing the evolution of the political and Social doctrine of Fascism out of revolutionary Syndicalism and Nationalism (Mentioning theorists: Such as Gentile, Rocco, Spirito, Carrodoni and Panunzio).
Fascism is Nationalist because it meant for the Italian People, seeking to initiate a revolution (a national rebirth) for them. It is syndicalist because it seeks organize society into nationalized Trade Unions which it calls Corporations ( NOT PRIVATELY OWNED BUISNESSES, but nationally, publicly state directed organs of Society) and it is Actualist because Idealism is ontological basis of fascist ideology
Nazism:
Nazism is totalitarian pan-germanic Aryanism with a philosphy of materialist and naturalist racial essetialism and social darwinism. It traces its origines back to racial theories of the late 19th century. Just read Mein Kampf.
See the difference
3. The argument doesn't make any sense. Just because Hitler persecuted MARXISTS doesn't mean that he could't have been a socialist. Do you know who else persecuted the Socialists? The Strasserists and they are concieved as being the ACTUAL SOCIALISTS of the NSDAP, which Hitler eliminated in the night of the long knives. Infact the night of the long knives Argument is an ADMISSION that Nazism (namely Strasserism) can be Socialist and yet be staunchly anti-Marxist! By the way Stalin also persecuted Socialists who disagreed with him such Trotsky. Was Stalin no real Socialist then, or even, God forbid, right wing? You need to draw a distinction between Socialisms and Marxism. Not all Socialists, I REPEAT, NOT ALL SOCIALISTS ARE MARXISTS! MARXISM IS BUT A VARIANT OF SOCIALISM! YOU CAN BE AGAINST MARXISM AND STILL BE SOCIALST OR EVEN A COMMUNIST! IT IS NOT A CONTRACDICTION IN TERMS TO BE AN ANTI-MARXIST SOCIALIST!
To make it short, so that you understand: H
1