Comments by "Genocide the Fash" (@endloesung_der_braunen_frage) on "Balkan Mapper"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
@learningchannel5937
Qotes from Mein Kampf to prove my definition:
1. Advocacy for Racism/anti-semitism
1. "In this case the only remaining hope was struggle, struggle with
all the weapons which the human spirit, reason, and will can
devise, regardless on which side of the scale Fate should lay its
blessing. Thus I began to make myself familiar with the founders of this
doctrine, in order to study the foundations of the movement. If I
reached my goal more quickly than at first I had perhaps
ventured to believe, it was thanks to my newly acquired, though
at that time not very profound, knowledge of the Jewish question.
This alone enabled me to draw a practical comparison between
the reality and the theoretical flimflam of the founding fathers of
Social Democracy, since it taught me to understand the language
of the Jewish people, who speak in order to conceal or at least to
veil their thoughts; their real aim is not therefore to be found in
the lines themselves, but slumbers well concealed between them.
For or me this was the time of the greatest spiritual upheaval I
have ever had to go through.
I had ceased to be a weakkneed cosmopolitan and become an
antiSemite.
Just once moreand this was the last timefearful, oppressive
thoughts came to me in profound anguish.
When over long periods of human history I scrutinized the
activity of the Jewish people, suddenly there rose up in me the
fearful question whether inscrutable Destiny, perhaps Or reasons
unknown to us poor mortals, did not with eternal and immutable
resolve, desire the final victory of this little nation.
Was it possible that the earth had been promised as a reward to
this people which lives only for this earth?
Have we an objective right to struggle for our selfpreservation,
or is this justified only subjectively within ourselves?
As I delved more deeply into the teachings of Marxism and thus
in tranquil clarity submitted the deeds of the Jewish people to
contemplation, Fate itself gave me its answer.
The Jewish doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle
of Nature and replaces the eternal privilege of power and strength
by the mass of numbers and their dead weight. Thus it denies the
value of personality in man, contests the significance of
nationality and race, and thereby withdraws from humanity the
premise of its existence and its culture. As a foundation of the universe, this doctrine would bring about the end of any order
intellectually conceivable to man. And as, in this greatest of ail
recognizable organisms, the result of an application of such a law
could only be chaos, on earth it could only be destruction for the
inhabitants of this planet.
If, with the help of his Marxist creed, the Jew is victorious over
the other peoples of the world, his crown will be the funeral
wreath of humanity and this planet will, as it did thousands l of
years ago, move through the ether devoid of men.
Eternal Nature inexorably avenges the infringement of her
commands.
Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the
will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the
Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord."
1
-
@learningchannel5937 2. Biological Essentialism
"The urge to preserve the species is the first cause for the
formation of human communities; thus the state is a national
organism and not an economic organization. A difference which
is just as large as it is incomprehensible, particularly to our so-
called ' statesmen ' of today. That is why they think they can
build up the state through economics while in reality it results
and always will result solely from the action of those qualities
which lie in line with the will to preserve the species and race."
1.3 Racial purity
"Any crossing of two beings not at exactly the same level
produces a medium between the level of the two parents. This
means: the offspring will probably stand higher than the racially
lower parent, but not as high as the higher one. Consequently, it
will later succumb in the struggle against the higher level. Such
mating is contrary to the will of Nature for a higher breeding of
all life. The precondition for this does not lie in associating
superior and inferior, but in the total victory of the former. The
stronger must dominate and not blend with the weaker, thus
sacrificing his own greatness. Only the born weakling can view
this as cruel, but he after all is only a weak and limited man; for
if this law did not prevail, any conceivable higher development
of organic living beings would be unthinkable.
The consequence of this racial purity, universally valid in Nature,
is not only the sharp outward delimitation of the various races,
but their uniform character in themselves. The fox is always a
fox, the goose a goose, the tiger a tiger, etc., and the difference
can lie at most in the varying measure of force, strength,
intelligence, dexterity, endurance, etc., of the individual
specimens. But you will never find a fox who in his inner attitude
might, for example, show humanitarian tendencies toward geese,
as similarly there is no cat with a friendly inclination toward
mice.
Therefore, here, too, the struggle among themselves arises less
from inner aversion than from hunger and love. In both cases,
Nature looks on calmly, with satisfaction, in fact. In the struggle
for daily bread all those who are weak and sickly or less
determined succumb, while the struggle of the males for the
female grants the right or opportunity to propagate only to the
healthiest. And struggle is always a means for improving a
species' health and power of resistance and, therefore, a cause of
its higher development.
If the process were different, all further and higher development
would cease and the opposite would occur. For, since the inferior
always predominates numerically over the best, if both had the same possibility of preserving life and propagating, the inferior
would multiply so much more rapidly that in the end the best
would inevitably be driven into the background, unless a
correction of this state of affairs were undertaken. Nature does
just this by subjecting the weaker part to such severe living
conditions that by them alone the number is limited, and by not
permitting the remainder to increase promiscuously, but making
a new and ruthless choice according to strength and health."
National Socialism made the extermination and enslavement of those considered racially inferior its modus operandi.
1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost
2. https://gplanost.x-berg.de/generalplaneast.html
3.http://www.worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/GPO/gpo%20sources.htm
4.https://military.wikia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost
Also Mein Kampf underlines the Genocidal and Imperialist Ambitions of the National Socialists.
Advocacy for Genocide
1. Genocide
"The soul of the people can only be won if along with carrying
on a positive struggle for our own aims, we destroy the opponent
of these aims.
The people at all times see the proof of their own right in ruthless
attack on a foe, and to them renouncing the destruction of the
adversary seems like uncertainty with regard to their own right if
not a sign of their own unriglxt.
The broad masses are only a piece of Nature and their sentiment
does not understand the mutual handshake of people who daim
that they want the opposite things. What they desire is the victory of the stronger and the destruction of the weak or his
unconditional subjection.
The nationalization of our masses will succeed only when, aside
from all the positive struggle for the soul of our people, their
international poisoners are exterminated."
The international poison is obviously the J E W S.
2. Racial Imperialism
"The folkish movement must not be the champion of other
peoples, but the vanguard fighter of its own. Otherwise it is
superfluous and above all has no right to sulk about the past. For
in that case it is behaving in exactly tbe same wav. The old
German policy was wrongly determined by dynastic
considerations, and the future policy must not be directed by
cosmopolitan folkish drivel. In particular, we are not constables
guarding the wellknown 'poor little nations,' but soldiers of our
own nation.
But we National Socialists must go further. The right to possess
soil can become a duty if without extension of its soil a great
nation seems doomed to destruction. And most especially when
not some little negro nation or other is involved, but the
Germanic mother of life, which has given the presentday world
its cultural picture. Germany will either be a world power or
there will be no Germany. And for world power she needs that
magnitude which will give her the position she needs in the
present period, and life to her citizens.
And so we National Socialists consciously draw a line beneath
the foreign policy tendency of our preWar period. We take up
where we broke off six hundred years ago. We stop the endless
German movement to the south and west, and turn our gaze
toward the land in the east. At long last we break of the colonial
and commercial policy of the preWar period and shift to the soil
policy of the future.
If we speak of soil in Europe today, we can primarily have in
mind only Russia and her vassal border states.
Here Fate itself seems desirous of giving us a sign. By handing P
ussia to Bolshevism, it robbed the Russian nation of that
intelligentsia which previously brought about and guaranteed its
existence as a state. For the organization of a Russian state
formation was not the result of the political abilities of the Slavs
in Russia, but only a wonderful example of the stateforming
efficacity of the German element in an inferior race. Numerous
mighty empires on earth have been created in this way. Lower
nations led by Germanic organizers and overlords have more
than once grown to be mighty state formations and have endured
as long as the racial nudeus of the creative state race maintained
itself. For centuries Russia drew nourishment from this Germanic
nucleus of its upper leading strata. Today it can be regarded as
almost totally exterminated and extinguished. It has been
replaced by the Jew. Impossible as it is for the Russian by
himself to shake off the yoke of the Jew by his own resources, it
is equally impossible for the Jew to maintain the mighty empire
forever. He himself is no element of organization, but a ferment
of decomposition. The Persian I empire in the east is ripe for
collapse. And the end of Jewish rule in Russia will also be the
end of Russia as a state. We have been chosen by Fate as
witnesses of a catastrophe which will be the mightiest
confirmation of the soundness of the folkish theory.
Our task, the mission of the National Socialist movement, is to
bring our own people to such political insight that they will not
see their goal for the future in the breathtaking sensation of a
new Alexander's conquest, but in the industrious work of the
German plow, to which the sword need only give soil."
1
-
1
-
1